Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.
Source coverage notes Source fidelity gap: the original arXiv HTML omits an author TeX footnote attached to equation e:def-omega, including its reference to Remark r:error-function. The retained HTML is preserved as published; the original author TeX remains available. TeX correspondence is not complete. Complete original source context Β· Original author HTML
Proof.
The calculation in the proof is purely elementary.
The order estimate involving the parameter Q Q will be used at crucial places for our later estimates, so we include the detailed proof.
Plugging the critical points formulae (5.114 ) and (5.115 ) into the expression of F F and G G ,
(5.140)
F β‘ ( t 0 ) + G β‘ ( u 0 ) = y β t 0 + ( β y ) 1 2 β u 0 β 2 β Q + Ξ³ n 2 + Q β log β t 0 t 0 + 1 + ( 2 β Q + Ξ³ n ) β log β u 0 , F(t_{0})+G(u_{0})=yt_{0}+(-y)^{\frac{1}{2}}u_{0}-\frac{2Q+\gamma_{n}}{2}+Q\log\frac{t_{0}}{t_{0}+1}+(2Q+\gamma_{n})\log u_{0},
where Q β‘ Ξ± β Ξ² β 1 Q\equiv\alpha-\beta-1 and Ξ³ n β‘ 1 2 + 1 n \gamma_{n}\equiv\frac{1}{2}+\frac{1}{n} as before.
First, it is straightforward that
(5.141)
y β t 0 + ( β y ) 1 2 β u 0 β€ ( β y ) + Ξ³ n 2 . yt_{0}+(-y)^{\frac{1}{2}}u_{0}\leq(-y)+\frac{\gamma_{n}}{2}.
So this implies that
(5.142)
e F β‘ ( t 0 ) + G β‘ ( u 0 ) \displaystyle e^{F(t_{0})+G(u_{0})}
β€ \displaystyle\leq
C n β
e β y β
e β Q β
( t 0 1 + t 0 ) Q β
u 0 2 β Q + Ξ³ n \displaystyle C_{n}\cdot e^{-y}\cdot e^{-Q}\cdot\Big(\frac{t_{0}}{1+t_{0}}\Big)^{Q}\cdot u_{0}^{2Q+\gamma_{n}}
= \displaystyle=
C n β
e β y β
e β Q β
( t 0 2 t 0 β ( 1 + t 0 ) ) Q β
u 0 2 β Q + Ξ³ n \displaystyle C_{n}\cdot e^{-y}\cdot e^{-Q}\cdot\Big(\frac{t_{0}^{2}}{t_{0}(1+t_{0})}\Big)^{Q}\cdot u_{0}^{2Q+\gamma_{n}}
= \displaystyle=
C n β
e β y β
u 0 Ξ³ n β
e β Q β
( u 0 β t 0 ) 2 β Q ( Q β y ) Q , \displaystyle C_{n}\cdot e^{-y}\cdot u_{0}^{\gamma_{n}}\cdot e^{-Q}\cdot\frac{(u_{0}t_{0})^{2Q}}{(\frac{Q}{-y})^{Q}},
where the last equality follows from (5.112 ).
Now we claim
(5.143)
u 0 β t 0 β€ ( β y ) β 1 2 β
( Q + Ξ³ n 2 ) . u_{0}t_{0}\leq(-y)^{-\frac{1}{2}}\cdot(Q+\frac{\gamma_{n}}{2}).
To prove this, we denote Ο β‘ 2 β Ξ³ n β y > 0 \tau\equiv\frac{2\gamma_{n}}{-y}>0 and Q ^ β‘ 4 β Q β y > 0 \widehat{Q}\equiv\frac{4Q}{-y}>0 . Then
using the critical point formulae of u 0 u_{0} and t 0 t_{0} given by (5.114 ) and (5.115 ), we obtain
(5.144)
u 0 β t 0 \displaystyle u_{0}t_{0}
= \displaystyle=
( β y ) 1 2 4 β
( 1 + 1 + Q ^ ) β
( β 1 + 1 + Q ^ + Ο ) \displaystyle\frac{(-y)^{\frac{1}{2}}}{4}\cdot\Big(1+\sqrt{1+\widehat{Q}}\Big)\cdot\Big(-1+\sqrt{1+\widehat{Q}+\tau}\Big)
= \displaystyle=
( β y ) 1 2 4 β
( β 1 + 1 + Q ^ β
1 + Q ^ + Ο + 1 + Q ^ β 1 + Q ^ + Ο ) \displaystyle\frac{(-y)^{\frac{1}{2}}}{4}\cdot\Big(-1+\sqrt{1+\widehat{Q}}\cdot\sqrt{1+\widehat{Q}+\tau}+\sqrt{1+\widehat{Q}}-\sqrt{1+\widehat{Q}+\tau}\Big)
β€ \displaystyle\leq
( β y ) 1 2 4 β
( β 1 + 1 + Q ^ + Ο β
1 + Q ^ + Ο + 1 + Q ^ + Ο β 1 + Q ^ + Ο ) \displaystyle\frac{(-y)^{\frac{1}{2}}}{4}\cdot\Big(-1+\sqrt{1+\widehat{Q}+\tau}\cdot\sqrt{1+\widehat{Q}+\tau}+\sqrt{1+\widehat{Q}+\tau}-\sqrt{1+\widehat{Q}+\tau}\Big)
= \displaystyle=
( β y ) 1 2 4 β
( Q ^ + Ο ) \displaystyle\frac{(-y)^{\frac{1}{2}}}{4}\cdot(\widehat{Q}+\tau)
= \displaystyle=
( β y ) β 1 2 β
( Q + Ξ³ n 2 ) . \displaystyle(-y)^{-\frac{1}{2}}\cdot(Q+\frac{\gamma_{n}}{2}).
Then it follows that
(5.145)
( u 0 β t 0 ) 2 β Q ( Q β y ) Q β€ ( Q + Ξ³ n 2 ) 2 β Q Q Q = Q Q β
( 1 + Ξ³ n 2 β Q ) 2 β Q β€ e Ξ³ n β
Q Q . \frac{(u_{0}t_{0})^{2Q}}{(\frac{Q}{-y})^{Q}}\leq\frac{(Q+\frac{\gamma_{n}}{2})^{2Q}}{Q^{Q}}=Q^{Q}\cdot(1+\frac{\gamma_{n}}{2Q})^{2Q}\leq e^{\gamma_{n}}\cdot Q^{Q}.
Moreover, we notice that
(5.146)
u 0 Ξ³ n β€ C n β
Q Ξ³ n 2 β
( β y ) Ξ³ n 2 . u_{0}^{\gamma_{n}}\leq C_{n}\cdot Q^{\frac{\gamma_{n}}{2}}\cdot(-y)^{\frac{\gamma_{n}}{2}}.
Therefore, combining all the above, we have
(5.147)
e F β‘ ( t 0 ) + G β‘ ( u 0 ) \displaystyle e^{F(t_{0})+G(u_{0})}
β€ \displaystyle\leq
C n β
e β y β
u 0 Ξ³ n β
e β Q β
( u 0 β t 0 ) 2 β Q ( Q β y ) Q \displaystyle C_{n}\cdot e^{-y}\cdot u_{0}^{\gamma_{n}}\cdot e^{-Q}\cdot\frac{(u_{0}t_{0})^{2Q}}{(\frac{Q}{-y})^{Q}}
β€ \displaystyle\leq
C n β
( β y ) Ξ³ n 2 β
e β y β
e β Q β
Q Q + Ξ³ n 2 . \displaystyle C_{n}\cdot(-y)^{\frac{\gamma_{n}}{2}}\cdot e^{-y}\cdot e^{-Q}\cdot Q^{Q+\frac{\gamma_{n}}{2}}.