ScalingStacks

Proof. [0546]

Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.

Complete original source context Β· Original author HTML

Proof.

The calculation in the proof is purely elementary. The order estimate involving the parameter QQ will be used at crucial places for our later estimates, so we include the detailed proof. Plugging the critical points formulae (5.114) and (5.115) into the expression of FF and GG,

(5.140) F⁑(t0)+G⁑(u0)=y​t0+(βˆ’y)12​u0βˆ’2​Q+Ξ³n2+Q​log​t0t0+1+(2​Q+Ξ³n)​log​u0,F(t_{0})+G(u_{0})=yt_{0}+(-y)^{\frac{1}{2}}u_{0}-\frac{2Q+\gamma_{n}}{2}+Q\log\frac{t_{0}}{t_{0}+1}+(2Q+\gamma_{n})\log u_{0},

where Qβ‰‘Ξ±βˆ’Ξ²βˆ’1Q\equiv\alpha-\beta-1 and Ξ³n≑12+1n\gamma_{n}\equiv\frac{1}{2}+\frac{1}{n} as before.

First, it is straightforward that

(5.141) y​t0+(βˆ’y)12​u0≀(βˆ’y)+Ξ³n2.yt_{0}+(-y)^{\frac{1}{2}}u_{0}\leq(-y)+\frac{\gamma_{n}}{2}.

So this implies that

(5.142) eF⁑(t0)+G⁑(u0)\displaystyle e^{F(t_{0})+G(u_{0})} ≀\displaystyle\leq Cnβ‹…eβˆ’yβ‹…eβˆ’Qβ‹…(t01+t0)Qβ‹…u02​Q+Ξ³n\displaystyle C_{n}\cdot e^{-y}\cdot e^{-Q}\cdot\Big(\frac{t_{0}}{1+t_{0}}\Big)^{Q}\cdot u_{0}^{2Q+\gamma_{n}}
=\displaystyle= Cnβ‹…eβˆ’yβ‹…eβˆ’Qβ‹…(t02t0​(1+t0))Qβ‹…u02​Q+Ξ³n\displaystyle C_{n}\cdot e^{-y}\cdot e^{-Q}\cdot\Big(\frac{t_{0}^{2}}{t_{0}(1+t_{0})}\Big)^{Q}\cdot u_{0}^{2Q+\gamma_{n}}
=\displaystyle= Cnβ‹…eβˆ’yβ‹…u0Ξ³nβ‹…eβˆ’Qβ‹…(u0​t0)2​Q(Qβˆ’y)Q,\displaystyle C_{n}\cdot e^{-y}\cdot u_{0}^{\gamma_{n}}\cdot e^{-Q}\cdot\frac{(u_{0}t_{0})^{2Q}}{(\frac{Q}{-y})^{Q}},

where the last equality follows from (5.112).

Now we claim

(5.143) u0​t0≀(βˆ’y)βˆ’12β‹…(Q+Ξ³n2).u_{0}t_{0}\leq(-y)^{-\frac{1}{2}}\cdot(Q+\frac{\gamma_{n}}{2}).

To prove this, we denote τ≑2​γnβˆ’y>0\tau\equiv\frac{2\gamma_{n}}{-y}>0 and Q^≑4​Qβˆ’y>0\widehat{Q}\equiv\frac{4Q}{-y}>0. Then using the critical point formulae of u0u_{0} and t0t_{0} given by (5.114) and (5.115), we obtain

(5.144) u0​t0\displaystyle u_{0}t_{0}
=\displaystyle= (βˆ’y)124β‹…(1+1+Q^)β‹…(βˆ’1+1+Q^+Ο„)\displaystyle\frac{(-y)^{\frac{1}{2}}}{4}\cdot\Big(1+\sqrt{1+\widehat{Q}}\Big)\cdot\Big(-1+\sqrt{1+\widehat{Q}+\tau}\Big)
=\displaystyle= (βˆ’y)124β‹…(βˆ’1+1+Q^β‹…1+Q^+Ο„+1+Q^βˆ’1+Q^+Ο„)\displaystyle\frac{(-y)^{\frac{1}{2}}}{4}\cdot\Big(-1+\sqrt{1+\widehat{Q}}\cdot\sqrt{1+\widehat{Q}+\tau}+\sqrt{1+\widehat{Q}}-\sqrt{1+\widehat{Q}+\tau}\Big)
≀\displaystyle\leq (βˆ’y)124β‹…(βˆ’1+1+Q^+Ο„β‹…1+Q^+Ο„+1+Q^+Ο„βˆ’1+Q^+Ο„)\displaystyle\frac{(-y)^{\frac{1}{2}}}{4}\cdot\Big(-1+\sqrt{1+\widehat{Q}+\tau}\cdot\sqrt{1+\widehat{Q}+\tau}+\sqrt{1+\widehat{Q}+\tau}-\sqrt{1+\widehat{Q}+\tau}\Big)
=\displaystyle= (βˆ’y)124β‹…(Q^+Ο„)\displaystyle\frac{(-y)^{\frac{1}{2}}}{4}\cdot(\widehat{Q}+\tau)
=\displaystyle= (βˆ’y)βˆ’12β‹…(Q+Ξ³n2).\displaystyle(-y)^{-\frac{1}{2}}\cdot(Q+\frac{\gamma_{n}}{2}).

Then it follows that

(5.145) (u0​t0)2​Q(Qβˆ’y)Q≀(Q+Ξ³n2)2​QQQ=QQβ‹…(1+Ξ³n2​Q)2​Q≀eΞ³nβ‹…QQ.\frac{(u_{0}t_{0})^{2Q}}{(\frac{Q}{-y})^{Q}}\leq\frac{(Q+\frac{\gamma_{n}}{2})^{2Q}}{Q^{Q}}=Q^{Q}\cdot(1+\frac{\gamma_{n}}{2Q})^{2Q}\leq e^{\gamma_{n}}\cdot Q^{Q}.

Moreover, we notice that

(5.146) u0Ξ³n≀Cnβ‹…QΞ³n2β‹…(βˆ’y)Ξ³n2.u_{0}^{\gamma_{n}}\leq C_{n}\cdot Q^{\frac{\gamma_{n}}{2}}\cdot(-y)^{\frac{\gamma_{n}}{2}}.

Therefore, combining all the above, we have

(5.147) eF⁑(t0)+G⁑(u0)\displaystyle e^{F(t_{0})+G(u_{0})} ≀\displaystyle\leq Cnβ‹…eβˆ’yβ‹…u0Ξ³nβ‹…eβˆ’Qβ‹…(u0​t0)2​Q(Qβˆ’y)Q\displaystyle C_{n}\cdot e^{-y}\cdot u_{0}^{\gamma_{n}}\cdot e^{-Q}\cdot\frac{(u_{0}t_{0})^{2Q}}{(\frac{Q}{-y})^{Q}}
≀\displaystyle\leq Cnβ‹…(βˆ’y)Ξ³n2β‹…eβˆ’yβ‹…eβˆ’Qβ‹…QQ+Ξ³n2.\displaystyle C_{n}\cdot(-y)^{\frac{\gamma_{n}}{2}}\cdot e^{-y}\cdot e^{-Q}\cdot Q^{Q+\frac{\gamma_{n}}{2}}.

∎

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source-backed reader collection; mathematical self-containment is not assessed.