ScalingStacks

Remark 4.3.1 . [051L]

Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.

Complete original source context · Original author HTML

Remark 4.3.1.

Now we are ready to explain the reason for the choice of the function q⁡(z)q(z) and the rescaling factor Tn−2nT^{\frac{n-2}{n}} in the above definition of ω\omega. These are chosen to make the Kähler metric (ω,Ω)(\omega,\Omega) approximately Calabi-Yau in the following sense:

  1. (1)

    Applying (3.349) and (4.16), we have ErrC​Y=T−2​ϵ​(z⁡(𝒙))\mathrm{Err}_{CY}=T^{-2}\epsilon(z(\bm{x})) for 𝒙∈ℳ∗\bm{x}\in\mathcal{M}^{*} satisfying |z⁡(𝒙)|≥C|z(\bm{x})|\geq C.

  2. (2)

    Applying (3.316) and (4.17), we have ErrC​Y=O⁡(T−2)\mathrm{Err}_{CY}=O(T^{-2}) for 𝒙∈ℳ∗\bm{x}\in\mathcal{M}^{*} satisfying |z⁡(𝒙)|≤C|z(\bm{x})|\leq C and dQ​(𝒙,P)≥d0>0d_{Q}(\bm{x},P)\geq d_{0}>0, where d0>0d_{0}>0 is some definite constant.

We will need a more precise weighted estimate on ErrC​Y\mathrm{Err}_{CY}. See Proposition 4.23.

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source-backed reader collection; mathematical self-containment is not assessed.