ScalingStacks

Proof. [0516]

Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.

Complete original source context · Original author HTML

Proof.

We need to calculate the expansion for d​w1∧…∧d​wn−1dw_{1}\wedge\ldots\wedge dw_{n-1}. First, by Lemma 3.27,

(3.339) d​w1=a1​(d​y+y​dH​log⁡a1)+O~​(|y|)​d​y+O~​(|y|2),dw_{1}=a_{1}(dy+yd_{H}\log a_{1})+\widetilde{O}(|y|)dy+\widetilde{O}(|y|^{2}),

where a1=|σ|−1a_{1}=|\sigma|^{-1}. Notice that

(3.340) dH​log⁡a1=2​∂Hlog⁡a1−−1​dHc​log⁡a1.d_{H}\log a_{1}=2\partial_{H}\log a_{1}-\sqrt{-1}d_{H}^{c}\log a_{1}.

Applying Lemma 3.25,

(3.341) dH​log⁡a1=2​(∂Hlog⁡a1+−1​Γ).d_{H}\log a_{1}=2(\partial_{H}\log a_{1}+\sqrt{-1}\Gamma).

Next, applying Lemma 3.27 to wjw_{j}’s for j≥2j\geq 2,

(3.342) d​wj=d​wj′+cj​d​y+y​d​cj+O~​(|y|)​d​y+O~​(|y|2).dw_{j}=dw_{j}^{\prime}+c_{j}dy+ydc_{j}+\widetilde{O}(|y|)dy+\widetilde{O}(|y|^{2}).

Since it holds that

(3.343) ∂Hlog⁡a1∧ΩH≡0,\partial_{H}\log a_{1}\wedge\Omega_{H}\equiv 0,

then taking the wedge product,

(3.344) d​w1∧⋯∧d​wn−1=a1​(d​y+2​−1​y​Γ)∧ΩH+O~​(|y|)​d​y+O~​(|y|2).dw_{1}\wedge\cdots\wedge dw_{n-1}=a_{1}(dy+2\sqrt{-1}y\Gamma)\wedge\Omega_{H}+\widetilde{O}(|y|)dy+\widetilde{O}(|y|^{2}).

On the other hand, we have the expansion of ff,

(3.345) f=f|H+∂f∂y|H⋅y+∂f∂y¯|H⋅y¯+O~​(|y|2).f=f|_{H}+\frac{\partial f}{\partial y}|_{H}\cdot y+\frac{\partial f}{\partial\bar{y}}|_{H}\cdot\bar{y}+\widetilde{O}(|y|^{2}).

Therefore,

(3.346) ΩD=f|H​a1​(d​y+2​−1​y​Γ)∧ΩH+O~​(|y|)​d​y+O~​(|y|2).\Omega_{D}=f|_{H}a_{1}(dy+2\sqrt{-1}y\Gamma)\wedge\Omega_{H}+\widetilde{O}(|y|)dy+\widetilde{O}(|y|^{2}).

So we obtain the conclusion by taking F=f|H⋅a1F=f|_{H}\cdot a_{1}.

∎

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source-backed reader collection; mathematical self-containment is not assessed.