Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.
Source coverage notes Source fidelity gap: the original arXiv HTML omits an author TeX footnote attached to equation e:def-omega, including its reference to Remark r:error-function. The retained HTML is preserved as published; the original author TeX remains available. TeX correspondence is not complete. Complete original source context Β· Original author HTML
Proof.
Let π 0 β‘ H Ξ± β y Ξ± 4 β r β d β y 1 β§ d β y 2 β§ d β y 3 \mathfrak{b}_{0}\equiv\frac{H^{\alpha}y_{\alpha}}{4r}dy_{1}\wedge dy_{2}\wedge dy_{3} , then Item (2) of Lemma 3.19 tells us that
(3.193)
Ξ β π 0 = H Ξ± β y Ξ± 2 β r 3 β d β y 1 β§ d β y 2 β§ d β y 3 + r β 5 β Ξ 3 ( 4 ) + O β² β ( 1 ) . \Delta\mathfrak{b}_{0}=\frac{H^{\alpha}y_{\alpha}}{2r^{3}}dy_{1}\wedge dy_{2}\wedge dy_{3}+r^{-5}\Gamma_{3}^{(4)}+O^{\prime}(1).
Let Ξ ( 4 ) \Pi^{(4)} be the 3 3 -form in the expansion of Ξ β Ο 1 \Delta\phi_{1} given by (3.119 ) in Proposition 3.15 .
Next, Lemma 3.18 and Lemma 3.19 tell us that
there are 3 3 -forms Ξ ^ 3 ( 4 ) \widehat{\Gamma}_{3}^{(4)}
and Ξ ^ 3 ( 4 ) \widehat{\Pi}_{3}^{(4)} which are also of the form as in (3.45 ) such that
(3.194)
Ξ β‘ ( r β 3 β Ξ ^ 3 ( 4 ) ) = β r β 5 β Ξ 3 ( 4 ) + O β² β ( 1 ) , \displaystyle\Delta(r^{-3}\widehat{\Gamma}_{3}^{(4)})=-r^{-5}\Gamma_{3}^{(4)}+O^{\prime}(1),
(3.195)
Ξ β‘ ( r β 3 β Ξ ^ 3 ( 4 ) ) = β r β 5 β Ξ 3 ( 4 ) + O β² β ( 1 ) . \displaystyle\Delta(r^{-3}\widehat{\Pi}_{3}^{(4)})=-r^{-5}\Pi_{3}^{(4)}+O^{\prime}(1).
Now let
(3.196)
π 1 β‘ r β 3 β Ξ ^ 3 ( 4 ) + r β 3 β Ξ ^ 3 ( 4 ) , \mathfrak{b}_{1}\equiv r^{-3}\widehat{\Gamma}_{3}^{(4)}+r^{-3}\widehat{\Pi}_{3}^{(4)},
then the correction term π 0 + π 1 \mathfrak{b}_{0}+\mathfrak{b}_{1} is chosen as the above such that Ξ β‘ ( π 0 + π 1 ) \Delta(\mathfrak{b}_{0}+\mathfrak{b}_{1}) in fact eliminates the O β² β ( r β 2 ) O^{\prime}(r^{-2}) -term and implicit
O β² β ( r β 1 ) O^{\prime}(r^{-1}) -terms in the expansion of Ξ β Ο 1 \Delta\phi_{1} (see Proposition 3.15 ).
In the following, we will make a further correction such that those explicit O β² β ( r β 1 ) O^{\prime}(r^{-1}) -terms will be cancelled out as well. In fact,
we define
(3.197)
π 2 β‘ ( Ξ© i β j β Ξ± β Ξ² β ( 1 16 β y Ξ± β Ξ² ^ β d β r β 3 16 β r β d β y Ξ± β Ξ² ^ ) β 1 16 β A i β j β Ξ± β Ξ² β ( y Ξ± β Ξ² ^ β d β r + r β d β y Ξ± β Ξ² ^ ) ) β§ d β x i β§ d β x j , \mathfrak{b}_{2}\equiv\Big(\Omega_{ij\alpha\beta}(\frac{1}{16}y_{\widehat{\alpha\beta}}dr-\frac{3}{16}rdy_{\widehat{\alpha\beta}})-\frac{1}{16}A_{ij\alpha\beta}(y_{\widehat{\alpha\beta}}dr+rdy_{\widehat{\alpha\beta}})\Big)\wedge dx_{i}\wedge dx_{j},
applying Lemma 3.18 and Lemma 3.19 again, then
(3.198)
Ξ β π 2 = Ξ© i β j β Ξ± β Ξ² β ( 1 4 β r β d β y Ξ² β Ξ± ^ + y Ξ± β Ξ² ^ 4 β r 2 β d β r ) β§ d β x i β§ d β x j β A i β j β Ξ± β Ξ² β ( y Ξ± β Ξ² ^ 4 β r 2 β d β r β 1 4 β r β d β y Ξ± β Ξ² ^ ) β§ d β x i β§ d β x j , \Delta\mathfrak{b}_{2}=\Omega_{ij\alpha\beta}\Big(\frac{1}{4r}dy_{\widehat{\beta\alpha}}+\frac{y_{\widehat{\alpha\beta}}}{4r^{2}}dr\Big)\wedge dx_{i}\wedge dx_{j}-A_{ij\alpha\beta}\Big(\frac{y_{\widehat{\alpha\beta}}}{4r^{2}}dr-\frac{1}{4r}dy_{\widehat{\alpha\beta}}\Big)\wedge dx_{i}\wedge dx_{j},
and hence
(3.199)
Ξ β‘ ( Ο 1 + π 0 + π 1 + π 2 ) = O β² β ( 1 ) . \Delta(\phi_{1}+\mathfrak{b}_{0}+\mathfrak{b}_{1}+\mathfrak{b}_{2})=O^{\prime}(1).
Therefore,
it suffices to choose the correction term
(3.200)
π
0 β‘ π 0 + π 1 + π 2 , \mathfrak{B}_{0}\equiv\mathfrak{b}_{0}+\mathfrak{b}_{1}+\mathfrak{b}_{2},
which gives
Ξ β‘ ( Ο 1 + π
0 ) = O β² β ( 1 ) \Delta(\phi_{1}+\mathfrak{B}_{0})=O^{\prime}(1) .
Notice that, π 2 \mathfrak{b}_{2} has a further cancellation,
π 2 = \displaystyle\mathfrak{b}_{2}=
( Ξ© i β j β Ξ± β Ξ² β ( 1 16 β y Ξ± β Ξ² ^ β d β r β 3 16 β r β d β y Ξ± β Ξ² ^ ) β 1 16 β A i β j β Ξ± β Ξ² β ( y Ξ± β Ξ² ^ β d β r + r β d β y Ξ± β Ξ² ^ ) ) β§ d β x i β§ d β x j , \displaystyle\Big(\Omega_{ij\alpha\beta}(\frac{1}{16}y_{\widehat{\alpha\beta}}dr-\frac{3}{16}rdy_{\widehat{\alpha\beta}})-\frac{1}{16}A_{ij\alpha\beta}(y_{\widehat{\alpha\beta}}dr+rdy_{\widehat{\alpha\beta}})\Big)\wedge dx_{i}\wedge dx_{j},
= \displaystyle=
β 1 4 β A i β j β Ξ± β Ξ² β r β d β y Ξ± β Ξ² ^ β§ d β x i β§ d β x j β 1 16 β ( A i , Ξ± , Ξ± + 1 β A j , Ξ± , Ξ± + 2 β A i , Ξ± , Ξ± + 2 β A j , Ξ± , Ξ± + 1 ) β y Ξ± β d β r β§ d β x i β§ d β x j \displaystyle-\frac{1}{4}A_{ij\alpha\beta}rdy_{\widehat{\alpha\beta}}\wedge dx_{i}\wedge dx_{j}-\frac{1}{16}(A_{i,\alpha,\alpha+1}A_{j,\alpha,\alpha+2}-A_{i,\alpha,\alpha+2}A_{j,\alpha,\alpha+1})y_{\alpha}dr\wedge dx_{i}\wedge dx_{j}
(3.201)
+ 3 16 β ( A i , Ξ± , Ξ± + 1 β A j , Ξ± , Ξ± + 2 β A i , Ξ± , Ξ± + 2 β A j , Ξ± , Ξ± + 1 ) β r β d β y Ξ± β§ d β x i β§ d β x j . \displaystyle+\frac{3}{16}(A_{i,\alpha,\alpha+1}A_{j,\alpha,\alpha+2}-A_{i,\alpha,\alpha+2}A_{j,\alpha,\alpha+1})rdy_{\alpha}\wedge dx_{i}\wedge dx_{j}.
Therefore,
Ο 2 = \displaystyle\phi_{2}=
Ο 1 + π
0 \displaystyle\phi_{1}+\mathfrak{B}_{0}
= \displaystyle=
1 2 β r β ( 1 β H Ξ± β y Ξ± 2 ) β d β y 1 β§ d β y 2 β§ d β y 3 + 1 2 β r β y Ξ² β A i β Ξ± β Ξ² β d β x i β§ d β y Ξ± ^ β 1 4 β A i β j β Ξ± β Ξ² β r β
d β y Ξ± β Ξ² ^ β§ d β x i β§ d β x j \displaystyle\frac{1}{2r}(1-\frac{H^{\alpha}y_{\alpha}}{2})dy_{1}\wedge dy_{2}\wedge dy_{3}+\frac{1}{2r}y_{\beta}A_{i\alpha\beta}dx_{i}\wedge dy_{\widehat{\alpha}}-\frac{1}{4}A_{ij\alpha\beta}r\cdot dy_{\widehat{\alpha\beta}}\wedge dx_{i}\wedge dx_{j}
(3.202)
+ 3 16 β ( A i β Ξ± , Ξ± + 1 β A j β Ξ± , Ξ± + 2 β A i β Ξ± , Ξ± + 2 β A j β Ξ± , Ξ± + 1 ) β d β ( r β y Ξ± ) β§ d β x i β§ d β x j + r β 3 β Ξ 3 ( 4 ) + O β² β ( r 2 ) , \displaystyle+\frac{3}{16}(A_{i\alpha,\alpha+1}A_{j\alpha,\alpha+2}-A_{i\alpha,\alpha+2}A_{j\alpha,\alpha+1})d(ry_{\alpha})\wedge dx_{i}\wedge dx_{j}+r^{-3}\Pi_{3}^{(4)}+O^{\prime}(r^{2}),
and
(3.203)
Ξ β Ο 2 = O β² β ( 1 ) . \Delta\phi_{2}=O^{\prime}(1).