3. Affinoid torus fibrations [04XC]
Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.
Complete original source context Β· Original author HTML
3. Affinoid torus fibrations
(3.1) Let be a maximally degenerate Calabi-Yau variety and let be a good minimal dlt-model of with reduced special fiber. Then we will see in Corollary 4.6 that satisfies assumption (2), so that it gives rise to a non-archimedean SYZ fibration in the sense of Definition 2.5. The principal aim of this article is to study the fibers of . In the classical SYZ conjecture, the fibers of the SYZ fibration are expected to be special Lagrangian tori away from a codimension two subset of the base. We will now present the corresponding structure in non-archimedean geometry, which was introduced in [KS06, Β§4.1].
(3.2) Let be a positive integer, and let be a split algebraic -torus of dimension with character module and cocharacter module . We define the tropicalization map of by
This map is continuous, and its fibers are (not necessarily strictly) -affinoid tori. The tropicalization map has a canonical continuous section that maps each to the Gauss point of the affinoid torus . The image of is called the canonical skeleton of , and denoted by . The map induces a homeomorphism , which we will use to tacitly identify with .
(3.3) Let be a -analytic space, let be a topological space and let be a continuous map. Then we say that is an -dimensional affinoid torus fibration if we can cover by open subsets such that there exist an open subset of and a commutative diagram
where the upper horizontal map is an isomorphism of -analytic spaces and the lower horizontal map is a homeomorphism.
(3.4) If is an -dimensional affinoid torus fibration, then induces an integral affine structure on the base [KS06, Β§4.1]. For every open in as in the definition, and every invertible analytic function on , the absolute value of is constant on the fibers of by the maximum modulus principle. Thus induces a continuous function . The integral affine functions on are, by definition, the functions of the form . If is connected, then it is proven in Theorem 1 of [KS06, Β§4.1] that under the homeomorphism , the ring of integral affine functions on is identified with the ring of polynomial functions of degree one with -coefficients on , so that this construction indeed defines an integral affine structure on (to be precise, in [KS06] the authors consider affine functions with constant term in , rather than , but since is discretely valued in our case, we get a slightly stronger result).
Example 3.5.
We use the tropicalization map to identify the canonical skeleton with . We denote by the open cone in . Let be a locally finite fan of strongly convex rational polyhedral cones in . We denote by the rational polyhedral complex in obtained by intersecting the cones in with . Consider the torus embedding over associated with as in [KΓΌ98, 1.13]. The -scheme is separated and locally of finite type, and it is quasi-compact if and only if is finite. Since is supported in , the generic fiber of is canonically isomorphic to the split -torus . Assume that is regular; this is equivalent to the property that the fan is simple, and it implies that the special fiber is a strict normal crossings divisor. Denote by the formal -adic completion of . The generic fiber is a -analytic space endowed with a natural injective morphism of -analytic spaces . The morphism embeds as an analytic domain in .
The construction of the Berkovich skeleton and the retraction map in [MN15, Β§3] are local on , so that they extend immediately to schemes that are locally of finite type. This yields a canonical embedding of the dual intersection complex of into . The image of this embedding is called the Berkovich skeleton of . The embedding has a canonical retraction . It follows directly from the definitions that is contained in and coincides with the support of . In particular, if is a subdivision of , then . Moreover, the -structure on is precisely the polyhedral decomposition . We have , and the retraction map is the restriction of to .
(3.6) As a first application, let us discuss the case of abelian varieties. Let be an abelian -variety of dimension , and denote by its NΓ©ron model. Then Berkovich has constructed in [Be90, Β§6.5] a canonical skeleton in , together with a continuous retraction , via the theory of non-archimedean uniformization. The dimension of is equal to the toric rank of (the dimension of the maximal subtorus). Let us make this construction more precise in the maximally degenerate case. Assume that has purely toric reduction, that is, is a torus. Let be the identity point on . Then the universal pointed covering space of (with respect to the Berkovich topology) is isomorphic to the analytification of a split -dimensional -torus . The kernel of the morphism is a lattice in (called the period lattice), and the image of in is a lattice of rank . By definition, the canonical skeleton is the image of under the map . Moreover, we have a Cartesian diagram of topological spaces
such that sends homeomorphically onto . In particular, is a real torus of dimension , is an -dimensional torus fibration, and the induced integral affine structure on coincides with the quotient structure on .
(3.7) If has purely toric reduction, then we can interpret as a non-archimedean SYZ fibration by means of the theory of Mumford models [Mu72] and the refinements of Mumfordβs construction given in [KΓΌ98]. We say that a model of is a KΓΌnnemann-Mumford model if it is a regular model that arises through the construction in the proof of [KΓΌ98, 3.5].
Proposition 3.8.
Let be an abelian -variety of dimension . Then the essential skeleton of coincides with Berkovichβs canonical skeleton . If has semi-abelian reduction and is a KΓΌnnemann-Mumford model of over , then is a good minimal dlt-model that satisfies assumption (2). If has purely toric reduction, then the non-archimedean SYZ fibration coincides with Berkovichβs canonical retraction . In particular, is an -dimensional affinoid torus fibration.
Proof.
The equality is proven in [HN17, 4.3.2]. Let be a KΓΌnnemann-Mumford model for over . Then, by definition, is an snc-model, and thus certainly good and dlt. It is shown in [HN17, 5.1.7] that is minimal.
Let be a regular relatively complete model of as in [KΓΌ98, 2.11] such that the formal -adic completion of arises as a quotient of the formal -adic completion of under an action of the period lattice. Then, by construction, is a torus embedding of over , and we have a commutative diagram
Thus in order to prove that , it suffices to observe that by Example 3.5. β
Remark 3.9.
A refinement of the proof shows that the equality remains valid if we only assume that has semi-abelian reduction; then the non-archimedean uniformization of takes the form , where is an extension of an abelian -variety with good reduction by a split -torus . The dimension of is precisely the toric rank of , the identity component of the special fiber of the NΓ©ron model of . The KΓΌnnemann-Mumford construction produces a relatively complete model of that is a Zariski-locally trivial fibration in torus embeddings over the NΓ©ron model of . Since we do not need this generalization in this paper, we omit the details.