ScalingStacks

Subsection [04WX]

Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.

Complete original source context ยท Original author HTML

(1.10) Let XX be a smooth and proper KK-scheme. A model of XX is a proper flat RR-scheme ๐’ณ\mathscr{X} endowed with an isomorphism ๐’ณKโ†’X\mathscr{X}_{K}\to X. An snc-model of XX is a regular model ๐’ณ\mathscr{X} such that ๐’ณk\mathscr{X}_{k} is a divisor with strict normal crossings. An snc-model is called semistable if ๐’ณk\mathscr{X}_{k} is reduced. By the semistable reduction theorem [KKMS73, Ch4ยง3], there exists a finite extension Kโ€ฒK^{\prime} of KK such that Xร—KKโ€ฒX\times_{K}K^{\prime} has a semistable snc-model over the integral closure of RR in Kโ€ฒK^{\prime}.

A dlt-model of XX is a normal model ๐’ณ\mathscr{X} such that the pair (๐’ณ,๐’ณk,red)(\mathscr{X},\mathscr{X}_{k,\mathrm{red}}) is divisorially log terminal (dlt). We say that a dlt-model is good if every prime component of ๐’ณk,red\mathscr{X}_{k,\mathrm{red}} is โ„š\mathbb{Q}-Cartier; this is slightly weaker than the usual condition that ๐’ณ\mathscr{X} is โ„š\mathbb{Q}-factorial, but it is sufficient for our purposes. In particular, every snc-model is also a good dlt-model. A dlt-model ๐’ณ\mathscr{X} is called minimal if the logarithmic relative canonical divisor K๐’ณ/R+๐’ณk,redK_{\mathscr{X}/R}+\mathscr{X}_{k,\mathrm{red}} is semi-ample. When XX is Calabi-Yau, this is equivalent to saying that K๐’ณ/R+๐’ณk,redK_{\mathscr{X}/R}+\mathscr{X}_{k,\mathrm{red}} is torsion; when, moreover, ๐’ณk\mathscr{X}_{k} is reduced, then it is equivalent to saying that K๐’ณ/Rโˆผ0K_{\mathscr{X}/R}\sim 0.

Theorem 1.11.

Let XX be a projective Calabi-Yau variety over KK. Then there exists a finite extension Kโ€ฒK^{\prime} of KK such that XX has a projective โ„š\mathbb{Q}-factorial minimal dlt-model with reduced special fiber over the integral closure of RR in Kโ€ฒK^{\prime}.

Proof.

This follows from Theorem 2 in [KNX18]; โ„š\mathbb{Q}-factoriality is not included in the statement, but the proof produces such a model. โˆŽ

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source-backed reader collection; mathematical self-containment is not assessed.