ScalingStacks

Proof. [02YG]

Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.

Complete original source context · Original author HTML

Proof.

The metric on E∨E^{\vee} is given, for p∈ℙn​(ℂ)p\in\mathbb{P}^{n}(\mathbb{C}) and q0,…,qr∈ℂq_{0},\dots,q_{r}\in\mathbb{C}, by

‖q0​s0​(p)⊕⋯⊕qr​sr​(p)‖∞2=|q0|2​‖s0​(p)‖2+⋯+|qr|2​‖sr​(p)‖2,||q_{0}s_{0}(p)\oplus\dots\oplus q_{r}s_{r}(p)||_{\infty}^{2}=|q_{0}|^{2}||s_{0}(p)||^{2}+\dots+|q_{r}|^{2}||s_{r}(p)||^{2},

where ‖sj​(p)‖||s_{j}(p)|| is the norm of sj​(p)s_{j}(p) with respect to the Fubini-Study metric on 𝒪​(−aj)an{\mathcal{O}}(-a_{j})^{{\text{\rm an}}}. By Example 2.2,

‖sj​(p)‖2=(|p0|2|p0|2+⋯+|pn|2)−aj.||s_{j}(p)||^{2}=\bigg(\frac{|p_{0}|^{2}}{|p_{0}|^{2}+\dots+|p_{n}|^{2}}\bigg)^{-a_{j}}.

Let s⊗−1s^{\otimes-1} be the monomial section of the tautological line bundle defined by ss. Then

(8.18) ‖s⊗−1∘θ0∘𝐞ℂ⁡(u,v)‖2=∑j=0re−2​vj⁡(∑i=0ne−2​ui)aj.\|s^{\otimes-1}\circ\theta_{0}\circ{\operatorname{\mathbf{e}}}_{\mathbb{C}}(u,v)\|^{2}=\sum_{j=0}^{r}{\operatorname{e}}^{-2v_{j}}\left(\sum_{i=0}^{n}{\operatorname{e}}^{-2u_{i}}\right)^{a_{j}}.

By Proposition 5.19(2), ψ∞\psi_{\infty} is −1/2-1/2 times the logarithm of the above expression.

For the last statement, observe that the functions e−2​vj⁡(∑i=0ne−2​ui)aj{\operatorname{e}}^{-2v_{j}}(\sum_{i=0}^{n}{\operatorname{e}}^{-2u_{i}})^{a_{j}} are log-strictly convex, because −1/2-1/2 times their logarithm is the function associated to the Fubini-Study metric on 𝒪​(aj)an{\mathcal{O}}(a_{j})^{{\text{\rm an}}}, which is a strictly concave function. Their sum is also log-strictly convex [BV04, §3.5.2]. Hence, ψ∞\psi_{\infty} is strictly concave. ∎

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source-backed reader collection; mathematical self-containment is not assessed.