Write for short. First we
consider the Archimedean case. We have that
. By Proposition
8.1,
|
|
|
which proves (1). Hence,
|
|
|
The Monge-Ampère measure of is given by
, and so the above proves (2).
To prove (3) we apply Lemma 8.6. We have that
, , and . Thus,
| (8.9) |
|
|
|
We have . Hence,
|
|
|
Moreover
and
|
|
|
for the principal determination of . These calculations together
with equation
(8.9) imply that
|
|
|
which proves (3).
Next we consider the non-Archimedean case. Let be a sufficiently small open subset and . For
short, write . By Proposition
8.1, the genericity of , and the condition for , imply
|
|
|
By the factorization of ,
|
|
|
The image of
is a dense subset. We deduce that, ,
|
|
|
which proves (4). The gradient of this function is, for ,
|
|
|
Hence, the associated Monge-Ampère measure is
which proves (5).
The derivative of in the sense of (8.5) is, for ,
|
|
|
Moreover, , and . By Lemma 8.6
| (8.10) |
|
|
|
If we write
|
|
|
then, we have that, almost everywhere
and . Therefore
| (8.11) |
|
|
|
Thus, joining together (8.10), (8.11) and the
relation we deduce
|
|
|
finishing the proof of the theorem.
∎