ScalingStacks

Proof. [02WZ]

Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.

Complete original source context Β· Original author HTML

Proof.

By the definition of adelic field, val𝕂v⁑(p)=0{\operatorname{val}}_{\mathbb{K}_{v}}(p)=0 for almost all vβˆˆπ”π•‚v\in\mathfrak{M}_{\mathbb{K}}. Therefore, the integrability of YY follows as in the proof of Proposition 6.35.

Let Ξ£\Sigma be the complete regular fan of NℝN_{\mathbb{R}} induced by HH and ΣΔr\Sigma_{\Delta^{r}}, and let XΞ£X_{\Sigma} be the associated toric variety. Write Ο†=Ο†H,p\varphi=\varphi_{H,p} for short. The fact that H⁑(N)H(N) is saturated implies that Ο†\varphi has degree 1 and so Y=Ο†βˆ—β€‹XΞ£Y=\varphi_{*}X_{\Sigma}. By the functoriality of the global height (Theorem 2.57(2)),

hπ’ͺ⁑(1)Β―can⁑(Y)=hΟ†βˆ—β€‹(π’ͺ⁑(1)Β―can)⁑(XΞ£).\operatorname{h}_{{\overline{{\mathcal{O}}(1)}}^{{\operatorname{can}}}}(Y)=\operatorname{h}_{\varphi^{*}({\overline{{\mathcal{O}}(1)}}^{{\operatorname{can}}})}(X_{\Sigma}).

Let vβˆˆπ”π•‚v\in\mathfrak{M}_{\mathbb{K}}. Using the results in Example 6.31, it follows from Theorem 6.37 that

hΟ†βˆ—β€‹(π’ͺ¯​(1)can)⁑(XΞ£)=[(n+1)!β€‹βˆ‘vβˆ«Ξ”Β―nv​ϑ¯v​d​volM].\operatorname{h}_{\varphi^{\ast}({\overline{{\mathcal{O}}}}(1)^{{\operatorname{can}}})}(X_{\Sigma})=\left[(n+1)!\sum_{v}\int_{{\overline{\Delta}}}n_{v}{\overline{\vartheta}}_{v}\,\text{\rm d}\operatorname{vol}_{M}\right].

where Δ¯=conv⁑(0,m1βˆ’m0,…,mrβˆ’m0)βŠ‚Mℝ{\overline{\Delta}}=\operatorname{conv}(0,m_{1}-m_{0},\dots,m_{r}-m_{0})\subset M_{\mathbb{R}} and ϑ¯v{\overline{\vartheta}}_{v} is the function parameterizing the upper envelope of the extended polytope

conv⁑((0,0),(m1βˆ’m0,log⁑|p1/p0|v),…,(mrβˆ’m0,log⁑|pr/p0|v))βŠ‚Mℝ×ℝ.\operatorname{conv}\left((0,0),(m_{1}-m_{0},\log|p_{1}/p_{0}|_{v}),\dots,(m_{r}-m_{0},\log|p_{r}/p_{0}|_{v})\right)\subset M_{\mathbb{R}}\times\mathbb{R}.

We have that Δ¯=Ξ”βˆ’m0{\overline{\Delta}}=\Delta-m_{0} and ϑ¯v=Ο„βˆ’m0​ϑvβˆ’log⁑|p0|v{\overline{\vartheta}}_{v}=\tau_{-m_{0}}\vartheta_{v}-\log|p_{0}|_{v}. Hence,

βˆ«Ξ”Β―Ο‘Β―v​d​volM=βˆ«Ξ”Ο‘v​d​volMβˆ’log⁑|p0|v​volM⁑(Ξ”).\int_{{\overline{\Delta}}}{\overline{\vartheta}}_{v}\,\text{\rm d}\operatorname{vol}_{M}=\int_{\Delta}\vartheta_{v}\,\text{\rm d}\operatorname{vol}_{M}-\log|p_{0}|_{v}\operatorname{vol}_{M}(\Delta).

Since βˆ‘vnv​log⁑|p0|v∈def⁑(𝕂×)\sum_{v}n_{v}\log|p_{0}|_{v}\in\operatorname{def}(\mathbb{K}^{\times}), we deduce the result. ∎

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source-backed reader collection; mathematical self-containment is not assessed.