ScalingStacks

5.8. Adelic toric metrics [02VW]

Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.

Complete original source context Β· Original author HTML

5.8. Adelic toric metrics

We now turn to the global case. Let (𝕂,M𝕂)(\mathbb{K},M_{\mathbb{K}}) be an adelic field (Definition 2.47). We fix a complete fan Ξ£\Sigma in NℝN_{\mathbb{R}} and a virtual support function Ξ¨\Psi on Ξ£\Sigma. Let (L,s)(L,s) be the associated toric line bundle and section. If XX is a variety over 𝕂\mathbb{K} and v∈M𝕂v\in M_{\mathbb{K}} we will denote by Xan,vX^{{\text{\rm an}},v} its analytification with respect to vv. Analogously π•Šan,v\mathbb{S}^{{\text{\rm an}},v} will denote the compact subtorus of 𝕋an,v\mathbb{T}^{{\text{\rm an}},v}.

Definition 5.84.

A toric metric on LL is a family (βˆ₯β‹…βˆ₯v)v∈M𝕂(\|\cdot\|_{v})_{v\in M_{\mathbb{K}}}, where βˆ₯β‹…βˆ₯v\|\cdot\|_{v} is a toric metrics on LvanL_{v}^{{\text{\rm an}}}. A toric metric is called adelic if ψβˆ₯β‹…βˆ₯v=Ξ¨\psi_{\|\cdot\|_{v}}=\Psi for all but finitely many vv.

Theorem 5.85.

Let (𝕂,M𝕂)(\mathbb{K},M_{\mathbb{K}}) be a global field. A toric metric on LL is quasi-algebraic (Definition 2.52) if and only if it is an adelic toric metric.

Proof.

Let (βˆ₯β‹…βˆ₯v)v∈M𝕂(\|\cdot\|_{v})_{v\in M_{\mathbb{K}}} be a metric on LL and write LΒ―=(L,(βˆ₯β‹…βˆ₯v)v∈M𝕂){\overline{L}}=(L,(\|\cdot\|_{v})_{v\in M_{\mathbb{K}}}). Suppose first that LΒ―{\overline{L}} is toric and quasi-algebraic. Let SβŠ‚M𝕂S\subset M_{\mathbb{K}} be a finite set containing the Archimedean places, 𝕂S∘\mathbb{K}^{\circ}_{S} as in Definition 2.51, eβ‰₯1e\geq 1 an integer and (𝒳,β„’)({\mathcal{X}},{\mathcal{L}}) a proper model over 𝕂S∘\mathbb{K}^{\circ}_{S} of (XΞ£,LβŠ—e)(X_{\Sigma},L^{\otimes e}) so that βˆ₯β‹…βˆ₯v\|\cdot\|_{v} is induced by the localization β„’v{\mathcal{L}}_{v} for all vβˆ‰Sv\notin S. Over 𝕂\mathbb{K}, there is an isomorphism from (𝒳,β„’)({\mathcal{X}},{\mathcal{L}}) to the canonical model (𝒳Σ,β„’e​Ψ)({\mathcal{X}}_{\Sigma},{\mathcal{L}}_{e\Psi}). Since 𝕂S∘\mathbb{K}^{\circ}_{S} is Noetherian, this isomorphism and its inverse are defined over 𝕂Sβ€²βˆ˜\mathbb{K}^{\circ}_{S^{\prime}} for certain finite subset Sβ€²S^{\prime} containing SS. Thus, enlarging the finite set SS if necessary, we can suppose without loss of generality that (𝒳,β„’)({\mathcal{X}},{\mathcal{L}}) agrees with the canonical model (𝒳Σ,β„’e​Ψ)({\mathcal{X}}_{\Sigma},{\mathcal{L}}_{e\Psi}). Hence, βˆ₯β‹…βˆ₯v=βˆ₯β‹…βˆ₯v,e​Ψ1/e=βˆ₯β‹…βˆ₯v,Ξ¨\|\cdot\|_{v}=\|\cdot\|_{v,e\Psi}^{1/e}=\|\cdot\|_{v,\Psi} for all places vβˆ‰Sv\notin S. In consequence, it is an adelic toric metric.

Conversely, suppose that LΒ―{\overline{L}} is a toric adelic metrized line bundle. Let SS be the union of the set of Archimedean places and {v∈M𝕂|ψvβ‰ Ξ¨}\{v\in M_{\mathbb{K}}|\psi_{v}\neq\Psi\}. By definition, this is a finite set. Let (𝒳Σ,β„’Ξ¨)({\mathcal{X}}_{\Sigma},{\mathcal{L}}_{\Psi}) be the canonical model over 𝕂S∘\mathbb{K}^{\circ}_{S} of (XΞ£,L)(X_{\Sigma},L). Then βˆ₯β‹…βˆ₯v\|\cdot\|_{v} is the metric induced by this model, for all vβˆ‰Sv\notin S. Hence LΒ―{\overline{L}} is quasi-algebraic. ∎

Corollary 5.86.

Let LL be as before.

  1. (1)

    There is a bijection between the set of approachable adelic toric metric on LL and the set of families of continuous concave functions {ψv}v\{\psi_{v}\}_{v} on NℝN_{\mathbb{R}} such that |ψvβˆ’Ξ¨||\psi_{v}-\Psi| is bounded and ψv=Ξ¨\psi_{v}=\Psi for all but finitely many vv.

  2. (2)

    There is a bijection between the set of approachable adelic toric metric on LL and the set of families of continuous concave functions {ψv∨}v\{\psi^{\vee}_{v}\}_{v} on ΔΨ\Delta_{\Psi} such that ψv∨=0\psi^{\vee}_{v}=0 for all but finitely many vv.

Proof.

This follows from Theorem 5.85 and Theorem 5.73. ∎

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source-backed reader collection; mathematical self-containment is not assessed.