ScalingStacks

Proof. [02UZ]

Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.

Complete original source context · Original author HTML

Proof.

Let 1≤i≤k1\leq i\leq k. The rational function x:=t​ϖ−a+ix:=t\varpi^{-a+i} has a zero of order one along the component Ei−1E_{i-1} and the support of its divisor does not contain the component EiE_{i}. On the other hand, the rational function y:=t−1​ϖa−i+1y:=t^{-1}\varpi^{a-i+1} has a zero of order one along the component EiE_{i} and the support of its divisor does not contain the component Ei−1E_{i-1}. Thus {x,y}\{x,y\} is a system of parameters in a neighbourhood of qiq_{i}. We denote

A=K∘​[t​ϖ−a+i,t−1​ϖa−i+1]≃K∘​[x,y]/(x​y−ϖ).A=K^{\circ}[t\varpi^{-a+i},t^{-1}\varpi^{a-i+1}]\simeq K^{\circ}[x,y]/(xy-\varpi).

The local ring at the point qiq_{i} is A(x,y)A_{(x,y)}. Let pp be a point such that |ϖ|a−i+1<|t⁡(p)|<|ϖ|a−i|\varpi|^{a-i+1}<|t(p)|<|\varpi|^{a-i}. Therefore, for f∈Af\in A we have |f⁡(p)|≤1|f(p)|\leq 1. Moreover, if f∈(x,y)f\in(x,y), then |f⁡(p)|<1|f(p)|<1. Since the ideal (x,y)(x,y) is maximal, we deduce that, for f∈Af\in A, the condition |f⁡(p)|<1|f(p)|<1 is equivalent to the condition f∈(x,y)f\in(x,y). This implies that red⁡(p)=qi{\operatorname{red}}(p)=q_{i}. A similar argument works for q0q_{0} and qk+1q_{k+1}.

Assume now that p∈im⁡(θΣ)p\in\operatorname{im}(\theta_{\Sigma}) and that |t⁡(p)|=|ϖ|a−i|t(p)|=|\varpi|^{a-i}. If i≠0i\not=0 we consider again the ring AA, but in this case |x⁡(p)|=|t⁡(p)​ϖ−a+i|=1|x(p)|=|t(p)\varpi^{-a+i}|=1. Let I={f∈A∣|f⁡(p)|<1}I=\{f\in A\mid|f(p)|<1\}. It is clear that (y,ϖ)⊂I(y,\varpi)\subset I. For f=∑m∈ℤβm​tm∈Af=\sum_{m\in\mathbb{Z}}\beta_{m}t^{m}\in A, since p∈im⁡(θΣ)p\in\operatorname{im}(\theta_{\Sigma}), we have

|f⁡(p)|=supm(|βm|​|t⁡(p)|m).|f(p)|=\sup_{m}(|\beta_{m}||t(p)|^{m}).

This implies that I⊂(y,ϖ)I\subset(y,\varpi). Hence II is the ideal that defines the component EiE_{i} and this is equivalent to red⁡(p)=ηi{\operatorname{red}}(p)=\eta_{i}. The case i=0i=0 is analogous. ∎

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source-backed reader collection; mathematical self-containment is not assessed.