ScalingStacks

Proof. [02TZ]

Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.

Complete original source context · Original author HTML

Proof.

Since the measure c1​(L¯)n∧δXΣc_{1}({\overline{L}})^{n}\land\delta_{X_{\Sigma}} is given by a smooth volume form and XΣan∖X0anX^{{\text{\rm an}}}_{\Sigma}\setminus X^{{\text{\rm an}}}_{0} is a set of Lebesgue measure zero, the measure c1​(L¯)n∧δXΣc_{1}({\overline{L}})^{n}\land\delta_{X_{\Sigma}} is determined by its restriction to the dense open subset X0anX_{0}^{{\text{\rm an}}}. Thus, to prove equation (5.34) it is enough to show that

(5.35) val∗⁡(c1​(L¯)n∧δXΣ|X0an)=n!​ℳM​(ψ).{\operatorname{val}}_{\ast}(c_{1}({\overline{L}})^{n}\land\delta_{X_{\Sigma}}|_{X^{{\text{\rm an}}}_{0}})=n!\mathcal{M}_{M}(\psi).

We use the coordinate system of the proof of Proposition 5.29. We denote by 𝐞~:Nℂ→X0​(ℂ){\widetilde{{\operatorname{\mathbf{e}}}}}\colon N_{\mathbb{C}}\to X_{0}(\mathbb{C}) the map induced by the morphism ℂ→ℂ×\mathbb{C}\to\mathbb{C}^{\times} given by z↦exp⁡(−z)z\mapsto\exp(-z). We write uk+i​vku_{k}+iv_{k} for the complex coordinates of NℂN_{\mathbb{C}}. Then

(5.36) 𝐞~∗​(d​zk∧d​z¯kzk​z¯k)=(−2​i)​d​uk∧d​vk.{\widetilde{{\operatorname{\mathbf{e}}}}}^{\ast}\left(\frac{\,\text{\rm d}z_{k}\land\,\text{\rm d}\bar{z}_{k}}{z_{k}\bar{z}_{k}}\right)=(-2i)\,\text{\rm d}u_{k}\land\,\text{\rm d}v_{k}.

Using now equations (5.30), (5.31) and (5.36), we obtain that,

1(2​π​i)n​𝐞~∗​c1​(L¯)n\displaystyle\frac{1}{(2\pi i)^{n}}{\widetilde{{\operatorname{\mathbf{e}}}}}^{\ast}c_{1}({\overline{L}})^{n} =𝐞~∗​(1(i​π)n​n!​detG​d​z1∧d​z¯1∧⋯∧d​zn∧d​z¯n)\displaystyle={\widetilde{{\operatorname{\mathbf{e}}}}}^{\ast}\left(\frac{1}{(i\pi)^{n}}n!\det G\,\text{\rm d}z_{1}\land\,\text{\rm d}\bar{z}_{1}\land\dots\land\,\text{\rm d}z_{n}\land\,\text{\rm d}\bar{z}_{n}\right)
=(−1)n(2​π)n​n!​detHess⁡(ψ)​d​u1∧d​v1∧⋯∧d​un∧d​un.\displaystyle=\frac{(-1)^{n}}{(2\pi)^{n}}n!\det\operatorname{Hess}(\psi)\,\text{\rm d}u_{1}\land\,\text{\rm d}v_{1}\land\dots\land\,\text{\rm d}u_{n}\land\,\text{\rm d}u_{n}.

Since the map val{\operatorname{val}} is the composition of 𝐞~−1{\widetilde{{\operatorname{\mathbf{e}}}}}^{-1} with the projection Nℂ→NℝN_{\mathbb{C}}\to N_{\mathbb{R}}, integrating with respect to the variables v1,…,vnv_{1},\dots,v_{n} in the domain [0,2​π]n[0,2\pi]^{n}, taking into account the natural orientation of ℂn\mathbb{C}^{n} and the orientation of NℝN_{\mathbb{R}} given by the coordinate system, and the fact that the normalization factor 1/(2​π​i)n1/(2\pi i)^{n} is implicit in the current δXΣ\delta_{X_{\Sigma}}, we obtain

val∗⁡(c1​(L¯)n∧δXΣ|X0an)=(−1)n​n!​detHess⁡(ψ)​d​u1∧⋯∧d​un.{\operatorname{val}}_{\ast}(c_{1}({\overline{L}})^{n}\land\delta_{X_{\Sigma}}|_{X_{0}^{{\text{\rm an}}}})=(-1)^{n}n!\det\operatorname{Hess}(\psi)\,\text{\rm d}u_{1}\land\dots\land\,\text{\rm d}u_{n}.

Thus equation (5.35) follows from Proposition 3.94. Finally, the last statement follows from the fact that, in a compact Abelian group there is a unique Haar measure with fixed total volume. ∎

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source-backed reader collection; mathematical self-containment is not assessed.