ScalingStacks

Proof. [02J3]

Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.

Complete original source context · Original author HTML

Proof.

Write ∥⋅∥=∥⋅∥𝒳,ℒ,e\|\cdot\|=\|\cdot\|_{\mathcal{X},\mathcal{L},e} for short. Let 𝒰=Spec⁡(𝒜)∋red⁡(p)\mathcal{U}=\operatorname{Spec}({\mathcal{A}})\ni{\operatorname{red}}(p) be an open affine trivializing set of ℒ\mathcal{L} and σ\sigma be a generator of ℒ|𝒰\mathcal{L}|_{{\mathcal{U}}}. Then s⊗e=λ​σs^{\otimes e}=\lambda\sigma with λ\lambda in the fraction field of 𝒜{\mathcal{A}}. We have that λ⁡(p)∈H\lambda(p)\in H and, by definition, ‖s⁡(p)‖=|λ⁡(p)|1/e\|s(p)\|=|\lambda(p)|^{1/e}. If λ⁡(p)=0\lambda(p)=0, the equation is clearly satisfied. Denote temporarily by CC the right-hand side of (2.22). If λ⁡(p)≠0\lambda(p)\not=0,

λ​(p)−1​p~∗​s⊗e=p~∗​σ∈p~∗​ℒ.\lambda(p)^{-1}\widetilde{p}^{\ast}s^{\otimes e}=\widetilde{p}^{\ast}\sigma\in{\widetilde{p}}^{*}\mathcal{L}.

Hence ‖s⁡(p)‖≥C\|s(p)\|\geq C. Moreover, if a∈H×a\in H^{\times} is such that a−1​p~∗​s⊗e∈p~∗​ℒa^{-1}\widetilde{p}^{\ast}s^{\otimes e}\in{\widetilde{p}}^{*}\mathcal{L}, then there is an element α∈H∘∖{0}\alpha\in H^{\circ}\setminus\{0\} with a−1​p~∗​s⊗e=α​p~∗​σa^{-1}\widetilde{p}^{\ast}s^{\otimes e}=\alpha\widetilde{p}^{\ast}\sigma. Therefore, a=λ⁡(p)/αa=\lambda(p)/\alpha and |a|1/e=|λ⁡(p)|1/e/|α|1/e≥|λ⁡(p)|1/e|a|^{1/e}=|\lambda(p)|^{1/e}/|\alpha|^{1/e}\geq|\lambda(p)|^{1/e}. Thus, ‖s⁡(p)‖≤C\|s(p)\|\leq C. ∎

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source-backed reader collection; mathematical self-containment is not assessed.