2.3. Algebraic metrics in the non-Archimedean case
Let be a field complete with respect to a nontrivial
non-Archimedean absolute value, as in the previous section. For
simplicity, we will assume from now on that
is a discrete valuation ring (DVR),
and we will fix a generator of its maximal ideal . This is the only case
we will need in the sequel and it allows us to use a more elementary
definition of measures and local heights. Nevertheless, the reader can
consult [Gub03, Gub07] for the general case.
Let be an algebraic variety over and a line bundle
on . Let and be their respective
analytifications.
Definition 2.10.
A metric
on is
an assignment that, to each local section of on an
open subset , associates a continuous function
|
|
|
such that, for all ,
- (1)
if and only if ;
- (2)
for any , it holds
The pair
is called a metrized line bundle.
Models of varieties and line bundles give rise to an important class
of metrics. To introduce and study these metrics, we first
consider the notion of model of varieties. Write
.
The scheme has two points: the
special point
and the generic point .
Given a scheme
over , we set
and for its
special fibre
and its generic fibre,
respectively.
Definition 2.11.
A model
over of is a flat scheme of finite type over together
with a fixed isomorphism . This
isomorphism is part of the model, and so we can
identify with . When is proper, we say that
the model is proper
whenever the scheme is proper over .
Given a model of , there is a reduction map
defined on a
closed subset of with values in
[Ber90, §2.4].
This map can be described as follows. Let be a finite open
affine cover of by schemes over of finite type
and, for each , let be a -algebra such that
.
Set and let be the closed
subset of defined as
| (2.12) |
|
|
|
For each , the prime ideal contains and
so it determines a point . Consider the
closed subset . The above maps glue
together to define a map
| (2.13) |
|
|
|
This map is surjective and anti-continuous, in the sense that the
preimages of the open subsets are closed [Ber90, §2.4]. For
each irreducible component of , there is a unique point
such that
| (2.14) |
|
|
|
where denotes the generic point of [Ber90, Proposition
2.4.4]. The finite subset is called the Shilov boundary
of . Observe that it depends on the choice of
.
If both and are proper, then
and the reduction map is defined on
the whole of . If both and are normal, we can
compute the Shilov boundary.
Let be an
irreducible component of and choose a finite type
affine open subset containing . Put
and . Then the point is the multiplicative seminorm on given by
| (2.15) |
|
|
|
for each ,
where is the order of at the generic point of .
Next we recall the definition of models of line bundles. Let be a
line bundle on .
Definition 2.16.
A model
over of
is a triple
,
where is a model over of ,
is a line bundle on and is an
integer, together with a fixed isomorphism . When , the model will be denoted for short. A model
of is called
proper
whenever is proper.
We assume that the variety is proper for the rest of this section.
To a proper model of a line bundle we can associate a
metric.
Definition 2.17.
Let be a proper model
of . Let be a local section of defined at a
point . Let be a
trivializing open neighbourhood of and a
generator of . Let and such that on
. Then, the metric induced by the proper model
on ,,
denoted ,
is given by
|
|
|
This definition does neither depend on the choice of the open set
nor of the section , and it
gives a metric on . The metrics on
obtained in this way are called
algebraic, and a pair is called an
algebraic metrized line bundle.
Different models may give rise to the same metric.
Proposition 2.18.
Let and
be proper models of , and a morphism of models such that
. Then the
metrics on induced by both models agree.
Proof.
Let be a local section of defined on a point . Let be a trivializing open neighbourhood
of , the reduction of with respect to the model , and
a generator of . Let be an analytic function
on such that .
We have that and
is a trivializing open set of
with generator . Then on . Now the proposition follows directly from
Definition 2.17.
∎
The inverse image of an algebraic metric is algebraic.
Proposition 2.19.
Let be a morphism of
proper algebraic varieties over and a line bundle on
equipped with an algebraic metric. Assume that
admits a proper model. Then , the inverse
image under of , is a line bundle on
equipped with an algebraic metric.
Proof.
Let be a proper model of
which induces the metric in , and be a proper
model of . Let be the Zariski closure of the graph
of in . This is a proper model
of equipped with a morphism . Then is a proper
model of which induces the metric
of .
∎
Next we give a second description of an algebraic metric. As before, let be
a proper variety over and a line bundle on , and an algebraic metric on . Let
and put , which is a complete extension of . Let
be its valuation ring, and and the
special and the generic point of , respectively. The
point induces a morphism of schemes . By the
valuative criterion of properness, there is a unique extension
| (2.20) |
|
|
|
It satisfies , where is the natural map introduced at the beginning
of §2.2, and .
Proposition 2.21.
With notation as above, let be
a local section of in a neighbourhood of . Then
| (2.22) |
|
|
|
Proof.
Write for short. Let
be an open affine trivializing
set of and be a generator of
. Then with
in the fraction field of . We have that and, by definition, . If
, the equation is clearly satisfied. Denote
temporarily by the right-hand side of (2.22). If ,
|
|
|
Hence . Moreover, if is
such that , then there is an element with . Therefore, and . Thus, .
∎
We give a third description of an algebraic metric in terms of
intersection theory that makes evident the relationship with higher
dimensional Arakelov theory. Let be a proper model of
and a closed algebraic curve. Let
be the normalization of and and the induced
morphisms. Let be a rational section of such that
intersects properly . Then the intersection number
is defined
as
|
|
|
Proposition 2.23.
With the above notation, let . Let as in (2.20). This is a closed algebraic curve. Let
be a local section of defined at and such that . Then
|
|
|
Proof.
We keep the notation in the proof of
Proposition 2.21. In particular, with in the fraction field of ,
and . We verify that
|
|
|
and
|
|
|
which proves the statement.
∎
Example 2.24.
Let . A line bundle on is necessarily
trivial, that is, . Consider the model of
given
by , , and a
free -submodule of of rank one. Let be a basis of . For a section of we can
write with . Hence,
|
|
|
All algebraic metrics on can be obtained in this way.
Example 2.25.
Let and ,
the universal line bundle of . As a model for we
consider , the projective space over
, ,
and . A rational section of can be identified with a
homogeneous rational function
of degree 1.
Let and
set . Let be such that
. Take (respectively ) as
the affine set over (respectively
). The point corresponds to the algebraic morphism
|
|
|
that sends to . The extension factors
through the algebraic morphism
|
|
|
with the same definition. Then
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We call this the canonical metric of
and we denote it by
.
Many other algebraic metrics can be obtained from Example 2.25,
by considering maps of varieties to projective spaces. Let be a
proper variety over equipped with a line bundle such that
is generated by global sections for an integer . A set of global sections in that
generates induces a morphism and, by inverse image, a metric
on . If admits a a proper model,
Proposition 2.19 shows that this metric is algebraic.
Now we recall the notion of semipositivity for algebraic
metrics. A curve in is vertical if it is
contained in .
Definition 2.26.
Let be an algebraic metric on and set . We say that is
semipositive
if there is a model
of that
induces the metric such that, for every vertical curve in ,
|
|
|
With the hypothesis in Proposition 2.19, the inverse image of
a semipositive algebraic metric is also a semipositive algebraic
metric.
Example 2.27.
The canonical metric in Example 2.25 is semipositive: for a
vertical curve , its degree with respect to
equals its degree with respect to the
restriction of this model to the special fibre.
This restriction identifies with , the universal
line bundle of , which is ample. Hence all the
metrics obtained by inverse image of the canonical metric of
are also semipositive.
Finally, we recall the definition of the signed measures associated with
algebraic metrics.
Definition 2.28.
Let ,
, be line bundles on equipped with algebraic
metrics. For each , choose a model
that realizes the metric of . We can assume without loss of generality
that the models agree with a common model
. Let be a -dimensional subvariety of
and its analytification. Let be the closure of , be its
normalization, its special fibre, and
the set of irreducible components of this
special fibre. For each , consider the
point defined by (2.15). Let be the Dirac delta measure on supported on
. We define a discrete signed measure on
by
| (2.29) |
|
|
|
This notion extends by linearity to the group of -dimensional cycles of .
This signed measure only depends on the metrics and not
on the particular choice of models [Cha06, Proposition 2.7]. Observe that
is the multiplicity of the component in
and that the total mass of this measure equals
. If is semipositive for
all and is effective, this signed measure is a measure.
Remark 2.30.
The above measure was introduced by Chambert-Loir [Cha06]. For
the subvarieties of a projective space equipped with the canonical
metric, it is also possible to define similar measures through the
theory of Chow forms, see [Phi94].