2. Metrized line bundles and their associated heights [02IF]
Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.
Complete original source context · Original author HTML
2. Metrized line bundles and their associated heights
In this section we will recall the adelic theory of heights as introduced by Zhang [Zha95b] and developed by Gubler [Gub02, Gub03] and Chambert-Loir [Cha06]. These heights generalize the ones that can be obtained from the arithmetic intersection theory of Gillet and Soulé [GS90, BGS94].
To explain the difference between both points of view, consider a smooth variety over . In Gillet-Soulé’s theory, we choose a regular proper model over of , and we also consider the real analytic space given by the set of complex points and the anti-linear involution induced by the complex conjugation. By contrast, in the adelic point of view we consider the whole family of analytic spaces , . For the Archimedean place, is the real analytic space considered before, while for the non-Archimedean places, this is the associated Berkovich space [Ber90]. Both points of view have advantages and disadvantages. In the former point of view, there exists a complete formalism of intersection theory and characteristic classes, with powerful theorems like the arithmetic Riemann-Roch theorem and the Lefschetz fixed point theorem, but one is restricted to smooth varieties and needs an explicit integral model of . In the latter point of view, one can define heights, but does not dispose yet of a complete formalism of intersection theory. Its main advantages are that it can be easily extended to non-smooth varieties and that there is no need of an integral model of . Moreover, all places, Archimedean and non-Archimedean, are set on a similar footing.
2.1. Smooth metrics in the Archimedean case
Let be an algebraic variety over and its associated complex analytic space. We recall the definition of differential forms on introduced by Bloom and Herrera [BH69]. The space can be covered by a family of open subsets such that each can be identified with a closed analytic subset of an open ball in for some . On each , the differential forms are defined as the restriction to this subset of smooth complex-valued differential forms defined on an open neighbourhood of in . Two differential forms on are identified if they coincide on the non-singular locus of . We denote by the complex of differential forms of , which is independent of the chosen embedding. In particular, if is non-singular, we recover the usual complex of differential forms. These complexes glue together to define a sheaf . This sheaf is equipped with differential operators d, , , , an external product and inverse images with respect to analytic morphisms: these operations are defined locally on each by extending the differential forms to a neighbourhood of in as above and applying the corresponding operations for . We write and for the sheaves of analytic functions and of smooth functions of , respectively.
Let be an algebraic line bundle on and its analytification.
Definition 2.1.
A metric on is an assignment that, to each local section of on an open subset , associates a continuous function
such that, for all ,
- (1)
if and only if ;
- (2)
for any , it holds
The pair is called a metrized line bundle.The metric is smooth if for every local section of , the function is smooth.
We remark that what we call “metric” in this text is called “continuous metric” in other contexts.
Let be a smooth metrized line bundle. Given a local section of on an open subset , the first Chern form of is the -form defined on as
It does not depend on the choice of local section and can be extended to a global closed -form. Observe that we are using the algebro-geometric convention, and so determines a class in .
Example 2.2.
Let and , the universal line bundle of . A rational section of can be identified with a homogeneous rational function of degree 1. The poles of this section coincide which those of . For a point outside this set of poles, the Fubini-Study metric of is defined as
Clearly, this definition does not depend on the choice of a representative of . The pair is a metrized line bundle.
Many smooth metrics can be obtained as the inverse image of the Fubini-Study metric. Let be a variety over and a line bundle on , and assume that there is an integer such that is generated by global sections. Choose a basis of the space of global sections and let be the induced morphism. Given a local section of , let be a local section of such that . Then, the smooth metric on obtained from the Fubini-Study metric by inverse image is given by
for any which is not a pole of .
Definition 2.3.
Let be a smooth metrized line bundle and , the unit disk of . We say that is semipositive if, for every holomorphic map
We say that is positive if this integral is strictly positive for all non-constant holomorphic maps as before.
Example 2.4.
A family of smooth metrized line bundles on and a -dimensional cycle of define a signed measure on as follows. First suppose that is a subvariety of and let denote the current of integration along the analytic subvariety , defined as for . Then the current
is a signed measure on . This notion extends by linearity to . If , , are semipositive and is effective, this signed measure is a measure.
Remark 2.5.
We can reduce the study of algebraic varieties and line bundles over the field of real numbers to the complex case by using the following standard technique. A variety over induces a variety over together with an anti-linear involution such that the diagram
commutes, where the arrow below denotes the map induced by complex conjugation. A line bundle on determines a line bundle on and an isomorphism such that a section of is real if and only if . By a metric on we will mean a metric on such that the induced map is an isometry.
In this way, the above definitions can be extended to metrized line bundles on varieties over . For instance, a real smooth metrized line bundle is semipositive if and only if its associated complex smooth metrized line bundle is semipositive. The corresponding signed measure is a measure over which is invariant under .
In the sequel, every time we have a real variety, we will work with the associated complex variety and quietly ignore the anti-linear involution , because it will play no role in our results.
2.2. Berkovich spaces of schemes
In this section we recall Berkovich’s theory of analytic spaces. We will not present the most general theory developed in [Ber90] but we will content ourselves with the analytic spaces associated to algebraic varieties, that are simpler to define and enough for our purposes.
Let be a field complete with respect to a nontrivial non-Archimedean absolute value . Such fields will be called non-Archimedean fields. Let be the valuation ring, the maximal ideal and the residue field.
Let be a scheme of finite type over . Following [Ber90, §1 and Remark 3.4.2], we can associate an analytic space to the scheme as follows. First assume that , where is a finitely generated -algebra. Then, the points of are the multiplicative seminorms of that extend the absolute value of , see [Ber90, §1.1]. Every element of defines a function given by evaluation of the seminorm. The topology of is the coarsest topology that makes the functions continuous for all .
To each point we attach a prime ideal
This induces a map defined as . The point is a multiplicative seminorm on and so it induces a non-Archimedean absolute value on the field of fractions of . We denote by the completion of this field with respect to that absolute value.
Let be an open subset of . An analytic function on is a function
such that, for each , and there is an open neigborhood of with the property that, for all , there are elements with and for all . The analytic functions form a sheaf, denoted , and is a locally ringed space [Ber90, §1.5 and Remark 3.4.2]. In particular, every element determines an analytic function on , also denoted . The function can then be obtained by composing with the absolute value map
which justifies its notation.
Now, if is a scheme of finite type over , the analytic space is defined by gluing together the affine analytic spaces obtained from an affine open cover of . If we want to stress the base field we will denote by .
Let be a complete extension of and the analytic space associated to the scheme . There is a natural map defined locally by restricting seminorms.
Definition 2.6.
A rational point of is a point satisfying . We denote by the set of rational points of . More generally, for a complete extension of , the set of -rational points of is defined as . There is a map , defined by the composing the inclusion with the map as above. The set of algebraic points of is the union of for all finite extensions of . Its image in is denoted . We have that .
The basic properties of are summarized in the following theorem.
Theorem 2.7.
Let be a scheme of finite type over and the associated analytic space.
- (1)
is a locally compact and locally arc-connected topological space.
- (2)
is Hausdorff (respectively compact and Hausdorff, arc-connected) if and only if is separated (respectively proper, connected).
- (3)
The map is continuous. A locally constructible subset is open (respectively closed, dense) if and only if is open (respectively closed, dense).
- (4)
Let be a morphism of schemes of finite type over and its analytification. Then is flat (respectively unramified, étale, smooth, separated, injective, surjective, open immersion, isomorphism) if and only if has the same property.
- (5)
Let be a complete extension of . Then the map induces a bijection between and .
- (6)
Set . Then induces a bijection between and . The subset is dense.
Proof.
The proofs can be found in [Ber90] and the next pointers are with respect to the numeration in this reference: (1) follows from Theorem 1.2.1, Corollary 2.2.8 and Theorem 3.2.1, (2) is Theorem 3.4.8, (3) is Corollary 3.4.5, (4) is Proposition 3.4.6, (5) is Theorem 3.4.1(i), while (6) follows from Theorem 3.4.1(i) and Proposition 2.1.15. ∎
Example 2.8.
Let be a finitely generated free -module of rank . Consider the associated group algebra and the algebraic torus . The corresponding analytic space is the set of multiplicative seminorms of that extend the absolute value of . This is an analytic group. We warn the reader that the set of points of an analytic group is not an abstract group, hence some care has to be taken when speaking of actions and orbits. The precise definitions and basic properties can be found in [Ber90, §5.1].
Its analytification is an analytic torus as in [Ber90, §6.3]. The subset
is a compact subgroup, called the compact torus of .
Remark 2.9.
Not every analytic space in the sense of Berkovich can be obtained by the above procedure. The general theory is based on spectra of affinoid -algebras, that provide compact analytic spaces that are the building blocks of the more general analytic spaces.
2.3. Algebraic metrics in the non-Archimedean case
Let be a field complete with respect to a nontrivial non-Archimedean absolute value, as in the previous section. For simplicity, we will assume from now on that is a discrete valuation ring (DVR), and we will fix a generator of its maximal ideal . This is the only case we will need in the sequel and it allows us to use a more elementary definition of measures and local heights. Nevertheless, the reader can consult [Gub03, Gub07] for the general case.
Let be an algebraic variety over and a line bundle on . Let and be their respective analytifications.
Definition 2.10.
A metric on is an assignment that, to each local section of on an open subset , associates a continuous function
such that, for all ,
- (1)
if and only if ;
- (2)
for any , it holds
The pair is called a metrized line bundle.
Models of varieties and line bundles give rise to an important class of metrics. To introduce and study these metrics, we first consider the notion of model of varieties. Write . The scheme has two points: the special point and the generic point . Given a scheme over , we set and for its special fibre and its generic fibre, respectively.
Definition 2.11.
A model over of is a flat scheme of finite type over together with a fixed isomorphism . This isomorphism is part of the model, and so we can identify with . When is proper, we say that the model is proper whenever the scheme is proper over .
Given a model of , there is a reduction map defined on a closed subset of with values in [Ber90, §2.4]. This map can be described as follows. Let be a finite open affine cover of by schemes over of finite type and, for each , let be a -algebra such that . Set and let be the closed subset of defined as
| (2.12) |
For each , the prime ideal contains and so it determines a point . Consider the closed subset . The above maps glue together to define a map
| (2.13) |
This map is surjective and anti-continuous, in the sense that the preimages of the open subsets are closed [Ber90, §2.4]. For each irreducible component of , there is a unique point such that
| (2.14) |
where denotes the generic point of [Ber90, Proposition 2.4.4]. The finite subset is called the Shilov boundary of . Observe that it depends on the choice of .
If both and are proper, then and the reduction map is defined on the whole of . If both and are normal, we can compute the Shilov boundary. Let be an irreducible component of and choose a finite type affine open subset containing . Put and . Then the point is the multiplicative seminorm on given by
| (2.15) |
for each , where is the order of at the generic point of .
Next we recall the definition of models of line bundles. Let be a line bundle on .
Definition 2.16.
A model over of is a triple , where is a model over of , is a line bundle on and is an integer, together with a fixed isomorphism . When , the model will be denoted for short. A model of is called proper whenever is proper.
We assume that the variety is proper for the rest of this section. To a proper model of a line bundle we can associate a metric.
Definition 2.17.
Let be a proper model of . Let be a local section of defined at a point . Let be a trivializing open neighbourhood of and a generator of . Let and such that on . Then, the metric induced by the proper model on ,, denoted , is given by
This definition does neither depend on the choice of the open set nor of the section , and it gives a metric on . The metrics on obtained in this way are called algebraic, and a pair is called an algebraic metrized line bundle.
Different models may give rise to the same metric.
Proposition 2.18.
Let and be proper models of , and a morphism of models such that . Then the metrics on induced by both models agree.
Proof.
Let be a local section of defined on a point . Let be a trivializing open neighbourhood of , the reduction of with respect to the model , and a generator of . Let be an analytic function on such that .
We have that and is a trivializing open set of with generator . Then on . Now the proposition follows directly from Definition 2.17. ∎
The inverse image of an algebraic metric is algebraic.
Proposition 2.19.
Let be a morphism of proper algebraic varieties over and a line bundle on equipped with an algebraic metric. Assume that admits a proper model. Then , the inverse image under of , is a line bundle on equipped with an algebraic metric.
Proof.
Let be a proper model of which induces the metric in , and be a proper model of . Let be the Zariski closure of the graph of in . This is a proper model of equipped with a morphism . Then is a proper model of which induces the metric of . ∎
Next we give a second description of an algebraic metric. As before, let be a proper variety over and a line bundle on , and an algebraic metric on . Let and put , which is a complete extension of . Let be its valuation ring, and and the special and the generic point of , respectively. The point induces a morphism of schemes . By the valuative criterion of properness, there is a unique extension
| (2.20) |
It satisfies , where is the natural map introduced at the beginning of §2.2, and .
Proposition 2.21.
With notation as above, let be a local section of in a neighbourhood of . Then
| (2.22) |
Proof.
Write for short. Let be an open affine trivializing set of and be a generator of . Then with in the fraction field of . We have that and, by definition, . If , the equation is clearly satisfied. Denote temporarily by the right-hand side of (2.22). If ,
Hence . Moreover, if is such that , then there is an element with . Therefore, and . Thus, . ∎
We give a third description of an algebraic metric in terms of intersection theory that makes evident the relationship with higher dimensional Arakelov theory. Let be a proper model of and a closed algebraic curve. Let be the normalization of and and the induced morphisms. Let be a rational section of such that intersects properly . Then the intersection number is defined as
Proposition 2.23.
With the above notation, let . Let as in (2.20). This is a closed algebraic curve. Let be a local section of defined at and such that . Then
Proof.
We keep the notation in the proof of Proposition 2.21. In particular, with in the fraction field of , and . We verify that
and
which proves the statement. ∎
Example 2.24.
Let . A line bundle on is necessarily trivial, that is, . Consider the model of given by , , and a free -submodule of of rank one. Let be a basis of . For a section of we can write with . Hence,
All algebraic metrics on can be obtained in this way.
Example 2.25.
Let and , the universal line bundle of . As a model for we consider , the projective space over , , and . A rational section of can be identified with a homogeneous rational function of degree 1.
Let and set . Let be such that . Take (respectively ) as the affine set over (respectively ). The point corresponds to the algebraic morphism
that sends to . The extension factors through the algebraic morphism
with the same definition. Then
We call this the canonical metric of and we denote it by .
Many other algebraic metrics can be obtained from Example 2.25, by considering maps of varieties to projective spaces. Let be a proper variety over equipped with a line bundle such that is generated by global sections for an integer . A set of global sections in that generates induces a morphism and, by inverse image, a metric on . If admits a a proper model, Proposition 2.19 shows that this metric is algebraic.
Now we recall the notion of semipositivity for algebraic metrics. A curve in is vertical if it is contained in .
Definition 2.26.
Let be an algebraic metric on and set . We say that is semipositive if there is a model of that induces the metric such that, for every vertical curve in ,
With the hypothesis in Proposition 2.19, the inverse image of a semipositive algebraic metric is also a semipositive algebraic metric.
Example 2.27.
The canonical metric in Example 2.25 is semipositive: for a vertical curve , its degree with respect to equals its degree with respect to the restriction of this model to the special fibre. This restriction identifies with , the universal line bundle of , which is ample. Hence all the metrics obtained by inverse image of the canonical metric of are also semipositive.
Finally, we recall the definition of the signed measures associated with algebraic metrics.
Definition 2.28.
Let , , be line bundles on equipped with algebraic metrics. For each , choose a model that realizes the metric of . We can assume without loss of generality that the models agree with a common model . Let be a -dimensional subvariety of and its analytification. Let be the closure of , be its normalization, its special fibre, and the set of irreducible components of this special fibre. For each , consider the point defined by (2.15). Let be the Dirac delta measure on supported on . We define a discrete signed measure on by
| (2.29) |
This notion extends by linearity to the group of -dimensional cycles of .
This signed measure only depends on the metrics and not on the particular choice of models [Cha06, Proposition 2.7]. Observe that is the multiplicity of the component in and that the total mass of this measure equals . If is semipositive for all and is effective, this signed measure is a measure.
2.4. Approachable and integrable metrics, measures and local heights
Let be either or (the Archimedean case) as in §2.1, or a complete field with respect to a nontrivial non-Archimedean absolute value (the non-Archimedean case) as in §2.3. Let be a proper variety over . Its analytification will be a complex analytic space in the Archimedean case (equipped with an anti-linear involution when ), or an analytic space in the sense of Berkovich, in the non-Archimedean case. A metrized line bundle on is a pair , where is a line bundle on and is a metric on . Recall that the operations on line bundles of tensor product, dual and inverse image under a morphism extend to metrized line bundles.
Given two metrics and on , their quotient defines a continuous function given by for any local section of not vanishing at . The distance between and is defined as the supremum of the absolute value of the logarithm of this function. In other words,
for any non-zero rational section of .
Definition 2.31.
Let be a metrized line bundle on . The metric is approachable if there exists a sequence of semipositive smooth (in the Archimedean case) or semipositive algebraic (in the non-Archimedean case) metrics on such that
If this is the case, we say that is approachable. This metrized line bundle is integrable if there are approachable line bundles , such that .
The tensor product and the inverse image of approachable line bundles are also approachable. The tensor product, the dual and the inverse image of integrable line bundles are also integrable.
Example 2.32.
Let be the projective space over and . The canonical metric of is the metric given, for , by
for any rational section of defined at and the homogeneous rational function associated to .
This is an approachable metric. Indeed, consider the -power map defined as . The -th root of the inverse image by of the Fubini-Study metric of is the semipositive smooth metric on given by
The family of metrics obtained varying converges uniformly to the canonical metric.
Proposition 2.33.
Let be a -dimensional subvariety of and , , a collection of approachable metrized line bundles on . For each , let be a sequence of semipositive smooth (in the Archimedean case) or algebraic (in the non-Archimedean case) metrics on that converge to . Then the measures converge weakly to a measure on .
Proof.
Definition 2.34.
Let , , be a collection of approachable metrized line bundles on . For a -dimensional subvariety , we denote by the limit measure in Proposition 2.33. For integrable bundles and a -dimensional cycle of , we can associate a signed measure on by multilinearity.
This signed measure behaves well under field extensions.
Proposition 2.35.
With the previous notation, let be a finite extension of . Set and let be the induced map. Let , , be the line bundles with algebraic metrics on obtained by base change. Then
Proof.
This follows from [Gub07, Remark 3.10]. ∎
We also have the following functorial property.
Proposition 2.36.
Let be a morphism of proper varieties over , a -dimensional cycle of , and , , a collection of integrable metrized line bundles on . Then
Proof.
In the non-Archimedean, this follows from [Gub07, Corollary 3.9(2)]. In the Archimedean case, this follows from the functoriality of Chern classes, the projection formula, and the continuity of direct image of measures. ∎
These signed measures allow us to integrate continuous functions on . Indeed, it is also possible to integrate certain functions with logarithmic singularities that play an important role in the definition of local heights.
Proposition 2.37.
Let be a -dimensional cycle of , , , a collection of integrable metrized line bundles, and a rational section of such that intersects properly. Then is integrable with respect to the measure .
Proof.
This is proved in [CT09, Theorem 4.1] for completions of number fields. The argument can be easily extended to cover the general case. ∎
Definition 2.38.
Let be a -dimensional cycle of and a line bundle on and a rational section of , . We say that meet properly if, for all ,
Definition 2.39.
The local height on is the function that, to each -dimensional cycle and each family of integrable metrized line bundles with sections , , such that the sections meet properly, associates a real number determined inductively by the properties:
- (1)
;
- (2)
if is a cycle of dimension , then
In particular, for ,
| (2.40) |
Remark 2.41.
Definition 2.39 works better when the variety is projective. In this case, for every cycle there exist sections that meet properly, thanks to the moving lemma. This does not necessarily occur for arbitrary proper varieties. Nevertheless, we will be able to define the global height (Definition 2.56) of any cycle of a proper variety by using Chow’s lemma. Similarly we will be able to define the toric local height (Definition 6.1) of any cycle of a proper toric variety.
Remark 2.42.
When is regular and the metrics are smooth (in the Archimedean case) or algebraic (in the non-Archimedean case), the local heights of Definition 2.39 agree with the local heights that can be derived using the Gillet-Soulé arithmetic intersection product. In particular, in the Archimedean case, this local height agrees with the Archimedean contribution of the Arakelov global height introduced by Bost, Gillet and Soulé in [BGS94]. In the non-Archimedean case, the local height can be interpreted in terms of an intersection product. Assume that is prime and choose models of that realize the algebraic metrics of . Without loss of generality, we may assume that all the models agree with a common model . The sections can be seen as rational sections of over . With the notations in Definition 2.28, the equation (2.15) implies that
Therefore, in this case the equation in Definition 2.39(2) can be written as
| (2.43) |
Remark 2.44.
It is a fundamental observation by Zhang [Zha95b] that the non-Archimedean contribution of the Arakelov global height of a variety can be expressed in terms of a family of metrics. In particular, this global height only depends on the metrics and not on a particular choice of models, exhibiting the analogy between the Archimedean and non-Archimedean settings. The local heights were extended by Gubler [Gub02, Gub03] to non-necessarily discrete valuations and he also weakened the hypothesis of proper intersection.
Remark 2.45.
The local heights of Definition 2.39 agree with the local heights introduced by Gubler, see [Gub03, Proposition 3.5] for the Archimedean case and [Gub03, Remark 9.4] for the non-Archimedean case. In the Archimedean case, the local height in [Gub03] is defined in terms of a refined star product of Green currents based on [Bur94]. The hypothesis needed in Gubler’s definition of local heights are weaker than the ones we use. We have chosen the current definition because it is more elementary and suffices for our purposes.
Theorem 2.46.
The local height function satisfies the following properties.
- (1)
It is symmetric and multilinear with respect to in the pairs , , provided that all terms are defined.
- (2)
Let be a morphism of proper varieties over , a -dimensional cycle of , and an integrable metrized line bundle on and a section, . Then
provided that both terms are defined.
- (3)
Let be the zero-cycle and a rational function such that the section meets properly. Then
where, if , then .
- (4)
Let be another choice of metric. Then
is independent of the choice of sections.
2.5. Adelic metrics and global heights
To define global heights, we first introduce the notion of adelic field, which is a generalization of the notion of global field. In [Gub03] one can find a more general theory of global heights based on the concept of -fields.
Definition 2.47.
Let be a field and a family of absolute values on with real weights. For each we denote by the corresponding absolute value, by the weight, and by the completion of with respect to . We say that is an adelic field if
- (1)
for each , the absolute value is Archimedean or associated to a nontrivial discrete valuation;
- (2)
for each , except a for a finite number of .
Observe that the complete fields are either , or of the kind of fields considered in §2.3.
Definition 2.48.
Let be an adelic field. For , the defect of is
Since is a group homomorphism, we have that is a subgroup of . If , then is said to satisfy the product formula. The group of global heights of is .
Let be an adelic field and a finite extension of . For each , put for the set of absolute values of that extend , with weight
Set . Then is an adelic field and . In particular, if satisfies the product formula so does .
Example 2.49.
Let be the set of places of , where the corresponding absolute values are normalized in the standard way. Then is an adelic field that satisfies the product formula. If is a number field, by the construction above, we obtain an adelic field which satisfies the product formula too.
Example 2.50.
Let be a irreducible projective variety over a field , which is regular in codimension 1, and an ample line bundle on . Set . For a prime divisor on and , we denote by the order of at . Fix a constant and denote by the set of prime divisors on . For each , the corresponding absolute value and weight are defined as
Then is an adelic field. Moreover, satisfies the product formula, since the degree of a principal divisor is zero,
Definition 2.51.
Definition 2.52.
Let be an adelic field. Let be a proper variety over and a line bundle on . For each set and .
- (1)
A metric on is a family of metrics , , where is a metric on . We will denote by the corresponding metrized line bundle. The metric is said to be approachable (respectively integrable) if the metrics are approachable (respectively integrable) for all .
- (2)
Suppose that is a global field. A metric on is called quasi-algebraic if there exists a finite subset containing the Archimedean places, an integer and a proper model over of such that, for each , the metric is induced by the localization of this model at .
Definition 2.53.
Let be an adelic field, a proper variety over and , , a family of integrable metrized line bundles on . Let be a -dimensional cycle of . We say that is integrable with respect to if there is a proper map , a cycle of such that , and rational sections of , , that intersect properly and such that for all but a finite number of ,
| (2.54) |
where denotes the local height function on .
The notion of integrability of cycles is stable under tensor product and inverse image of integrable metrized line bundles, thanks to Theorem 2.46(1,2). For an integrable cycle , the condition (2.54) is satisfied for any choice of morphism , cycle and sections that intersect properly, thanks to the definition of adelic field and Theorem 2.46(3).
We are mainly interested in global fields and quasi-algebraic metrics. In this case, all cycles are integrable.
Proposition 2.55.
Let be a global field and a proper variety over of dimension . Let and let , , be a family of line bundles with quasi-algebraic integrable metrics. Then every -dimensional cycle of is integrable with respect to .
Proof.
It is enough to prove that every prime cycle is integrable. Applying the Chow Lemma to the support of the cycle and using that the inverse image of a quasi-algebraic metric is quasi-algebraic, we are reduced to the case when is projective.
We proceed by induction on . For , the statement is clear, and so we consider the case when . Let be a -dimensional cycle of and , , rational sections of that intersect properly. Let be a proper model over of . Then is a non-zero rational section of and so it defines a finite number of vertical components. Hence, for all places which are not below any of these vertical components,
thanks to the equation (2.43). The statement follows then from the inductive hypothesis. ∎
Definition 2.56.
Let be a proper variety over , integrable metrized line bundles on , and an integrable -dimensional cycle of . Let , and be as in Definition 2.53. The global height of with respect to is defined as
The global height of , denoted , is the class of in the quotient group .
The global height is well-defined as an element of because of Theorem 2.46(3). In particular, if satisfies the product formula, the global height is a well-defined real number.
Theorem 2.57.
The global height of integrable cycles satisfies the following properties.
- (1)
It is symmetric and multilinear with respect to tensor products of integrable metrized line bundles.
- (2)
Let be a morphism of proper varieties over , , , integrable metrized line bundles on , and an integrable -dimensional cycle of . Then