Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.
Source coverage notes Source fidelity gap: the original arXiv HTML omits an author TeX footnote attached to equation e:def-omega, including its reference to Remark r:error-function. The retained HTML is preserved as published; the original author TeX remains available. TeX correspondence is not complete. Complete original source context · Original author HTML
Proof.
We need to calculate the expansion for d w 1 ∧ … ∧ d w n − 1 dw_{1}\wedge\ldots\wedge dw_{n-1} .
First, by Lemma 3.27 ,
(3.339)
d w 1 = a 1 ( d y + y d H log a 1 ) + O ~ ( | y | ) d y + O ~ ( | y | 2 ) , dw_{1}=a_{1}(dy+yd_{H}\log a_{1})+\widetilde{O}(|y|)dy+\widetilde{O}(|y|^{2}),
where a 1 = | σ | − 1 a_{1}=|\sigma|^{-1} .
Notice that
(3.340)
d H log a 1 = 2 ∂ H log a 1 − − 1 d H c log a 1 . d_{H}\log a_{1}=2\partial_{H}\log a_{1}-\sqrt{-1}d_{H}^{c}\log a_{1}.
Applying Lemma 3.25 ,
(3.341)
d H log a 1 = 2 ( ∂ H log a 1 + − 1 Γ ) . d_{H}\log a_{1}=2(\partial_{H}\log a_{1}+\sqrt{-1}\Gamma).
Next, applying Lemma 3.27 to w j w_{j} ’s for j ≥ 2 j\geq 2 ,
(3.342)
d w j = d w j ′ + c j d y + y d c j + O ~ ( | y | ) d y + O ~ ( | y | 2 ) . dw_{j}=dw_{j}^{\prime}+c_{j}dy+ydc_{j}+\widetilde{O}(|y|)dy+\widetilde{O}(|y|^{2}).
Since it holds that
(3.343)
∂ H log a 1 ∧ Ω H ≡ 0 , \partial_{H}\log a_{1}\wedge\Omega_{H}\equiv 0,
then taking the wedge product,
(3.344)
d w 1 ∧ ⋯ ∧ d w n − 1 = a 1 ( d y + 2 − 1 y Γ ) ∧ Ω H + O ~ ( | y | ) d y + O ~ ( | y | 2 ) . dw_{1}\wedge\cdots\wedge dw_{n-1}=a_{1}(dy+2\sqrt{-1}y\Gamma)\wedge\Omega_{H}+\widetilde{O}(|y|)dy+\widetilde{O}(|y|^{2}).
On the other hand, we have the expansion of f f ,
(3.345)
f = f | H + ∂ f ∂ y | H ⋅ y + ∂ f ∂ y ¯ | H ⋅ y ¯ + O ~ ( | y | 2 ) . f=f|_{H}+\frac{\partial f}{\partial y}|_{H}\cdot y+\frac{\partial f}{\partial\bar{y}}|_{H}\cdot\bar{y}+\widetilde{O}(|y|^{2}).
Therefore,
(3.346)
Ω D = f | H a 1 ( d y + 2 − 1 y Γ ) ∧ Ω H + O ~ ( | y | ) d y + O ~ ( | y | 2 ) . \Omega_{D}=f|_{H}a_{1}(dy+2\sqrt{-1}y\Gamma)\wedge\Omega_{H}+\widetilde{O}(|y|)dy+\widetilde{O}(|y|^{2}).
So we obtain the conclusion by taking F = f | H ⋅ a 1 F=f|_{H}\cdot a_{1} .