ScalingStacks

Proof. [050G]

Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.

Complete original source context Β· Original author HTML

Proof.

Let π”Ÿ0≑Hα​yΞ±4​r​d​y1∧d​y2∧d​y3\mathfrak{b}_{0}\equiv\frac{H^{\alpha}y_{\alpha}}{4r}dy_{1}\wedge dy_{2}\wedge dy_{3}, then Item (2) of Lemma 3.19 tells us that

(3.193) Ξ”β€‹π”Ÿ0=Hα​yΞ±2​r3​d​y1∧d​y2∧d​y3+rβˆ’5​Γ3(4)+O′​(1).\Delta\mathfrak{b}_{0}=\frac{H^{\alpha}y_{\alpha}}{2r^{3}}dy_{1}\wedge dy_{2}\wedge dy_{3}+r^{-5}\Gamma_{3}^{(4)}+O^{\prime}(1).

Let Ξ (4)\Pi^{(4)} be the 33-form in the expansion of Δ​ϕ1\Delta\phi_{1} given by (3.119) in Proposition 3.15.

Next, Lemma 3.18 and Lemma 3.19 tell us that there are 33-forms Ξ“^3(4)\widehat{\Gamma}_{3}^{(4)} and Ξ ^3(4)\widehat{\Pi}_{3}^{(4)} which are also of the form as in (3.45) such that

(3.194) Δ⁑(rβˆ’3​Γ^3(4))=βˆ’rβˆ’5​Γ3(4)+O′​(1),\displaystyle\Delta(r^{-3}\widehat{\Gamma}_{3}^{(4)})=-r^{-5}\Gamma_{3}^{(4)}+O^{\prime}(1),
(3.195) Δ⁑(rβˆ’3​Π^3(4))=βˆ’rβˆ’5​Π3(4)+O′​(1).\displaystyle\Delta(r^{-3}\widehat{\Pi}_{3}^{(4)})=-r^{-5}\Pi_{3}^{(4)}+O^{\prime}(1).

Now let

(3.196) π”Ÿ1≑rβˆ’3​Γ^3(4)+rβˆ’3​Π^3(4),\mathfrak{b}_{1}\equiv r^{-3}\widehat{\Gamma}_{3}^{(4)}+r^{-3}\widehat{\Pi}_{3}^{(4)},

then the correction term π”Ÿ0+π”Ÿ1\mathfrak{b}_{0}+\mathfrak{b}_{1} is chosen as the above such that Δ⁑(π”Ÿ0+π”Ÿ1)\Delta(\mathfrak{b}_{0}+\mathfrak{b}_{1}) in fact eliminates the O′​(rβˆ’2)O^{\prime}(r^{-2})-term and implicit O′​(rβˆ’1)O^{\prime}(r^{-1})-terms in the expansion of Δ​ϕ1\Delta\phi_{1} (see Proposition 3.15).

In the following, we will make a further correction such that those explicit O′​(rβˆ’1)O^{\prime}(r^{-1})-terms will be cancelled out as well. In fact, we define

(3.197) π”Ÿ2≑(Ξ©i​j​α​β​(116​yα​β^​d​rβˆ’316​r​d​yα​β^)βˆ’116​Ai​j​α​β​(yα​β^​d​r+r​d​yα​β^))∧d​xi∧d​xj,\mathfrak{b}_{2}\equiv\Big(\Omega_{ij\alpha\beta}(\frac{1}{16}y_{\widehat{\alpha\beta}}dr-\frac{3}{16}rdy_{\widehat{\alpha\beta}})-\frac{1}{16}A_{ij\alpha\beta}(y_{\widehat{\alpha\beta}}dr+rdy_{\widehat{\alpha\beta}})\Big)\wedge dx_{i}\wedge dx_{j},

applying Lemma 3.18 and Lemma 3.19 again, then

(3.198) Ξ”β€‹π”Ÿ2=Ξ©i​j​α​β​(14​r​d​yβ​α^+yα​β^4​r2​d​r)∧d​xi∧d​xjβˆ’Ai​j​α​β​(yα​β^4​r2​d​rβˆ’14​r​d​yα​β^)∧d​xi∧d​xj,\Delta\mathfrak{b}_{2}=\Omega_{ij\alpha\beta}\Big(\frac{1}{4r}dy_{\widehat{\beta\alpha}}+\frac{y_{\widehat{\alpha\beta}}}{4r^{2}}dr\Big)\wedge dx_{i}\wedge dx_{j}-A_{ij\alpha\beta}\Big(\frac{y_{\widehat{\alpha\beta}}}{4r^{2}}dr-\frac{1}{4r}dy_{\widehat{\alpha\beta}}\Big)\wedge dx_{i}\wedge dx_{j},

and hence

(3.199) Δ⁑(Ο•1+π”Ÿ0+π”Ÿ1+π”Ÿ2)=O′​(1).\Delta(\phi_{1}+\mathfrak{b}_{0}+\mathfrak{b}_{1}+\mathfrak{b}_{2})=O^{\prime}(1).

Therefore, it suffices to choose the correction term

(3.200) 𝔅0β‰‘π”Ÿ0+π”Ÿ1+π”Ÿ2,\mathfrak{B}_{0}\equiv\mathfrak{b}_{0}+\mathfrak{b}_{1}+\mathfrak{b}_{2},

which gives Δ⁑(Ο•1+𝔅0)=O′​(1)\Delta(\phi_{1}+\mathfrak{B}_{0})=O^{\prime}(1).

Notice that, π”Ÿ2\mathfrak{b}_{2} has a further cancellation,

π”Ÿ2=\displaystyle\mathfrak{b}_{2}= (Ξ©i​j​α​β​(116​yα​β^​d​rβˆ’316​r​d​yα​β^)βˆ’116​Ai​j​α​β​(yα​β^​d​r+r​d​yα​β^))∧d​xi∧d​xj,\displaystyle\Big(\Omega_{ij\alpha\beta}(\frac{1}{16}y_{\widehat{\alpha\beta}}dr-\frac{3}{16}rdy_{\widehat{\alpha\beta}})-\frac{1}{16}A_{ij\alpha\beta}(y_{\widehat{\alpha\beta}}dr+rdy_{\widehat{\alpha\beta}})\Big)\wedge dx_{i}\wedge dx_{j},
=\displaystyle= βˆ’14​Ai​j​α​β​r​d​yα​β^∧d​xi∧d​xjβˆ’116​(Ai,Ξ±,Ξ±+1​Aj,Ξ±,Ξ±+2βˆ’Ai,Ξ±,Ξ±+2​Aj,Ξ±,Ξ±+1)​yα​d​r∧d​xi∧d​xj\displaystyle-\frac{1}{4}A_{ij\alpha\beta}rdy_{\widehat{\alpha\beta}}\wedge dx_{i}\wedge dx_{j}-\frac{1}{16}(A_{i,\alpha,\alpha+1}A_{j,\alpha,\alpha+2}-A_{i,\alpha,\alpha+2}A_{j,\alpha,\alpha+1})y_{\alpha}dr\wedge dx_{i}\wedge dx_{j}
(3.201) +316​(Ai,Ξ±,Ξ±+1​Aj,Ξ±,Ξ±+2βˆ’Ai,Ξ±,Ξ±+2​Aj,Ξ±,Ξ±+1)​r​d​yα∧d​xi∧d​xj.\displaystyle+\frac{3}{16}(A_{i,\alpha,\alpha+1}A_{j,\alpha,\alpha+2}-A_{i,\alpha,\alpha+2}A_{j,\alpha,\alpha+1})rdy_{\alpha}\wedge dx_{i}\wedge dx_{j}.

Therefore,

Ο•2=\displaystyle\phi_{2}= Ο•1+𝔅0\displaystyle\phi_{1}+\mathfrak{B}_{0}
=\displaystyle= 12​r​(1βˆ’Hα​yΞ±2)​d​y1∧d​y2∧d​y3+12​r​yβ​Ai​α​β​d​xi∧d​yΞ±^βˆ’14​Ai​j​α​β​rβ‹…d​yα​β^∧d​xi∧d​xj\displaystyle\frac{1}{2r}(1-\frac{H^{\alpha}y_{\alpha}}{2})dy_{1}\wedge dy_{2}\wedge dy_{3}+\frac{1}{2r}y_{\beta}A_{i\alpha\beta}dx_{i}\wedge dy_{\widehat{\alpha}}-\frac{1}{4}A_{ij\alpha\beta}r\cdot dy_{\widehat{\alpha\beta}}\wedge dx_{i}\wedge dx_{j}
(3.202) +316​(Ai​α,Ξ±+1​Aj​α,Ξ±+2βˆ’Ai​α,Ξ±+2​Aj​α,Ξ±+1)​d​(r​yΞ±)∧d​xi∧d​xj+rβˆ’3​Π3(4)+O′​(r2),\displaystyle+\frac{3}{16}(A_{i\alpha,\alpha+1}A_{j\alpha,\alpha+2}-A_{i\alpha,\alpha+2}A_{j\alpha,\alpha+1})d(ry_{\alpha})\wedge dx_{i}\wedge dx_{j}+r^{-3}\Pi_{3}^{(4)}+O^{\prime}(r^{2}),

and

(3.203) Δ​ϕ2=O′​(1).\Delta\phi_{2}=O^{\prime}(1).

∎

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source-backed reader collection; mathematical self-containment is not assessed.