ScalingStacks

Proof. [02Y7]

Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.

Complete original source context · Original author HTML

Proof.

Write ψ=ψL¯,s\psi=\psi_{{\overline{L}},s} for short. First we consider the Archimedean case. We have that q=|pr|2​∏i(z−ξi)ℓiq=|p_{r}|^{2}\prod_{i}(z-\xi_{i})^{\ell_{i}}. By Proposition 8.1,

ψ⁡(u)=−12​log⁡(q⁡(e−2​u))=−log⁡|pr|−12​∑iℓi​log​|e−2​u−ξi|,\psi(u)=-\frac{1}{2}\log(q(\operatorname{e}^{-2u}))=-\log|p_{r}|-\frac{1}{2}\sum_{i}\ell_{i}\log|\operatorname{e}^{-2u}-\xi_{i}|,

which proves (1). Hence,

ψ′​(u)=∑iℓi​11−ξi​e2​uandψ′′​(u)=∑i2​ℓi​ξi​e2​u(1−ξi​e2​u)2.\psi^{\prime}(u)=\sum_{i}\ell_{i}\frac{1}{1-\xi_{i}\operatorname{e}^{2u}}\quad\text{and}\quad\psi^{\prime\prime}(u)=\sum_{i}2\ell_{i}\frac{\xi_{i}\operatorname{e}^{2u}}{(1-\xi_{i}\operatorname{e}^{2u})^{2}}.

The Monge-Ampère measure of ψ\psi is given by −ψ′′​d​u-\psi^{\prime\prime}\,\text{\rm d}u, and so the above proves (2). To prove (3) we apply Lemma 8.6. We have that stab⁡(ψ)=[0,mr]\operatorname{stab}(\psi)=[0,m_{r}], ψ∨​(0)=0\psi^{\vee}(0)=0, and ψ∨​(mr)=log⁡|pr|\psi^{\vee}(m_{r})=\log|p_{r}|. Thus,

(8.9) hL¯tor⁡(Y)=mr​log⁡|pr|+∫−∞∞(mr−ψ′)​ψ′​d​u.\operatorname{h}^{\operatorname{tor}}_{{\overline{L}}}(Y)=m_{r}\log|p_{r}|+\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}(m_{r}-\psi^{\prime})\psi^{\prime}\,\text{\rm d}u.

We have mr−ψ′(u)=∑iℓi(1−11−ξi​e2​u)=−∑iℓiξi​e2​u1−ξi​e2​u\displaystyle m_{r}-\psi^{\prime}(u)=\sum_{i}\ell_{i}\bigg(1-\frac{1}{1-\xi_{i}\operatorname{e}^{2u}}\bigg)=-\sum_{i}\ell_{i}\frac{\xi_{i}\operatorname{e}^{2u}}{1-\xi_{i}\operatorname{e}^{2u}}. Hence,

(mr−ψ′​(u))​ψ′​(u)=−(∑iℓi​ξi​e2​u1−ξi​e2​u)​(∑jℓj​11−ξj​e2​u)=−∑iℓi2ξi​e2​u(1−ξi​e2​u)2−∑i≠jℓiℓjξi​e2​u(1−ξi​e2​u)​(1−ξj​e2​u).(m_{r}-\psi^{\prime}(u))\psi^{\prime}(u)=-\bigg(\sum_{i}\ell_{i}\frac{\xi_{i}\operatorname{e}^{2u}}{1-\xi_{i}\operatorname{e}^{2u}}\bigg)\bigg(\sum_{j}\ell_{j}\frac{1}{1-\xi_{j}\operatorname{e}^{2u}}\bigg)\\ =-\sum_{i}\ell_{i}^{2}\frac{\xi_{i}\operatorname{e}^{2u}}{(1-\xi_{i}\operatorname{e}^{2u})^{2}}-\sum_{i\neq j}\ell_{i}\ell_{j}\frac{\xi_{i}\operatorname{e}^{2u}}{(1-\xi_{i}\operatorname{e}^{2u})(1-\xi_{j}\operatorname{e}^{2u})}.

Moreover ∫−∞∞ξi​e2​u(1−ξi​e2​u)2​d​u=[12​(1−ξi​e2​u)]−∞∞=−12\displaystyle\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}\frac{\xi_{i}\operatorname{e}^{2u}}{(1-\xi_{i}\operatorname{e}^{2u})^{2}}\,\text{\rm d}u=\bigg[\frac{1}{2(1-\xi_{i}\operatorname{e}^{2u})}\bigg]^{\infty}_{-\infty}=-\frac{1}{2} and

∫−∞∞ξi​e2​u(1−ξi​e2​u)​(1−ξj​e2​u)​d​u=[ξi2​(ξi−ξj)​(log⁡(1−ξj​e2​u))−log⁡(1−ξi​e2​u)]−∞∞=ξi2​(ξi−ξj)​(log⁡(−ξi)−log⁡(−ξj)),\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}\frac{\xi_{i}\operatorname{e}^{2u}}{(1-\xi_{i}\operatorname{e}^{2u})(1-\xi_{j}\operatorname{e}^{2u})}\,\text{\rm d}u=\bigg[\frac{\xi_{i}}{2(\xi_{i}-\xi_{j})}(\log(1-\xi_{j}\operatorname{e}^{2u}))-\log(1-\xi_{i}\operatorname{e}^{2u})\bigg]^{\infty}_{-\infty}\\ =\frac{\xi_{i}}{2(\xi_{i}-\xi_{j})}(\log(-\xi_{i})-\log(-\xi_{j})),

for the principal determination of log\log. These calculations together with equation (8.9) imply that

hL¯tor⁡(Y)=mr​log⁡|pr|+12​∑iℓi2+12​∑i≠jℓi​ℓj​ξiξi−ξj​(log⁡(−ξi)−log⁡(−ξj))=mr​log⁡|pr|+12​∑iℓi2+12​∑i<jℓi​ℓj​ξi+ξjξi−ξj​(log⁡(−ξi)−log⁡(−ξj)),\operatorname{h}^{\operatorname{tor}}_{{\overline{L}}}(Y)=m_{r}\log|p_{r}|+\frac{1}{2}\sum_{i}\ell_{i}^{2}+\frac{1}{2}\sum_{i\neq j}\ell_{i}\ell_{j}\frac{\xi_{i}}{\xi_{i}-\xi_{j}}(\log(-\xi_{i})-\log(-\xi_{j}))\\ =m_{r}\log|p_{r}|+\frac{1}{2}\sum_{i}\ell_{i}^{2}+\frac{1}{2}\sum_{i<j}\ell_{i}\ell_{j}\frac{\xi_{i}+\xi_{j}}{\xi_{i}-\xi_{j}}(\log(-\xi_{i})-\log(-\xi_{j})),

which proves (3).

Next we consider the non-Archimedean case. Let U⊂K¯×U\subset{\overline{K}}^{\times} be a sufficiently small open subset and ζ∈U\zeta\in U. For short, write vi=valK¯⁡(ξi)v_{i}={\operatorname{val}}_{{\overline{K}}}(\xi_{i}). By Proposition 8.1, the genericity of ζ\zeta, and the condition mi≠mjm_{i}\not=m_{j} for i≠ji\not=j, imply

ψ⁡(valK¯⁡(ζ))=mini⁡{0,mi​valK¯⁡(ζ)+valK⁡(pi)}=valK¯⁡(q⁡(ζ)).\psi({\operatorname{val}}_{{\overline{K}}}(\zeta))=\min_{i}\{0,m_{i}{\operatorname{val}}_{{\overline{K}}}(\zeta)+{\operatorname{val}}_{K}(p_{i})\}={\operatorname{val}}_{{\overline{K}}}(q(\zeta)).

By the factorization of qq,

valK¯⁡(q⁡(ζ))=valK⁡(pr)+∑iℓi​valK¯⁡(ζ−ξi)=valK⁡(pr)+∑iℓi​min​{valK¯⁡(ζ),vi}.{\operatorname{val}}_{{\overline{K}}}(q(\zeta))={\operatorname{val}}_{K}(p_{r})+\sum_{i}\ell_{i}{\operatorname{val}}_{{\overline{K}}}(\zeta-\xi_{i})={\operatorname{val}}_{K}(p_{r})+\sum_{i}\ell_{i}\min\{{\operatorname{val}}_{{\overline{K}}}(\zeta),v_{i}\}.

The image of valK¯:K¯×→ℝ{\operatorname{val}}_{{\overline{K}}}\colon{\overline{K}}^{\times}\to\mathbb{R} is a dense subset. We deduce that, u∈ℝu\in\mathbb{R},

ψ⁡(u)=valK⁡(pr)+∑iℓi​min​{u,valK⁡(ξi)},\psi(u)={\operatorname{val}}_{K}(p_{r})+\sum_{i}\ell_{i}\min\{u,{\operatorname{val}}_{K}(\xi_{i})\},

which proves (4). The gradient of this function is, for u∈ℝu\in\mathbb{R},

∂ψ(u)={[∑j:vj>viℓj,∑j:vj≥viℓj] if ​u=vi​ for some ​i,∑j:vj>xℓj otherwise.\partial\psi(u)=\begin{cases}\Big[\sum_{j:v_{j}>v_{i}}\ell_{j},\sum_{j:v_{j}\geq v_{i}}\ell_{j}\Big]&\text{ if }u=v_{i}\text{ for some }i,\\ \sum_{j:v_{j}>x}\ell_{j}&\text{ otherwise.}\end{cases}

Hence, the associated Monge-Ampère measure is ∑iℓi​δvi,\sum_{i}\ell_{i}\delta_{v_{i}}, which proves (5). The derivative of ψ\psi in the sense of (8.5) is, for u∈ℝu\in\mathbb{R},

ψ′(u)={∑j:vj>viℓj+12∑j:vj=viℓj if ​u=vi​ for some ​i,∑j:vj>xℓj otherwise.\psi^{\prime}(u)=\begin{cases}\sum_{j:v_{j}>v_{i}}\ell_{j}+\frac{1}{2}\sum_{j:v_{j}=v_{i}}\ell_{j}&\text{ if }u=v_{i}\text{ for some }i,\\ \sum_{j:v_{j}>x}\ell_{j}&\text{ otherwise.}\end{cases}

Moreover, stab⁡(ψ)=[0,mr]\operatorname{stab}(\psi)=[0,m_{r}], ψ∨​(0)=0\psi^{\vee}(0)=0 and ψ∨​(mr)=−valK⁡(pr)\psi^{\vee}(m_{r})=-{\operatorname{val}}_{K}(p_{r}). By Lemma 8.6

(8.10) hL¯tor⁡(Y)=−mr​λK​valK⁡(pr)+λK​∫−∞∞(mr−ψ′)​ψ′​d​u.\operatorname{h}^{\operatorname{tor}}_{{\overline{L}}}(Y)=-m_{r}\lambda_{K}{\operatorname{val}}_{K}(p_{r})+\lambda_{K}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}(m_{r}-\psi^{\prime})\psi^{\prime}\,\text{\rm d}u.

If we write

fi​(u)={0, if ​x≤viℓi, if ​x>vi,f_{i}(u)=\begin{cases}0,&\text{ if }x\leq v_{i}\\ \ell_{i},&\text{ if }x>v_{i},\end{cases}

then, we have that, almost everywhere ψ′​(u)=∑iℓi−fi​(u)\psi^{\prime}(u)=\sum_{i}\ell_{i}-f_{i}(u) and mr−ψ′​(u)=∑ifim_{r}-\psi^{\prime}(u)=\sum_{i}f_{i}. Therefore

(8.11) ∫−∞∞(mr−ψ′)​ψ′​d​u=∑i,j∫−∞∞fi​(ℓj−fj)​d​u=∑i,jℓi​ℓj​max⁡{0,vj−vi}.\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}(m_{r}-\psi^{\prime})\psi^{\prime}\,\text{\rm d}u=\sum_{i,j}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}f_{i}(\ell_{j}-f_{j})\,\text{\rm d}u=\sum_{i,j}\ell_{i}\ell_{j}\max\{0,v_{j}-v_{i}\}.

Thus, joining together (8.10), (8.11) and the relation log⁡(|ζ|)=−λK​valK⁡(ζ)\log(|\zeta|)=-\lambda_{K}{\operatorname{val}}_{K}(\zeta) we deduce

hL¯tor⁡(Y)=mr​log​|pr|+∑i,jℓi​ℓj​max​{0,log⁡(|ξi|/|ξj|)},\operatorname{h}^{\operatorname{tor}}_{{\overline{L}}}(Y)=m_{r}\log|p_{r}|+\sum_{i,j}\ell_{i}\ell_{j}\max\{0,\log(|\xi_{i}|/|\xi_{j}|)\},

finishing the proof of the theorem. ∎

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source-backed reader collection; mathematical self-containment is not assessed.