ScalingStacks

5.1.2. Case for general ( X , L ) [00NF]

Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.

Complete original source context · Original author HTML

5.1.2. Case for general (X,L)(X,L)

Proposition 5.7.

Assume that ϕ\phi is a Fubini-Study metric. If LL is very ample, then V^∙​(L,ϕ)\widehat{V}_{{\scriptscriptstyle\bullet}}(L,\phi), V^​(LX|Y,ϕX|Y)\widehat{V}(L_{X|Y},\phi_{X|Y}) and V^∙​(L|Y,ϕ|Y)\widehat{V}_{{\scriptscriptstyle\bullet}}(L|_{Y},\phi|_{Y}) are affinoid algebras.

Proof.

By the assumption, the elements of V1​(L)V_{1}(L) induces an embedding

ι1:X→ℙkd1\iota_{1}:X\rightarrow\mathbb{P}^{d_{1}}_{k}

such that ι1∗​𝒪​(1)=L\iota_{1}^{*}\mathscr{O}(1)=L with dimk​V1=d1+1\mathrm{dim}_{k}V_{1}=d_{1}+1. Moreover there exists a norm ∥⋅∥1\lVert\mathord{\cdot}\rVert_{1} on V1​(L)V_{1}(L) such that ϕ=FS⁡(∥⋅∥1)\phi=\mathrm{FS}(\lVert\mathord{\cdot}\rVert_{1}). View ∥⋅∥1\lVert\mathord{\cdot}\rVert_{1} as a norm on V1​(𝒪​(1))V_{1}(\mathscr{O}(1)), we get a metric ψ=FS⁡(∥⋅∥1)\psi=\mathrm{FS}(\lVert\mathord{\cdot}\rVert_{1}) on 𝒪⁡(1)\mathscr{O}(1). By construction ψ|X=ϕ\psi|_{X}=\phi.

By Proposition 5.6, the Banach algebra V^∙(𝒪(1),⦀⋅⦀ψ)\widehat{V}_{{\scriptscriptstyle\bullet}}(\mathscr{O}(1),\vvvert\mathord{\cdot}\vvvert_{\psi}) is an affinoid algebra. Hence the quotient Banach algebra V^∙(L,⦀⋅⦀ψ,ℙd1|X)\widehat{V}_{{\scriptscriptstyle\bullet}}(L,\vvvert\mathord{\cdot}\vvvert_{\psi,\mathbb{P}^{d_{1}}|X}) is an affinoid algebra.

By Proposition 3.27, the algebra norm ⦀⋅⦀ϕ\vvvert\mathord{\cdot}\vvvert_{\phi} is the spectral norm of ⦀⋅⦀ψ,ℙd1|X\vvvert\mathord{\cdot}\vvvert_{\psi,\mathbb{P}^{d_{1}}|X}. The later is an affinoid norm, hence is equivalent to its spectral norm by Proposition 2.58. So ⦀⋅⦀ϕ\vvvert\mathord{\cdot}\vvvert_{\phi} is also an affinoid algebra norm. Thus V^∙​(L,ϕ)\widehat{V}_{{\scriptscriptstyle\bullet}}(L,\phi) is an affinoid algebra.

Similarly, by Proposition 3.27, on V∙​(LX|Y)V_{{\scriptscriptstyle\bullet}}(L_{X|Y}), the algebra norm ⦀⋅⦀ϕ|Y\vvvert\mathord{\cdot}\vvvert_{\phi|_{Y}} is the spectral norm of ⦀⋅⦀ϕ,X|Y\vvvert\mathord{\cdot}\vvvert_{\phi,X|Y}, hence is itself an affinoid algebra norm. ∎

Corollary 5.8.

Assume that ϕ\phi is a Fubini-Study metric. If LL is just ample, then V^∙​(L,ϕ)\widehat{V}_{{\scriptscriptstyle\bullet}}(L,\phi), V^​(LX|Y,ϕX|Y)\widehat{V}(L_{X|Y},\phi_{X|Y}) and V^∙​(L|Y,ϕ|Y)\widehat{V}_{{\scriptscriptstyle\bullet}}(L|_{Y},\phi|_{Y}) are affinoid algebras.

Proof.

By assumption, L⊗ML^{\otimes M} is very ample. So V^∙(M)​(L,ϕ)\widehat{V}_{{\scriptscriptstyle\bullet}}^{(M)}(L,\phi), V^∙(M)​(LX|Y,ϕX|Y)\widehat{V}_{{\scriptscriptstyle\bullet}}^{(M)}(L_{X|Y},\phi_{X|Y}) and V^∙(M)​(L|Y,ϕ|Y)\widehat{V}_{{\scriptscriptstyle\bullet}}^{(M)}(L|_{Y},\phi|_{Y}) are affinoid algebras. Since V∙​(L)V_{{\scriptscriptstyle\bullet}}(L) is integral and is finite over V∙(M)​(L)V_{{\scriptscriptstyle\bullet}}^{(M)}(L), by Proposition 2.45, the Banach algebras V^∙​(L,ϕ)\widehat{V}_{{\scriptscriptstyle\bullet}}(L,\phi), V^​(LX|Y,ϕX|Y)\widehat{V}(L_{X|Y},\phi_{X|Y}) and V^∙​(L|Y,ϕ|Y)\widehat{V}_{{\scriptscriptstyle\bullet}}(L|_{Y},\phi|_{Y}) are Banach finite over V^∙(M)​(L,ϕ)\widehat{V}_{{\scriptscriptstyle\bullet}}^{(M)}(L,\phi), V^∙(M)​(LX|Y,ϕX|Y)\widehat{V}_{{\scriptscriptstyle\bullet}}^{(M)}(L_{X|Y},\phi_{X|Y}) and V^∙(M)​(L|Y,ϕ|Y)\widehat{V}_{{\scriptscriptstyle\bullet}}^{(M)}(L|_{Y},\phi|_{Y}) respectively. Hence they are affinoid algebras. ∎

Proposition 5.9.

Assume that ϕ\phi is a Fubini-Study metric. Then there exist C⁡(ϕ,Y)>0C(\phi,Y)>0 such that for any t¯∈V∙​(LX|Y)\underline{t}\in V_{{\scriptscriptstyle\bullet}}(L_{X|Y}), there exists s¯∈V∙​(L)\underline{s}\in V_{{\scriptscriptstyle\bullet}}(L) with

⦀s¯⦀ϕ≤C(ϕ,Y,X)⋅⦀t¯⦀ϕ|Y.\vvvert\underline{s}\vvvert_{\phi}\leq C(\phi,Y,X)\cdot\vvvert\underline{t}\vvvert_{\phi|_{Y}}.

In particular, for any n∈ℕn\in\mathbb{N} and tn∈V∙​(LX|Y)t_{n}\in V_{{\scriptscriptstyle\bullet}}(L_{X|Y}), there exists sn∈V∙​(L)s_{n}\in V_{{\scriptscriptstyle\bullet}}(L) with

∥sn∥n​ϕ≤C⁡(ϕ,Y,X)⋅∥tn∥n​ϕ|Y.\lVert s_{n}\rVert_{n\phi}\leq C(\phi,Y,X)\cdot\lVert t_{n}\rVert_{n\phi|_{Y}}.
Proof.

By Corollary 5.8, the Banach algebra norm ⦀⋅⦀ϕX|Y\vvvert\mathord{\cdot}\vvvert_{\phi_{X|Y}} is an affinoid algebra norm. By Proposition 2.58, there exists C⁡(ϕ,Y)>0C(\phi,Y)>0 such that

⦀⋅⦀ϕX|Y≤C(ϕ,Y,X)⋅⦀⋅⦀ϕX|Y;sp.\vvvert\mathord{\cdot}\vvvert_{\phi_{X|Y}}\leq C(\phi,Y,X)\cdot\vvvert\mathord{\cdot}\vvvert_{\phi_{X|Y};\mathrm{sp}}.

Since ⦀⋅⦀ϕX|Y;sp=⦀⋅⦀ϕ|Y\vvvert\mathord{\cdot}\vvvert_{\phi_{X|Y};\mathrm{sp}}=\vvvert\mathord{\cdot}\vvvert_{\phi|_{Y}} by Corollary 3.27, one gets the bounds. ∎

Remark 5.10.

With the metric finiteness properties of affinoid algebra norm, here the upper bound for metric extension of a Fubini-Study metric is much better than what was expected, compared to (3) or even to (2), for its (in)depence on n∈ℕn\in\mathbb{N}. This independence suggest that it would be reasonable to compare this affinoid algebra technique in this non-Archimedean setting with the use of Ohsawa-Takegoshi L2L^{2} extension technique in the complex analytic setting.

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source-backed reader collection; mathematical self-containment is not assessed.