5.1.2. Case for general ( X , L ) [00NF]
Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.
Complete original source context · Original author HTML
5.1.2. Case for general
Proposition 5.7.
Assume that is a Fubini-Study metric. If is very ample, then , and are affinoid algebras.
Proof.
By the assumption, the elements of induces an embedding
such that with . Moreover there exists a norm on such that . View as a norm on , we get a metric on . By construction .
By Proposition 5.6, the Banach algebra is an affinoid algebra. Hence the quotient Banach algebra is an affinoid algebra.
By Proposition 3.27, the algebra norm is the spectral norm of . The later is an affinoid norm, hence is equivalent to its spectral norm by Proposition 2.58. So is also an affinoid algebra norm. Thus is an affinoid algebra.
Similarly, by Proposition 3.27, on , the algebra norm is the spectral norm of , hence is itself an affinoid algebra norm. ∎
Corollary 5.8.
Assume that is a Fubini-Study metric. If is just ample, then , and are affinoid algebras.
Proof.
By assumption, is very ample. So , and are affinoid algebras. Since is integral and is finite over , by Proposition 2.45, the Banach algebras , and are Banach finite over , and respectively. Hence they are affinoid algebras. ∎
Proposition 5.9.
Assume that is a Fubini-Study metric. Then there exist such that for any , there exists with
In particular, for any and , there exists with
Proof.
Remark 5.10.
With the metric finiteness properties of affinoid algebra norm, here the upper bound for metric extension of a Fubini-Study metric is much better than what was expected, compared to (3) or even to (2), for its (in)depence on . This independence suggest that it would be reasonable to compare this affinoid algebra technique in this non-Archimedean setting with the use of Ohsawa-Takegoshi extension technique in the complex analytic setting.