ScalingStacks

4.1. Localization of spectrum by affinoid domain covering [00NA]

Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.

Complete original source context ยท Original author HTML

4.1. Localization of spectrum by affinoid domain covering

For any ฯต>0\epsilon>0, one can identify ๐”โก(V^โˆ™โ€‹(LX|Y,ฯ•|Yโ€‹(ฯต)))\mathfrak{M}(\widehat{V}_{{\scriptscriptstyle\bullet}}(L_{X|Y},\phi|_{Y}(\epsilon))) with ๐”โก(V^โˆ™โ€‹(LX|Y,ฯ•โ€‹(ฯต)X|Y))\mathfrak{M}(\widehat{V}_{{\scriptscriptstyle\bullet}}(L_{X|Y},\phi(\epsilon)_{X|Y})) by Corollary 3.27. Via this identification, one has

๐”โก(V^โˆ™โ€‹(LX|Y,ฯ•X|Y))โІ๐”โก(V^โˆ™โ€‹(LX|Y,ฯ•|Yโ€‹(ฯต))).\mathfrak{M}(\widehat{V}_{{\scriptscriptstyle\bullet}}(L_{X|Y},\phi_{X|Y}))\subseteq\mathfrak{M}(\widehat{V}_{{\scriptscriptstyle\bullet}}(L_{X|Y},\phi|_{Y}(\epsilon))).

By Corollary 3.6, they can be both identified with closed subsets in ๐”โก(V^โˆ™โ€‹(LX|Y,ฯ•โ€‹(ฯต)X|Yaff))\mathfrak{M}(\widehat{V}_{{\scriptscriptstyle\bullet}}(L_{X|Y},\phi(\epsilon)_{X|Y}^{\mathrm{aff}})), which itself can be identified with a closed subset in Specโก(Vโˆ™โ€‹(LX|Y))an\spec(V_{{\scriptscriptstyle\bullet}}(L_{X|Y}))^{\mathrm{an}}. We shall work in this fixed affinoid domain. We use notations Int๐”top\text{Int}^{\mathrm{top}}_{\mathfrak{M}} and IntVโˆ™top\text{Int}^{\mathrm{top}}_{V_{{\scriptscriptstyle\bullet}}} to distinguish the topological interior in ๐”โก(V^โˆ™โ€‹(LX|Y,ฯ•โ€‹(ฯต)X|Yaff))\mathfrak{M}(\widehat{V}_{{\scriptscriptstyle\bullet}}(L_{X|Y},\phi(\epsilon)_{X|Y}^{\mathrm{aff}})) and in Specโก(Vโˆ™โ€‹(LX|Y))an\spec(V_{{\scriptscriptstyle\bullet}}(L_{X|Y}))^{\mathrm{an}}.

Lemma 4.1.

Assume that ฯ•|Y\phi|_{Y} is asymptotic Fubini-Study. For any ฯต>0\epsilon>0, ๐”โก(V^โˆ™โ€‹(LX|Y,ฯ•X|Y))\mathfrak{M}(\widehat{V}_{{\scriptscriptstyle\bullet}}(L_{X|Y},\phi_{X|Y})) is contained in Int๐”topโ€‹(๐”โก(V^โˆ™โ€‹(LX|Y,ฯ•|Yโ€‹(ฯต))))\text{Int}^{\mathrm{top}}_{\mathfrak{M}}(\mathfrak{M}(\widehat{V}_{{\scriptscriptstyle\bullet}}(L_{X|Y},\phi|_{Y}(\epsilon)))).

Proof.

By Proposition 3.26, ๐’ซ(โฆ€โ‹…โฆ€ฯ•|Y)\mathcal{P}(\vvvert\mathord{\cdot}\vvvert_{\phi|_{Y}}) is equal to ฯ•|Y\phi|_{Y}, so it is continuous. Hence for any ฯต>0\epsilon>0, by Proposition 3.23, one has

๐”โก(V^โˆ™โ€‹(LX|Y,ฯ•X|Y))=๐”โก(V^โˆ™โ€‹(LX|Y,ฯ•|Y))โІIntVโˆ™topโ€‹(๐”โก(V^โˆ™โ€‹(LX|Y,ฯ•|Yโ€‹(ฯต)))).\mathfrak{M}(\widehat{V}_{{\scriptscriptstyle\bullet}}(L_{X|Y},\phi_{X|Y}))=\mathfrak{M}(\widehat{V}_{{\scriptscriptstyle\bullet}}(L_{X|Y},\phi|_{Y}))\subseteq\text{Int}^{\mathrm{top}}_{V_{{\scriptscriptstyle\bullet}}}(\mathfrak{M}(\widehat{V}_{{\scriptscriptstyle\bullet}}(L_{X|Y},\phi|_{Y}(\epsilon)))).

By Proposition 2.88, the topology on ๐”โก(V^โˆ™โ€‹(LX|Y,ฯ•โ€‹(ฯต)X|Yaff))\mathfrak{M}(\widehat{V}_{{\scriptscriptstyle\bullet}}(L_{X|Y},\phi(\epsilon)_{X|Y}^{\mathrm{aff}})) coincides the induced topology from Specโก(Vโˆ™โ€‹(L|Y))an\spec(V_{{\scriptscriptstyle\bullet}}(L|_{Y}))^{\mathrm{an}}, hence the set IntVโˆ™topโ€‹(๐”โก(V^โˆ™โ€‹(LX|Y,ฯ•|Yโ€‹(ฯต))))\text{Int}^{\mathrm{top}}_{V_{{\scriptscriptstyle\bullet}}}(\mathfrak{M}(\widehat{V}_{{\scriptscriptstyle\bullet}}(L_{X|Y},\phi|_{Y}(\epsilon)))) which is open in Specโก(Vโˆ™โ€‹(L|Y))an\spec(V_{{\scriptscriptstyle\bullet}}(L|_{Y}))^{\mathrm{an}} is also open in ๐”โก(V^โˆ™โ€‹(LX|Y,ฯ•โ€‹(ฯต)X|Yaff))\mathfrak{M}(\widehat{V}_{{\scriptscriptstyle\bullet}}(L_{X|Y},\phi(\epsilon)_{X|Y}^{\mathrm{aff}})). Therefore this set is contained in Int๐”topโ€‹(๐”โก(V^โˆ™โ€‹(LX|Y,ฯ•|Yโ€‹(ฯต))))\text{Int}^{\mathrm{top}}_{\mathfrak{M}}(\mathfrak{M}(\widehat{V}_{{\scriptscriptstyle\bullet}}(L_{X|Y},\phi|_{Y}(\epsilon)))). โˆŽ

Proposition 4.2.

Assume that ฯ•|Y\phi|_{Y} is asymptotic Fubini-Study. For any ฯต>0\epsilon>0, there exist a special domain WฯตW_{\epsilon} such that

๐”โก(V^โˆ™โ€‹(LX|Y,ฯ•X|Y))โІWฯตโІ๐”โก(V^โˆ™โ€‹(LX|Y,ฯ•|Yโ€‹(ฯต))).\mathfrak{M}(\widehat{V}_{{\scriptscriptstyle\bullet}}(L_{X|Y},\phi_{X|Y}))\subseteq W_{\epsilon}\subseteq\mathfrak{M}(\widehat{V}_{{\scriptscriptstyle\bullet}}(L_{X|Y},\phi|_{Y}(\epsilon))).
Proof.

By Corollary 2.64, every point in ๐”โก(V^โˆ™โ€‹(LX|Y,ฯ•โ€‹(ฯต)X|Yaff))\mathfrak{M}(\widehat{V}_{{\scriptscriptstyle\bullet}}(L_{X|Y},\phi(\epsilon)_{X|Y}^{\mathrm{aff}})) has a neighbourhood system consisting of affinoid domains. Hence for any zโˆˆ๐”โก(V^โˆ™โ€‹(LX|Y,ฯ•X|Y))z\in\mathfrak{M}(\widehat{V}_{{\scriptscriptstyle\bullet}}(L_{X|Y},\phi_{X|Y})), there exists an affinoid domain neighbourhood Vโก(z)V(z). By Lemma 4.1, zz has an open neighbourhood Int๐”topโ€‹(๐”โก(V^โˆ™โ€‹(LX|Y,ฯ•|Yโ€‹(ฯต))))\text{Int}^{\mathrm{top}}_{\mathfrak{M}}(\mathfrak{M}(\widehat{V}_{{\scriptscriptstyle\bullet}}(L_{X|Y},\phi|_{Y}(\epsilon)))), so we can assume that each Vโก(z)V(z) is contained in this open set.

One forms a covering by open sets

๐”โก(V^โˆ™โ€‹(LX|Y,ฯ•X|Y))โІโ‹ƒzโˆˆ๐”โก(V^โˆ™โ€‹(LX|Y,ฯ•X|Y))Int๐”topโ€‹Vโ€‹(z).\mathfrak{M}(\widehat{V}_{{\scriptscriptstyle\bullet}}(L_{X|Y},\phi_{X|Y}))\subseteq\bigcup_{z\in\mathfrak{M}(\widehat{V}_{{\scriptscriptstyle\bullet}}(L_{X|Y},\phi_{X|Y}))}\text{Int}^{\mathrm{top}}_{\mathfrak{M}}V(z).

Since the left hand side is a compact set by Proposition 2.21, there exist finitely many points {z1,โ€ฆ,zm}\{z_{1},\dots,z_{m}\} such that {Int๐”topโ€‹Vโ€‹(zi)}iโˆˆ{1,โ€ฆ,m}\{\text{Int}^{\mathrm{top}}_{\mathfrak{M}}V(z_{i})\}_{i\in\{1,\dots,m\}} form a covering of ๐”โก(V^โˆ™โ€‹(LX|Y,ฯ•X|Y))\mathfrak{M}(\widehat{V}_{{\scriptscriptstyle\bullet}}(L_{X|Y},\phi_{X|Y})). Let WฯตW_{\epsilon} be the union of affinoid domains {Vโก(zi)}iโˆˆ{1,โ€ฆ,m}\{V(z_{i})\}_{i\in\{1,\dots,m\}}, then it is a special domain, and satisfies the desired inclusion conditions. โˆŽ

Remark 4.3.

One denotes by ๐’ฒฯต\mathcal{W}_{\epsilon} the Banach kk-algebra of ฮ“โก(Wฯต,๐’ชWฯต)\Gamma(W_{\epsilon},\mathscr{O}_{W_{\epsilon}}) equipped with supremum norm โฆ€โ‹…โฆ€Wฯต\vvvert\mathord{\cdot}\vvvert_{W_{\epsilon}} (see Definition 2.70).

Geometric approximation๐”โก(V^โˆ™โ€‹(LX|Y,ฯ•X|Y))โІWฯตโІ๐”โก(V^โˆ™โ€‹(LX|Y,ฯ•|Yโ€‹(ฯต)))โІ๐”โก(V^โˆ™โ€‹(LX|Y,ฯ•X|Yโ€‹(ฯต)aff)CLOSE\mathfrak{M}(\widehat{V}_{{\scriptscriptstyle\bullet}}(L_{X|Y},\phi_{X|Y}))\subseteq{\color[rgb]{0,0,1}W_{\epsilon}}\subseteq\mathfrak{M}(\widehat{V}_{{\scriptscriptstyle\bullet}}(L_{X|Y},\phi|_{Y}(\epsilon)))\subseteq{\color[rgb]{0.5,0,0.5}\mathfrak{M}(\widehat{V}_{{\scriptscriptstyle\bullet}}(L_{X|Y},\phi_{X|Y}(\epsilon)^{\mathrm{aff}})}

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source-backed reader collection; mathematical self-containment is not assessed.