ScalingStacks

3.6. Comparison of algebra norms [00N8]

Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.

Complete original source context ยท Original author HTML

3.6. Comparison of algebra norms

We compare the quotient algebra norm and the supremum algebra norm on the restricted section algebra, and get directly a (non-uniform) extension theorem.

Proposition 3.24.

Let ฯ•\phi be an upper-semicontinuous metric on LL. Then

๐’ซ(โฆ€โ‹…โฆ€ฯ•)|Y=๐’ซ(โฆ€โ‹…โฆ€ฯ•,X|Y).\mathcal{P}(\vvvert\mathord{\cdot}\vvvert_{\phi})|_{Y}=\mathcal{P}(\vvvert\mathord{\cdot}\vvvert_{\phi,X|Y}).
Proof.

By definition, for any yโˆˆYany\in Y^{\mathrm{an}}, one has

๐’ซ(โฆ€โ‹…โฆ€ฯ•)(y)=limnโ†’โˆž1nFS(โˆฅโ‹…โˆฅnโ€‹ฯ•)(y),\mathcal{P}(\vvvert\mathord{\cdot}\vvvert_{\phi})(y)=\lim_{\begin{subarray}{c}n\to\infty\end{subarray}}\frac{1}{n}\mathrm{FS}(\lVert\mathord{\cdot}\rVert_{n\phi})(y),
๐’ซ(โฆ€โ‹…โฆ€ฯ•,X|Y)(y)=limnโ†’โˆž1nFS(โˆฅโ‹…โˆฅnโ€‹ฯ•,X|Y)(y).\mathcal{P}(\vvvert\mathord{\cdot}\vvvert_{\phi,X|Y})(y)=\lim_{\begin{subarray}{c}n\to\infty\end{subarray}}\frac{1}{n}\mathrm{FS}(\lVert\mathord{\cdot}\rVert_{n\phi,X|Y})(y).

Since the kk-linear map Vnโ€‹(L)โ†’Vnโ€‹(LX|Y)V_{n}(L)\rightarrow V_{n}(L_{X|Y}) is surjective for all large nโˆˆโ„•n\in\mathbb{N}, and โˆฅโ‹…โˆฅnโ€‹ฯ•,X|Y\lVert\mathord{\cdot}\rVert_{n\phi,X|Y} is the quotient norm of โˆฅโ‹…โˆฅnโ€‹ฯ•\lVert\mathord{\cdot}\rVert_{n\phi}, one has

FSโก(โˆฅโ‹…โˆฅnโ€‹ฯ•)โ€‹(y)=FSโก(โˆฅโ‹…โˆฅnโ€‹ฯ•,X|Y)โ€‹(y).\mathrm{FS}(\lVert\mathord{\cdot}\rVert_{n\phi})(y)=\mathrm{FS}(\lVert\mathord{\cdot}\rVert_{n\phi,X|Y})(y).

Hence the two envelop metrics are equal. โˆŽ

Lemma 3.25.

Let ฯ•\phi be an asymptotic Fubini-Study metric on LL. Then ฯ•|Y\phi|_{Y} is an asymptotic Fubini-Study metric on L|YL|_{Y}.

Proof.

Suppose that ฯ•\phi is the pointwise limit on XanX^{\mathrm{an}} of {1nโ€‹FSโ€‹(โˆฅโ‹…โˆฅn)}\{\frac{1}{n}\mathrm{FS}(\lVert\mathord{\cdot}\rVert_{n})\}, where {โˆฅโ‹…โˆฅn}\{\lVert\mathord{\cdot}\rVert_{n}\} are norms on Vnโ€‹(L)V_{n}(L). Then L|YL|_{Y} is the pointwise limit of {1nโ€‹FSโ€‹(โˆฅโ‹…โˆฅn,X|Y)}\{\frac{1}{n}\mathrm{FS}(\lVert\mathord{\cdot}\rVert_{n,X|Y})\} on YanY^{\mathrm{an}}. โˆŽ

Proposition 3.26.

Let ฯ•\phi be a asymptotic Fubini-Study metric on LL. Consider two algebra norms โฆ€โ‹…โฆ€ฯ•|Y\vvvert\mathord{\cdot}\vvvert_{\phi|_{Y}} and โฆ€โ‹…โฆ€ฯ•,X|Y\vvvert\mathord{\cdot}\vvvert_{\phi,X|Y} on Vโˆ™โ€‹(LX|Y)V_{{\scriptscriptstyle\bullet}}(L_{X|Y}). Then the three metrics are equal

๐’ซ(โฆ€โ‹…โฆ€ฯ•,X|Y)=๐’ซ(โฆ€โ‹…โฆ€ฯ•|Y)=ฯ•|Y.\mathcal{P}(\vvvert\mathord{\cdot}\vvvert_{\phi,X|Y})=\mathcal{P}(\vvvert\mathord{\cdot}\vvvert_{\phi|_{Y}})=\phi|_{Y}.
Proof.

By Proposition 3.24,

๐’ซ(โฆ€โ‹…โฆ€ฯ•,X|Y)=๐’ซ(โฆ€โ‹…โฆ€ฯ•)|Y=ฯ•|Y.\mathcal{P}(\vvvert\mathord{\cdot}\vvvert_{\phi,X|Y})=\mathcal{P}(\vvvert\mathord{\cdot}\vvvert_{\phi})|_{Y}=\phi|_{Y}.

It suffices to show the second equality. By Lemma 3.25, ฯ•|Y\phi|_{Y} is an asymptotic Fubini-Study metric on L|YL|_{Y}. By Proposition 3.12,

๐’ซ(โฆ€โ‹…โฆ€ฯ•|Y)=ฯ•|Y.\mathcal{P}(\vvvert\mathord{\cdot}\vvvert_{\phi|_{Y}})=\phi|_{Y}.

โˆŽ

Corollary 3.27.

Let ฯ•\phi be a asymptotic Fubini-Study metric on LL. Then on Vโˆ™โ€‹(LX|Y)V_{{\scriptscriptstyle\bullet}}(L_{X|Y}), the spectral algebra seminorm of โฆ€โ‹…โฆ€ฯ•,X|Y\vvvert\mathord{\cdot}\vvvert_{\phi,X|Y} is equal to โฆ€โ‹…โฆ€ฯ•|Y\vvvert\mathord{\cdot}\vvvert_{\phi|_{Y}}. There exists a canonical homeomorphism

๐”โก(V^โˆ™โ€‹(LX|Y,ฯ•X|Y))โ‰ƒ๐”โก(V^โˆ™โ€‹(LX|Y,ฯ•|Y)).\mathfrak{M}(\widehat{V}_{{\scriptscriptstyle\bullet}}(L_{X|Y},\phi_{X|Y}))\simeq\mathfrak{M}(\widehat{V}_{{\scriptscriptstyle\bullet}}(L_{X|Y},\phi|_{Y})).
Proof.

By Theorem 2.33, one has a homeomorphism

๐”(V^โˆ™(LX|Y,โฆ€โ‹…โฆ€ฯ•,X|Y;sp))โ‰ƒ๐”(V^โˆ™(LX|Y,โฆ€โ‹…โฆ€ฯ•,X|Y))=๐”(V^โˆ™(LX|Y,ฯ•X|Y)),\mathfrak{M}(\widehat{V}_{{\scriptscriptstyle\bullet}}(L_{X|Y},\vvvert\mathord{\cdot}\vvvert_{\phi,X|Y;\mathrm{sp}}))\simeq\mathfrak{M}(\widehat{V}_{{\scriptscriptstyle\bullet}}(L_{X|Y},\vvvert\mathord{\cdot}\vvvert_{\phi,X|Y}))=\mathfrak{M}(\widehat{V}_{{\scriptscriptstyle\bullet}}(L_{X|Y},\phi_{X|Y})),

by Proposition 3.26, one has

๐”(V^โˆ™(LX|Y,โฆ€โ‹…โฆ€ฯ•,X|Y;sp))โ‰ƒ๐”(V^โˆ™(LX|Y,โฆ€โ‹…โฆ€ฯ•|Y))=๐”(V^โˆ™(LX|Y,ฯ•|Y)).\mathfrak{M}(\widehat{V}_{{\scriptscriptstyle\bullet}}(L_{X|Y},\vvvert\mathord{\cdot}\vvvert_{\phi,X|Y;\mathrm{sp}}))\simeq\mathfrak{M}(\widehat{V}_{{\scriptscriptstyle\bullet}}(L_{X|Y},\vvvert\mathord{\cdot}\vvvert_{\phi|_{Y}}))=\mathfrak{M}(\widehat{V}_{{\scriptscriptstyle\bullet}}(L_{X|Y},\phi|_{Y})).

By Proposition 2.30, the two power-multiplicative algebra seminorms โฆ€โ‹…โฆ€ฯ•|Y\vvvert\mathord{\cdot}\vvvert_{\phi|_{Y}} and โฆ€โ‹…โฆ€ฯ•,X|Y;sp\vvvert\mathord{\cdot}\vvvert_{\phi,X|Y;\mathrm{sp}} on Vโˆ™โ€‹(LX|Y)V_{{\scriptscriptstyle\bullet}}(L_{X|Y}) are equal since they are both supremum norms on the same spectrum. โˆŽ

Theorem 3.28.

Let ฯ•\phi be an asymptotic Fubini-Study metric on LL, then for any ฯต>0\epsilon>0, and any t1โˆˆV1โ€‹(L|Y)t_{1}\in V_{1}(L|_{Y}), there exists nYโˆˆโ„•n_{Y}\in\mathbb{N} such that for any nโ‰ฅnYn\geq n_{Y}, there exists snโˆˆVnโ€‹(L)s_{n}\in V_{n}(L) with sn|Y=t1โŠ—ns_{n}|_{Y}=t_{1}^{\otimes n} and

โˆฅsnโˆฅnโ€‹ฯ•โ‰คenโ€‹ฯตโ‹…(โˆฅt1โˆฅฯ•|Y)n.\lVert s_{n}\rVert_{n\phi}\leq\mathrm{e}^{n\epsilon}\cdot(\lVert t_{1}\rVert_{\phi|_{Y}})^{n}.
Proof.

For any Mโ‰คmโ‰ค2โ€‹Mโˆ’1M\leq m\leq 2M-1, we have t1โŠ—mโˆˆVmโ€‹(LX|Y)t_{1}^{\otimes m}\in V_{m}(L_{X|Y}). By Corollary 3.27, for any ฯต>0\epsilon>0, there exists Nmโˆˆโ„•N_{m}\in\mathbb{N} such that for lโ‰ฅNml\geq N_{m},

โฆ€t1โŠ—mโ€‹lโฆ€ฯ•,X|Y1l/โฆ€t1โŠ—mโฆ€ฯ•|Yโ‰คฯต.\vvvert t_{1}^{\otimes ml}\vvvert_{\phi,X|Y}^{\frac{1}{l}}/\vvvert t_{1}^{\otimes m}\vvvert_{\phi|_{Y}}\leq\epsilon.

It is easy to see that there exists nYโˆˆโ„•n_{Y}\in\mathbb{N} such that the set of integers

{ml:lโ‰ฅNm,Mโ‰คmโ‰ค2Mโˆ’1}\{ml:l\geq N_{m},M\leq m\leq 2M-1\}

contains a subset of form โ„•โˆ’{0,โ€ฆ,nYโˆ’1}\mathbb{N}-\{0,\dots,n_{Y}-1\}: the case M=1M=1 is clear; if Mโ‰ฅ2M\geq 2, the fact that MM and M+1M+1 are coprime guarantees the existence of nYn_{Y}. Note that โฆ€โ‹…โฆ€ฯ•|Y\vvvert\mathord{\cdot}\vvvert_{\phi|_{Y}} is power-multiplicative, so for any nโ‰ฅnYn\geq n_{Y}, there exists snโˆˆVnโ€‹(L)s_{n}\in V_{n}(L) with sn|Y=t1โŠ—ns_{n}|_{Y}=t_{1}^{\otimes n} such that

โˆฅsnโˆฅnโ€‹ฯ•โ‰คenโ€‹ฯตโ‹…โˆฅt1โŠ—nโˆฅnโ€‹ฯ•|Y=enโ€‹ฯตโ‹…(โˆฅt1โˆฅฯ•|Y)n.\lVert s_{n}\rVert_{n\phi}\leq\mathrm{e}^{n\epsilon}\cdot\lVert t_{1}^{\otimes n}\rVert_{n\phi|_{Y}}=\mathrm{e}^{n\epsilon}\cdot(\lVert t_{1}\rVert_{\phi|_{Y}})^{n}.

โˆŽ

Remark 3.29.

This result is first obtained in [CMor18], by using approximation of ฯ•\phi by model metrics. Here we give another proof. Note that a slight unsatisfactory point of this version of metric extension theorem is that the degree nYn_{Y} depends a priori on the choice of initial data, the restricted section t1t_{1}. We will remove this dependence in the following sections.

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source-backed reader collection; mathematical self-containment is not assessed.