ScalingStacks

2.2.4. Spectral seminorm [00MP]

Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.

Complete original source context · Original author HTML

2.2.4. Spectral seminorm

Definition 2.28.

The spectral algebra seminorm ⦀⋅⦀sp\vvvert\mathord{\cdot}\vvvert_{\mathrm{sp}} of an algebra seminorm ⦀⋅⦀\vvvert\mathord{\cdot}\vvvert on a kk-algebra AA is the one defined by

∀f∈𝒜,⦀f⦀sp:=limn→∞⦀fn⦀1n.\forall f\in\mathcal{A},\quad\vvvert f\vvvert_{\mathrm{sp}}:=\lim_{\begin{subarray}{c}n\to\infty\end{subarray}}\vvvert f^{n}\vvvert^{\frac{1}{n}}.

Note that the triangle inequality for ⦀⋅⦀sp\vvvert\mathord{\cdot}\vvvert_{\mathrm{sp}} follows from sub-multiplicativity of ⦀⋅⦀\vvvert\mathord{\cdot}\vvvert. In general, ⦀⋅⦀sp\vvvert\mathord{\cdot}\vvvert_{\mathrm{sp}} is only a seminorm even if ⦀⋅⦀\vvvert\mathord{\cdot}\vvvert is a norm.

Remark 2.29.

The existence of limit is guaranteed by the (multiplicative) Fekete lemma for the sub-multiplicative sequence {⦀fn⦀}n∈ℕ\{\vvvert f^{n}\vvvert\}_{n\in\mathbb{N}}. The spectral seminorm is sub-multiplicative, and is bounded by the original seminorm ⦀⋅⦀\vvvert\mathord{\cdot}\vvvert. Moreover, it is power-multiplicative by construction.

Proposition 2.30.

Let 𝒜\mathcal{A} be a kk-Banach algebra. For any f∈Af\in A, one has ([Ber, Theorem 1.3.1])

⦀f⦀sp=maxz∈𝔐⁡(A)|f|z\vvvert f\vvvert_{\mathrm{sp}}=\max_{z\in\mathfrak{M}(A)}|f|_{z}
Definition 2.31.

Let 𝒜\mathcal{A} be a Banach kk-algebra. The radical of 𝒜\mathcal{A} is the null-space of its spectral seminorm 𝔫(⦀⋅⦀sp)\mathfrak{n}(\vvvert\mathord{\cdot}\vvvert_{\mathrm{sp}}). A Banach kk-algebra with radical equal to {0}\{0\} is called semi-simple. Elements in the radical are said to be quasi-nilpotent (or topological nilpotent).

Remark 2.32.

The radical of 𝒜\mathcal{A} contains the nil-radical of AA; in other words, nilpotent elemtents are quasi-nilpotent. If 𝒜\mathcal{A} is semi-simple, then AA is reduced. The converse may not be true.

Let 𝒜=(A,⦀⋅⦀)\mathcal{A}=(A,\vvvert\mathord{\cdot}\vvvert) be a kk-Banach algebra. The spectral seminorm ⦀⋅⦀sp\vvvert\mathord{\cdot}\vvvert_{\mathrm{sp}} defines a quotient norm on the quotient kk-algebra 𝒜/rad​(𝒜)\mathcal{A}/\text{rad}(\mathcal{A}), still denoted by ⦀⋅⦀sp\vvvert\mathord{\cdot}\vvvert_{\mathrm{sp}}. The quotient norm ⦀⋅⦀sp\vvvert\mathord{\cdot}\vvvert_{\mathrm{sp}} is bounded by the quotient norm of ⦀⋅⦀\vvvert\mathord{\cdot}\vvvert. The uniformization 𝒜u\mathcal{A}^{u} of 𝒜\mathcal{A} is defined to be the Banach kk-algebra of separated completion of (𝒜/rad(𝒜),⦀⋅⦀sp)(\mathcal{A}/\text{rad}(\mathcal{A}),\vvvert\mathord{\cdot}\vvvert_{\mathrm{sp}}). Conversely, if ⦀⋅⦀\vvvert\mathord{\cdot}\vvvert is a power-multiplicative Banach algebra norm on AA with radical {0}\{0\}, then it is said to be uniform.

Obviously, ⦀⋅⦀sp\vvvert\mathord{\cdot}\vvvert_{\mathrm{sp}} is bounded by ⦀⋅⦀\vvvert\mathord{\cdot}\vvvert. It is important to note that the converse may not be true in general. In other words, ⦀⋅⦀sp\vvvert\cdot\vvvert_{\mathrm{sp}} may not be complete on 𝒜/rad​(𝒜)\mathcal{A}/\text{rad}(\mathcal{A}). Yet one still has the following statement

Proposition 2.33.

𝔐⁡(𝒜)\mathfrak{M}(\mathcal{A}) is canonically homeomorphic to 𝔐⁡(𝒜u)\mathfrak{M}(\mathcal{A}^{u}). ([Ber, Corollary 1.3.3, 1.3.4])

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source-backed reader collection; mathematical self-containment is not assessed.