ScalingStacks

2.2. Banach algebra [00MK]

Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.

Complete original source context Β· Original author HTML

2.2. Banach algebra

2.2.1. Basic constructions

Definition 2.16.

Let AA be a kk-algebra (the unit of which is denoted by 𝟏\mathbf{1}) and βˆ₯β‹…βˆ₯\lVert\mathord{\cdot}\rVert be a seminorm on AA (viewed as a vector space over kk).

  1. (1)

    The seminorm βˆ₯β‹…βˆ₯\lVert\mathord{\cdot}\rVert is said to be sub-multiplicative if for any (a,b)∈AΓ—A(a,b)\in A\times A one has βˆ₯a​bβˆ₯≀βˆ₯aβˆ₯β‹…βˆ₯bβˆ₯\lVert ab\rVert\leq\lVert a\rVert\cdot\lVert b\rVert.

  2. (2)

    The seminorm βˆ₯β‹…βˆ₯\lVert\mathord{\cdot}\rVert is called power-multiplicative if βˆ₯anβˆ₯=βˆ₯aβˆ₯n\lVert a^{n}\rVert=\lVert a\rVert^{n} for any a∈Aa\in A and any nβˆˆβ„•βˆ–{0}n\in\mathbb{N}\setminus\{0\}.

  3. (3)

    The seminorm βˆ₯β‹…βˆ₯\lVert\mathord{\cdot}\rVert is called multiplicative if βˆ₯a​bβˆ₯=βˆ₯aβˆ₯β‹…βˆ₯bβˆ₯\lVert ab\rVert=\lVert a\rVert\cdot\lVert b\rVert for any (a,b)∈A2(a,b)\in A^{2}.

A kk-algebra seminorm (resp. kk-algebra norm) on AA is defined to be a sub-multiplicative seminorm (resp. sub-multiplicative norm) βˆ₯β‹…βˆ₯\lVert\mathord{\cdot}\rVert on AA such that βˆ₯𝟏βˆ₯=1\lVert\mathbf{1}\rVert=1. We denote by ⦀⋅⦀\vvvert\mathord{\cdot}\vvvert an algebra seminorm. Any kk-algebra equipped with a complete kk-algebra norm is called a Banach kk-algebra.

We use calligraphic letters to denote Banach algebras and Banach modules (defined below) and use the corresponding capital letters to denote the underlying kk-algebra or the underlying module of a kk-algebra. For example, a Banach kk-algebra (A,⦀⋅⦀)(A,\vvvert\mathord{\cdot}\vvvert) is denoted by π’œ\mathcal{A}. If Aβ€²A^{\prime} is a sub-kk-algebra of AA, then the restriction of ⦀⋅⦀\vvvert\mathord{\cdot}\vvvert on Aβ€²A^{\prime} is a kk-algebra norm. If this norm is complete, we say that π’œβ€²\mathcal{A}^{\prime} (Aβ€²A^{\prime} equipped with the restricted norm) is a Banach kk-sub-algebra of π’œ\mathcal{A}. Similarly, if QQ is a quotient kk-algebra of AA, then the quotient of the norm ⦀⋅⦀\vvvert\mathord{\cdot}\vvvert on QQ is a sub-multiplicative seminorm. If it is a complete norm, we say that 𝒬\mathcal{Q} (QQ equipped with the quotient norm) is a Banach quotient kk-algebra of π’œ\mathcal{A}.

Example 2.17.

Let π’œ\mathcal{A} be a Banach kk-algebra. The Tate kk-Banach algebra over π’œ\mathcal{A} of multiradius 𝒓=(r1,…,rn)∈(ℝ+)N\boldsymbol{r}=(r_{1},\dots,r_{n})\in(\mathbb{R}_{+})^{N} is the algebra over kk

{βˆ‘Jβˆˆβ„•naJ𝑻J,Β aJ∈AΒ andΒ lim|J|β†’βˆžβ¦€aJ⦀⋅𝒓J=0}\Big\{\sum_{J\in\mathbb{N}^{n}}a_{J}\boldsymbol{T}^{J},\text{ }a_{J}\in A\text{ and }\lim_{|J|\to\infty}\vvvert a_{J}\vvvert\cdot\boldsymbol{r}^{J}=0\Big\}

(for J=(j1,…,jn)βˆˆβ„•nJ=(j_{1},\dots,j_{n})\in\mathbb{N}^{n}, we denote ∏i∈{1,…,n}Tiji\prod_{i\in\{1,\dots,n\}}T_{i}^{j_{i}} by 𝑻J\boldsymbol{T}^{J} and ∏i∈{1,…,n}riji\prod_{i\in\{1,\dots,n\}}r_{i}^{j_{i}} by 𝒓J\boldsymbol{r}^{J}) with a complete kk-algebra norm defined by

β¦€βˆ‘Jβˆˆβ„•naJ𝑻Jβ¦€π’―π’œβ€‹(𝒓):=supJ⦀aJ⦀⋅𝒓J\Big\vvvert\sum_{J\in\mathbb{N}^{n}}a_{J}\boldsymbol{T}^{J}\Big\vvvert_{\mathcal{T}_{\mathcal{A}}(\boldsymbol{r})}:=\sup_{J}\vvvert a_{J}\vvvert\cdot\boldsymbol{r}^{J}

This Banach algebra is denoted by π’œβ‘{r1βˆ’1​T1,…,rnβˆ’1​Tn}\mathcal{A}\{r_{1}^{-1}T_{1},\dots,r_{n}^{-1}T_{n}\}, and is called an π’œ\mathcal{A}-Tate algebra of multiradius 𝒓\boldsymbol{r}.

Definition 2.18.

Let π’œ1,π’œ2\mathcal{A}_{1},\mathcal{A}_{2} be two Banach kk-algebras, and Ο•:A1β†’A2\phi:A_{1}\to A_{2} be a homomorphism of kk-algebras. We say that Ο•\phi is a homomorphism of Banach kk-algebras if it is bounded as a kk-linear map. A homomorphism of Banach kk-algebra Ο•\phi is often denoted by Ο•:π’œ1β†’π’œ2\phi:\mathcal{A}_{1}\to\mathcal{A}_{2}. A homomorphism of Banach kk-algebra Ο•\phi is called an isomorphism of Banach kk-algebras if there exists a homomorphism of Banach kk-algebras ψ:π’œ2β†’π’œ1\psi:\mathcal{A}_{2}\to\mathcal{A}_{1} such that Ο•βˆ˜Οˆ=Idπ’œ2\phi\circ\psi=\mathrm{Id}_{\mathcal{A}_{2}} and Οˆβˆ˜Ο•=Idπ’œ1\psi\circ\phi=\mathrm{Id}_{\mathcal{A}_{1}}.

2.2.2. Spectrum

Let π’œ=(A,⦀⋅⦀)\mathcal{A}=(A,\vvvert\mathord{\cdot}\vvvert) be a Banach kk-algebra. Let ⦀⋅⦀′\vvvert\mathord{\cdot}\vvvert^{\prime} be a kk-algebra seminorm on AA. One says that ⦀⋅⦀′\vvvert\mathord{\cdot}\vvvert^{\prime} is bounded (with respect to π’œ\mathcal{A}) if there exists C>0C>0 such that ⦀⋅⦀′≀C⦀⋅⦀\vvvert\mathord{\cdot}\vvvert^{\prime}\leq C\vvvert\mathord{\cdot}\vvvert. Its null-space is a closed ideal II of AA; the quotient kk-algebra norm of ⦀⋅⦀′\vvvert\mathord{\cdot}\vvvert^{\prime} on the quotient kk-algebra A/IA/I is bounded with respect to the quotient kk-algebra norm of ⦀⋅⦀\vvvert\mathord{\cdot}\vvvert. ([Ber, Remark 1.2.2.i])

Definition 2.19.

Let π’œ\mathcal{A} be a kk-Banach algebra. The Berkovich spectrum 𝔐⁑(π’œ)\mathfrak{M}(\mathcal{A}) is the following topological space: the points, denoted by zz, are bounded multiplicative kk-algebra seminorms ⦀⋅⦀z\vvvert\mathord{\cdot}\vvvert_{z} on π’œ\mathcal{A}, and the topology is the weakest topology on this set of points, for which all ℝβ‰₯0\mathbb{R}_{\geq 0}-valued functions of the form z↦⦀f⦀zz\mapsto\vvvert f\vvvert_{z} are continuous for any f∈Af\in A. This topology is called the canonical topology. For any subset VV of 𝔐⁑(π’œ)\mathfrak{M}(\mathcal{A}), we denote by Inttop​(V)\text{Int}^{\mathrm{top}}(V) the topological interior of VV. This topological interior is to be compared with the notion of interior of an affinoid subdomain in an affinoid domain (see [Ber, Definition 2.5.7]), which we do not use in this article.

Remark 2.20.

A basis for the canonical topology constituting of open sets is given by basic open sets, which are sets of the form

U⁑(f,p,q):={zβˆˆπ”β‘(π’œ):p<|f|z<q}U(f;p,q):=\{z\in\mathfrak{M}(\mathcal{A}):p<\lvert f\rvert_{z}<q\}

indexed by (p,q)βˆˆβ„2(p,q)\in\mathbb{R}^{2} and fβˆˆπ’œf\in\mathcal{A}. A general open set is a union of finite intersections of basic open sets.

Proposition 2.21.

Let π’œ\mathcal{A} be a kk-Banach algebra. Then 𝔐⁑(π’œ)\mathfrak{M}(\mathcal{A}) is a non-empty compact Hausdorff topological space. ([Ber, Theorem 1.2.1])

For any point zβˆˆπ”β‘(A)z\in\mathfrak{M}(A), let 𝔭z\mathfrak{p}_{z} be the closed ideal 𝔫(⦀⋅⦀z)\mathfrak{n}(\vvvert\mathord{\cdot}\vvvert_{z}) of AA which is a prime ideal, and f⁑(z)f(z) be the image of ff in the quotient kk-algebra A/𝔭zA/\mathfrak{p}_{z}. The residual field at zz is defined to be the fraction field of A/𝔭zA/\mathfrak{p}_{z}, denoted by κ⁑(z)\kappa(z), it is equipped with a quotient norm |β‹…|z\lvert\mathord{\cdot}\rvert_{z} of ⦀⋅⦀z\vvvert\mathord{\cdot}\vvvert_{z}, which becomes an absolute value on κ⁑(x)\kappa(x) extending |β‹…|\lvert\mathord{\cdot}\rvert on kk. The completed residual field at zz is defined to be the completion of |β‹…|z\lvert\mathord{\cdot}\rvert_{z} with respect to this quotient norm |β‹…|z\lvert\mathord{\cdot}\rvert_{z}, denoted as ΞΊ^​(z)\widehat{\kappa}(z). The canonical homomorphism of kk-algebra from AA to (ΞΊ^​(z),|β‹…|z)(\widehat{\kappa}(z),\lvert\mathord{\cdot}\rvert_{z}) is denoted by Ο‡z\chi_{z}. It is a homomorphism of Banach kk-algebras.

Definition 2.22.

Let π’œ\mathcal{A} be a Banach kk-algebra. A character Ο‡\chi of π’œ\mathcal{A} is a homomorphism of Banach kk-algebra from π’œ\mathcal{A} to some complete valued field extension (K,|β‹…|K)(K,\lvert\mathord{\cdot}\rvert_{K}) of (k,|β‹…|k)(k,\lvert\mathord{\cdot}\rvert_{k}). Two characters Ο‡1:π’œβ†’(K1,|β‹…|K1)\chi_{1}:\mathcal{A}\to(K_{1},\lvert\mathord{\cdot}\rvert_{K_{1}}) and Ο‡2:π’œβ†’(K2,|β‹…|K2)\chi_{2}:\mathcal{A}\to(K_{2},\lvert\mathord{\cdot}\rvert_{K_{2}}) are said to be equivalent if there exist a character Ο‡:π’œβ†’(K,|β‹…|K)\chi:\mathcal{A}\to(K,\lvert\mathord{\cdot}\rvert_{K}) and valued field extensions ΞΉ1:Kβ†’K1\iota_{1}:K\to K_{1} and ΞΉ2:Kβ†’K2\iota_{2}:K\to K_{2} which preserve norms such that Ο‡=i1βˆ˜Ο‡1=i2βˆ˜Ο‡2\chi=i_{1}\circ\chi_{1}=i_{2}\circ\chi_{2}. Let [Ο‡][\chi] be the equivalence class of Ο‡\chi.

Lemma 2.23.

The set of points of 𝔐⁑(π’œ)\mathfrak{M}(\mathcal{A}) is in canonical bijection with the set of equivalence classes of characters on π’œ\mathcal{A}. This bijection sends zβˆˆπ”β‘(π’œ)z\in\mathfrak{M}(\mathcal{A}) to [Ο‡z][\chi_{z}]. ([Ber, Remark 1.2.2.ii])

Definition 2.24.

The Gelfand transform of π’œ\mathcal{A} is the homomorphism of Banach kk-algebras

^:Aβ†’βˆzβˆˆπ”β‘(π’œ)ΞΊ^​(z),f↦f^=(f⁑(z))zβˆˆπ”β‘(π’œ)\widehat{}:A\to\prod_{z\in\mathfrak{M}(\mathcal{A})}\hat{\kappa}(z),\quad f\mapsto\widehat{f}=(f(z))_{z\in\mathfrak{M}(\mathcal{A})}
Proposition 2.25.

An element fβˆˆπ’œf\in\mathcal{A} is invertible if and only if f⁑(z)β‰ 0f(z)\neq 0 for any zβˆˆπ”β‘(π’œ)z\in\mathfrak{M}(\mathcal{A}). ([Ber, Corollary 1.2.4])

2.2.3. Continuous map

Proposition 2.26.

Let Ο•:π’œ1β†’π’œ2\phi:\mathcal{A}_{1}\to\mathcal{A}_{2} be a homomorphism of Banach kk-algebras. It induces a continuous map ϕ⋆:𝔐⁑(π’œ2)→𝔐⁑(π’œ1)\phi^{\star}:\mathfrak{M}(\mathcal{A}_{2})\to\mathfrak{M}(\mathcal{A}_{1}) by sending an equivalent class of characters [Ο‡][\chi] of π’œ2\mathcal{A}_{2} to the class of characters [Ο‡βˆ˜Οˆ][\chi\circ\psi] of π’œ1\mathcal{A}_{1}. ([Ber, Remark 1.2.2 (iii)])

Lemma 2.27.

If Ο•:π’œ1β†’π’œ2\phi:\mathcal{A}_{1}\to\mathcal{A}_{2} is a homomorphism of Banach kk-algebras with dense image, then ϕ⋆\phi^{\star} is an injective map whose image is closed.

Proof.

The map ϕ⋆\phi^{\star} is injective since for any two characters Ο‡1,Ο‡2:π’œ2β†’K\chi_{1},\chi_{2}:\mathcal{A}_{2}\to K, if Ο‡1βˆ˜Ο•=Ο‡2βˆ˜Ο•\chi_{1}\circ\phi=\chi_{2}\circ\phi, then the restriction of Ο‡1\chi_{1} and Ο‡2\chi_{2} on the image of Ο•\phi are equal, hence the two characters are equal by the density of image.

Let (z,|β‹…|z)βˆˆπ”β‘(π’œ1)(z,\lvert\mathord{\cdot}\rvert_{z})\in\mathfrak{M}(\mathcal{A}_{1}) which is not in the image of ϕ⋆\phi^{\star}, then ker⁑(Ο•)βŠˆπ”­z\ker(\phi)\nsubseteq\mathfrak{p}_{z}: otherwise the character π’œ1/ker⁑(Ο•)β†’ΞΊ^​(z)\mathcal{A}_{1}/\ker(\phi)\to\hat{\kappa}(z) extends to a character π’œ2β†’ΞΊ^​(z)\mathcal{A}_{2}\to\hat{\kappa}(z) by the density of image of Ο•\phi. Now there exists f∈ker⁑(Ο•)βˆ–π”­zf\in\ker(\phi)\setminus\mathfrak{p}_{z}, so |f|zβ‰ 0|f|_{z}\neq 0. For small enough Ο΅>0\epsilon>0, the basic open set U⁑(f,|f|zβˆ’Ο΅,|f|z+Ο΅)βŠ‚π”β‘(π’œ1)U(f;|f|_{z}-\epsilon,|f|_{z}+\epsilon)\subset\mathfrak{M}(\mathcal{A}_{1}) is a neighbourhood of (z,|β‹…|z)(z,\lvert\mathord{\cdot}\rvert_{z}) which is not contained in the image of ϕ⋆\phi^{\star}. So the image of ϕ⋆\phi^{\star} is a closed subset in 𝔐⁑(π’œ1)\mathfrak{M}(\mathcal{A}_{1}). ∎

2.2.4. Spectral seminorm

Definition 2.28.

The spectral algebra seminorm ⦀⋅⦀sp\vvvert\mathord{\cdot}\vvvert_{\mathrm{sp}} of an algebra seminorm ⦀⋅⦀\vvvert\mathord{\cdot}\vvvert on a kk-algebra AA is the one defined by

βˆ€fβˆˆπ’œ,⦀f⦀sp:=limnβ†’βˆžβ¦€fn⦀1n.\forall f\in\mathcal{A},\quad\vvvert f\vvvert_{\mathrm{sp}}:=\lim_{\begin{subarray}{c}n\to\infty\end{subarray}}\vvvert f^{n}\vvvert^{\frac{1}{n}}.

Note that the triangle inequality for ⦀⋅⦀sp\vvvert\mathord{\cdot}\vvvert_{\mathrm{sp}} follows from sub-multiplicativity of ⦀⋅⦀\vvvert\mathord{\cdot}\vvvert. In general, ⦀⋅⦀sp\vvvert\mathord{\cdot}\vvvert_{\mathrm{sp}} is only a seminorm even if ⦀⋅⦀\vvvert\mathord{\cdot}\vvvert is a norm.

Remark 2.29.

The existence of limit is guaranteed by the (multiplicative) Fekete lemma for the sub-multiplicative sequence {⦀fn⦀}nβˆˆβ„•\{\vvvert f^{n}\vvvert\}_{n\in\mathbb{N}}. The spectral seminorm is sub-multiplicative, and is bounded by the original seminorm ⦀⋅⦀\vvvert\mathord{\cdot}\vvvert. Moreover, it is power-multiplicative by construction.

Proposition 2.30.

Let π’œ\mathcal{A} be a kk-Banach algebra. For any f∈Af\in A, one has ([Ber, Theorem 1.3.1])

⦀f⦀sp=maxzβˆˆπ”β‘(A)|f|z\vvvert f\vvvert_{\mathrm{sp}}=\max_{z\in\mathfrak{M}(A)}|f|_{z}
Definition 2.31.

Let π’œ\mathcal{A} be a Banach kk-algebra. The radical of π’œ\mathcal{A} is the null-space of its spectral seminorm 𝔫(⦀⋅⦀sp)\mathfrak{n}(\vvvert\mathord{\cdot}\vvvert_{\mathrm{sp}}). A Banach kk-algebra with radical equal to {0}\{0\} is called semi-simple. Elements in the radical are said to be quasi-nilpotent (or topological nilpotent).

Remark 2.32.

The radical of π’œ\mathcal{A} contains the nil-radical of AA; in other words, nilpotent elemtents are quasi-nilpotent. If π’œ\mathcal{A} is semi-simple, then AA is reduced. The converse may not be true.

Let π’œ=(A,⦀⋅⦀)\mathcal{A}=(A,\vvvert\mathord{\cdot}\vvvert) be a kk-Banach algebra. The spectral seminorm ⦀⋅⦀sp\vvvert\mathord{\cdot}\vvvert_{\mathrm{sp}} defines a quotient norm on the quotient kk-algebra π’œ/rad​(π’œ)\mathcal{A}/\text{rad}(\mathcal{A}), still denoted by ⦀⋅⦀sp\vvvert\mathord{\cdot}\vvvert_{\mathrm{sp}}. The quotient norm ⦀⋅⦀sp\vvvert\mathord{\cdot}\vvvert_{\mathrm{sp}} is bounded by the quotient norm of ⦀⋅⦀\vvvert\mathord{\cdot}\vvvert. The uniformization π’œu\mathcal{A}^{u} of π’œ\mathcal{A} is defined to be the Banach kk-algebra of separated completion of (π’œ/rad(π’œ),⦀⋅⦀sp)(\mathcal{A}/\text{rad}(\mathcal{A}),\vvvert\mathord{\cdot}\vvvert_{\mathrm{sp}}). Conversely, if ⦀⋅⦀\vvvert\mathord{\cdot}\vvvert is a power-multiplicative Banach algebra norm on AA with radical {0}\{0\}, then it is said to be uniform.

Obviously, ⦀⋅⦀sp\vvvert\mathord{\cdot}\vvvert_{\mathrm{sp}} is bounded by ⦀⋅⦀\vvvert\mathord{\cdot}\vvvert. It is important to note that the converse may not be true in general. In other words, ⦀⋅⦀sp\vvvert\cdot\vvvert_{\mathrm{sp}} may not be complete on π’œ/rad​(π’œ)\mathcal{A}/\text{rad}(\mathcal{A}). Yet one still has the following statement

Proposition 2.33.

𝔐⁑(π’œ)\mathfrak{M}(\mathcal{A}) is canonically homeomorphic to 𝔐⁑(π’œu)\mathfrak{M}(\mathcal{A}^{u}). ([Ber, Corollary 1.3.3, 1.3.4])

2.2.5. Banach module

One can also consider seminorms on modules over Banach algebra. Let π’œ\mathcal{A} be a Banach kk-algebra. A (semi)normed π’œ\mathcal{A}-module is defined to be an AA-module MM with a (semi)norm βˆ₯β‹…βˆ₯\lVert\mathord{\cdot}\rVert such that (M,βˆ₯β‹…βˆ₯)(M,\lVert\mathord{\cdot}\rVert) is a (semi)normed vector space over kk (denoted by β„³\mathcal{M}), and that the multiplication is bounded, in the sense that there exists C>0C>0 such that

βˆ€aβˆˆπ’œ,βˆ€m∈M,βˆ₯aβ‹…mβˆ₯≀C⦀a⦀⋅βˆ₯mβˆ₯\forall a\in\mathcal{A},\ \forall m\in M,\quad\lVert a\cdot m\rVert\leq C\vvvert a\vvvert\cdot\lVert m\rVert

One calls a Banach π’œ\mathcal{A}-module a normed π’œ\mathcal{A}-module (M,βˆ₯β‹…βˆ₯)(M,\lVert\mathord{\cdot}\rVert) whose norm is complete.

Let β„³1=(M1,βˆ₯β‹…βˆ₯1)\mathcal{M}_{1}=(M_{1},\lVert\mathord{\cdot}\rVert_{1}), β„³2=(M2,βˆ₯β‹…βˆ₯2)\mathcal{M}_{2}=(M_{2},\lVert\mathord{\cdot}\rVert_{2}) be Banach π’œ\mathcal{A}-modules and Ο•:M1β†’M2\phi:M_{1}\to M_{2} be a homomorphism of AA-modules. It is called bounded if there exists C>0C>0 such that βˆ₯ϕ⁑(m1)βˆ₯2≀C​βˆ₯m1βˆ₯1\lVert\phi(m_{1})\rVert_{2}\leq C\lVert m_{1}\rVert_{1} for any m1∈M1m_{1}\in M_{1}. In this case Ο•\phi is said to be a homomorphism of Banach π’œ\mathcal{A}-modules, and is denoted by Ο•:β„³1β†’β„³2\phi:\mathcal{M}_{1}\rightarrow\mathcal{M}_{2}. In addition, the homomorphism Ο•\phi of Banach π’œ\mathcal{A}-modules is called admissible if it is admissible as linear map between normed-vector spaces over kk.

Definition 2.34.

Let β„³\mathcal{M} be a Banach π’œ\mathcal{A}-module. It is called a Banach finite π’œ\mathcal{A}-module if there exists lβˆˆβ„•+l\in\mathbb{N}_{+} and a surjective homomorphism of Banach π’œ\mathcal{A}-modules π’œβŠ•lβ†’β„³\mathcal{A}^{\oplus l}\to\mathcal{M} where π’œβŠ•l\mathcal{A}^{\oplus l} is the Banach π’œ\mathcal{A}-module corresponding to the AA-module AβŠ•lA^{\oplus l} equipped with the norm (a1,…,al)↦max⦀ai⦀(a_{1},\dots,a_{l})\mapsto\max\vvvert a_{i}\vvvert. (Note that such a homomorphism is necessarily admissible.)

Proposition 2.35.

Let π’œ\mathcal{A} be a Banach kk-algebra and β„³\mathcal{M} be a Banach π’œ\mathcal{A}-module. If AA is Noetherian as a kk-algebra and MM is finitely generated as AA-module, then any π’œ\mathcal{A}-sub-module of β„³\mathcal{M} is closed, and β„³\mathcal{M} is a Banach finite π’œ\mathcal{A}-module. ([FvdP, Lemma 1.2.3]

Definition 2.36.

Let Ο•:π’œ1β†’π’œ2\phi:\mathcal{A}_{1}\to\mathcal{A}_{2} be a homomorphism between Banach kk-algebras. It is called Banach finite if π’œ2\mathcal{A}_{2} is a Banach finite π’œ1\mathcal{A}_{1}-module. In this case π’œ2\mathcal{A}_{2} is called a Banach finite π’œ1\mathcal{A}_{1}-algebra.

Remark 2.37.

If a kk-Banach algebra homomorphism Ο•\phi is finite as homomorphism of kk-algebra, and π’œ1\mathcal{A}_{1} is Noetherian, then Ο•\phi is automatically Banach finite: there is a surjective π’œ1\mathcal{A}_{1}-module homomorphism p:π’œ1βŠ•nβ†’π’œ2p:\mathcal{A}_{1}^{\oplus n}\to\mathcal{A}_{2}, by Proposition 2.35 ker⁑(p)\ker(p) is closed. Then pp is continuous hence is admissible by Corollary 2.5. So π’œ2\mathcal{A}_{2} is a Banach finite π’œ1\mathcal{A}_{1}-module.

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source-backed reader collection; mathematical self-containment is not assessed.