ScalingStacks

Proof. [04L4]

Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.

Complete original source context · Original author HTML

Proof.

One uses the same arguments as in the proof of Proposition 6.9. Suppose there is an extension of f+:X+→B+f^{+}:X^{+}\rightarrow B^{+} to a smooth Lagrangian fibration f~+\tilde{f}^{+} defined on a neighborhood W⊆XW\subseteq X of ZZ such that f~+|𝔘=f|𝔘\tilde{f}^{+}|_{\mathfrak{U}}=f|_{\mathfrak{U}}. Then one may compute the period lattice of f~+\tilde{f}^{+}; this gives a smooth function HH extending the function H+H^{+} in Proposition 6.23. Assuming that also f−f^{-} has been extended to f~−\tilde{f}^{-} so that f~−|𝔘=f|𝔘\tilde{f}^{-}|_{\mathfrak{U}}=f|_{\mathfrak{U}}, one may verify that the period map Θ+:T∗​U/ΛH→W#\Theta^{+}:T^{\ast}U/\penalty\Lambda_{H}\rightarrow W^{\#} gives the required equivalence between ℱ\mathcal{F} and ℱu,H\mathcal{F}_{u,H} where u=f~−∘Θ+u=\tilde{f}^{-}\circ\Theta^{+}.

To extend f+f^{+}, notice that f𝔘=f|𝔘f_{\mathfrak{U}}=f|_{\mathfrak{U}} is smooth so, tautologically, f𝔘f_{\mathfrak{U}} is an extension of f+f^{+} to 𝔘\mathfrak{U}. It remains to extend f+f^{+} away from 𝔘\mathfrak{U}. Let 𝔘′⊂𝔘\mathfrak{U}^{\prime}\subset\mathfrak{U} and define f∘:X∘→Bf^{\circ}:X^{\circ}\rightarrow B as in (62). Denote Z∘=Z∩X∘Z^{\circ}=Z\cap X^{\circ} and by Z¯∘\bar{Z}^{\circ} its S1S^{1} quotient with f¯∘:Z¯∘→Γ\bar{f}^{\circ}:\bar{Z}^{\circ}\rightarrow\Gamma the reduced fibration. Then f¯∘\bar{f}^{\circ} is a smooth Lagrangian cylinder fibration.

The coisotropic neighborhood theorem allows us to identify a neighborhood of Z∘Z^{\circ} inside X∘X^{\circ} with a neighborhood VV of {0}×S1×Z¯∘\{0\}\times S^{1}\times\bar{Z}^{\circ} inside ℝ×S1×Z¯∘\mathbb{R}\times S^{1}\times\bar{Z}^{\circ} (tt will denote the ℝ\mathbb{R} coordinate). Moreover, since Z¯#\bar{Z}^{\#} can be identified with T∗​Γ/Λ¯HT^{\ast}\Gamma/\bar{\Lambda}_{H} (see Remark 6.24), Z¯∘\bar{Z}^{\circ} can be identified with a subset of T∗​Γ/Λ¯HT^{\ast}\Gamma/\bar{\Lambda}_{H} of the type Z¯L∘\bar{Z}^{\circ}_{L} for some positive LL (see Example 6.25). The pullback of f∘f^{\circ} under these identifications gives a piecewise smooth Lagrangian fibration on V⊂ℝ×S1×Z¯L∘V\subset\mathbb{R}\times S^{1}\times\bar{Z}^{\circ}_{L}

g={u+on​V+;u−on​V−g=\begin{cases}u^{+}\quad\text{on}\ V^{+};\\ u^{-}\quad\text{on}\ V^{-}\end{cases} (68)

where V+=V∩{t≥0}V^{+}=V\cap\{t\geq 0\}, V−=V∩{t≤0}V^{-}=V\cap\{t\leq 0\} and u±u^{\pm} is the restriction to V±V^{\pm} of a C∞C^{\infty} map. The set Z∘∩𝔘Z^{\circ}\cap\mathfrak{U} where f∘f^{\circ} is smooth, corresponds (under the above identifications) to the interior of ZL∘−ZL′∘Z^{\circ}_{L}-Z^{\circ}_{L^{\prime}} which we denote CL,L′C_{L,L^{\prime}}, where L′<LL^{\prime}<L. Notice that the map gg above is then smooth along CL,L′C_{L,L^{\prime}}, in particular the Taylor expansions in tt of u+u^{+} and u−u^{-} coincide along CL,L′C_{L,L^{\prime}}. With the same arguments used in the proper case one can show that u±u^{\pm} can be smoothly extended to a Lagrangian fibration u~±\tilde{u}^{\pm} beyond V±V^{\pm} (cf. Proposition 6.9 above, or [2] Proposition 6.3 for more details). In fact with a little more care one can do this so that along ℝ×CL,L′\mathbb{R}\times C_{L,L^{\prime}}, where an extension already exists, namely gg itself, we have u~±|ℝ×CL,L′=g|ℝ×CL,L′\tilde{u}^{\pm}|_{\mathbb{R}\times C_{L,L^{\prime}}}=g|_{\mathbb{R}\times C_{L,L^{\prime}}}. The map u~+\tilde{u}^{+} gives the required extension f~+\tilde{f}^{+} of f+f^{+}, where the last observation guarantees that f~+|𝔘=f|𝔘\tilde{f}^{+}|_{\mathfrak{U}}=f|_{\mathfrak{U}}. ∎

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source-backed reader collection; mathematical self-containment is not assessed.