2 The topology. [04HJ]
Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.
Complete original source context · Original author HTML
2 The topology.
In this section we review Mark Gross’ Topological Mirror Symmetry [7], which is the starting point for the results of this paper. Gross developed a method to compactify certain bundles over -dimensional manifolds to obtain topological models of Calabi-Yau manifolds. We now outline how this method works. Along the way, we discuss how Gross’ method can be modified to produce topological fibrations with mixed codimension one and two discriminant locus. We focus in dimension and .
A topological fibration is a continuous, proper, surjective map between smooth manifolds, , , such that for a dense open set and for all the fibre is homeomorphic to an -torus. We call the set the discriminant locus of . Sometimes we will denote a topological fibration by a triple . Notice that this notion of fibration differs from the usual differential geometric one in the sense that here is allowed to have singular fibres over points in . Allowing singular fibres is necessary if we aim at obtaining total spaces with interesting topology, such as Calabi-Yau manifolds other than complex tori. When is a symplectic manifold, with symplectic form , a topological -fibration is said to be Lagrangian if restricted to the smooth part of every fibre vanishes.
Definition 2.1.
Let and be a pair of topological fibrations with discriminant loci and respectively. We define the following notions of conjugacy between and :
- (i)
We say that is conjugate to if there exist a homeomorphism and a homeomorphism sending to homeomorphically, such that . We shall say that is -conjugate to whenever the specification is required.
- (ii)
If in addition and are symplectic manifolds and the fibrations are Lagrangian, we will say that is symplectically conjugate to if is a symplectomorphism and is a diffeomorphism.
- (iii)
Given points and , we shall say that is (symplectically) conjugate to over (or over and ) if there are neighborhoods and of and (or of and ) respectively, such that is (symplectically) conjugate to .
Part (iii) can also be found in the literature as semi-global (symplectic) equivalence as it involves a fibred neighborhood of a fibre but not the total space. When carries additional specified data, –e.g. a (Lagrangian) section or a choice of basis of – one may also consider a slightly stronger version of (i)-(iii) which requires that the specified data is preserved, e.g. that sends the section of to the section of and a basis of to a basis of . Clearly all three notions define equivalence relations. The corresponding equivalence classes will be called germs of fibrations. Throughout this article we will often use conjugation to topologically or symplectically glue together fibred sets in order to obtain larger fibred sets and eventually produce compact (symplectic) manifolds.
Given a topological (or Lagrangian) fibration and a subset , we will often use the notation to denote the fibration and we will refer to it as the restriction of to .
The topological fibrations considered by Gross have everywhere codimension two discriminant. For , is a finite collection of points and the singular fibres are nodal. For , is a connected trivalent graph with vertices labeled ‘positive’ or ‘negative’. There are three types of singular fibres in this case: generic-singular fibres, i.e. the product of a nodal fibre with ; positive fibres, i.e. a 3-torus with a 2-cycle collapsed to a point; and negative fibres, singular along a ‘figure eight’. For a more detailed description of these singular fibres we refer the reader to Examples 2.6, 2.7, 2.8 and 2.10 below or to [7] for further details.
In this article, we will allow to jump dimension, i.e. will include the region , which may be regarded as a “fattening” of a graph near negative vertices. We also propose a new model with discriminant locus of type (cf. Example 2.9) which is an alternative to Gross’ negative fibration and, in some sense, it is a more generic version of it. The idea of using models with codimension one discriminant was first suggested by Joyce [21]§8, based on his knowledge of special Lagrangian singularities. Ruan’s Lagrangian fibrations [28, 27, 29, 30] also have codimension one discriminant loci.
Consider the following three closed subsets of :
Clearly is a model of a neighborhood of a vertex in a three valent graph and can be regarded as a fattening of around the vertex. We also denote by the open unit ball in .
In this paper, we consider fibrations satisfying the following topological properties:
Assumption 2.2.
Let be a topological fibration with discriminant locus and fibre over . We assume that satisfies the following conditions:
- 1.
for , is a finite union of points and given a small neighborhood of a point in , the fibration is topologically conjugate to a nodal fibration (see Example 2.6);
- 2.
for , there is a finite covering of with open subsets of such that one of the following three possibilities occur (see also Figure 1):
- (a)
- (b)
the pair is homeomorphic to and is topologically conjugate to an alternative negative fibration (see Example 2.9);
- (c)
the pair is homeomorphic to and is topologically conjugate to a generic-singular fibration (see Example 2.7);
We denote by the set of points in belonging to a satisfying , which are the vertices of . We call these points vertices of . We denote by the union of the sets , where satisfies ; we can assume these sets to be pairwise disjoint. A point in admitting open neighborhood of such that is homeomorphic to is called an edge point. We denote by the set of edge points.
We denote by the locus formed by the singularities of all the fibres, therefore sometimes will also be denoted by ; when is smooth, will indeed coincide with the set of critical points of . We insist, however, that is not a priori required to be a smooth map. In fact, we will see that, near , our fibrations are not smooth. Inspired by tropical geometry, we refer to a connected component of as a 3-legged amoeba (with thin ends). As we will see later when we will introduce affine structures, an important property of is that it is locally planar, i.e. each connected component of is contained, in some sense, in a 2-plane.
Definition 2.3.
Let be a topological fibration and let be an open contractible neighborhood of such that , when ; or else, when , such that satisfies , or in point of Assumption 2.2. Let be a fibre over . Consider the monodromy representation
The image of is called the local monodromy group about (also denoted by ).
Now we review the local models of these fibrations. For the details we refer the reader to [7]§2. The construction of the local models relies on the following:
Proposition 2.4.
Let be a manifold of dimension . Let be an oriented submanifold of codimension three and let . Let be a principal -bundle over with Chern class . For each triple there is a unique compactification extending the topology of , making into a manifold and such that
commutes, with proper and the identity.
Remark 2.5.
One can explicitly describe the above compactification as follows. For any point there is a neighborhood of such that and can be identified with . By unicity of , there is a commutative diagram
| (1) |
where , .
The constructions of topological fibrations in this section are based on the following basic principle. One starts with a manifold with , a submanifold and a map as in Proposition 2.4. The trivial fibration can be lifted to a fibration with discriminant locus . One can readily see that for , the singularities of the fibre occur along . The set –which is the locus of singular fibres of – can be regarded as the locus where the vanishing cycles of the fibres of collapse (cf. Figure 2).
Example 2.6 (Nodal fibration).
This example is the topological model for the fibration over a point of in the case . Let be the unit disc in and . Let be a -bundle with monodromy generated by . We can use Proposition 2.4 to compactify as follows. The monodromy invariant cycle, , induces a fibre preserving action, with . The quotient modulo this action yields an -bundle . One can verify that extends to an -bundle , where . Furthermore . Then Proposition 2.4 ensures that compactifies to a manifold and that there is a proper map extending . Defining as the projection map, we obtain a fibration extending . The only singular fibre, , is homeomorphic to after is collapsed to . We denote this fibre by , following Kodaira’s notation for singular fibres of elliptic fibrations. In Hamiltonian mechanics, a Lagrangian fibration with this topology is known as a focus-focus fibration.
Example 2.7 (Generic singular fibration).
This example is the model for the fibration over a neighborhood of an edge point of –in [7] this is called fibration. Let , where is the unit disc, and let . Define to be the cylinder sitting above defined as follows. Let be a basis of . Let be a circle representing the homology class . Define . Now let be an -bundle with Chern class . Then compactifies to a manifold and there is a proper map extending . We can now define where is the projection. Then it is clear is a fibration with singular fibres homeomorphic to lying over . If is an orbit of , one can take as a basis of , where is a regular fibre. In this basis, and are monodromy invariant and a generator of the monodromy group of about is represented in this basis by
| (2) |
Example 2.8 (Negative fibration).
This example is one of the two models over a neighborhood of a point in –in [7] this is called fibration. Let with homeomorphic to a 3-ball. Let be a cone over three distinct, non-collinear points. We write where is the vertex of and the are the legs of . Fix a basis , for . Define to be a pair of pants lying over such that for , is a leg of which is the cylinder generated by , and respectively. These legs are glued together along a nodal curve or ‘figure eight’ lying over . Now consider an -bundle with Chern class . This bundle compactifies to . Now consider the projection map . The composition is a proper map. The generic fibre of is a 3-torus. For the fibre is singular along , which is a circle when , or the aforementioned figure eight when . Thus the fibres over are homeomorphic to , whereas the central fibre, , is singular along a nodal curve. A regular fibre can be regarded as the total space of an -bundle over . We can take as a basis of , , where and are the 1-cycles in as before and is a fibre of the -bundle. The cycle vanishes as . In this basis, the matrices generating the monodromy group corresponding to loops about with , (cf. Figure 3) are
| (3) |
Example 2.9 (Alternative negative fibration).
This is the local model for a fibration over a neighborhood of a component of . Consider and as in Example 2.8. Now think of making a small perturbation of just in a neighborhood of the “figure eight” –i.e. where the three cylinders forming are joined together– and leaving the rest unchanged. A generic perturbation will be such that, near the fibre over , will intersect the fibres of in isolated points. Then will have the shape of a -legged amoeba. One then constructs the bundle with Chern class and compactifies it to . The total fibration is .
We can give an explicit construction of a fibration of this type, following ideas in [6]§4. Consider with the fibration . Let and be the fibration
where and . Define a surface in to be
and view it as a surface in . Clearly is and one can compute that it has the shape depicted in Figure 4. Images by of algebraic curves in are known in the literature as amoebas, and this explains the name we gave to the components of .
As a surface in , intersects in and in . One can see that in a small neighborhood of one can twist slightly, so to make it coincide, in a smaller neighborhood, with . Similarly one can twist near , so to make it coincide with . Finally, when and are both big, we can twist so to coincide with . Let be this new twisted version of . A schematic description of these twistings is described in Figure 5, where is the light-colored diagonal line and is the over-imposed twisted dark line. It is clear that will have the shape of a -legged amoeba whose legs have been pinched to -dimensional segments toward the ends, as depicted in the right-hand side of Figure 5 (Mikhalkin [25] also defines a similar construction and calls this shape a localized amoeba). The bundle with Chern class and its compactification can again be constructed. The fibration is and .
We give a description of the fibration over the codimension part of . One can see that the fibres of over a point in the interior of the amoeba intersect in two distinct points. These two points come together to a double point as the base point approaches the boundary of the amoeba. If and are two points on –which may coincide– then the singular fibres of look like after is collapsed to a point. This behavior is topologically the same as the one conjectured by Joyce [21] for special Lagrangian fibrations. Moreover, the singularities of the fibres are modeled on those of an explicit example of a special Lagrangian fibration with non-compact fibres (cf. Joyce [21]§5).
In view of Proposition 2.4 and Remark 2.5, the total space in this example is diffeomorphic to the one in Example 2.8, although the fibrations differ. In both cases the singularities of the fibres occur along the intersection of the critical surface with the fibres of . But the intersections happen in a different way. In Example 2.8 they occur either along circles, or along a figure eight. Here they occur along circles when the fibre is over a point in the codimension part of and as isolated points when the fibre is over a point in the codimension part. As argued by Joyce, the isolated singularities are more generic in certain sense (cf. [21]§3). A schematic description of the fibration over the codimension part of is depicted in Figure 6. It can be compared with Figure 2. We remark that over the codimension part of , the fibration has the same topology of the generic singular fibration of Example 2.7. It follows that the monodromy around the legs is same as the monodromy of Example 2.8, i.e. it is represented by the matrices (3).
Most of the effort in this paper is devoted to the construction of a fibration as in the previous example which is also Lagrangian with respect to a symplectic form on . In the process we will also make more explicit the twistings which allow us to deform into .
Observe that in the above examples there is a fibre-preserving -action, induced by the bundle . One can use the same principle to construct -invariant fibrations starting from suitable compactifications of -bundles:
Example 2.10 (Positive fibration).
This model is the other possible fibration over a neighborhood of a point in –in [7] this is called fibration. Let with and as in Example 2.8. Let , where . Let and define . Now consider a principal -bundle . Under some mild assumptions on (cf. [7] Prop. 2.9), there is a unique manifold with extending the topology of and a proper extension of . The composition of with the projection defines a topological -fibration, . The fibre of over is . The fibre over is homeomorphic to , whereas the fibre over the vertex is homeomorphic to . It is proved in [7] that the monodromy group of this model is generated, in some basis, by the inverse transpose of the matrices (3). The reader should not worry, at this point, for the lack of details in this description as we will give explicit Lagrangian models for this example later on.
Notice that the monodromy representation of the above models is semi-stable, in other words the monodromy matrices of are unipotent. This terminology is imported from the classical theory of elliptic fibrations. The topological models described above may be regarded as 3-dimensional topological analogues to semi-stable singular elliptic fibres. We are now ready to state Gross’ result. We refer the reader to [7]§2 for the details:
Theorem 2.11 (Gross).
Let be a 3-manifold and let be a dense open set such that is a trivalent graph, i.e. such that . Assume that the vertices of are labeled, i.e. decomposes as a union of positive and negative vertices. Suppose there is a bundle such that its local monodromy is generated by
Then there is a fibration and a commutative diagram
Over connected components of , is conjugate to the generic singular fibration, over points of it is conjugate to the positive fibration and over points of to the negative fibration.
A topological manifold obtained from as in Theorem 2.11 is called a topological semi-stable compactification. Fibrations arising from semi-stable compactifications satisfy the so-called topological simplicity property (cf. [7]§2). This is intimately related to the affine simplicity of the subsequent sections. It is due to simplicity that Theorem 2.11 may be used to produce dual fibrations of manifolds homeomorphic to mirror pairs of Calabi-Yau manifolds. In §3 we shall review Gross’ construction of a bundle which compactifies to a smooth manifold homeomorphic to the quintic hypersurface in . The compactification of the dual bundle produces a manifold, , which is homeomorphic to the mirror quintic. This construction gives evidence that the SYZ duality should indeed explain Mirror Symmetry.
Theorem 2.11 could be stated and proved, with little effort, replacing with , i.e. replacing a neighborhood of each negative vertex, with a -legged amoeba. Over connected components of , the resulting fibration would then be conjugate to the alternative negative fibration of Example 2.9 but the topology of the total space remains the same. In fact we can do more: the main result of this paper is the proof that there exist symplectic semi-stable compactifications with respect to which the fibres are Lagrangian. The starting point for this compactifications will be the Lagrangian bundles obtained from affine -dimensional manifolds.