ScalingStacks

2 The topology. [04HJ]

Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.

Complete original source context · Original author HTML

2 The topology.

In this section we review Mark Gross’ Topological Mirror Symmetry [7], which is the starting point for the results of this paper. Gross developed a method to compactify certain TnT^{n} bundles over nn-dimensional manifolds to obtain topological models of Calabi-Yau manifolds. We now outline how this method works. Along the way, we discuss how Gross’ method can be modified to produce topological fibrations with mixed codimension one and two discriminant locus. We focus in dimension n=2n=2 and 33.

A topological TnT^{n} fibration f:X→Bf:X\rightarrow B is a continuous, proper, surjective map between smooth manifolds, dimX=2​n\dim X=2n, dimB=n\dim B=n, such that for a dense open set B0⊆BB_{0}\subseteq B and for all b∈B0b\in B_{0} the fibre Xb=f−1​(b)X_{b}=f^{-1}(b) is homeomorphic to an nn-torus. We call the set Δ:=B−B0\Delta:=B-B_{0} the discriminant locus of ff. Sometimes we will denote a topological fibration by a triple ℱ=(X,f,B)\mathcal{F}=(X,f,B). Notice that this notion of fibration differs from the usual differential geometric one in the sense that here ℱ\mathcal{F} is allowed to have singular fibres over points in Δ\Delta. Allowing singular fibres is necessary if we aim at obtaining total spaces with interesting topology, such as Calabi-Yau manifolds other than complex tori. When XX is a symplectic manifold, with symplectic form ω\omega, a topological TnT^{n}-fibration is said to be Lagrangian if ω\omega restricted to the smooth part of every fibre vanishes.

Definition 2.1.

Let ℱ=(X,f,B)\mathcal{F}=(X,f,B) and ℱ′=(X′,f′,B′)\mathcal{F}^{\prime}=(X^{\prime},f^{\prime},B^{\prime}) be a pair of topological fibrations with discriminant loci Δ\Delta and Δ′\Delta^{\prime} respectively. We define the following notions of conjugacy between ℱ\mathcal{F} and ℱ′\mathcal{F}^{\prime}:

  • (i)

    We say that ℱ\mathcal{F} is conjugate to ℱ′\mathcal{F}^{\prime} if there exist a homeomorphism ψ:X→X′\psi:X\rightarrow X^{\prime} and a homeomorphism ϕ:B→B′\phi:B\rightarrow B^{\prime} sending Δ\Delta to Δ′\Delta^{\prime} homeomorphically, such that f′∘ψ=ϕ∘ff^{\prime}\circ\psi=\phi\circ f. We shall say that ℱ\mathcal{F} is (ψ,ϕ)(\psi,\phi)-conjugate to ℱ′\mathcal{F}^{\prime} whenever the specification is required.

  • (ii)

    If in addition XX and X′X^{\prime} are symplectic manifolds and the fibrations are Lagrangian, we will say that ℱ\mathcal{F} is symplectically conjugate to ℱ′\mathcal{F}^{\prime} if ψ\psi is a C∞C^{\infty} symplectomorphism and ϕ\phi is a C∞C^{\infty} diffeomorphism.

  • (iii)

    Given points b∈Δb\in\Delta and b′∈Δ′b^{\prime}\in\Delta^{\prime}, we shall say that ℱ\mathcal{F} is (symplectically) conjugate to ℱ′\mathcal{F}^{\prime} over Δ\Delta (or over bb and b′b^{\prime}) if there are neighborhoods UU and U′U^{\prime} of Δ\Delta and Δ′\Delta^{\prime} (or of bb and b′b^{\prime}) respectively, such that (f−1​(U),f,U)(f^{-1}(U),f,U) is (symplectically) conjugate to ((f′)−1​(U′),f′,U′)((f^{\prime})^{-1}(U^{\prime}),f^{\prime},U^{\prime}).

Part (iii) can also be found in the literature as semi-global (symplectic) equivalence as it involves a fibred neighborhood of a fibre but not the total space. When ℱ\mathcal{F} carries additional specified data, –e.g. a (Lagrangian) section or a choice of basis of H1​(X,ℤ)H_{1}(X,\mathbb{Z})– one may also consider a slightly stronger version of (i)-(iii) which requires that the specified data is preserved, e.g. that ϕ\phi sends the section of ff to the section of f′f^{\prime} and a basis of H1​(X,ℤ)H_{1}(X,\mathbb{Z}) to a basis of H1​(X′,ℤ)H_{1}(X^{\prime},\mathbb{Z}) . Clearly all three notions define equivalence relations. The corresponding equivalence classes will be called germs of fibrations. Throughout this article we will often use conjugation to topologically or symplectically glue together fibred sets in order to obtain larger fibred sets and eventually produce compact (symplectic) manifolds.

Given a topological (or Lagrangian) fibration ℱ=(X,f,B)\mathcal{F}=(X,f,B) and a subset U⊂BU\subset B, we will often use the notation ℱ|U\mathcal{F}|_{U} to denote the fibration (f−1​(U),f,U)(f^{-1}(U),f,U) and we will refer to it as the restriction of ℱ\mathcal{F} to UU.

The topological fibrations considered by Gross have everywhere codimension two discriminant. For n=2n=2, Δ\Delta is a finite collection of points and the singular fibres are nodal. For n=3n=3, Δ\Delta is a connected trivalent graph with vertices labeled ‘positive’ or ‘negative’. There are three types of singular fibres in this case: generic-singular fibres, i.e. the product of a nodal fibre with S1S^{1}; positive fibres, i.e. a 3-torus with a 2-cycle collapsed to a point; and negative fibres, singular along a ‘figure eight’. For a more detailed description of these singular fibres we refer the reader to Examples 2.6, 2.7, 2.8 and 2.10 below or to [7] for further details.

In this article, we will allow Δ\Delta to jump dimension, i.e. Δ\Delta will include the region Δa⊆Δ\Delta_{a}\subseteq\Delta, which may be regarded as a “fattening” of a graph near negative vertices. We also propose a new model with discriminant locus of type Δa\Delta_{a} (cf. Example 2.9) which is an alternative to Gross’ negative fibration and, in some sense, it is a more generic version of it. The idea of using models with codimension one discriminant was first suggested by Joyce [21]§8, based on his knowledge of special Lagrangian singularities. Ruan’s Lagrangian fibrations [28, 27, 29, 30] also have codimension one discriminant loci.

Consider the following three closed subsets of ℝ3\mathbb{R}^{3}:

𝒞e={x1=x2=0},\mathscr{C}_{e}=\{x_{1}=x_{2}=0\},
𝒞d={x1=x2=0,x3≤0}∪{x1=x3=0,x2≤0}∪{x1=0,x2=x3≥0},\mathscr{C}_{d}=\{x_{1}=x_{2}=0,\,x_{3}\leq 0\}\cup\{x_{1}=x_{3}=0,\,x_{2}\leq 0\}\cup\{x_{1}=0,\,x_{2}=x_{3}\geq 0\},
𝒞a=𝒞d∪{x1=0,x22+x32≤12}.\mathscr{C}_{a}=\mathscr{C}_{d}\cup\left\{x_{1}=0,\,x_{2}^{2}+x_{3}^{2}\leq\frac{1}{2}\right\}.

Clearly 𝒞d\mathscr{C}_{d} is a model of a neighborhood of a vertex in a three valent graph and 𝒞a\mathscr{C}_{a} can be regarded as a fattening of 𝒞d\mathscr{C}_{d} around the vertex. We also denote by D3D^{3} the open unit ball in ℝ3\mathbb{R}^{3}.

In this paper, we consider fibrations satisfying the following topological properties:

Assumption 2.2.

Let ℱ=(X,f,B)\mathcal{F}=(X,f,B) be a topological TnT^{n} fibration with discriminant locus Δ⊆B\Delta\subseteq B and fibre XbX_{b} over b∈Bb\in B. We assume that ℱ\mathcal{F} satisfies the following conditions:

  1. 1.

    for n=2n=2, Δ\Delta is a finite union of points and given a small neighborhood UU of a point in Δ\Delta, the fibration ℱ|U\mathcal{F}|_{U} is topologically conjugate to a nodal fibration (see Example 2.6);

  2. 2.

    for n=3n=3, there is a finite covering {Ui}\{U_{i}\} of Δ\Delta with open subsets of BB such that one of the following three possibilities occur (see also Figure 1):

    1. (a)

      the pair (Ui,Ui∩Δ)(U_{i},U_{i}\cap\Delta) is homeomorphic to (D3,D3∩𝒞d)(D^{3},D^{3}\cap\mathscr{C}_{d}) and ℱ|Ui\mathcal{F}|_{U_{i}} is topologically conjugate to either a positive or a negative fibration (see Examples 2.10 and 2.8);

    2. (b)

      the pair (Ui,Ui∩Δ)(U_{i},U_{i}\cap\Delta) is homeomorphic to (D3,D3∩𝒞a)(D^{3},D^{3}\cap\mathscr{C}_{a}) and ℱ|Ui\mathcal{F}|_{U_{i}} is topologically conjugate to an alternative negative fibration (see Example 2.9);

    3. (c)

      the pair (Ui,Ui∩Δ)(U_{i},U_{i}\cap\Delta) is homeomorphic to (D3,D3∩𝒞e)(D^{3},D^{3}\cap\mathscr{C}_{e}) and ℱ|Ui\mathcal{F}|_{U_{i}} is topologically conjugate to a generic-singular fibration (see Example 2.7);

    We denote by Δd\Delta_{d} the set of points in Δ\Delta belonging to a UiU_{i} satisfying (a)(a), which are the vertices of Ui∩ΔU_{i}\cap\Delta. We call these points vertices of Δ\Delta. We denote by Δa\Delta_{a} the union of the sets Ui∩ΔU_{i}\cap\Delta, where UiU_{i} satisfies (b)(b); we can assume these sets to be pairwise disjoint. A point in Δ\Delta admitting open neighborhood UU of BB such that (U,U∩Δ)(U,U\cap\Delta) is homeomorphic to (D3,D3∩𝒞e)(D^{3},D^{3}\cap\mathscr{C}_{e}) is called an edge point. We denote by Δg\Delta_{g} the set of edge points.

Figure 1: The three possibilities for Ui∩ΔU_{i}\cap\Delta, n=3n=3.

We denote by Σ\Sigma the locus formed by the singularities of all the fibres, therefore sometimes Σ\Sigma will also be denoted by Crit⁡(f)\Crit(f); when ff is smooth, Crit⁡(f)\Crit(f) will indeed coincide with the set of critical points of ff. We insist, however, that ff is not a priori required to be a smooth map. In fact, we will see that, near Δa\Delta_{a}, our fibrations are not smooth. Inspired by tropical geometry, we refer to a connected component of Δa\Delta_{a} as a 3-legged amoeba (with thin ends). As we will see later when we will introduce affine structures, an important property of Δa\Delta_{a} is that it is locally planar, i.e. each connected component of Δa\Delta_{a} is contained, in some sense, in a 2-plane.

Definition 2.3.

Let f:X→Bf:X\rightarrow B be a topological TnT^{n} fibration and let U⊂BU\subset B be an open contractible neighborhood of b∈Δb\in\Delta such that U∩Δ={b}U\cap\Delta=\{b\}, when n=2n=2; or else, when n=3n=3, such that UU satisfies (a)(a), (b)(b) or (c)(c) in point 22 of Assumption 2.2. Let Xb0X_{b_{0}} be a fibre over b0∈U−Δb_{0}\in U-\Delta. Consider the monodromy representation

ℳb:π1​(U−Δ,b0)→S​L​(H1​(Xb0,ℤ)).\mathcal{M}_{b}:\pi_{1}(U-\Delta,b_{0})\rightarrow SL(H_{1}(X_{b_{0}},\mathbb{Z})).

The image of ℳb\mathcal{M}_{b} is called the local monodromy group about XbX_{b} (also denoted by ℳb\mathcal{M}_{b}).

Now we review the local models of these fibrations. For the details we refer the reader to [7]§2. The construction of the local models relies on the following:

Proposition 2.4.

Let YY be a manifold of dimension 2​n−12n-1. Let Σ⊆Y\Sigma\subseteq Y be an oriented submanifold of codimension three and let Y′=Y−ΣY^{\prime}=Y-\Sigma. Let π′:X′→Y′\pi^{\prime}:X^{\prime}\rightarrow Y^{\prime} be a principal S1S^{1}-bundle over Y′Y^{\prime} with Chern class c1=±1c_{1}=\pm 1. For each triple (Y,Σ,π′)(Y,\Sigma,\pi^{\prime}) there is a unique compactification X=X′∪ΣX=X^{\prime}\cup\Sigma extending the topology of X′X^{\prime}, making XX into a manifold and such that

X′↪X↓↓Y′↪Y\begin{array}[]{ccc}X^{\prime}&\hookrightarrow&X\\ \downarrow&&\downarrow\\ Y^{\prime}&\hookrightarrow&Y\end{array}

commutes, with π:X→Y\pi:X\rightarrow Y proper and π|Σ:Σ→Σ\pi|_{\Sigma}:\Sigma\rightarrow\Sigma the identity.

Remark 2.5.

One can explicitly describe the above compactification as follows. For any point p∈Σp\in\Sigma there is a neighborhood U⊂YU\subset Y of pp such that U≅ℝ3×ℂn−2U\cong\mathbb{R}^{3}\times\mathbb{C}^{n-2} and U∩ΣU\cap\Sigma can be identified with {0}×ℂn−2\{0\}\times\mathbb{C}^{n-2}. By unicity of π\pi, there is a commutative diagram

π−1​(U)→≅ℂ2×ℂn−2π↓π¯↓U→≅ℝ3×ℂn−2\begin{CD}\pi^{-1}(U)@>{\cong}>{}>\mathbb{C}^{2}\times\mathbb{C}^{n-2}\\ @V{\pi}V{}V@V{\bar{\pi}}V{}V\\ U@>{\cong}>{}>\mathbb{R}^{3}\times\mathbb{C}^{n-2}\end{CD} (1)

where π¯​(z1,z2,ζ)=(|z1|2−|z2|2,z1​z2,ζ)\bar{\pi}(z_{1},z_{2},\zeta)=(|z_{1}|^{2}-|z_{2}|^{2},z_{1}z_{2},\zeta), ζ∈ℂn−2\zeta\in\mathbb{C}^{n-2}.

The constructions of topological TnT^{n} fibrations in this section are based on the following basic principle. One starts with a manifold Y=B×Tn−1Y=B\times T^{n-1} with dimB=n\dim B=n, a submanifold Σ⊂Y\Sigma\subset Y and a map π:X→Y\pi:X\rightarrow Y as in Proposition 2.4. The trivial Tn−1T^{n-1} fibration P:Y→BP:Y\rightarrow B can be lifted to a TnT^{n} fibration f:=P∘π:X→Bf:=P\circ\pi:X\rightarrow B with discriminant locus Δ:=P⁡(Σ)\Delta:=P(\Sigma). One can readily see that for b∈Δb\in\Delta, the singularities of the fibre XbX_{b} occur along Σ∩P−1​(b)\Sigma\cap P^{-1}(b). The set Σ\Sigma –which is the locus of singular fibres of π\pi– can be regarded as the locus where the vanishing cycles of the fibres of ff collapse (cf. Figure 2).

π X Y P B Δ Σ
Figure 2: Negative fibration.
Example 2.6 (Nodal fibration).

This example is the topological model for the fibration over a point of Δ\Delta in the case n=2n=2. Let DD be the unit disc in ℂ\mathbb{C} and D∗=D−{0}D^{\ast}=D-\{0\}. Let f0:X0→D∗f_{0}:X_{0}\rightarrow D^{\ast} be a T2T^{2}-bundle with monodromy generated by (1011)\left(\begin{array}[]{cc}1&0\\ 1&1\end{array}\right). We can use Proposition 2.4 to compactify X0X_{0} as follows. The monodromy invariant cycle, L∈H1​(f0−1​(b),ℤ)L\in H_{1}(f_{0}^{-1}(b),\mathbb{Z}), induces a fibre preserving T⁡(L)T(L) action, with T⁡(L)=L⊗ℝ/LT(L)=L\otimes\mathbb{R}/\penalty L. The quotient modulo this action yields an S1S^{1}-bundle π0:X0→Y0=D∗×S1\pi_{0}:X_{0}\rightarrow Y_{0}=D^{\ast}\times S^{1}. One can verify that π0\pi_{0} extends to an S1S^{1}-bundle π′:X′→Y′=D×S1−{(0,p)}\pi^{\prime}:X^{\prime}\rightarrow Y^{\prime}=D\times S^{1}-\{(0,p)\}, where p∈S1p\in S^{1}. Furthermore c1​(π′)=±1c_{1}(\pi^{\prime})=\pm 1. Then Proposition 2.4 ensures that X′X^{\prime} compactifies to a manifold X=X′∪{p​t}X=X^{\prime}\cup\{pt\} and that there is a proper map π:X→Y=D×S1\pi:X\rightarrow Y=D\times S^{1} extending π′\pi^{\prime}. Defining P:Y→DP:Y\rightarrow D as the projection map, we obtain a fibration f=P∘π:X→Df=P\circ\pi:X\rightarrow D extending f0f_{0}. The only singular fibre, f−1​(0)f^{-1}(0), is homeomorphic to T2=S1×S1T^{2}=S^{1}\times S^{1} after S1×{x}⊂T2S^{1}\times\{x\}\subset T^{2} is collapsed to xx. We denote this fibre by I1I_{1}, following Kodaira’s notation for singular fibres of elliptic fibrations. In Hamiltonian mechanics, a Lagrangian fibration with this topology is known as a focus-focus fibration.

Example 2.7 (Generic singular fibration).

This example is the model for the fibration over a neighborhood of an edge point of Δ\Delta –in [7] this is called (2,2)(2,2) fibration. Let B=D×(0,1)B=D\times(0,1), where D⊂ℂD\subset\mathbb{C} is the unit disc, and let Y=T2×BY=T^{2}\times B. Define Σ⊂Y\Sigma\subset Y to be the cylinder sitting above {0}×(0,1)⊂B\{0\}\times(0,1)\subset B defined as follows. Let e1,e3e_{1},e_{3} be a basis of H1​(T2,ℤ)H_{1}(T^{2},\mathbb{Z}). Let S1⊂T2S^{1}\subset T^{2} be a circle representing the homology class e3e_{3}. Define Σ=S1×{0}×(0,1)\Sigma=S^{1}\times\{0\}\times(0,1). Now let π′:X′→Y′:=Y−Σ\pi^{\prime}:X^{\prime}\rightarrow Y^{\prime}:=Y-\Sigma be an S1S^{1}-bundle with Chern class c1=1c_{1}=1. Then X′X^{\prime} compactifies to a manifold X=X′∪ΣX=X^{\prime}\cup\Sigma and there is a proper map π:X→Y\pi:X\rightarrow Y extending π′\pi^{\prime}. We can now define f=P∘π:X→Bf=P\circ\pi:X\rightarrow B where P:Y→BP:Y\rightarrow B is the projection. Then it is clear ff is a T3T^{3} fibration with singular fibres homeomorphic to I1×S1I_{1}\times S^{1} lying over Δ:={0}×(0,1)\Delta:=\{0\}\times(0,1). If e2e_{2} is an orbit of π\pi, one can take e1,e2,e3e_{1},e_{2},e_{3} as a basis of H1​(Xb,ℤ)H_{1}(X_{b},\mathbb{Z}), where XbX_{b} is a regular fibre. In this basis, e2e_{2} and e3e_{3} are monodromy invariant and a generator of the monodromy group of ff about Δ\Delta is represented in this basis by

T=(100110001).T=\left(\begin{array}[]{ccc}1&0&0\\ 1&1&0\\ 0&0&1\end{array}\right). (2)
Example 2.8 (Negative fibration).

This example is one of the two models over a neighborhood of a point in Δd\Delta_{d} –in [7] this is called (2,1)(2,1) fibration. Let Y=T2×BY=T^{2}\times B with BB homeomorphic to a 3-ball. Let Δ⊂B\Delta\subset B be a cone over three distinct, non-collinear points. We write Δ={b0}∪Δ1∪Δ2∪Δ3\Delta=\{b_{0}\}\cup\Delta_{1}\cup\Delta_{2}\cup\Delta_{3} where b0b_{0} is the vertex of Δ\Delta and the Δi\Delta_{i} are the legs of Δ\Delta. Fix a basis e2e_{2}, e3e_{3} for H1​(T2,ℤ)H_{1}(T^{2},\mathbb{Z}). Define Σ⊂T2×B\Sigma\subset T^{2}\times B to be a pair of pants lying over Δ\Delta such that for i=1,2,3i=1,2,3, Σ∩(T2×Δi)\Sigma\cap(T^{2}\times\Delta_{i}) is a leg of Σ\Sigma which is the cylinder generated by −e3-e_{3}, −e2-e_{2} and e2+e3e_{2}+e_{3} respectively. These legs are glued together along a nodal curve or ‘figure eight’ lying over b0b_{0}. Now consider an S1S^{1}-bundle π′:X′→Y′=Y−Σ\pi^{\prime}:X^{\prime}\rightarrow Y^{\prime}=Y-\Sigma with Chern class c1=1c_{1}=1. This bundle compactifies to π:X→Y\pi:X\rightarrow Y. Now consider the projection map P:Y→BP:Y\rightarrow B. The composition f=P∘πf=P\circ\pi is a proper map. The generic fibre of ff is a 3-torus. For b∈Δb\in\Delta the fibre f−1​(b)f^{-1}(b) is singular along P−1​(b)∩ΣP^{-1}(b)\cap\Sigma, which is a circle when b∈Δib\in\Delta_{i}, or the aforementioned figure eight when b=b0b=b_{0}. Thus the fibres over Δi\Delta_{i} are homeomorphic to I1×S1I_{1}\times S^{1}, whereas the central fibre, Xb0X_{b_{0}}, is singular along a nodal curve. A regular fibre can be regarded as the total space of an S1S^{1}-bundle over P−1​(b)P^{-1}(b). We can take as a basis of H1​(Xb,ℤ)H_{1}(X_{b},\mathbb{Z}), e1​(b),e2​(b),e3​(b)e_{1}(b),e_{2}(b),e_{3}(b), where e2e_{2} and e3e_{3} are the 1-cycles in P−1​(b)=T2P^{-1}(b)=T^{2} as before and e1e_{1} is a fibre of the S1S^{1}-bundle. The cycle e1​(b)e_{1}(b) vanishes as b→Δb\rightarrow\Delta. In this basis, the matrices generating the monodromy group corresponding to loops gig_{i} about Δi\Delta_{i} with g1​g2​g3=1g_{1}g_{2}g_{3}=1, (cf. Figure 3) are

T1=(110010001),T2=(10−1010001),T3=(1−11010001).T_{1}=\left(\begin{array}[]{ccc}1&1&0\\ 0&1&0\\ 0&0&1\end{array}\right),\quad T_{2}=\left(\begin{array}[]{ccc}1&0&-1\\ 0&1&0\\ 0&0&1\end{array}\right),\quad T_{3}=\left(\begin{array}[]{ccc}1&-1&1\\ 0&1&0\\ 0&0&1\end{array}\right). (3)
Refer to caption
Figure 3: Loops g1g_{1}, g2g_{2} and g3g_{3}, such that g1​g2​g3=1g_{1}g_{2}g_{3}=1.
Example 2.9 (Alternative negative fibration).

This is the local model for a fibration over a neighborhood of a component of Δa\Delta_{a}. Consider YY and Σ\Sigma as in Example 2.8. Now think of making a small perturbation of Σ\Sigma just in a neighborhood of the “figure eight” –i.e. where the three cylinders forming Σ\Sigma are joined together– and leaving the rest unchanged. A generic perturbation will be such that, near the fibre over b0b_{0}, Σ\Sigma will intersect the fibres of P:Y→BP:Y\rightarrow B in isolated points. Then P⁡(Σ)P(\Sigma) will have the shape of a 33-legged amoeba. One then constructs the bundle π′:X′→Y′=Y−Σ\pi^{\prime}:X^{\prime}\rightarrow Y^{\prime}=Y-\Sigma with Chern class c1=1c_{1}=1 and compactifies it to π:X→Y\pi:X\rightarrow Y. The total fibration is f=P∘πf=P\circ\pi.

We can give an explicit construction of a fibration of this type, following ideas in [6]§4. Consider (ℂ∗)2(\mathbb{C}^{\ast})^{2} with the T2T^{2} fibration Log:(v1,v2)↦(log⁡|v1|,log⁡|v2|)\Log:(v_{1},v_{2})\mapsto(\log|v_{1}|,\log|v_{2}|). Let Y=ℝ×(ℂ∗)2Y=\mathbb{R}\times(\mathbb{C}^{\ast})^{2} and PP be the fibration

P:(t,v)→(t,Log⁡v),P:(t,v)\rightarrow(t,\Log v),

where t∈ℝt\in\mathbb{R} and v=(v1,v2)∈(ℂ∗)2v=(v_{1},v_{2})\in(\mathbb{C}^{\ast})^{2}. Define a surface Σ′\Sigma^{\prime} in (ℂ∗)2(\mathbb{C}^{\ast})^{2} to be

Σ′={v1+v2+1=0},\Sigma^{\prime}=\{v_{1}+v_{2}+1=0\},

and view it as a surface in {0}×(ℂ∗)2⊂Y\{0\}\times(\mathbb{C}^{\ast})^{2}\subset Y. Clearly P⁡(Σ′)P(\Sigma^{\prime}) is {0}×Log⁡(Σ′)\{0\}\times\Log(\Sigma^{\prime}) and one can compute that it has the shape depicted in Figure 4. Images by Log\Log of algebraic curves in (ℂ∗)2(\mathbb{C}^{\ast})^{2} are known in the literature as amoebas, and this explains the name we gave to the components of Δa\Delta_{a}.

Refer to caption
Figure 4: Amoeba of v1+v2+1=0v_{1}+v_{2}+1=0

As a surface in ℂ2\mathbb{C}^{2}, Σ′\Sigma^{\prime} intersects {v1=0}\{v_{1}=0\} in q1=(0,0,−1)q_{1}=(0,0,-1) and {v2=0}\{v_{2}=0\} in q2=(0,−1,0)q_{2}=(0,-1,0). One can see that in a small neighborhood of q1q_{1} one can twist Σ′\Sigma^{\prime} slightly, so to make it coincide, in a smaller neighborhood, with {v2=−1}\{v_{2}=-1\}. Similarly one can twist Σ′\Sigma^{\prime} near q2q_{2}, so to make it coincide with {v1=−1}\{v_{1}=-1\}. Finally, when |v1||v_{1}| and |v2||v_{2}| are both big, we can twist Σ′\Sigma^{\prime} so to coincide with {v1+v2=0}\{v_{1}+v_{2}=0\}. Let Σ\Sigma be this new twisted version of Σ′\Sigma^{\prime}. A schematic description of these twistings is described in Figure 5, where Σ′\Sigma^{\prime} is the light-colored diagonal line and Σ\Sigma is the over-imposed twisted dark line. It is clear that P⁡(Σ)={0}×Log⁡(Σ)P(\Sigma)=\{0\}\times\Log(\Sigma) will have the shape of a 33-legged amoeba whose legs have been pinched to 11-dimensional segments toward the ends, as depicted in the right-hand side of Figure 5 (Mikhalkin [25] also defines a similar construction and calls this shape a localized amoeba). The bundle π′:X′→Y′=Y−Σ\pi^{\prime}:X^{\prime}\rightarrow Y^{\prime}=Y-\Sigma with Chern class c1=1c_{1}=1 and its compactification π:X→Y\pi:X\rightarrow Y can again be constructed. The fibration is f=P∘πf=P\circ\pi and Δ=P⁡(Σ)\Delta=P(\Sigma).

× C ∗ C ∗ Log - 1 - 1
Figure 5: The twisted Σ\Sigma gives and amoeba with thin legs.

We give a description of the fibration over the codimension 11 part of Δ\Delta. One can see that the fibres of Log\Log over a point in the interior of the amoeba intersect Σ\Sigma in two distinct points. These two points come together to a double point as the base point approaches the boundary of the amoeba. If p1p_{1} and p2p_{2} are two points on T2T^{2} –which may coincide– then the singular fibres of ff look like S1×T2S^{1}\times T^{2} after S1×{pj}S^{1}\times\{p_{j}\} is collapsed to a point. This behavior is topologically the same as the one conjectured by Joyce [21] for special Lagrangian T3T^{3} fibrations. Moreover, the singularities of the fibres are modeled on those of an explicit example of a special Lagrangian fibration with non-compact fibres (cf. Joyce [21]§5).

In view of Proposition 2.4 and Remark 2.5, the total space XX in this example is diffeomorphic to the one in Example 2.8, although the fibrations differ. In both cases the singularities of the fibres occur along the intersection of the critical surface Σ\Sigma with the fibres of PP. But the intersections happen in a different way. In Example 2.8 they occur either along circles, or along a figure eight. Here they occur along circles when the fibre is over a point in the codimension 22 part of Δ\Delta and as isolated points when the fibre is over a point in the codimension 11 part. As argued by Joyce, the isolated singularities are more generic in certain sense (cf. [21]§3). A schematic description of the fibration over the codimension 11 part of Δ\Delta is depicted in Figure 6. It can be compared with Figure 2. We remark that over the codimension 22 part of Δ\Delta, the fibration has the same topology of the generic singular fibration of Example 2.7. It follows that the monodromy around the legs is same as the monodromy of Example 2.8, i.e. it is represented by the matrices (3).

X Y P π R 3 Σ
Figure 6: Negative fibration with amoeba-like discriminant.

Most of the effort in this paper is devoted to the construction of a fibration as in the previous example which is also Lagrangian with respect to a symplectic form on XX. In the process we will also make more explicit the twistings which allow us to deform Σ′\Sigma^{\prime} into Σ\Sigma.

Observe that in the above examples there is a fibre-preserving S1S^{1}-action, induced by the S1S^{1} bundle π′\pi^{\prime}. One can use the same principle to construct T2T^{2}-invariant fibrations starting from suitable compactifications of T2T^{2}-bundles:

Example 2.10 (Positive fibration).

This model is the other possible fibration over a neighborhood of a point in Δd\Delta_{d} –in [7] this is called (1,2)(1,2) fibration. Let Y=S1×BY=S^{1}\times B with BB and Δ⊂B\Delta\subset B as in Example 2.8. Let Y′=Y∖({p}×Δ)Y^{\prime}=Y\setminus(\{p\}\times\Delta), where p∈S1p\in S^{1}. Let L≅ℤ2L\cong\mathbb{Z}^{2} and define T⁡(L)=L⊗ℤℝ/LT(L)=L\otimes_{\mathbb{Z}}\mathbb{R}/\penalty L. Now consider a principal T⁡(L)T(L)-bundle π′:X′→Y′\pi^{\prime}:X^{\prime}\rightarrow Y^{\prime}. Under some mild assumptions on π′\pi^{\prime} (cf. [7] Prop. 2.9), there is a unique manifold XX with X′⊂XX^{\prime}\subset X extending the topology of X′X^{\prime} and a proper extension π:X→Y\pi:X\rightarrow Y of π′\pi^{\prime}. The composition of π\pi with the projection Y→BY\rightarrow B defines a topological T3T^{3}-fibration, f:X→Bf:X\rightarrow B. The fibre of ff over b∈B∖Δb\in B\setminus\Delta is T3T^{3}. The fibre over b∈Δib\in\Delta_{i} is homeomorphic to S1×I1S^{1}\times I_{1}, whereas the fibre over the vertex b0∈Δb_{0}\in\Delta is homeomorphic to S1×T2/({p​o​i​n​t}×T2)S^{1}\times T^{2}/\penalty(\{point\}\times T^{2}). It is proved in [7] that the monodromy group of this model is generated, in some basis, by the inverse transpose of the matrices (3). The reader should not worry, at this point, for the lack of details in this description as we will give explicit Lagrangian models for this example later on.

Notice that the monodromy representation of the above models is semi-stable, in other words the monodromy matrices of ℳb\mathcal{M}_{b} are unipotent. This terminology is imported from the classical theory of elliptic fibrations. The topological models described above may be regarded as 3-dimensional topological analogues to semi-stable singular elliptic fibres. We are now ready to state Gross’ result. We refer the reader to [7]§2 for the details:

Theorem 2.11 (Gross).

Let BB be a 3-manifold and let B0⊆BB_{0}\subseteq B be a dense open set such that Δ:=B−B0\Delta:=B-B_{0} is a trivalent graph, i.e. such that Δ=Δd∪Δg\Delta=\Delta_{d}\cup\Delta_{g}. Assume that the vertices of Δ\Delta are labeled, i.e. Δd\Delta_{d} decomposes as a union Δ+∪Δ−\Delta_{+}\cup\Delta_{-} of positive and negative vertices. Suppose there is a T3T^{3} bundle f0:X⁡(B0)→B0f_{0}:X(B_{0})\rightarrow B_{0} such that its local monodromy ℳb\mathcal{M}_{b} is generated by

  1. 1.

    TT as in (2), when b∈Δgb\in\Delta_{g};

  2. 2.

    T1,T2,T3T_{1},T_{2},T_{3} as in (3), when b∈Δ−b\in\Delta_{-};

  3. 3.

    (T1t)−1,(T2t)−1,(T3t)−1(T_{1}^{t})^{-1},(T_{2}^{t})^{-1},(T_{3}^{t})^{-1}, when b∈Δ+b\in\Delta_{+}.

Then there is a T3T^{3} fibration f:X→Bf:X\rightarrow B and a commutative diagram

X⁡(B0)↪X↓↓B0↪B.\begin{array}[]{ccc}X(B_{0})&\hookrightarrow&X\\ \downarrow&&\downarrow\\ B_{0}&\hookrightarrow&B.\end{array}

Over connected components of Δg\Delta_{g}, (X,f,B)(X,f,B) is conjugate to the generic singular fibration, over points of Δ+\Delta_{+} it is conjugate to the positive fibration and over points of Δ−\Delta_{-} to the negative fibration.

A topological manifold XX obtained from X⁡(B0)X(B_{0}) as in Theorem 2.11 is called a topological semi-stable compactification. Fibrations arising from semi-stable compactifications satisfy the so-called topological simplicity property (cf. [7]§2). This is intimately related to the affine simplicity of the subsequent sections. It is due to simplicity that Theorem 2.11 may be used to produce dual TnT^{n} fibrations of manifolds homeomorphic to mirror pairs of Calabi-Yau manifolds. In §3 we shall review Gross’ construction of a T3T^{3} bundle X⁡(B0)X(B_{0}) which compactifies to a smooth manifold XX homeomorphic to the quintic hypersurface in ℙ4\mathbb{P}^{4}. The compactification of the dual bundle produces a manifold, Xˇ\check{X}, which is homeomorphic to the mirror quintic. This construction gives evidence that the SYZ duality should indeed explain Mirror Symmetry.

Theorem 2.11 could be stated and proved, with little effort, replacing Δ−\Delta_{-} with Δa\Delta_{a}, i.e. replacing a neighborhood of each negative vertex, with a 33-legged amoeba. Over connected components of Δa\Delta_{a}, the resulting fibration would then be conjugate to the alternative negative fibration of Example 2.9 but the topology of the total space remains the same. In fact we can do more: the main result of this paper is the proof that there exist symplectic semi-stable compactifications with respect to which the fibres are Lagrangian. The starting point for this compactifications will be the Lagrangian T3T^{3} bundles obtained from affine 33-dimensional manifolds.

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source-backed reader collection; mathematical self-containment is not assessed.