ScalingStacks

Proof. [046U]

Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.

Complete original source context · Original author HTML

Proof.

Take a large collection of points {Pi}i=1N\{P_{i}\}_{i=1}^{N} on S∩ℬν−S\cap\mathcal{B}^{-}_{\nu}, such that for any point PP on S∩ℬν−S\cap\mathcal{B}^{-}_{\nu}, the number of points PiP_{i} in the collection within gag_{a}-distance O(A−1/2)O(A^{-1/2}) to PP is at least one but no more than CC. Then take cutoff functions χi\chi_{i} on ℬν−\mathcal{B}^{-}_{\nu} supported in {distga(⋅,Pi)≲A−1/2}\{\text{dist}_{g_{a}}(\cdot,P_{i})\lesssim A^{-1/2}\} such that ∑χi=1\sum\chi_{i}=1 on ℬν−∩{R≲A−1/2}\mathcal{B}^{-}_{\nu}\cap\{R\lesssim A^{-1/2}\}. These allow us to decompose ff into a large number of localised contributions:

f=∑i=1Nχi​f,‖χi​f‖C0α≤C,f=\sum_{i=1}^{N}\chi_{i}f,\quad\left\lVert\chi_{i}f\right\rVert_{C^{\alpha}_{0}}\leq C,

using the fact that the CδαC^{\alpha}_{\delta}-norm is not sensitive to δ\delta inside {R≲A−1/2}\{R\lesssim A^{-1/2}\}.

For each term χi​f\chi_{i}f we apply Lemma 4.35 to produce an approximate local solution uiu_{i} on {rPi≲A1/4}\{r_{P_{i}}\lesssim A^{1/4}\}, with bounds prescribed in Lemma 4.35. Here rPi​(Q)r_{P_{i}}(Q) is uniformly equivalent to |Pi−Q|ga|P_{i}-Q|_{g_{a}}. The candidate solution is

u=u1+u2+…​uN.u=u_{1}+u_{2}+\ldots u_{N}.

By construction uu is supported in {R≲A1/4}\{R\lesssim A^{1/4}\}.

We now bound uu, focusing on the absolute estimate. Summing up the contributions

|ui|≤C​A−1​(A1/2​rPi+1)−3+ϵ​‖χi​f‖C0α≤C​A−1​(A1/2​rPi+1)−3+ϵ,|u_{i}|\leq CA^{-1}(A^{1/2}r_{P_{i}}+1)^{-3+\epsilon}\left\lVert\chi_{i}f\right\rVert_{C^{\alpha}_{0}}\leq CA^{-1}(A^{1/2}r_{P_{i}}+1)^{-3+\epsilon},

we estimate at a point QQ:

|u⁡(Q)|≤∑|Pi−Q|ga≲A1/4|ui|(Q)≤C​A−1​∑|Pi−Q|ga≲A1/4(A1/2​|Pi−Q|ga+1)−3+ϵ≤C∫S∩{|P−Q|ga≲A1/4}(A1/2|P−Q|ga+1)−3+ϵd𝒜(P)≤C​A−1​(A1/2​R​(Q)+1)−1+ϵ.\begin{split}|u(Q)|\leq&\sum_{|P_{i}-Q|_{g_{a}}\lesssim A^{1/4}}|u_{i}|(Q)\\ \leq&CA^{-1}\sum_{|P_{i}-Q|_{g_{a}}\lesssim A^{1/4}}(A^{1/2}|P_{i}-Q|_{g_{a}}+1)^{-3+\epsilon}\\ \leq&C\int_{S\cap\{|P-Q|_{g_{a}}\lesssim A^{1/4}\}}(A^{1/2}|P-Q|_{g_{a}}+1)^{-3+\epsilon}d\mathcal{A}(P)\\ \leq&CA^{-1}(A^{1/2}R(Q)+1)^{-1+\epsilon}.\end{split}

The higher order version is ‖u‖C−1−ϵ2,α≤C​A−1,\left\lVert u\right\rVert_{C^{2,\alpha}_{-1-\epsilon}}\leq CA^{-1}, so ‖u‖Cδ2,α≤C​A−1\left\lVert u\right\rVert_{C^{2,\alpha}_{\delta}}\leq CA^{-1} for δ>−3+ϵ\delta>-3+\epsilon.

Next we estimate the error Δg(2)​u−f\Delta_{g^{(2)}}u-f. The error Δg(2)​ui−χi​f\Delta_{g^{(2)}}u_{i}-\chi_{i}f has two sources: the cutoff error supported on {rPi∼A1/4}\{r_{P_{i}}\sim A^{1/4}\} from Lemma 4.35

‖ΔgNUT​ui−χi​f‖C−2α​(gNUT)≤C​A3​(−3+ϵ)/4,\left\lVert\Delta_{g_{\text{NUT}}}u_{i}-\chi_{i}f\right\rVert_{C^{\alpha}_{-2}(g_{\text{NUT}})}\leq CA^{3(-3+\epsilon)/4},

and the metric deviation error ΔgNUT​ui−Δg(2)​f\Delta_{g_{\text{NUT}}}u_{i}-\Delta_{g^{(2)}}f, which is controlled because by Proposition 4.19 the local diffeomorphism Ψ\Psi is a C1,αC^{1,\alpha}-approximate isometry between gNUTg_{\text{NUT}} and g(2)g^{(2)}, and ff has weighted C2,αC^{2,\alpha} control. We focus on the absolute estimate:

|Δg(2)ui−ΔgNUTui|≤CA−3/4(A1/2rPi+1)−3+ϵ(A1/2R+1)−2(A|ξ2|+ν),|\Delta_{g^{(2)}}u_{i}-\Delta_{g_{\text{NUT}}}u_{i}|\leq CA^{-3/4}(A^{1/2}r_{P_{i}}+1)^{-3+\epsilon}(A^{1/2}R+1)^{-2}(A|\xi_{2}|+\nu),

so that

|Δg(2)ui−χif|≤CA−3/4(A1/2rPi+1)−3+ϵ(A1/2R+1)−2(A1/2rPi+ν).|\Delta_{g^{(2)}}u_{i}-\chi_{i}f|\leq CA^{-3/4}(A^{1/2}r_{P_{i}}+1)^{-3+\epsilon}(A^{1/2}R+1)^{-2}(A^{1/2}r_{P_{i}}+\nu).

Using

{∑|Pi−Q|ga≲A1/4(A1/2​rPi​(Q)+1)−3+ϵ≤(A1/2​R​(Q)+1)−1+ϵ,∑|Pi−Q|ga≲A1/4(A​rPi​(Q)+1)−2+ϵ≤C​A3​ϵ/4,\begin{cases}\sum_{|P_{i}-Q|_{g_{a}}\lesssim A^{1/4}}(A^{1/2}r_{P_{i}}(Q)+1)^{-3+\epsilon}\leq(A^{1/2}R(Q)+1)^{-1+\epsilon},\\ \sum_{|P_{i}-Q|_{g_{a}}\lesssim A^{1/4}}(Ar_{P_{i}}(Q)+1)^{-2+\epsilon}\leq CA^{3\epsilon/4},\end{cases}

we sum up all contributions to deduce for δ>−3+ϵ\delta>-3+\epsilon,

|Δg(2)​u−f|≤∑|Pi−Q|ga≲A1/4|Δg(2)​ui−χi​f|≤CA−3/4{A3​ϵ/4(A1/2R+1)−2+ν(A1/2R+1)−3+ϵ}≪(A1/2R+1)δ.\begin{split}&|\Delta_{g^{(2)}}u-f|\leq\sum_{|P_{i}-Q|_{g_{a}}\lesssim A^{1/4}}|\Delta_{g^{(2)}}u_{i}-\chi_{i}f|\\ \leq&CA^{-3/4}\{A^{3\epsilon/4}(A^{1/2}R+1)^{-2}+\nu(A^{1/2}R+1)^{-3+\epsilon}\}\ll(A^{1/2}R+1)^{\delta}.\end{split}

The Hölder version is ‖Δg(2)​u−f‖Cδα≪1\left\lVert\Delta_{g^{(2)}}u-f\right\rVert_{C^{\alpha}_{\delta}}\ll 1 as required. ∎

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source-backed reader collection; mathematical self-containment is not assessed.