ScalingStacks

3.6. Perturbation in the Euclidean region [043G]

Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.

Complete original source context Β· Original author HTML

3.6. Perturbation in the Euclidean region

This Section corrects the volume form error sufficiently away from 𝔇\mathfrak{D}, by perturbatively solving the generalised Gibbons-Hawking equation. We will circumvent the problem caused by metric incompleteness by a trick from [27] called extension norm. From now on 1β‰ͺΞ½β‰ͺA3/81\ll\nu\ll A^{3/8}.

Proposition 3.23.

Let 1β‰ͺΞ½β‰ͺA3/81\ll\nu\ll A^{3/8}. Then there is a real valued function Ο†1\varphi_{1} on ℬν+\mathcal{B}^{+}_{\nu}, solving the generalised Gibbons-Hawking equation on ℬν+∩{β„“>2A1/2}\mathcal{B}^{+}_{\nu}\cap\{\ell>2A^{1/2}\}

V~(2)i​j=V~(1)i​j+βˆ‚2Ο†1βˆ‚ΞΌiβ€‹βˆ‚ΞΌj,W~(2)=W~(1)βˆ’4β€‹βˆ‚2Ο†1βˆ‚Ξ·β€‹βˆ‚Ξ·Β―,det(V~(2)i​j)=W~(2).\tilde{V}^{ij}_{(2)}=\tilde{V}^{ij}_{(1)}+\frac{\partial^{2}\varphi_{1}}{\partial\mu_{i}\partial\mu_{j}},\quad\tilde{W}_{(2)}=\tilde{W}_{(1)}-4\frac{\partial^{2}\varphi_{1}}{\partial\eta\partial\bar{\eta}},\quad\det(\tilde{V}^{ij}_{(2)})=\tilde{W}_{(2)}.

Morever Ο†1\varphi_{1} is Ξ”a\Delta_{a}-harmonic on ℬν+∩{β„“<A1/2}\mathcal{B}^{+}_{\nu}\cap\{\ell<A^{1/2}\}, and

β€–βˆ‡ga2Ο†1β€–Ck,Ξ±βˆ’1,0(ℬ+ν∩{ℓ≳A1/2})≀CΞ½3Aβˆ’3/4,\left\lVert\nabla^{2}_{g_{a}}\varphi_{1}\right\rVert_{C^{k,\alpha}_{-1,0}(\mathcal{B}^{+}_{\nu}\cap\{\ell\gtrsim A^{1/2}\})}\leq C\nu^{3}A^{-3/4},

and |βˆ‡2gaΟ†1|ga≀CΞ½3Aβˆ’3/2|\nabla^{2}_{g_{a}}\varphi_{1}|_{g_{a}}\leq C\nu^{3}A^{-3/2} on ℬν+\mathcal{B}^{+}_{\nu}. In particular the matrix (V~(2)i​j)(\tilde{V}^{ij}_{(2)}) is positive definite and W~(2)\tilde{W}_{(2)} is positive on ℬν+\mathcal{B}^{+}_{\nu}.

Proof.

The method is to set up a Banach iteration scheme to correct the volume form error. The generalised Gibbons-Hawking equation can be rewritten in the linearised form

ℒ​φ1+1W~(1)​det(βˆ‚2Ο†1βˆ‚ΞΌiβ€‹βˆ‚ΞΌj)=E~(1).\mathcal{L}\varphi_{1}+\frac{1}{\tilde{W}_{(1)}}\det(\frac{\partial^{2}\varphi_{1}}{\partial\mu_{i}\partial\mu_{j}})=\tilde{E}^{(1)}.

where the linearised operator

β„’=1W~(1)​(V~(1)11β€‹βˆ‚2βˆ‚ΞΌ2β€‹βˆ‚ΞΌ2+V~(1)22β€‹βˆ‚2βˆ‚ΞΌ1β€‹βˆ‚ΞΌ1βˆ’2​V~(1)12β€‹βˆ‚2βˆ‚ΞΌ1β€‹βˆ‚ΞΌ2+4β€‹βˆ‚2βˆ‚Ξ·β€‹βˆ‚Ξ·Β―).\mathcal{L}=\frac{1}{\tilde{W}_{(1)}}(\tilde{V}_{(1)}^{11}\frac{\partial^{2}}{\partial\mu_{2}\partial\mu_{2}}+\tilde{V}_{(1)}^{22}\frac{\partial^{2}}{\partial\mu_{1}\partial\mu_{1}}-2\tilde{V}^{12}_{(1)}\frac{\partial^{2}}{\partial\mu_{1}\partial\mu_{2}}+4\frac{\partial^{2}}{\partial\eta\partial\bar{\eta}}).

The key point below is that in ℬν+∩{β„“>2A1/2}\mathcal{B}^{+}_{\nu}\cap\{\ell>2A^{1/2}\} the quadratic term is small while β„’\mathcal{L} is approximately Ξ”a\Delta_{a}.

  • β€’

    Start with the initial volume form error E~(1)\tilde{E}^{(1)} on ℬν+1+∩{β„“β‰₯A1/2}\mathcal{B}^{+}_{\nu+1}\cap\{\ell\geq A^{1/2}\}, where β€–E~(1)β€–Cβˆ’1,0k,α≀CAβˆ’3/4Ξ½2\left\lVert\tilde{E}^{(1)}\right\rVert_{C^{k,\alpha}_{-1,0}}\leq CA^{-3/4}\nu^{2} according to Lemma 3.16. We will only need the precise value of E~(1)\tilde{E}^{(1)} in the shrinked region ℬν+∩{β„“>2A1/2}\mathcal{B}^{+}_{\nu}\cap\{\ell>2A^{1/2}\}.

  • β€’

    Define the extension norm for a function ff on ℬν+∩{β„“>2A1/2}\mathcal{B}^{+}_{\nu}\cap\{\ell>2A^{1/2}\} as the infimum of the Cβˆ’1,0k,Ξ±C^{k,\alpha}_{-1,0}-norms for all functions fβ€²f^{\prime} extending ff with compact support inside ℬν+1+∩{β„“>A1/2}\mathcal{B}^{+}_{\nu+1}\cap\{\ell>A^{1/2}\}. The extension norm of E~(1)\tilde{E}^{(1)} is bounded by CAβˆ’3/4Ξ½2CA^{-3/4}\nu^{2}, since we can find an appropriate cutoff function Ο‡\chi such that χ​E~(1)\chi\tilde{E}^{(1)} provides a required extension.

  • β€’

    Apply Proposition 3.21 to produce u1=Ξ”aβˆ’1​(χ​E~(1)),u_{1}=\Delta_{a}^{-1}(\chi\tilde{E}^{(1)}), with second derivative bound on ℬν+1+∩{β„“>A1/2}\mathcal{B}^{+}_{\nu+1}\cap\{\ell>A^{1/2}\},

    β€–βˆ‡ga2u1β€–Cβˆ’1,0k,α≀CΞ½β€–E~(1)β€–Cβˆ’1,0k,α≀CΞ½3Aβˆ’3/4.\left\lVert\nabla^{2}_{g_{a}}u_{1}\right\rVert_{C^{k,\alpha}_{-1,0}}\leq C\nu\left\lVert\tilde{E}^{(1)}\right\rVert_{C^{k,\alpha}_{-1,0}}\leq C\nu^{3}A^{-3/4}.

    In particular on ℬν+1+∩{β„“>A1/2}\mathcal{B}^{+}_{\nu+1}\cap\{\ell>A^{1/2}\},

    |βˆ‡2gau1|ga≀CΞ½3Aβˆ’3/2,|\nabla^{2}_{g_{a}}u_{1}|_{g_{a}}\leq C\nu^{3}A^{-3/2},

    which in fact holds on the entire ℬν+1+\mathcal{B}^{+}_{\nu+1} using Ξ”a\Delta_{a}-harmonicity in {β„“<A1/2}\{\ell<A^{1/2}\}. Whence the quadratic term is bounded on ℬν+1+∩{β„“>A1/2}\mathcal{B}^{+}_{\nu+1}\cap\{\ell>A^{1/2}\} by

    β€–1W~(1)​det(βˆ‚2u1βˆ‚ΞΌiβ€‹βˆ‚ΞΌj)β€–Cβˆ’1,0k,α≀CΞ½3Aβˆ’3/2β€–βˆ‡2gau1β€–Cβˆ’1,0k,α≀CΞ½4Aβˆ’3/2β€–E~(1)β€–Cβˆ’1,0k,Ξ±β‰ͺβ€–E~(1)β€–Cβˆ’1,0k,Ξ±.\begin{split}\left\lVert\frac{1}{\tilde{W}_{(1)}}\det(\frac{\partial^{2}u_{1}}{\partial\mu_{i}\partial\mu_{j}})\right\rVert_{C^{k,\alpha}_{-1,0}}\leq&C\nu^{3}A^{-3/2}\left\lVert\nabla^{2}_{g_{a}}u_{1}\right\rVert_{C^{k,\alpha}_{-1,0}}\\ \leq&C\nu^{4}A^{-3/2}\left\lVert\tilde{E}^{(1)}\right\rVert_{C^{k,\alpha}_{-1,0}}\\ \ll&\left\lVert\tilde{E}^{(1)}\right\rVert_{C^{k,\alpha}_{-1,0}}.\end{split}

    The last inequality uses the condition Ξ½β‰ͺA3/8\nu\ll A^{3/8}.

    The linearised equation is approximately satisfied on ℬν+1+∩{β„“>A1/2}\mathcal{B}^{+}_{\nu+1}\cap\{\ell>A^{1/2}\}:

    ‖ℒ​u1βˆ’Ο‡β€‹E~(1)β€–Cβˆ’1,0k,Ξ±=‖ℒ​u1βˆ’Ξ”a​u1β€–Cβˆ’1,0k,α≀Aβˆ’3/4Ξ½β€–βˆ‡2gau1β€–Cβˆ’1,0k,Ξ±β‰ͺβ€–E~(1)β€–Cβˆ’1,0k,Ξ±.\begin{split}&\left\lVert\mathcal{L}u_{1}-\chi\tilde{E}^{(1)}\right\rVert_{C^{k,\alpha}_{-1,0}}=\left\lVert\mathcal{L}u_{1}-\Delta_{a}u_{1}\right\rVert_{C^{k,\alpha}_{-1,0}}\\ \leq&A^{-3/4}\nu\left\lVert\nabla^{2}_{g_{a}}u_{1}\right\rVert_{C^{k,\alpha}_{-1,0}}\ll\left\lVert\tilde{E}^{(1)}\right\rVert_{C^{k,\alpha}_{-1,0}}.\end{split}

    where we used the metric deviation estimate in Lemma 3.12.

    Elementary algebra shows that inside ℬν+∩{β„“>A1/2}\mathcal{B}^{+}_{\nu}\cap\{\ell>A^{1/2}\}, the volume form error is improved:

    E~1(1)=det(W(1)p​qΒ―βˆ’4β€‹βˆ‚2u1βˆ‚Ξ·pβ€‹βˆ‚Ξ·Β―q)​(V(1)+βˆ‚2u1βˆ‚ΞΌβ€‹βˆ‚ΞΌ)βˆ’1βˆ’1,\tilde{E}^{(1)}_{1}=\det(W^{p\bar{q}}_{(1)}-4\frac{\partial^{2}u_{1}}{\partial\eta_{p}\partial\bar{\eta}_{q}})(V_{(1)}+\frac{\partial^{2}u_{1}}{\partial\mu\partial\mu})^{-1}-1,
    β€–E~1(1)β€–Ck,Ξ±βˆ’1(ℬ+ν∩{β„“>2A1/2})β‰ͺβ€–E~(1)β€–Ck,Ξ±βˆ’1,0(ℬ+Ξ½+1∩{β„“>A1/2}).\left\lVert\tilde{E}^{(1)}_{1}\right\rVert_{C^{k,\alpha}_{-1}(\mathcal{B}^{+}_{\nu}\cap\{\ell>2A^{1/2}\})}\ll\left\lVert\tilde{E}^{(1)}\right\rVert_{C^{k,\alpha}_{-1,0}(\mathcal{B}^{+}_{\nu+1}\cap\{\ell>A^{1/2}\})}.

    More formally the extension norm of E(1)E^{(1)} is far smaller than that of E(1)E^{(1)}, after taking into account the cutoff procedures.

  • β€’

    Iterate this procedure to produce u1,u2,…u_{1},u_{2},\ldots, each time improving the extension norm by a factor say 10βˆ’110^{-1}. The second derivative estimate

    β€–βˆ‡ga2ujβ€–Cβˆ’1,0k,α≀C10βˆ’jΞ½3Aβˆ’3/4\left\lVert\nabla^{2}_{g_{a}}u_{j}\right\rVert_{C^{k,\alpha}_{-1,0}}\leq C10^{-j}\nu^{3}A^{-3/4}

    implies that the series βˆ‘jβˆ‡ga2uj\sum_{j}\nabla^{2}_{g_{a}}u_{j} converges. The series Ο†1=βˆ‘juj\varphi_{1}=\sum_{j}u_{j} also converges after possibly adjusting uju_{j} by some affine linear functions, and satisfies the Hessian estimate β€–βˆ‡ga2Ο†1β€–Cβˆ’1,0k,α≀CΞ½3Aβˆ’3/4.\left\lVert\nabla^{2}_{g_{a}}\varphi_{1}\right\rVert_{C^{k,\alpha}_{-1,0}}\leq C\nu^{3}A^{-3/4}. By construction the generalised Gibbons-Hawking equation holds on ℬν+∩{β„“>2A1/2}\mathcal{B}^{+}_{\nu}\cap\{\ell>2A^{1/2}\}.

∎

Applying the generalised Gibbons-Hawking ansatz, we obtain a second KΓ€hler ansatz (g~(2),Ο‰~(2),J~(2),Ξ©~(2))(\tilde{g}^{(2)},\tilde{\omega}^{(2)},\tilde{J}^{(2)},\tilde{\Omega}^{(2)}) associated to the data V~(2)i​j\tilde{V}^{ij}_{(2)} and W~(2)\tilde{W}_{(2)}. The new T2T^{2}-connection is (cf. (1.13))

Ο‘i(2)=Ο‘i+βˆ’1β€‹βˆ‚2Ο†1βˆ‚Ξ·β€‹βˆ‚ΞΌi​dβ€‹Ξ·βˆ’βˆ’1β€‹βˆ‚2Ο†1βˆ‚Ξ·Β―β€‹βˆ‚ΞΌi​d​η¯.\vartheta_{i}^{(2)}=\vartheta_{i}+\sqrt{-1}\frac{\partial^{2}\varphi_{1}}{\partial\eta\partial\mu_{i}}d\eta-\sqrt{-1}\frac{\partial^{2}\varphi_{1}}{\partial\bar{\eta}\partial\mu_{i}}d\bar{\eta}.
Corollary 3.24.

The volume form error E~(2)\tilde{E}^{(2)} of (g~(2),Ο‰~(2),J~(2),Ξ©~(2))(\tilde{g}^{(2)},\tilde{\omega}^{(2)},\tilde{J}^{(2)},\tilde{\Omega}^{(2)}) is zero on MΞ½+∩{β„“>2A1/2}M^{+}_{\nu}\cap\{\ell>2A^{1/2}\} and satisfies the bound on MΞ½+∩{|ΞΌβ†’|a≳A1/2}M^{+}_{\nu}\cap\{|\vec{\mu}|_{a}\gtrsim A^{1/2}\}

β€–E~(2)β€–Cβˆ’1,0k,α≀CAβˆ’3/4Ξ½2.\left\lVert\tilde{E}^{(2)}\right\rVert_{C^{k,\alpha}_{-1,0}}\leq CA^{-3/4}\nu^{2}.

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source-backed reader collection; mathematical self-containment is not assessed.