ScalingStacks

3.4. Weighted Hölder norms and initial error estimates [042U]

Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.

Complete original source context · Original author HTML

3.4. Weighted Hölder norms and initial error estimates

The central analytic difficulty comes from three sources:

  • •

    The metric ansatz behaves very differently in various characteristic regions, and for different Fourier modes. In short, the geometry is multi-scaled.

  • •

    The volume form error becomes larger at large distance, a problem closely related to the incompleteness of the metric.

  • •

    We wish to treat the error estimates with relatively high precision, incorporating features such as exponential decay of higher Fourier modes.

These difficulties require us to introduce some weighted Hölder norms which are more complicated than the ones used in a standard gluing problem. The purpose of this Section is to give precise estimates on the volume form errors of the ansatz, in the complement of a small ball near the origin in M+M^{+}; the small ball itself will be later replaced in our gluing construction by a region in ℂ3\mathbb{C}^{3} equipped with the Taub-NUT type metric. The task of developing the requisite linear analysis will be deferred to later Sections.

There are 3 useful weight parameters or characteristic length scales:

  • •

    The ga′g_{a}^{\prime}-distance to the origin is ϱ=|(μ1,μ2,y)|a′\varrho=|(\mu_{1},\mu_{2},y)|_{a}^{\prime}.

  • •

    The regularity scale is controlled by the parameter ℓ∼A−1/4+distga(⋅,𝔇).\ell\sim A^{-1/4}+\text{dist}_{g_{a}}(\cdot,\mathfrak{D}).

  • •

    The parameter ℓ~=2πA−1/2distga′(⋅,𝔇)\tilde{\ell}=2\pi A^{-1/2}\text{dist}_{g_{a}^{\prime}}(\cdot,\mathfrak{D}) is useful for measuring the rate of exponential decay of higher Fourier modes.

The key quantity to understand is the volume form error:

E~(1)=W~(1)det(V~(1)i​j)−1=A+w~A+A​ai​j​v~i​j+det(v~i​j)−1=−det(v~i​j)A+w~+det(v~i​j),\tilde{E}^{(1)}=\frac{\tilde{W}_{(1)}}{\det(\tilde{V}^{ij}_{(1)})}-1=\frac{A+\tilde{w}}{A+Aa^{ij}\tilde{v}^{ij}+\det(\tilde{v}^{ij})}-1=-\frac{\det(\tilde{v}^{ij})}{A+\tilde{w}+\det(\tilde{v}^{ij})},

where det(v~i​j)=α~1​α~2+α~1​α~3+α~2​α~3\det(\tilde{v}^{ij})=\tilde{\alpha}_{1}\tilde{\alpha}_{2}+\tilde{\alpha}_{1}\tilde{\alpha}_{3}+\tilde{\alpha}_{2}\tilde{\alpha}_{3} and w~=a22​α~1+a11​α~2+(a11+2​a12+a22)​α~3\tilde{w}=a_{22}\tilde{\alpha}_{1}+a_{11}\tilde{\alpha}_{2}+(a_{11}+2a_{12}+a_{22})\tilde{\alpha}_{3}. The weighted Hölder norms will be taylor made for the volume form error. Familiarity with Section 2.2, 2.3 and 2.6 will be assumed.

Let δ≤0\delta\leq 0. We shall define the weighted Hölder norms ‖T‖Cδ,0k,α\left\lVert T\right\rVert_{C^{k,\alpha}_{\delta,0}} for T2T^{2}-invariant tensor fields TT on M+∩{|μ→|a≳A−1/4}M^{+}\cap\{|\vec{\mu}|_{a}\gtrsim A^{-1/4}\}, by prescribing the norm on a number of overlapping regions up to uniform equivalence.

  • •

    In the region close to 𝔇\mathfrak{D} characterised by {ℓ≲A1/2}\{\ell\lesssim A^{1/2}\}, the ansatz metric is approximated by gTaubg_{\text{Taub}} (cf. Section 2.3), and ‖T‖Cδ,0k,α\left\lVert T\right\rVert_{C^{k,\alpha}_{\delta,0}} is uniformly equivalent to the norm ‖T‖Cδ,0k,α\left\lVert T\right\rVert_{C^{k,\alpha}_{\delta,0}} for gTaubg_{\text{Taub}} introduced in Section 2.3.

  • •

    The region {ℓ≳A1/2}\{\ell\gtrsim A^{1/2}\} can be covered by subregions of diameter ∼ℓ\sim\ell, where the T2T^{2}-bundle is topologically trivial. Over each subregion the metric is approximated by the periodic version of the constant solution gflatg_{\text{flat}} (cf. Section 2.2). The xx-variable defines an S1S^{1} direction. We decompose TT into the part T¯\bar{T} independent of xx (the ‘zeroth Fourier mode’) and the oscillatory part T−T¯T-\bar{T} (the ‘higher Fourier mode’), and define the weighted Hölder norm separately on the two parts.

  • •

    On the zeroth Fourier mode, the norm ‖T¯‖Cδ,0k,α\left\lVert\bar{T}\right\rVert_{C^{k,\alpha}_{\delta,0}} is equivalent to

    A−3δ/4(∑j=0k‖ℓj∇jT¯‖L∞+[ℓk∇kT¯]α),A^{-3\delta/4}(\sum_{j=0}^{k}\left\lVert\ell^{j}\nabla^{j}\bar{T}\right\rVert_{L^{\infty}}+[\ell^{k}\nabla^{k}\bar{T}]_{\alpha}),

    where []α[]_{\alpha} denotes the appropriately normalised Hölder seminorm. Here the ℓ\ell-dependence is inserted to reflect the regularity scale.

  • •

    On the higher Fourier modes we build in the exponential decay. Fix a parameter 0<κ<10<\kappa<1. The norm ‖T−T¯‖Cδ,0k,α\left\lVert T-\bar{T}\right\rVert_{C^{k,\alpha}_{\delta,0}} in this region is equivalent to

    A−3δ/4supℓ⁡(p)≳A1/2eκ​ℓ~(∑j=0k‖Aj/2∇j(T−T¯)‖L∞+Ak/2[∇k(T−T¯)]α).A^{-3\delta/4}\sup_{\ell(p)\gtrsim A^{1/2}}e^{\kappa\tilde{\ell}}(\sum_{j=0}^{k}\left\lVert A^{j/2}\nabla^{j}(T-\bar{T})\right\rVert_{L^{\infty}}+A^{k/2}[\nabla^{k}(T-\bar{T})]_{\alpha}).

    An estimate in this norm is the higher order version of |T−T¯|≤C​A3​δ/4​e−κ​ℓ~.|T-\bar{T}|\leq CA^{3\delta/4}e^{-\kappa\tilde{\ell}}.

Notation.

The norm ‖⋅‖Cδ,0k,α\left\lVert\cdot\right\rVert_{C^{k,\alpha}_{\delta,0}} can refer to any type of tensors depending on the context, such as functions, 1-forms, symmetric 2-tensors, and in some cases can refer to the norm computed in a subregion. Strictly speaking this norm depends on κ\kappa, but we suppress this to avoid cluttering the notation.

We will also need a variant weighted Hölder norm ‖T‖Cδk,α\left\lVert T\right\rVert_{C^{k,\alpha}_{\delta}}. The only difference from ‖T‖Cδ,0k,α\left\lVert T\right\rVert_{C^{k,\alpha}_{\delta,0}} is that in the region {ℓ≳A1/2}\{\ell\gtrsim A^{1/2}\} on the zeroth Fourier mode, ‖T¯‖Cδk,α\left\lVert\bar{T}\right\rVert_{C^{k,\alpha}_{\delta}} is equivalent to

A−δ/4(∑j=0k‖ℓj−δ∇jT¯‖L∞+[ℓk−δ∇kT¯]α),A^{-\delta/4}(\sum_{j=0}^{k}\left\lVert\ell^{j-\delta}\nabla^{j}\bar{T}\right\rVert_{L^{\infty}}+[\ell^{k-\delta}\nabla^{k}\bar{T}]_{\alpha}),

so an estimate in this norm is the higher order version of |T¯|=O(A3​δ/4(A−1/2ℓ)δ)|\bar{T}|=O(A^{3\delta/4}(A^{-1/2}\ell)^{\delta}). We have inserted an extra decay factor (A−1/2ℓ)δ(A^{-1/2}\ell)^{\delta}.

Notation.

For a parameter ν\nu with 1≪ν<ϵ0​A3/41\ll\nu<\epsilon_{0}A^{3/4}, define the subregion of M+M^{+}

Mν+={A−1/2ϱ<eν}⊂M+.M_{\nu}^{+}=\{A^{-1/2}\varrho<e^{\nu}\}\subset M^{+}.

Its base is ℬν+={A−1/2ϱ<eν}⊂ℝμ1,μ22×(S1×ℝ)η\mathcal{B}^{+}_{\nu}=\{A^{-1/2}\varrho<e^{\nu}\}\subset\mathbb{R}^{2}_{\mu_{1},\mu_{2}}\times(S^{1}\times\mathbb{R})_{\eta}.

The following Lemmas are simple consequences of asymptotes in Section 3.1 and 3.2. The higher order estimates are taken care by Δa\Delta_{a}-harmonicity of α~i\tilde{\alpha}_{i}.

Lemma 3.12.

In the region Mν+∖{μ→|a≲A1/2}M^{+}_{\nu}\setminus\{\vec{\mu}|_{a}\lesssim A^{1/2}\},

‖α~i‖C−1,0k,α≤CA1/2ν,i=1,2,3.\left\lVert\tilde{\alpha}_{i}\right\rVert_{C^{k,\alpha}_{-1,0}}\leq CA^{1/2}\nu,\quad i=1,2,3.
Lemma 3.13.

In the region {distga​(⋅,𝔇1)≲A1/2≲|μ→|a}⊂Mν+\{\text{dist}_{g_{a}}(\cdot,\mathfrak{D}_{1})\lesssim A^{1/2}\lesssim|\vec{\mu}|_{a}\}\subset M^{+}_{\nu}, which is far away from 𝔇2\mathfrak{D}_{2} and 𝔇3\mathfrak{D}_{3},

{‖α~1−12​μ12+a22​|η|2‖C0,0k,α≤CA−1/4ν,‖α~2‖C0,0k,α≤CA−1/4ν,‖α~3‖C0,0k,α≤CA−1/4ν.\begin{cases}\left\lVert\tilde{\alpha}_{1}-\frac{1}{2\sqrt{\mu_{1}^{2}+a_{22}|\eta|^{2}}}\right\rVert_{C^{k,\alpha}_{0,0}}\leq CA^{-1/4}\nu,\\ \left\lVert\tilde{\alpha}_{2}\right\rVert_{C^{k,\alpha}_{0,0}}\leq CA^{-1/4}\nu,\\ \left\lVert\tilde{\alpha}_{3}\right\rVert_{C^{k,\alpha}_{0,0}}\leq CA^{-1/4}\nu.\end{cases}

Likewise with the neighbourhood of 𝔇2\mathfrak{D}_{2} and 𝔇3\mathfrak{D}_{3}.

Lemma 3.14.

In the region {distga​(⋅,𝔇1)≲A1/2≲|μ→|a}⊂Mν+\{\text{dist}_{g_{a}}(\cdot,\mathfrak{D}_{1})\lesssim A^{1/2}\lesssim|\vec{\mu}|_{a}\}\subset M^{+}_{\nu}, the Kähler ansatz is approximated by the suitably gauge fixed metric model gTaubg_{\text{Taub}}, with metric deviation estimate

‖g~(1)−gTaub‖C0,0k,α≤CA−3/4ν,‖Ω~(1)−ΩTaub‖C0,0k,α≤CA−3/4ν.\left\lVert\tilde{g}^{(1)}-g_{\text{Taub}}\right\rVert_{C^{k,\alpha}_{0,0}}\leq CA^{-3/4}\nu,\quad\left\lVert\tilde{\Omega}^{(1)}-\Omega_{\text{Taub}}\right\rVert_{C^{k,\alpha}_{0,0}}\leq CA^{-3/4}\nu.

Similarly with the neighbourhood of 𝔇2\mathfrak{D}_{2} and 𝔇3\mathfrak{D}_{3}.

Lemma 3.15.

The region {ℓ≳A1/2}⊂Mν+\{\ell\gtrsim A^{1/2}\}\subset M^{+}_{\nu} is covered by subregions of diameter ∼ℓ\sim\ell where the Kähler ansatz is approximated by suitably gauge fixed flat models gflatg_{\text{flat}}, with metric deviation estimate

‖g~(1)−gflat‖C0,0k,α≤CA−3/4ν,‖Ω~(1)−Ωflat‖C0,0k,α≤CA−3/4ν.\left\lVert\tilde{g}^{(1)}-g_{\text{flat}}\right\rVert_{C^{k,\alpha}_{0,0}}\leq CA^{-3/4}\nu,\quad\left\lVert\tilde{\Omega}^{(1)}-\Omega_{\text{flat}}\right\rVert_{C^{k,\alpha}_{0,0}}\leq CA^{-3/4}\nu.

Finally, multiplication property for the weighted Hölder norms implies

Lemma 3.16.

In the region Mν+∖{|μ→|a≲A1/2}M^{+}_{\nu}\setminus\{|\vec{\mu}|_{a}\lesssim A^{1/2}\}, the volume form error is estimated by

‖E~(1)‖C−1,0k,α≤CA−3/4ν2.\left\lVert\tilde{E}^{(1)}\right\rVert_{C^{k,\alpha}_{-1,0}}\leq CA^{-3/4}\nu^{2}.

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source-backed reader collection; mathematical self-containment is not assessed.