ScalingStacks

4.8. Harmonic analysis I: periodic Euclidean region [046I]

Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.

Complete original source context · Original author HTML

4.8. Harmonic analysis I: periodic Euclidean region

The refined mapping properties of the Euclidean Green operator Δa−1\Delta_{a}^{-1} on (ℂ∗)η1,η22×ℝμ(\mathbb{C}^{*})^{2}_{\eta_{1},\eta_{2}}\times\mathbb{R}_{\mu} follow Section 3.5 almost verbatim:

Proposition 4.31.

(Periodic Euclidean region) Let −3<δ<0-3<\delta<0. Let ff be a function compactly supported in ℬν−∩{R>A−1/2}\mathcal{B}^{-}_{\nu}\cap\{R>A^{-1/2}\} with ‖f‖Cδ,0k,α≤1\left\lVert f\right\rVert_{C^{k,\alpha}_{\delta,0}}\leq 1 (respectively ‖f‖Cδk,α≤1\left\lVert f\right\rVert_{C^{k,\alpha}_{\delta}}\leq 1). Then Δa−1​f\Delta_{a}^{-1}f satisfies the gag_{a}-Hessian bound on ℬν−∩{R≳A−1/2}\mathcal{B}^{-}_{\nu}\cap\{R\gtrsim A^{-1/2}\},

‖∇ga2Δa−1​f‖Cδ,0k,α≤C​ν,resp. ​‖∇ga2Δa−1​f‖Cδk,α≤C.\left\lVert\nabla^{2}_{g_{a}}\Delta_{a}^{-1}f\right\rVert_{C^{k,\alpha}_{\delta,0}}\leq C\nu,\quad\text{resp. }\left\lVert\nabla^{2}_{g_{a}}\Delta_{a}^{-1}f\right\rVert_{C^{k,\alpha}_{\delta}}\leq C.
Remark 4.8.

The regularity of Δa−1​f\Delta_{a}^{-1}f in {R≲A−1/2}\{R\lesssim A^{-1/2}\} is well controlled by Δa\Delta_{a}-harmonicity.

This allows us to correct the volume form error sufficiently away from SS as in proposition 3.23. From now on 1≪ν≪A3/81\ll\nu\ll A^{3/8}.

Proposition 4.32.

Let 1≪ν≪A3/81\ll\nu\ll A^{3/8}. Then there is a real valued function φ1\varphi_{1} on ℬν−\mathcal{B}^{-}_{\nu}, solving the generalised Gibbons-Hawking equation on ℬν−∩{ℓ~>2}\mathcal{B}^{-}_{\nu}\cap\{\tilde{\ell}>2\}

V(2)=V(1)+∂2φ1∂μ​∂μ,W(2)p​q¯=W(1)p​q¯−4​∂2φ1∂ηp​∂η¯q,det(W(2)p​q¯)=V(2).V_{(2)}=V_{(1)}+\frac{\partial^{2}\varphi_{1}}{\partial\mu\partial\mu},\quad W^{p\bar{q}}_{(2)}=W^{p\bar{q}}_{(1)}-4\frac{\partial^{2}\varphi_{1}}{\partial\eta_{p}\partial\bar{\eta}_{q}},\quad\det(W^{p\bar{q}}_{(2)})=V_{(2)}.

Morever φ1\varphi_{1} is Δa\Delta_{a}-harmonic on ℬν−∩{ℓ~<1}\mathcal{B}^{-}_{\nu}\cap\{\tilde{\ell}<1\}, and

‖∇ga2φ1‖Ck,α−1,0(ℬ−ν∩{ℓ~≳1})≤Cν3A−3/4,\left\lVert\nabla^{2}_{g_{a}}\varphi_{1}\right\rVert_{C^{k,\alpha}_{-1,0}(\mathcal{B}^{-}_{\nu}\cap\{\tilde{\ell}\gtrsim 1\})}\leq C\nu^{3}A^{-3/4},

and |∇2gaφ1|ga≤Cν3A−3/2|\nabla^{2}_{g_{a}}\varphi_{1}|_{g_{a}}\leq C\nu^{3}A^{-3/2} on ℬν−\mathcal{B}^{-}_{\nu}. In particular the matrix (W(2)p​q¯)(W^{p\bar{q}}_{(2)}) is positive definite and V(2)V_{(2)} is positive on ℬν−\mathcal{B}^{-}_{\nu}.

We obtain by the generalised Gibbons-Hawking construction (g(2),ω(2),J,Ω)(g^{(2)},\omega^{(2)},J,\Omega) associated to the data V(2)V_{(2)} and W(2)p​q¯W^{p\bar{q}}_{(2)}, and identify its ambient space as Mν−M^{-}_{\nu}. The new S1S^{1}-connection ϑ(2)\vartheta^{(2)} is related to ϑ\vartheta by

ϑ(2)−ϑ=−1​(∂2φ−∂ηp​∂μ​d​ηp−∂2φ−∂η¯p​∂μ​d​η¯p).\vartheta^{(2)}-\vartheta=\sqrt{-1}(\frac{\partial^{2}\varphi^{-}}{\partial\eta_{p}\partial\mu}d\eta_{p}-\frac{\partial^{2}\varphi^{-}}{\partial\bar{\eta}_{p}\partial\mu}d\bar{\eta}_{p}).

The new volume form error E(2)E^{(2)} is supported in {ℓ≲1}\{\ell\lesssim 1\} with bound

(4.31) E(2)=det(W(2)p​q¯)V(2)−1,‖E(2)‖C−11,α​(Mν−)≤CA−3/4ν2,E^{(2)}=\frac{\det(W^{p\bar{q}}_{(2)})}{V_{(2)}}-1,\quad\left\lVert E^{(2)}\right\rVert_{C^{1,\alpha}_{-1}(M^{-}_{\nu})}\leq CA^{-3/4}\nu^{2},

and in particular ‖E(2)‖C−1−ϵα​(Mν−)≤CA−3/4ν2\left\lVert E^{(2)}\right\rVert_{C^{\alpha}_{-1-\epsilon}(M^{-}_{\nu})}\leq CA^{-3/4}\nu^{2}.

Henceforth the holomorphic structures will be fixed, and can be identified building on results in Section 4.6. The new holomorphic differentials d​log⁡Z3,d​log⁡Z4d\log Z_{3},d\log Z_{4} are related to d​log⁡z3,d​log⁡z4d\log z_{3},d\log z_{4} by

{d​log⁡Z3=d​log⁡z3+d⁡(∂φ1∂μ),d​log⁡Z4=d​log⁡z4−d⁡(∂φ1∂μ),\begin{cases}d\log Z_{3}=d\log z_{3}+d(\frac{\partial\varphi_{1}}{\partial\mu}),\\ d\log Z_{4}=d\log z_{4}-d(\frac{\partial\varphi_{1}}{\partial\mu}),\end{cases}

whence we find holomorphic coordinates by integration

(4.32) Z3=z3​exp⁡(∂φ1∂μ),Z4=z4​exp⁡(−∂φ1∂μ),Z_{3}=z_{3}\exp(\frac{\partial\varphi_{1}}{\partial\mu}),\quad Z_{4}=z_{4}\exp(-\frac{\partial\varphi_{1}}{\partial\mu}),

which satisfy the functional equation

Z3​Z4=z3​z4=1−z1−z2=1−e2​π​i​η1−e2​π​i​η2.Z_{3}Z_{4}=z_{3}z_{4}=1-z_{1}-z_{2}=1-e^{2\pi i\eta_{1}}-e^{2\pi i\eta_{2}}.

Following Lemma 4.28 and Proposition 4.29,

Proposition 4.33.

(Holomorphic structure) The map

Mν−→{Z3Z4=1−z1−z2}⊂ℂZ3,Z42×(ℂ∗)z1,z22M^{-}_{\nu}\to\{Z_{3}Z_{4}=1-z_{1}-z_{2}\}\subset\mathbb{C}^{2}_{Z_{3},Z_{4}}\times(\mathbb{C}^{*})^{2}_{z_{1},z_{2}}

extends continuously over the singular locus S∩Mν−S\cap M^{-}_{\nu} and defines a holomorphic open embedding under the complex structure JJ. The S1S^{1}-action is identified as

ei​θ⋅(z1,z2,Z3,Z4)=(z1,z2,ei​θ​Z3,e−i​θ​Z4),e^{i\theta}\cdot(z_{1},z_{2},Z_{3},Z_{4})=(z_{1},z_{2},e^{i\theta}Z_{3},e^{-i\theta}Z_{4}),

and the holomorphic volume form is Ω=−−14​π2​z1​z2​d​z2∧d​Z3∧d​Z4.\Omega=-\frac{\sqrt{-1}}{4\pi^{2}z_{1}z_{2}}dz_{2}\wedge dZ_{3}\wedge dZ_{4}. The Kähler structure is C1,αC^{1,\alpha}-regular near SS.

Proposition 4.34.

(Symplectic structure) The integral ∫T2ω(2)=Im​(a2​1¯).\int_{T^{2}}\omega^{(2)}=\text{Im}(a_{2\bar{1}}).

Proof.

The new Kähler form ω(2)\omega^{(2)} is cohomologous to ω(1)\omega^{(1)} by the formula

ω−=ω(1)+d⁡(−1​∂φ−∂ηp​d​ηp−−1​∂φ−∂η¯p​d​η¯p).\omega_{-}=\omega^{(1)}+d(\sqrt{-1}\frac{\partial\varphi^{-}}{\partial\eta_{p}}d\eta_{p}-\sqrt{-1}\frac{\partial\varphi^{-}}{\partial\bar{\eta}_{p}}d\bar{\eta}_{p}).

The claim then follows from Lemma 4.14. ∎

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source-backed reader collection; mathematical self-containment is not assessed.