Recall the model metric defined in (4.20) as the product of the Taub-NUT metric with flat . Denote in the local chart around , as in Section 4.4.
Lemma 4.35.
(Model Laplacian)
Given , let be an -invariant function on the model space supported in , with bound . Then there is a function compactly supported in , such that on an annulus region at any given dyadic scale (or the ball region ) we have a decay estimate
|
|
|
and is only supported on one dyadic scale with the bound
|
|
|
Proof.
Let be the Green operator on the model space, so is an -invariant function. Applying Hein’s package on Poisson equations as in Corollary 2.17 with a simple scaling argument, the function decays like
|
|
|
The decay exponent here comes from the quintic volume growth rate of .
Since the model space is smooth, we can bootstrap this to a weighted estimate on . The function is obtained by cutting off at a dyadic scale . The cutoff error is controlled by the Hessian estimate.
∎
The next Lemma patches together a large number of local parametrices to produce an approximate right inverse of in a neighbourhood of , with sufficiently fast decay estimates. Its proof is similar to Lemma 2.20.
Lemma 4.36.
(Neighbourhood of )
Given and , let be an -invariant function compactly supported in with bound . Then there is a function on supported in , with decay estimates
such that
Proof.
Take a large collection of points on , such that for any point on , the number of points in the collection within -distance to is at least one but no more than . Then take cutoff functions on supported in such that on . These allow us to decompose into a large number of localised contributions:
|
|
|
using the fact that the -norm is not sensitive to inside .
For each term we apply Lemma 4.35 to produce an approximate local solution on , with bounds prescribed in Lemma 4.35. Here is uniformly equivalent to . The candidate solution is
|
|
|
By construction is supported in .
We now bound , focusing on the absolute estimate. Summing up the contributions
|
|
|
we estimate at a point :
|
|
|
The higher order version is
so for .
Next we estimate the error . The error has two sources: the cutoff error supported on from Lemma 4.35
|
|
|
and the metric deviation error , which is controlled because by Proposition 4.19 the local diffeomorphism is a -approximate isometry between and , and has weighted control. We focus on the absolute estimate:
|
|
|
so that
|
|
|
Using
|
|
|
we sum up all contributions to deduce for ,
|
|
|
The Hölder version is
as required.
∎