ScalingStacks

4.9. Harmonic analysis II: Neighbourhood of S [046Q]

Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.

Complete original source context · Original author HTML

4.9. Harmonic analysis II: Neighbourhood of SS

This Section approximately inverts ℒ\mathcal{L} for source functions supported in the vicinity of SS.

Recall the model metric gNUTg_{\text{NUT}} defined in (4.20) as the product of the Taub-NUT metric with flat ℂ\mathbb{C}. Denote r=A⁡(μ12+|ξ1|2+|ξ2|2)r=\sqrt{A(\mu_{1}^{2}+|\xi_{1}|^{2}+|\xi_{2}|^{2})} in the local chart around P∈SP\in S, as in Section 4.4.

Lemma 4.35.

(Model Laplacian) Given 0<ϵ≪10<\epsilon\ll 1, let ff be an S1S^{1}-invariant function on the model space supported in {r≲A−1/2}\{r\lesssim A^{-1/2}\}, with bound ‖f‖C0k,α​(gNUT)≤1\left\lVert f\right\rVert_{C^{k,\alpha}_{0}(g_{\text{NUT}})}\leq 1. Then there is a function uu compactly supported in {r≲A1/4}\{r\lesssim A^{1/4}\}, such that on an annulus region at any given dyadic scale r∼r0r\sim r_{0} (or the ball region r≲A−1/2r\lesssim A^{-1/2}) we have a decay estimate

‖u‖C0k+2,α​(r∼r0,gNUT)≤C​A−1​(A1/2​r0+1)−3+ϵ,\left\lVert u\right\rVert_{C^{k+2,\alpha}_{0}(r\sim r_{0},g_{\text{NUT}})}\leq CA^{-1}(A^{1/2}r_{0}+1)^{-3+\epsilon},

and ΔgNUT​u−f\Delta_{g_{\text{NUT}}}u-f is only supported on one dyadic scale {r∼A1/4}\{r\sim A^{1/4}\} with the bound

‖ΔgNUT​u−f‖C−2k,α​(gNUT)≤C​A3​(−3+ϵ)/4.\left\lVert\Delta_{g_{\text{NUT}}}u-f\right\rVert_{C^{k,\alpha}_{-2}(g_{\text{NUT}})}\leq CA^{3(-3+\epsilon)/4}.
Proof.

Let GNUT{G}_{\text{NUT}} be the Green operator on the model space, so u′=GNUT​fu^{\prime}={G}_{\text{NUT}}f is an S1S^{1}-invariant function. Applying Hein’s package on Poisson equations as in Corollary 2.17 with a simple scaling argument, the function u′u^{\prime} decays like

|u′|≤C​A−1​(A1/2​r+1)−3+ϵ.|u^{\prime}|\leq CA^{-1}(A^{1/2}r+1)^{-3+\epsilon}.

The decay exponent −3+ϵ-3+\epsilon here comes from the quintic volume growth rate of gNUTg_{\text{NUT}}. Since the model space is smooth, we can bootstrap this to a weighted C2,αC^{2,\alpha} estimate on u′u^{\prime}. The function uu is obtained by cutting off u′u^{\prime} at a dyadic scale r∼A1/4r\sim A^{1/4}. The cutoff error is controlled by the Hessian estimate. ∎

The next Lemma patches together a large number of local parametrices to produce an approximate right inverse of Δg(2)\Delta_{g^{(2)}} in a neighbourhood of SS, with sufficiently fast decay estimates. Its proof is similar to Lemma 2.20.

Lemma 4.36.

(Neighbourhood of SS) Given 0<ϵ≪10<\epsilon\ll 1 and −3+ϵ<δ<0-3+\epsilon<\delta<0, let ff be an S1S^{1}-invariant function compactly supported in Mν−∩{R≲A−1/2}M^{-}_{\nu}\cap\{R\lesssim A^{-1/2}\} with bound ‖f‖Cδα≤1\left\lVert f\right\rVert_{C^{\alpha}_{\delta}}\leq 1. Then there is a function uu on ℬ\mathcal{B} supported in {R≲A1/4}\{R\lesssim A^{1/4}\}, with decay estimates ‖u‖C−1+ϵ2,α≤C​A−1,\left\lVert u\right\rVert_{C^{2,\alpha}_{-1+\epsilon}}\leq CA^{-1}, such that ‖Δg(2)​u−f‖Cδα≪1.\left\lVert\Delta_{g^{(2)}}u-f\right\rVert_{C^{\alpha}_{\delta}}\ll 1.

Proof.

Take a large collection of points {Pi}i=1N\{P_{i}\}_{i=1}^{N} on S∩ℬν−S\cap\mathcal{B}^{-}_{\nu}, such that for any point PP on S∩ℬν−S\cap\mathcal{B}^{-}_{\nu}, the number of points PiP_{i} in the collection within gag_{a}-distance O(A−1/2)O(A^{-1/2}) to PP is at least one but no more than CC. Then take cutoff functions χi\chi_{i} on ℬν−\mathcal{B}^{-}_{\nu} supported in {distga(⋅,Pi)≲A−1/2}\{\text{dist}_{g_{a}}(\cdot,P_{i})\lesssim A^{-1/2}\} such that ∑χi=1\sum\chi_{i}=1 on ℬν−∩{R≲A−1/2}\mathcal{B}^{-}_{\nu}\cap\{R\lesssim A^{-1/2}\}. These allow us to decompose ff into a large number of localised contributions:

f=∑i=1Nχi​f,‖χi​f‖C0α≤C,f=\sum_{i=1}^{N}\chi_{i}f,\quad\left\lVert\chi_{i}f\right\rVert_{C^{\alpha}_{0}}\leq C,

using the fact that the CδαC^{\alpha}_{\delta}-norm is not sensitive to δ\delta inside {R≲A−1/2}\{R\lesssim A^{-1/2}\}.

For each term χi​f\chi_{i}f we apply Lemma 4.35 to produce an approximate local solution uiu_{i} on {rPi≲A1/4}\{r_{P_{i}}\lesssim A^{1/4}\}, with bounds prescribed in Lemma 4.35. Here rPi​(Q)r_{P_{i}}(Q) is uniformly equivalent to |Pi−Q|ga|P_{i}-Q|_{g_{a}}. The candidate solution is

u=u1+u2+…​uN.u=u_{1}+u_{2}+\ldots u_{N}.

By construction uu is supported in {R≲A1/4}\{R\lesssim A^{1/4}\}.

We now bound uu, focusing on the absolute estimate. Summing up the contributions

|ui|≤C​A−1​(A1/2​rPi+1)−3+ϵ​‖χi​f‖C0α≤C​A−1​(A1/2​rPi+1)−3+ϵ,|u_{i}|\leq CA^{-1}(A^{1/2}r_{P_{i}}+1)^{-3+\epsilon}\left\lVert\chi_{i}f\right\rVert_{C^{\alpha}_{0}}\leq CA^{-1}(A^{1/2}r_{P_{i}}+1)^{-3+\epsilon},

we estimate at a point QQ:

|u⁡(Q)|≤∑|Pi−Q|ga≲A1/4|ui|(Q)≤C​A−1​∑|Pi−Q|ga≲A1/4(A1/2​|Pi−Q|ga+1)−3+ϵ≤C∫S∩{|P−Q|ga≲A1/4}(A1/2|P−Q|ga+1)−3+ϵd𝒜(P)≤C​A−1​(A1/2​R​(Q)+1)−1+ϵ.\begin{split}|u(Q)|\leq&\sum_{|P_{i}-Q|_{g_{a}}\lesssim A^{1/4}}|u_{i}|(Q)\\ \leq&CA^{-1}\sum_{|P_{i}-Q|_{g_{a}}\lesssim A^{1/4}}(A^{1/2}|P_{i}-Q|_{g_{a}}+1)^{-3+\epsilon}\\ \leq&C\int_{S\cap\{|P-Q|_{g_{a}}\lesssim A^{1/4}\}}(A^{1/2}|P-Q|_{g_{a}}+1)^{-3+\epsilon}d\mathcal{A}(P)\\ \leq&CA^{-1}(A^{1/2}R(Q)+1)^{-1+\epsilon}.\end{split}

The higher order version is ‖u‖C−1−ϵ2,α≤C​A−1,\left\lVert u\right\rVert_{C^{2,\alpha}_{-1-\epsilon}}\leq CA^{-1}, so ‖u‖Cδ2,α≤C​A−1\left\lVert u\right\rVert_{C^{2,\alpha}_{\delta}}\leq CA^{-1} for δ>−3+ϵ\delta>-3+\epsilon.

Next we estimate the error Δg(2)​u−f\Delta_{g^{(2)}}u-f. The error Δg(2)​ui−χi​f\Delta_{g^{(2)}}u_{i}-\chi_{i}f has two sources: the cutoff error supported on {rPi∼A1/4}\{r_{P_{i}}\sim A^{1/4}\} from Lemma 4.35

‖ΔgNUT​ui−χi​f‖C−2α​(gNUT)≤C​A3​(−3+ϵ)/4,\left\lVert\Delta_{g_{\text{NUT}}}u_{i}-\chi_{i}f\right\rVert_{C^{\alpha}_{-2}(g_{\text{NUT}})}\leq CA^{3(-3+\epsilon)/4},

and the metric deviation error ΔgNUT​ui−Δg(2)​f\Delta_{g_{\text{NUT}}}u_{i}-\Delta_{g^{(2)}}f, which is controlled because by Proposition 4.19 the local diffeomorphism Ψ\Psi is a C1,αC^{1,\alpha}-approximate isometry between gNUTg_{\text{NUT}} and g(2)g^{(2)}, and ff has weighted C2,αC^{2,\alpha} control. We focus on the absolute estimate:

|Δg(2)ui−ΔgNUTui|≤CA−3/4(A1/2rPi+1)−3+ϵ(A1/2R+1)−2(A|ξ2|+ν),|\Delta_{g^{(2)}}u_{i}-\Delta_{g_{\text{NUT}}}u_{i}|\leq CA^{-3/4}(A^{1/2}r_{P_{i}}+1)^{-3+\epsilon}(A^{1/2}R+1)^{-2}(A|\xi_{2}|+\nu),

so that

|Δg(2)ui−χif|≤CA−3/4(A1/2rPi+1)−3+ϵ(A1/2R+1)−2(A1/2rPi+ν).|\Delta_{g^{(2)}}u_{i}-\chi_{i}f|\leq CA^{-3/4}(A^{1/2}r_{P_{i}}+1)^{-3+\epsilon}(A^{1/2}R+1)^{-2}(A^{1/2}r_{P_{i}}+\nu).

Using

{∑|Pi−Q|ga≲A1/4(A1/2​rPi​(Q)+1)−3+ϵ≤(A1/2​R​(Q)+1)−1+ϵ,∑|Pi−Q|ga≲A1/4(A​rPi​(Q)+1)−2+ϵ≤C​A3​ϵ/4,\begin{cases}\sum_{|P_{i}-Q|_{g_{a}}\lesssim A^{1/4}}(A^{1/2}r_{P_{i}}(Q)+1)^{-3+\epsilon}\leq(A^{1/2}R(Q)+1)^{-1+\epsilon},\\ \sum_{|P_{i}-Q|_{g_{a}}\lesssim A^{1/4}}(Ar_{P_{i}}(Q)+1)^{-2+\epsilon}\leq CA^{3\epsilon/4},\end{cases}

we sum up all contributions to deduce for δ>−3+ϵ\delta>-3+\epsilon,

|Δg(2)​u−f|≤∑|Pi−Q|ga≲A1/4|Δg(2)​ui−χi​f|≤CA−3/4{A3​ϵ/4(A1/2R+1)−2+ν(A1/2R+1)−3+ϵ}≪(A1/2R+1)δ.\begin{split}&|\Delta_{g^{(2)}}u-f|\leq\sum_{|P_{i}-Q|_{g_{a}}\lesssim A^{1/4}}|\Delta_{g^{(2)}}u_{i}-\chi_{i}f|\\ \leq&CA^{-3/4}\{A^{3\epsilon/4}(A^{1/2}R+1)^{-2}+\nu(A^{1/2}R+1)^{-3+\epsilon}\}\ll(A^{1/2}R+1)^{\delta}.\end{split}

The Hölder version is ‖Δg(2)​u−f‖Cδα≪1\left\lVert\Delta_{g^{(2)}}u-f\right\rVert_{C^{\alpha}_{\delta}}\ll 1 as required. ∎

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source-backed reader collection; mathematical self-containment is not assessed.