ScalingStacks

4.7. Weighted Hölder norms and initial error estimate [046D]

Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.

Complete original source context · Original author HTML

4.7. Weighted Hölder norms and initial error estimate

The following few Sections are aimed at perturbing the Kähler ansatz into a Calabi-Yau metric. This Section sets up the weighted Hölder norms and measure the volume form error

(4.30) E(1)=det(W(1)p​q¯)V(1)−1=A+A​ap​q¯​wp​q¯+det(wp​q¯)A+v−1=det(wp​q¯)A+v.E^{(1)}=\frac{\det(W^{p\bar{q}}_{(1)})}{V_{(1)}}-1=\frac{A+Aa^{p\bar{q}}w^{p\bar{q}}+\det(w^{p\bar{q}})}{A+v}-1=\frac{\det(w^{p\bar{q}})}{A+v}.

There are three weight parameters:

ϱ=|(y1,y2,μ)|a′,R=distga​(⋅,S),ℓ~=κa​distga′​(⋅,Im​(S)).\varrho=|(y_{1},y_{2},\mu)|_{a}^{\prime},\quad R=\text{dist}_{g_{a}}(\cdot,S),\quad\tilde{\ell}=\kappa_{a}\text{dist}_{g_{a}^{\prime}}(\cdot,\text{Im}(S)).

The parameter ℓ~\tilde{\ell} is useful for measuring exponential decay rates (cf. Proposition 4.13). The following definitions are parallel to Section 3.4.

Let δ≤0\delta\leq 0. We shall define the weighted Hölder norms ‖T‖Cδ,0k,α\left\lVert T\right\rVert_{C^{k,\alpha}_{\delta,0}} for S1S^{1}-invariant tensor fields TT on M−M^{-}, by prescribing the norm on a number of overlapping regions up to uniform equivalence.

  • •

    The region {R≲A1/4}\{R\lesssim A^{1/4}\} is covered by local charts {r≲A1/4}\{r\lesssim A^{1/4}\} introduced in Section 4.4 and 4.5, where the ansatz metric is approximated by gNUTg_{\text{NUT}}. Let ‖T‖Cδ,0k,α\left\lVert T\right\rVert_{C^{k,\alpha}_{\delta,0}} be uniformly equivalent to the norm ‖Ψ∗​T‖Cδk,α​(gNUT)\left\lVert\Psi^{*}T\right\rVert_{C^{k,\alpha}_{\delta}(g_{\text{NUT}})} in Section 4.5. Inside {R≲A−1/2}\{R\lesssim A^{-1/2}\} the metric ansatz is C1,αC^{1,\alpha}-regular, so correspondingly we should work with functions of at most C2,αC^{2,\alpha}-regularity and tensors of at most C1,αC^{1,\alpha}-regularity. Inside {R≳A−1/2}\{R\gtrsim A^{-1/2}\} there is no restriction on regularity.

  • •

    The region {ℓ~≳1}\{\tilde{\ell}\gtrsim 1\} can be covered by subregions of diameter ∼R\sim R, where the S1S^{1}-bundle is topologically trivial. Over each subregion the metric is approximated by the periodic version of the constant solution gflatg_{\text{flat}} (cf. Section 2.2). The x1,x2x_{1},x_{2} variables define two periodic direction. We decompose TT into the part T¯\bar{T} independent of x1,x2x_{1},x_{2} (the ‘zeroth Fourier mode’) and the oscillatory part T−T¯T-\bar{T} (the ‘higher Fourier mode’), and define the weighted Hölder norm separately on the two parts:

  • •

    On the zeroth Fourier mode, the norm ‖T¯‖Cδ,0k,α\left\lVert\bar{T}\right\rVert_{C^{k,\alpha}_{\delta,0}} is equivalent to

    A−3δ/4(∑j=0k‖Rj∇jT¯‖L∞+[Rk∇kT¯]α),A^{-3\delta/4}(\sum_{j=0}^{k}\left\lVert R^{j}\nabla^{j}\bar{T}\right\rVert_{L^{\infty}}+[R^{k}\nabla^{k}\bar{T}]_{\alpha}),

    where []α[]_{\alpha} denotes the appropriately normalised Hölder seminorm.

  • •

    On the higher Fourier modes we build in the exponential decay. Fix a parameter 0<κ<10<\kappa<1. The norm ‖T−T¯‖Cδ,0k,α\left\lVert T-\bar{T}\right\rVert_{C^{k,\alpha}_{\delta,0}} in this region is equivalent to

    A−3δ/4supℓ~≳1eκ​ℓ~(∑j=0k‖Aj/4∇j(T−T¯)‖L∞+Ak/4[∇k(T−T¯)]α).A^{-3\delta/4}\sup_{\tilde{\ell}\gtrsim 1}e^{\kappa\tilde{\ell}}(\sum_{j=0}^{k}\left\lVert A^{j/4}\nabla^{j}(T-\bar{T})\right\rVert_{L^{\infty}}+A^{k/4}[\nabla^{k}(T-\bar{T})]_{\alpha}).

    An estimate in this norm is the higher order version of |T−T¯|≤C​A3​δ/4​e−κ​ℓ~.|T-\bar{T}|\leq CA^{3\delta/4}e^{-\kappa\tilde{\ell}}.

Notation.

The norm ‖⋅‖Cδ,0k,α\left\lVert\cdot\right\rVert_{C^{k,\alpha}_{\delta,0}} can refer to any type of tensors depending on the context, such as functions, 1-forms, symmetric 2-tensors, and in some cases can refer to the norm computed in a subregion. Strictly speaking this norm depends on κ\kappa, but we suppress this to avoid cluttering the notation.

We will also need a variant weighted Hölder norm ‖T‖Cδk,α\left\lVert T\right\rVert_{C^{k,\alpha}_{\delta}}. The only difference from ‖T‖Cδ,0k,α\left\lVert T\right\rVert_{C^{k,\alpha}_{\delta,0}} is that in the region {ℓ~≳1}\{\tilde{\ell}\gtrsim 1\} on the zeroth Fourier mode, ‖T¯‖Cδk,α\left\lVert\bar{T}\right\rVert_{C^{k,\alpha}_{\delta}} is equivalent to

A−δ/2(∑j=0k‖Rj−δ∇jT¯‖L∞+[Rk−δ∇kT¯]α),A^{-\delta/2}(\sum_{j=0}^{k}\left\lVert R^{j-\delta}\nabla^{j}\bar{T}\right\rVert_{L^{\infty}}+[R^{k-\delta}\nabla^{k}\bar{T}]_{\alpha}),

so an estimate in this norm is the higher order version of |T¯|=O(A3​δ/4(A−1/4R)δ)|\bar{T}|=O(A^{3\delta/4}(A^{-1/4}R)^{\delta}). We have inserted an extra decay factor (A−1/4R)δ(A^{-1/4}R)^{\delta}.

Notation.

For a parameter ν\nu with 1≪ν<ϵ0​A3/41\ll\nu<\epsilon_{0}A^{3/4}, define the subregion of M−M^{-}

Mν−={A−1/4ϱ<eν}⊂M−.M^{-}_{\nu}=\{A^{-1/4}\varrho<e^{\nu}\}\subset M^{-}.

Its base is ℬν−={A−1/4ϱ<eν}⊂(ℂ∗)η1,η22×ℝμ\mathcal{B}^{-}_{\nu}=\{A^{-1/4}\varrho<e^{\nu}\}\subset(\mathbb{C}^{*})^{2}_{\eta_{1},\eta_{2}}\times\mathbb{R}_{\mu}.

Lemma 4.30.

The volume form error E(1)E^{(1)} satisfies the estimate on Mν−M^{-}_{\nu}:

‖E(1)‖C−1,01,α≤CA−3/4ν2.\left\lVert E^{(1)}\right\rVert_{C^{1,\alpha}_{-1,0}}\leq CA^{-3/4}\nu^{2}.

In the subregion {R≳A1/4}⊂Mν−\{R\gtrsim A^{1/4}\}\subset M^{-}_{\nu}, and any fixed large kk,

‖E(1)‖C−1,0k,α≤CA−3/4ν2.\left\lVert E^{(1)}\right\rVert_{C^{k,\alpha}_{-1,0}}\leq CA^{-3/4}\nu^{2}.
Proof.

(Sketch) In the region {R≲A1/4}\{R\lesssim A^{1/4}\} the volume form estimate follows from Proposition 4.16 and 4.18. In the region {R≳A1/4}\{R\gtrsim A^{1/4}\} the absolute estimate follows by combining Section 4.2, 4.3, notably the exponential decay estimate in Proposition 4.13, and the higher order estimate uses the Δa\Delta_{a}-harmonicity on wp​q¯w^{p\bar{q}}. ∎

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source-backed reader collection; mathematical self-containment is not assessed.