ScalingStacks

Proof. [042D]

Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.

Complete original source context · Original author HTML

Proof.

We focus on the region {distga′(⋅,𝔇1)≳A1/2}\{\text{dist}_{g_{a}^{\prime}}(\cdot,\mathfrak{D}_{1})\gtrsim A^{1/2}\}. The key idea is that α~1−α¯1\tilde{\alpha}_{1}-\bar{\alpha}_{1} is Δa\Delta_{a}-harmonic , bounded and has no zero Fourier mode in the S1S^{1} direction defined by the xx-variable, so the exponential decay follows from Fourier analysis. We remark that similar ideas have appeared in the recent paper [13].

We perform Fourier decomposition in the S1S^{1} direction

α~1−α¯1=∑n≠0hn​(μ1,μ2,y)​e2​π​i​n​x,\tilde{\alpha}_{1}-\bar{\alpha}_{1}=\sum_{n\neq 0}h_{n}(\mu_{1},\mu_{2},y)e^{2\pi inx},

Parseval identity combined with Lemma 3.4 shows

∑n|hn|2=∫01|α~1−α¯1|2dx≤CA−1/2.\sum_{n}|h_{n}|^{2}=\int_{0}^{1}|\tilde{\alpha}_{1}-\bar{\alpha}_{1}|^{2}dx\leq CA^{-1/2}.

Now Δa\Delta_{a}-harmonicity translates into the 3-dimensional Helmholtz equations:

Δa′​hn−4​π2​n2​A−1​hn=0.\Delta_{a}^{\prime}h_{n}-4\pi^{2}n^{2}A^{-1}h_{n}=0.

The remaining task is conceptually speaking to estimate the Dirichlet Green’s function for the Helmholtz equation on the noncompact 3-dimensional domain {distga′(⋅,𝔇1)≳A1/2}\{\text{dist}_{g_{a}^{\prime}}(\cdot,\mathfrak{D}_{1})\gtrsim A^{1/2}\}. In practice, building an upper barrier for the Green’s function suffices for our purpose.

Recall ϱ=|(μ1,μ2,y)|a′\varrho=|(\mu_{1},\mu_{2},y)|_{a}^{\prime} is the distance function for the Euclidean metric ga′g_{a}^{\prime} on ℝμ1,μ22×ℝy\mathbb{R}^{2}_{\mu_{1},\mu_{2}}\times\mathbb{R}_{y}. By simple direct computation, for any κ>0\kappa>0,

(Δa′−4​π2​n2​A−1)​e−κ​ϱ≤(κ2−4​π2​n2​A−1)​e−κ​ϱ,(\Delta_{a}^{\prime}-4\pi^{2}n^{2}A^{-1})e^{-\kappa\varrho}\leq(\kappa^{2}-4\pi^{2}n^{2}A^{-1})e^{-\kappa\varrho},

so for kn=2π|n|A−1/2k_{n}=2\pi|n|A^{-1/2}, the function e−kn​ϱe^{-k_{n}\varrho} is a supersolution of the Helmholtz equation. Now we build a barrier function

hn′(μ1,μ2,y)=A−1/2∫0∞e−kn​|(μ1,μ2−s,y)|a′ds,h_{n}^{\prime}(\mu_{1},\mu_{2},y)=A^{-1/2}\int_{0}^{\infty}e^{-k_{n}|(\mu_{1},\mu_{2}-s,y)|_{a}^{\prime}}ds,

whose singularity lies on 𝔇1\mathfrak{D}_{1}. Since hn′h_{n}^{\prime} is a positive superposition of supersolutions, it must be itself a supersolution. Other basic properties are:

  • •

    On {distga′(⋅,𝔇1)≥A1/2}\{\text{dist}_{g_{a}^{\prime}}(\cdot,\mathfrak{D}_{1})\geq A^{1/2}\}, using the saddle point method for Laplace type integrals

    0≤hn′≤CA−3/4distga′(⋅,𝔇1)exp(−kndistga′(⋅,𝔇1)).0\leq h_{n}^{\prime}\leq CA^{-3/4}\text{dist}_{g_{a}^{\prime}}(\cdot,\mathfrak{D}_{1})\exp(-k_{n}\text{dist}_{g_{a}^{\prime}}(\cdot,\mathfrak{D}_{1})).
  • •

    On the boundary of {distga′(⋅,𝔇1)≥A1/2}\{\text{dist}_{g_{a}^{\prime}}(\cdot,\mathfrak{D}_{1})\geq A^{1/2}\}, we have hn′≥A−1/4C​|n|h_{n}^{\prime}\geq\frac{A^{-1/4}}{C|n|}.

Since |hn|≤CA−1/4|h_{n}|\leq CA^{-1/4} by the Parseval identity, the comparison principle implies

hn≤C|n|hn′≤CA−3/4|n|distga′(⋅,𝔇1)exp(−kndistga′(⋅,𝔇1)).\begin{split}h_{n}\leq C|n|h_{n}^{\prime}\leq CA^{-3/4}|n|\text{dist}_{g_{a}^{\prime}}(\cdot,\mathfrak{D}_{1})\exp(-k_{n}\text{dist}_{g_{a}^{\prime}}(\cdot,\mathfrak{D}_{1})).\end{split}

Thus on {distga′(⋅,𝔇1)≥A1/2}\{\text{dist}_{g_{a}^{\prime}}(\cdot,\mathfrak{D}_{1})\geq A^{1/2}\}, the desired bound on |α~1−α¯1||\tilde{\alpha}_{1}-\bar{\alpha}_{1}| follows by summing over these estimates over nn. It is worth commenting that we expect the exponential decay rate to be sharp. ∎

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source-backed reader collection; mathematical self-containment is not assessed.