ScalingStacks

Proof. [0429]

Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.

Complete original source context · Original author HTML

Proof.

We will focus on α¯1\bar{\alpha}_{1}. The periodic version of equation (2.7) on ℝμ1,μ22×(S1×ℝ)η\mathbb{R}^{2}_{\mu_{1},\mu_{2}}\times(S^{1}\times\mathbb{R})_{\eta} is the measure equation

(Δaα~1)A3/2dμ1∧dμ2∧dx∧dy=−2πA∫𝔇1dμ2.(\Delta_{a}\tilde{\alpha}_{1})A^{3/2}d\mu_{1}\wedge d\mu_{2}\wedge dx\wedge dy=-2\pi\sqrt{A}\int_{\mathfrak{D}_{1}}d\mu_{2}.

Integrating in the periodic xx-variable from 0 to 1,

(3.7) (Δa′α¯1)dVola′=−2π∫𝔇1dμ2,(\Delta_{a}^{\prime}\bar{\alpha}_{1})d\text{Vol}_{a}^{\prime}=-2\pi\int_{\mathfrak{D}_{1}}d\mu_{2},

where Δa′\Delta_{a}^{\prime} is the Laplacian of the metric ga′=ai​j​d​μi​d​μj+A​d​y2g_{a}^{\prime}=a_{ij}d\mu_{i}d\mu_{j}+Ady^{2} on ℝμ1,μ22×ℝ\mathbb{R}^{2}_{\mu_{1},\mu_{2}}\times\mathbb{R}, whose volume form is d​Vola′=A​d​μ1∧d​μ2∧d​yd\text{Vol}_{a}^{\prime}=Ad\mu_{1}\wedge d\mu_{2}\wedge dy.

Now the basic strategy is to build a function satisfying the same measure equation and then compare. For a large positive cutoff Λ\Lambda, we calculate the Green representation

−14​π∫0Λ−2​π|(μ1,μ2−s,y)|a′ds=12​a22sinh−1(sAa222​μ12+Aa22​y2)|s=−μ2−a12a22​μ1s=−μ2−a12a22​μ1+Λ.\begin{split}&-\frac{1}{4\pi}\int_{0}^{\Lambda}\frac{-2\pi}{|(\mu_{1},\mu_{2}-s,y)|_{a}^{\prime}}ds=\frac{1}{2\sqrt{a_{22}}}\sinh^{-1}\left(\frac{s}{\sqrt{\frac{A}{a_{22}^{2}}\mu_{1}^{2}+\frac{A}{a_{22}}y^{2}}}\right)|_{s=-\mu_{2}-\frac{a_{12}}{a_{22}}\mu_{1}}^{s=-\mu_{2}-\frac{a_{12}}{a_{22}}\mu_{1}+\Lambda}.\end{split}

If we subtract 12​a22​log⁡(2​Λ)\frac{1}{2\sqrt{a_{22}}}\log(2\Lambda) and take the limit Λ→∞\Lambda\to\infty, we obtain the function

−12​a22​log⁡(1a22​|(μ1,μ2,y)|a′−μ2−a12a22​μ1)-\frac{1}{2\sqrt{a_{22}}}\log\left(\frac{1}{\sqrt{a_{22}}}|(\mu_{1},\mu_{2},y)|_{a}^{\prime}-\mu_{2}-\frac{a_{12}}{a_{22}}\mu_{1}\right)

which by construction satisfies the same measure equation as (3.7).

We claim that this function differs from α¯1\bar{\alpha}_{1} by a constant. By the Liouville theorem, it suffices to show that the function α¯1\bar{\alpha}_{1} on ℝ2×ℝ\mathbb{R}^{2}\times\mathbb{R} has the logarithmic growth estimate

α¯1≤CA−1/4{log(1+A−3/4ϱ)+|log(1a22−1​μ12+y2)|+1}\bar{\alpha}_{1}\leq CA^{-1/4}\{\log(1+A^{-3/4}\varrho)+|\log(\frac{1}{a_{22}^{-1}\mu_{1}^{2}+y^{2}})|+1\}

which is easy to deduce from Lemma 3.2.

Now to pin down the constant, we can evaluate α¯1\bar{\alpha}_{1} for μ1=μ2=0,y≠0\mu_{1}=\mu_{2}=0,y\neq 0. Then the arctan\arctan term drops out, and

α¯1​(0,0,y)=12​a22​limΛ→+∞{∫0Λ1x2+y2​dx−∑n=1Λ1n}=12​a22​limΛ→∞{sinh−1⁡(Λ|y|)−log⁡Λ−γE}=12​a22​(log⁡(2|y|)−γE)\begin{split}\bar{\alpha}_{1}(0,0,y)&=\frac{1}{2\sqrt{a_{22}}}\lim_{\Lambda\to+\infty}\{\int_{0}^{\Lambda}\frac{1}{\sqrt{x^{2}+y^{2}}}dx-\sum_{n=1}^{\Lambda}\frac{1}{n}\}\\ &=\frac{1}{2\sqrt{a_{22}}}\lim_{\Lambda\to\infty}\{\sinh^{-1}(\frac{\Lambda}{|y|})-\log\Lambda-\gamma_{E}\}\\ &=\frac{1}{2\sqrt{a_{22}}}(\log(\frac{2}{|y|})-\gamma_{E})\end{split}

Comparing the expressions give the formula for α¯1\bar{\alpha}_{1}. ∎

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source-backed reader collection; mathematical self-containment is not assessed.