ScalingStacks

Proof. [041H]

Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.

Complete original source context · Original author HTML

Proof.

The existence of moment coordinates follows from H1​(ℂ3)=0H^{1}(\mathbb{C}^{3})=0, but for the purpose of estimation we wish to relate μ~iℂ3\tilde{\mu}_{i}^{\mathbb{C}^{3}} to μi\mu_{i} outside the ball {|μ→|a≲A−1/4}\{|\vec{\mu}|_{a}\lesssim A^{-1/4}\} where the surgery was performed. In this exterior region

ωℂ3=ω(2)+−1∂∂¯ϕℂ3=ω(1)+ddcϕℂ3,dc=−12(∂¯−∂).\omega_{\mathbb{C}^{3}}=\omega^{(2)}+\sqrt{-1}\partial\bar{\partial}\phi^{\mathbb{C}^{3}}=\omega^{(1)}+dd^{c}\phi^{\mathbb{C}^{3}},\quad d^{c}=\frac{\sqrt{-1}}{2}(\bar{\partial}-\partial).

The 1-form dc​ϕℂ3d^{c}\phi^{\mathbb{C}^{3}} is T2T^{2}-invariant, so by Cartan’s formula

ι∂∂θi​d​dc​ϕℂ3=−d​ι∂∂θi​dc​ϕℂ3,\iota_{\frac{\partial}{\partial\theta_{i}}}dd^{c}\phi^{\mathbb{C}^{3}}=-d\iota_{\frac{\partial}{\partial\theta_{i}}}d^{c}\phi^{\mathbb{C}^{3}},

which combined with d​μi=−ι∂∂θi​ω(1)d\mu_{i}=-\iota_{\frac{\partial}{\partial\theta_{i}}}\omega^{(1)} allow us to find the moment coordinates:

μ~iℂ3=μi+ι∂∂θidcϕℂ3,dμ~iℂ3=−ι∂∂θiωℂ3,i=1,2.\tilde{\mu}_{i}^{\mathbb{C}^{3}}=\mu_{i}+\iota_{\frac{\partial}{\partial\theta_{i}}}d^{c}\phi^{\mathbb{C}^{3}},\quad d\tilde{\mu}_{i}^{\mathbb{C}^{3}}=-\iota_{\frac{\partial}{\partial\theta_{i}}}\omega_{\mathbb{C}^{3}},\quad i=1,2.

Using the estimates |dϕℂ3|≤CA−1/2ℓ−ϵ|μ→|a−1+ϵ|d\phi^{\mathbb{C}^{3}}|\leq CA^{-1/2}\ell^{-\epsilon}|\vec{\mu}|_{a}^{-1+\epsilon} and |∂∂θi|≤CA−1/4,|\frac{\partial}{\partial\theta_{i}}|\leq CA^{-1/4}, we see

|μi−μ~iℂ3|≤CA−3/4ℓ−ϵ|μ→|a−1+ϵ.|\mu_{i}-\tilde{\mu}_{i}^{\mathbb{C}^{3}}|\leq CA^{-3/4}\ell^{-\epsilon}|\vec{\mu}|_{a}^{-1+\epsilon}.

Now inside {|μ→|a≲A−1/4}\{|\vec{\mu}|_{a}\lesssim A^{-1/4}\}, we have |μi|≤CA−1/2|\mu_{i}|\leq CA^{-1/2}, and |dμ~i|≤CA−1/4|d\tilde{\mu}_{i}|\leq CA^{-1/4} integrates to give |μ~i|≤CA−1/2|\tilde{\mu}_{i}|\leq CA^{-1/2}. Thus globally on ℂ3\mathbb{C}^{3}

|μi−μ~iℂ3|≤CA−3/4ℓ−ϵ(A−1/4+|μ→|a)−1+ϵ|\mu_{i}-\tilde{\mu}_{i}^{\mathbb{C}^{3}}|\leq CA^{-3/4}\ell^{-\epsilon}(A^{-1/4}+|\vec{\mu}|_{a})^{-1+\epsilon}

as required. Morever μ~1ℂ3,μ~2ℂ3,μ~1ℂ3−μ~2ℂ3\tilde{\mu}_{1}^{\mathbb{C}^{3}},\tilde{\mu}_{2}^{\mathbb{C}^{3}},\tilde{\mu}_{1}^{\mathbb{C}^{3}}-\tilde{\mu}_{2}^{\mathbb{C}^{3}} vanish respectively along 𝔇1,𝔇2,𝔇3\mathfrak{D}_{1},\mathfrak{D}_{2},\mathfrak{D}_{3}, due to the respective vanishing of the circle generators ∂∂θ1,∂∂θ2,∂∂θ1−∂∂θ2\frac{\partial}{\partial\theta_{1}},\frac{\partial}{\partial\theta_{2}},\frac{\partial}{\partial\theta_{1}}-\frac{\partial}{\partial\theta_{2}}.

Now consider the map ℂ3→(μ~1ℂ3,μ~2ℂ3,Im​(η))ℝ3\mathbb{C}^{3}\xrightarrow{(\tilde{\mu}_{1}^{\mathbb{C}^{3}},\tilde{\mu}_{2}^{\mathbb{C}^{3}},\text{Im}(\eta))}\mathbb{R}^{3}. It is a special Lagrangian fibration by Remark 1.6.

At a critical point p∈ℂ3p\in\mathbb{C}^{3} the Zariski tangent space of the fibre, namely the annihilator of span​(d​μ~1ℂ3,d​μ~2ℂ3,d​Im​η)\text{span}(d\tilde{\mu}_{1}^{\mathbb{C}^{3}},d\tilde{\mu}_{2}^{\mathbb{C}^{3}},d\text{Im}\eta), is a linear subspace of Tp​ℂ3T_{p}\mathbb{C}^{3} of real dimension at least 4. It contains ∂∂θ1,∂∂θ2\frac{\partial}{\partial\theta_{1}},\frac{\partial}{\partial\theta_{2}} and is gℂ3g_{\mathbb{C}^{3}}-orthogonal to I​∂∂θ1,I​∂∂θ2I\frac{\partial}{\partial\theta_{1}},I\frac{\partial}{\partial\theta_{2}}. If d​η≠0d\eta\neq 0 at pp, then ∂∂θ1,∂∂θ2\frac{\partial}{\partial\theta_{1}},\frac{\partial}{\partial\theta_{2}} are linearly independent, so the Zariski tangent space is the orthogonal complement of span​(I​∂∂θ1,I​∂∂θ2)\text{span}(I\frac{\partial}{\partial\theta_{1}},I\frac{\partial}{\partial\theta_{2}}) by dimension counting. Since d​Im​ηd\text{Im}\eta vanishes on the Zariski tangent space, and d​ηd\eta vanishes on spanℂ​(∂∂θ1,∂∂θ2)\text{span}_{\mathbb{C}}(\frac{\partial}{\partial\theta_{1}},\frac{\partial}{\partial\theta_{2}}), we deduce d​η=0d\eta=0 on Tp​ℂ3T_{p}\mathbb{C}^{3}, contradiction. Thus the critical points must satisfy d​η=0d\eta=0, or equivalently p∈⋃i,j{zi=zj=0}p\in\bigcup_{i,j}\{z_{i}=z_{j}=0\}. Conversely all points in ⋃i,j{zi=zj=0}\bigcup_{i,j}\{z_{i}=z_{j}=0\} are critical. Having identified the critical point set, the discriminant locus follows from the argument in Lemma 1.6. ∎

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source-backed reader collection; mathematical self-containment is not assessed.