ScalingStacks

2.2. Metric behaviour away from the discriminant locus [03ZP]

Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.

Complete original source context · Original author HTML

2.2. Metric behaviour away from the discriminant locus

This Section uses weighted Hölder norms to quantify the idea that sufficiently away from the discriminant locus the metric g(1)g^{(1)} is approximated by the constant solution.

Given a large number C1≫1C_{1}\gg 1, we consider MM over the base region

(2.12) {A1/4​|μ→|a≥C1,|μ→|a≤2​C1​ℓ,\begin{cases}A^{1/4}|\vec{\mu}|_{a}\geq C_{1},\\ |\vec{\mu}|_{a}\leq 2C_{1}\ell,\end{cases}

meaning that the region is far from the origin, and the gag_{a}-distance to 𝔇\mathfrak{D} is comparable to the gag_{a}-distance to the origin. Topologically the base region is obtained by removing the apex from a cone over a thrice-punctured 3-sphere. The AA-dependence is inserted for convenience when we analyse the scaling behaviours.

The flat model metric is simply constructed by applying the generalised Gibbons-Hawking ansatz to Vflati​j=ai​jV^{ij}_{\text{flat}}=a_{ij} and Wflat=AW_{\text{flat}}=A:

gflat=ai​j​d​μi​d​μj+A​|d​η|2+ai​j​ϑiflat​ϑjflat,g_{\text{flat}}=a_{ij}d\mu_{i}d\mu_{j}+A|d\eta|^{2}+a^{ij}\vartheta_{i}^{\text{flat}}\vartheta_{j}^{\text{flat}},

where ϑiflat\vartheta_{i}^{\text{flat}} for i=1,2i=1,2 are flat connections. Likewise we define ωflat\omega_{\text{flat}} and Ωflat\Omega_{\text{flat}}. A subtlety is that gflatg_{\text{flat}} cannot model g(1)g^{(1)} globally over the region defined by (2.12), because the Chern class of the T2T^{2}-bundle for g(1)g^{(1)} evaluates nontrivially on the S2S^{2} cycles wrapping the 3 puncture points in S3S^{3}, which obstructs the flat connection ϑiflat\vartheta_{i}^{\text{flat}}. It is thence understood that we are comparing the model metric with g(1)g^{(1)} over a finite number of contractible conical subregions which cover (2.12).

The deviation of Vi​jV^{ij} from ai​ja_{ij} is measured by α1,α2,α3\alpha_{1},\alpha_{2},\alpha_{3}. To estimate these quantities over these regions we introduce some weighted Hölder norms associated to the reference metrics gflatg_{\text{flat}}. For any T2T^{2}-invariant tensor field TT defined over the region, we define the normalised Hölder seminorm

[T]α=supp|μ→|aα⋅sup|p−p′|a<110​ℓ|T⁡(p)−T⁡(p′)|dflat​(p,p′)α[T]_{\alpha}=\sup_{p}|\vec{\mu}|_{a}^{\alpha}\cdot\sup_{|p-p^{\prime}|_{a}<\frac{1}{10}\ell}\frac{|T(p)-T(p^{\prime})|}{d_{\text{flat}}(p,p^{\prime})^{\alpha}}

where we compare T⁡(p)T(p) and T⁡(p′)T(p^{\prime}) using parallel transport along minimal geodesics. The weighted norm of TT is then defined by

‖T‖Cτ′k,α=A−τ′/4∑j=0k‖|μ→|a−τ′+j∇jT‖L∞+A−τ′/4[|μ→|a−τ′+k∇kT]α.\left\lVert T\right\rVert_{C^{k,\alpha}_{\tau^{\prime}}}=A^{-\tau^{\prime}/4}\sum_{j=0}^{k}\left\lVert|\vec{\mu}|_{a}^{-\tau^{\prime}+j}\nabla^{j}T\right\rVert_{L^{\infty}}+A^{-\tau^{\prime}/4}[|\vec{\mu}|_{a}^{-\tau^{\prime}+k}\nabla^{k}T]_{\alpha}.

An estimate in this norm is thought as the higher order version of |T|=O⁡(Aτ′/4​|μ→|aτ′)|T|=O(A^{\tau^{\prime}/4}|\vec{\mu}|_{a}^{\tau^{\prime}}).

Lemma 2.3.

Over each of the finitely many contractible conical subregions ‖αi‖C−1k,α≤C​A1/2\left\lVert\alpha_{i}\right\rVert_{C^{k,\alpha}_{-1}}\leq{CA^{1/2}}.

Proof.

The absolute value estimate |αi|≤C​A1/4|μ→|a|\alpha_{i}|\leq\frac{CA^{1/4}}{|\vec{\mu}|_{a}} is clear from the explicit defining formula. The higher order estimates use that Δa​αi=0\Delta_{a}\alpha_{i}=0 holds over a gag_{a}-ball of radius comparable to |μ→|a|\vec{\mu}|_{a}. ∎

Next we estimate the deviation of ϑi\vartheta_{i} from ϑiflat\vartheta_{i}^{\text{flat}}. Since gauge equivalent choices of ϑi\vartheta_{i} give rise to the same Kähler structure (g(1),ω(1),J,Ω)(g^{(1)},\omega^{(1)},J,\Omega) up to holomorphic isometry, we may make any convenient gauge choice. The defining condition on ϑi\vartheta_{i} is

d​ϑi=−1​(12​∂W(1)∂μi​d​η∧d​η¯+∂V(1)i​j∂η​d​μj∧d​η−∂V(1)i​j∂η¯​d​μj∧d​η¯),d\vartheta_{i}=\sqrt{-1}\left(\frac{1}{2}\frac{\partial W_{(1)}}{\partial\mu_{i}}d\eta\wedge d\bar{\eta}+\frac{\partial V^{ij}_{(1)}}{\partial\eta}d\mu_{j}\wedge d\eta-\frac{\partial V^{ij}_{(1)}}{\partial\bar{\eta}}d\mu_{j}\wedge d\bar{\eta}\right),

and d​ϑiflat=0d\vartheta_{i}^{\text{flat}}=0. Thus ‖d⁡(ϑi−ϑiflat)‖C−2k,α≤C​A1/2\left\lVert d(\vartheta_{i}-\vartheta_{i}^{\text{flat}})\right\rVert_{C^{k,\alpha}_{-2}}\leq CA^{1/2} using the higher derivative estimates on αi\alpha_{i}. Using the d-Poincaré lemma, we can find a gauge fixed choice of the 1-form ϑi−ϑiflat\vartheta_{i}-\vartheta_{i}^{\text{flat}} such that ‖ϑi−ϑiflat‖C−1k,α≤C​A1/4\left\lVert\vartheta_{i}-\vartheta_{i}^{\text{flat}}\right\rVert_{C^{k,\alpha}_{-1}}\leq CA^{1/4}. Combining these discussions, and noticing |dμi|≤CA−1/4,|dη|≤CA−1/2|d\mu_{i}|\leq CA^{-1/4},|d\eta|\leq CA^{-1/2}, we obtain

Corollary 2.4.

Over each of the finitely many contractible conical subregions, after suitable gauge fixing, we have the deviation estimates

‖g(1)−gflat‖C−1k,α≤C,‖ω(1)−ωflat‖C−1k,α≤C,‖Ω−Ωflat‖C−1k,α≤C.\left\lVert g^{(1)}-g_{\text{flat}}\right\rVert_{C^{k,\alpha}_{-1}}\leq C,\quad\left\lVert\omega^{(1)}-\omega_{\text{flat}}\right\rVert_{C^{k,\alpha}_{-1}}\leq C,\quad\left\lVert\Omega-\Omega_{\text{flat}}\right\rVert_{C^{k,\alpha}_{-1}}\leq C.

Morever the volume form error function E(1)E^{(1)} satisfies ‖E(1)‖C−2k,α≤C\left\lVert E^{(1)}\right\rVert_{C^{k,\alpha}_{-2}}\leq C, namely the higher order version of quadratic decay estimate.

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source-backed reader collection; mathematical self-containment is not assessed.