ScalingStacks

1.3.2. Holomorphic viewpoint [03Z8]

Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.

Complete original source context · Original author HTML

1.3.2. Holomorphic viewpoint

As a hyperKähler metric, the Ooguri-Vafa metric admits a 2-sphere of compatible integrable complex structures. There is one distinguished complex structure giving rise to a holomorphic elliptic fibration, which is described in detail in [11]. Here we wish to focus on another distinguished complex structure where η\eta is holomorphic and μ\mu is the symplectic moment map, which is more natural for special Lagrangian fibrations. The author is not aware of explicit references for the content of this Section.

Our main goal is to identify the complex structure on MM explicitly, which requires us to construct holomorphic functions on MM. We start with the type (1,0)(1,0) form ζ=V​d​μ+−1​ϑ\zeta=Vd\mu+\sqrt{-1}\vartheta and recall formula (1.14). To turn ζ\zeta into a holomorphic differential, we need to subtract a function times d​ηd\eta, whose differential cancels out d​ζd\zeta. Inspired by the Taub-NUT example 1.8, and taking care of periodicity requirement, we introduce the functions

{β+=π​−12−−1​θ∞+limk→∞∑n=−kn=k{12​(η+n)−μ2​(η+n)​μ2+|η+n|2}β−=π​−12+−1​θ∞+limk→∞∑n=−kn=k{12​(η+n)+μ2​(η+n)​μ2+|η+n|2}\begin{cases}\beta_{+}=\frac{\pi\sqrt{-1}}{2}-\sqrt{-1}\theta_{\infty}+\lim_{k\to\infty}\sum_{n=-k}^{n=k}\{\frac{1}{2(\eta+n)}-\frac{\mu}{2(\eta+n)\sqrt{\mu^{2}+|\eta+n|^{2}}}\}\\ \beta_{-}=\frac{\pi\sqrt{-1}}{2}+\sqrt{-1}\theta_{\infty}+\lim_{k\to\infty}\sum_{n=-k}^{n=k}\{\frac{1}{2(\eta+n)}+\frac{\mu}{2(\eta+n)\sqrt{\mu^{2}+|\eta+n|^{2}}}\}\end{cases}

These series are convergent and 1-periodic in η\eta, such that the forms ζ′=ζ+β+​d​η\zeta^{\prime}=\zeta+\beta_{+}d\eta, ζ′′=−ζ+β−​d​η\zeta^{\prime\prime}=-\zeta+\beta_{-}d\eta are closed. The real number θ∞\theta_{\infty} is chosen to cancel the asymptotic holonomy of the S1S^{1}-connection ϑ\vartheta along the Re​(η)\text{Re}(\eta)-circle as Im​η→∞\text{Im}\eta\to\infty. We have

ζ′+ζ′′=π​−1​d​η+limk→∞∑n=−kk1η+n​d​η=π​−1​d​η+d​log⁡(η​∏n=1∞(1−η2n2))=π​−1​d​η+d​log⁡(sin⁡(π​η)π)=d​log⁡(1−e2​π​i​η),\begin{split}\zeta^{\prime}+\zeta^{\prime\prime}&=\pi\sqrt{-1}d\eta+\lim_{k\to\infty}\sum_{n=-k}^{k}\frac{1}{\eta+n}d\eta\\ &=\pi\sqrt{-1}d\eta+d\log(\eta\prod_{n=1}^{\infty}(1-\frac{\eta^{2}}{n^{2}}))\\ &=\pi\sqrt{-1}d\eta+d\log(\frac{\sin(\pi\eta)}{\pi})=d\log(1-e^{2\pi i\eta}),\end{split}

where we made use of Euler’s factorisation identity of sin⁡(π​η)π​η\frac{\sin(\pi\eta)}{\pi\eta}. The line integrals ∫ζ′\int\zeta^{\prime} and ∫ζ′′\int\zeta^{\prime\prime} are locally holomorphic functions on MM, defined over the complement of {μ≤0,η=0}\{\mu\leq 0,\eta=0\} and {μ≥0,η=0}\{\mu\geq 0,\eta=0\} inside ℬ\mathcal{B}. Their T2T^{2}-periods lie in 2​π​−1​ℤ2\pi\sqrt{-1}\mathbb{Z}: the periods along the S1S^{1}-fibre over ℬ\mathcal{B} is ∫S1−1​ϑ=2​π​−1\int_{S^{1}}\sqrt{-1}\vartheta=2\pi\sqrt{-1}, while the periods along the S1S^{1}-cycle in MM lifting S1⊂ℝ×S1×ℝS^{1}\subset\mathbb{R}\times S^{1}\times\mathbb{R} can be evaluated by their asymptotic value as Im​(η)→+∞\text{Im}(\eta)\to+\infty; in particular if we twist the connection ϑ\vartheta by a flat connection, then we can always use the choice of θ∞\theta_{\infty} to cancel that twist. Thus we can define the holomorphic functions without multivalue issues

z1=exp⁡(∫ζ′),z2=exp⁡(∫ζ′′).z_{1}=\exp(\int\zeta^{\prime}),\quad z_{2}=\exp(\int\zeta^{\prime\prime}).

We are free to choose the multiplicative constants on z1,z2z_{1},z_{2} to satisfy the functional equation z1​z2=1−e2​π​i​ηz_{1}z_{2}=1-e^{2\pi i\eta}, from which we see that z1,z2z_{1},z_{2} extend to global holomorphic functions on MM, with zero locus {μ≤0,η=0}\{\mu\leq 0,\eta=0\} and {μ≥0,η=0}\{\mu\geq 0,\eta=0\} inside ℬ\mathcal{B} respectively. Setting z3=exp⁡(2​π​−1​η)z_{3}=\exp(2\pi\sqrt{-1}\eta), we obtain a holomorphic map

M→{z1z2=1−z3}⊂ℂz1,z22×ℂz3∗,M\to\{z_{1}z_{2}=1-z_{3}\}\subset\mathbb{C}^{2}_{z_{1},z_{2}}\times\mathbb{C}^{*}_{z_{3}},

which is easily seen to be an open embedding.

By looking at the action of the Hamiltonian vector field ∂∂θ\frac{\partial}{\partial\theta}, we can identify the circle action as

ei​θ⋅(z1,z2,z3)=(ei​θ​z1,e−i​θ​z2,z3).e^{i\theta}\cdot(z_{1},z_{2},z_{3})=(e^{i\theta}z_{1},e^{-i\theta}z_{2},z_{3}).

By construction the holomorphic volume form Ω\Omega satisfies ι∂∂θ​Ω=d​η\iota_{\frac{\partial}{\partial\theta}}\Omega=d\eta, which implies Ω=−12​π​1z3​d​z1∧d​z2,\Omega=-\frac{1}{2\pi}\frac{1}{z_{3}}dz_{1}\wedge dz_{2}, or equivalently

Ω∧d⁡((z1​z2)−1​(1−z3)−1)=12​π​d​log​z1∧d​log​z2∧d​log​z3.\Omega\wedge d((z_{1}z_{2})^{-1}(1-z_{3})-1)=\frac{1}{2\pi}d\log z_{1}\wedge d\log z_{2}\wedge d\log z_{3}.

The reader is advised to compare this discussion to Section 1.1.6.

Remark 1.10.

The viewpoint taken here starts with geometry, and the algebraic structure on the holomorphic functions only emerges a posteriori as a consequence of functional equations on transcendental integrals. This is conceptually rather similar to elliptic curves where algebraic relations arise from theta functions.

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source-backed reader collection; mathematical self-containment is not assessed.