A.2. Analytification of a scheme [018F]
Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.
Complete original source context · Original author HTML
A.2. Analytification of a scheme
To any scheme of finite type over a Banach ring , Berkovich associates an analytification99 9 We use the term analytification even though we shall only consider as a topological space. In particular, only depends on the reduced scheme structure of . , a locally compact topological space with a continuous morphism , defined as follows.
When is affine, with a finitely generated -algebra, is defined as the set of multiplicative seminorms on whose restriction to is bounded by the given norm on , i.e. belongs to . The topology on is the weakest one for which is continuous for every .
In the general case, the analytification is defined by gluing together the analytifications of an affine open cover, and yields a covariant functor . If is an open (resp. closed) embedding, then so is . If is surjective, then so is .
The topological space is Hausdorff (resp. compact) if is separated (resp. projective). The assignment above globalizes to a continuous map
where is equipped with the Zariski topology.
When is a valued field, it is more common to write instead of [Berk90].
Example A.3.
For , the Gelfand-Mazur theorem shows that coincides with the usual analytification of , i.e. the set of complex points of endowed with the euclidean topology.