ScalingStacks

8.1. A singular version of Theorem A [0181]

Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.

Complete original source context Β· Original author HTML

8.1. A singular version of Theorem A

Let Ο€:𝒳→𝔻\pi\colon{\mathcal{X}}\to{\mathbb{D}} be a projective, flat holomorphic map of a normal complex space onto the disc, with X:=Ο€βˆ’1​(π”»βˆ—)X:=\pi^{-1}({\mathbb{D}}^{*}) smooth over π”»βˆ—{\mathbb{D}}^{*}. Since Ο€\pi is projective, it defines a smooth projective variety Xℂ⁑((t))X_{{\mathbb{C}}(\!({t})\!)} over ℂ⁑((t)){\mathbb{C}}(\!({t})\!), as well as a model 𝒳ℂ⁑[[t]]{\mathcal{X}}_{{\mathbb{C}}[\![{t}]\!]}.

Let β„’{\mathcal{L}} be a β„š{\mathbb{Q}}-line bundle on 𝒳{\mathcal{X}} extending KX/π”»βˆ—K_{X/{\mathbb{D}}^{*}}, and ψ\psi a continuous Hermitian metric on β„’{\mathcal{L}}. This data induces a continuous Hermitian metric ψt\psi_{t} on KXtK_{X_{t}} for tβˆˆπ”»βˆ—t\in{\mathbb{D}}^{*}, as well as a residually metrized model β„’#{\mathcal{L}}^{\#} of KXℂ⁑((t))K_{X_{{\mathbb{C}}(\!({t})\!)}}, the model given by ℒℂ⁑[[t]]{\mathcal{L}}_{{\mathbb{C}}[\![{t}]\!]} and the metric by the restriction of ψ\psi to β„’0=β„’|𝒳0{\mathcal{L}}_{0}={\mathcal{L}}|_{{\mathcal{X}}_{0}}. Thus we obtain a skeletal measure ΞΌβ„’#\mu_{{\mathcal{L}}^{\#}} on Xℂ⁑((t))anX^{\mathrm{an}}_{{\mathbb{C}}(\!({t})\!)}.

Denote by β„’β€²{\mathcal{L}}^{\prime} (resp. Οˆβ€²\psi^{\prime}) the pull-back of β„’{\mathcal{L}} (resp. ψ\psi) to a log resolution 𝒳′→𝒳{\mathcal{X}}^{\prime}\to{\mathcal{X}}. By invariance of skeletal measures under pull-back, we have ΞΌβ„’β€²#=ΞΌβ„’#\mu_{{\mathcal{L}}^{\prime\#}}=\mu_{{\mathcal{L}}^{\#}}, and TheoremΒ 3.4 therefore implies:

Theorem 8.1.

The rescaled measures

ΞΌt:=e2β€‹Οˆt|t|2​κmin​(2​π​log⁑|t|βˆ’1)d,\mu_{t}:=\frac{e^{2\psi_{t}}}{|t|^{2\kappa_{\min}}(2\pi\log|t|^{-1})^{d}},

viewed as measures on 𝒳′hyb{\mathcal{X}}^{\prime\mathrm{hyb}}, converge weakly to ΞΌβ„’#\mu_{{\mathcal{L}}^{\#}}.

Corollary 8.2.

If 𝒳{\mathcal{X}} (i.e. the pair (𝒳,𝒳0,red)({\mathcal{X}},{\mathcal{X}}_{0,\mathrm{red}})) is dlt, then

limtβ†’0βˆ«π’³te2β€‹Οˆt|t|2​κmin​(2​π​log⁑|t|βˆ’1)d=βˆ‘Οƒ(∫YΟƒResYσ⁑(β„’#))​bΟƒβˆ’1​Vol⁑(Οƒ),\lim_{t\to 0}\frac{\int_{{\mathcal{X}}_{t}}e^{2\psi_{t}}}{|t|^{2\kappa_{\min}}(2\pi\log|t|^{-1})^{d}}=\sum_{\sigma}\left(\int_{Y_{\sigma}}\operatorname{Res}_{Y_{\sigma}}({\mathcal{L}}^{\#})\right)b_{\sigma}^{-1}\operatorname{Vol}(\sigma),

where Οƒ\sigma runs over the dd-dimensional faces of Δ⁑(β„’)\Delta({\mathcal{L}}).

When d=0d=0, this implies the following slight generalization ofΒ [Li13, Lemma 1].

Corollary 8.3.

Assume that 𝒳0{\mathcal{X}}_{0} has klt singularities (and hence 𝒳{\mathcal{X}} is dlt by inversion of adjunction). Let ψ\psi be a continuous metric on K𝒳/𝔻K_{{\mathcal{X}}/{\mathbb{D}}}. Then tβ†¦βˆ«π’³te2β€‹Οˆtt\mapsto\int_{{\mathcal{X}}_{t}}e^{2\psi_{t}} is continuous at t=0t=0.

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source-backed reader collection; mathematical self-containment is not assessed.