3.2. Statement and first reductions
It will be convenient to introduce the quantity
|
|
|
for . Note that as .
Let be the locally compact
hybrid space constructed in §2. It comes with a
proper map extending
and such that .
The next result implies Theorem A in the introduction.
Theorem 3.4.
Let be an snc degeneration,
a -line bundle on extending ,
and a continuous metric on .
Define as above, and set .
Then, viewed as measures on ,
|
|
|
converges weakly to
|
|
|
where ranges over the -dimensional faces of .
Here denotes normalized Lebesgue measure on
and , where
and , are the divisors defining .
We start by making a few reductions.
First, we may—and will—assume in what follows that
. Indeed, defines a nonvanishing section of
, and hence a smooth metric , so we may replace
and with and
, respectively, and end up with .
Since , we then have , with
equality if and only if corresponds to a vertex of .
Next we reduce the assertion of Theorem 3.4 to a local problem. Let be the stratum of an arbitrary face of , and denote by the components of cutting out , ordered so that
|
|
|
We can then make the identification
|
|
|
with .
Set and
|
|
|
Then is a face of under the embedding
given by .
Let be the corresponding stratum of .
Note that contains a face of if and only if ; in that case, the face is unique, equal to (which then implies ).
Pick , and choose local coordinates
at such that is a local equation of
for and
|
|
|
We may assume that is defined on a polydisc with . Decompose
|
|
|
as
|
|
|
where we view as a point of , and as
a point of
.
The coordinate chart is adapted to in the sense of §2.2, with
|
|
|
given by
|
|
|
We aim to establish the following result.
Lemma 3.5.
Pick . If and , then
|
|
|
in the weak topology of measures on ,
with the unique -dimensional face of
contained in .
Otherwise (i.e. if or )
.
Granted this result, let us show how to prove
Theorem 3.4.
For , is an
compact neighborhood
of with a map as in
Proposition 2.1.
We will use
Lemma 3.6.
Let , be a family of probability measures on
such that is supported on . Then
if and only if .
Here the limits are in the sense of weak convergence of measures on
and , respectively.
By Lemma 3.6 we must show that
|
|
|
where ranges
over -dimensional simplices in .
But this is easily seen to follow from Lemma 3.5,
using a partition of unity argument
as in the proof of Proposition 2.1.
Proof of Lemma 3.6.
The direct implication follows from the continuity of .
For the reverse implication, assume that
and
consider the following three subsets of :
is the set of functions of the form ,
where ;
is the set of functions of the form
, where ; and
together with the constant function 1.
Then the real vector space spanned
by functions of the form , with is
easily seen to be an -algebra that separates points and contains all
constant functions. By the Stone-Weierstrass Theorem, is
dense in , so it suffices to prove that
for . By linearity,
we may assume with .
We may further assume . Write and
. Then
|
|
|
which completes the proof.
∎