ScalingStacks

A.5. The hybrid circle [018J]

Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.

Complete original source context Β· Original author HTML

A.5. The hybrid circle

Now consider the hybrid circle of radius r∈(0,1)r\in(0,1), that is, Chyb(r):={|t|=r}βŠ‚π”Έ1,hyb=(Specβ„‚[t])hybC_{\mathrm{hyb}}(r):=\{|{t}|=r\}\subset{\mathbb{A}}^{1,\mathrm{hyb}}=(\operatorname{Spec}{\mathbb{C}}[{t}])^{\mathrm{hyb}}. ByΒ [Poi10, Prop 2.1.1], this is compact and realized as the Berkovich spectrum of the Banach ring

Ar:={f=βˆ‘Ξ±βˆˆβ„€cα​tΞ±βˆˆβ„‚β‘((t))|β€–fβ€–hyb:=βˆ‘Ξ±βˆˆβ„€β€–cΞ±β€–hyb​rΞ±<+∞}.A_{r}:=\left\{f=\sum_{\alpha\in{\mathbb{Z}}}c_{\alpha}{t}^{\alpha}\in{\mathbb{C}}(\!({t})\!)\ \bigg|\ \|f\|_{\mathrm{hyb}}:=\sum_{\alpha\in{\mathbb{Z}}}\|c_{\alpha}\|_{\mathrm{hyb}}r^{\alpha}<+\infty\right\}.

Since β€–cΞ±β€–hybβ‰₯|cΞ±|∞\|c_{\alpha}\|_{\mathrm{hyb}}\geq|c_{\alpha}|_{\infty}, every f∈Arf\in A_{r} defines a continuous function fholf^{\operatorname{hol}} on the punctured closed disc 𝔻¯rβˆ—\overline{{\mathbb{D}}}^{*}_{r} that is holomorphic on 𝔻rβˆ—{\mathbb{D}}^{*}_{r} and meromorphic at 0.

Proposition A.4.

There is a homeomorphism 𝔻¯rβ€‹β†’βˆΌβ€‹β„³β€‹(Ar)≃Chyb​(r)\overline{{\mathbb{D}}}_{r}\overset{\sim}{\to}{\mathcal{M}}(A_{r})\simeq C_{\mathrm{hyb}}(r), that maps zβˆˆπ”»Β―rβŠ‚β„‚z\in\overline{{\mathbb{D}}}_{r}\subset{\mathbb{C}} to the seminorm on ArA_{r} defined by

|f|={rord0⁑(f)ifΒ z=0rlog⁑|fhol​(z)|∞log⁑|z|∞otherwise,|f|=\begin{cases}r^{\operatorname{ord}_{0}(f)}&\ \text{if $z=0$}\\ r^{\frac{\log|f^{\operatorname{hol}}(z)|_{\infty}}{\log|z|_{\infty}}}\ &\text{otherwise},\end{cases} (A.1)

and via which the map Ξ»:Chyb​(r)β†’[0,1]\lambda\colon C_{\mathrm{hyb}}(r)\to[0,1] is given by λ⁑(z)=log⁑rlog⁑|z|∞\lambda(z)=\frac{\log r}{\log|z|_{\infty}}.

Proof.

The map Ο„:𝔻¯r→ℳ⁑(Ar)\tau\colon\overline{{\mathbb{D}}}_{r}\to{\mathcal{M}}(A_{r}) given byΒ (A.1) is clearly well defined. It is also continuous on 𝔻¯rβˆ—\overline{{\mathbb{D}}}^{*}_{r}. To prove continuity at 00, we note that for each f∈Arf\in A_{r}, we can write fhol=zord0⁑(f)​uf^{\operatorname{hol}}=z^{\operatorname{ord}_{0}(f)}u, where uu is a continuous function on 𝔻¯r\overline{{\mathbb{D}}}_{r} that is holomorphic on 𝔻r{\mathbb{D}}_{r} with u⁑(0)β‰ 0u(0)\neq 0. As a consequence, we get limzβ†’0log⁑|fhol​(z)|∞log⁑|z|∞=ord0⁑(f)\lim_{z\to 0}\frac{\log|f^{\operatorname{hol}}(z)|_{\infty}}{\log|z|_{\infty}}=\operatorname{ord}_{0}(f).

Now, for each ρ∈(0,1]\rho\in(0,1], Ξ»βˆ’1​(ρ)βŠ‚Chyb​(r)\lambda^{-1}(\rho)\subset C_{\mathrm{hyb}}(r) can be identified with the circle of radius rr with respect to the absolute value |β‹…|∞ρ|\cdot|_{\infty}^{\rho}, while Ξ»βˆ’1​(0)\lambda^{-1}(0) is the non-Archimedean absolute value rβˆ’ord0r^{-\operatorname{ord}_{0}} on ℂ⁑((t)){\mathbb{C}}(\!({t})\!). This proves that the map Ο„\tau above is bijective, and hence a homeomorphism by compactness. ∎

Remark A.5.

When r<sr<s, the identity gives a bounded map from AsA_{s} to ArA_{r}, and limβ†’rβ†’0⁑Ar\varinjlim_{r\to 0}A_{r} is the fraction field of π’ͺβ„‚,0{\mathcal{O}}_{{\mathbb{C}},0}, i.e. the ring of meromorphic germs at the origin of β„‚{\mathbb{C}}.

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source-backed reader collection; mathematical self-containment is not assessed.