5. Berkovich spaces and skeleta [016H]
Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.
Complete original source context · Original author HTML
5. Berkovich spaces and skeleta
Our goal in this section and the next is to study the limit measure appearing in Corollary B in more detail. This measure lives on a Berkovich space and its support has an integral piecewise affine structure.
In this section we undertake a fairly general study of metrics on the canonical bundle of a projective variety defined over a discretely valued field of residue characteristic zero. To such a metric is associated a skeleton, a subset of the underlying Berkovich space. In the setting of Corollary B, the skeleton will be the support of the measure .
The material here has overlap with [MN15, NX13] and also draws on [Tem14], but we present some details for the convenience of the reader.
Until further notice, denotes a smooth proper variety over the field of formal Laurent series with coefficients in an algebraically closed field of characteristic . We set and denote by the Berkovich analytification of with respect the non-Archimedean absolute value on , for some fixed .
While comes equipped with a structure sheaf, we shall merely consider it as a topological space. Since is proper, is compact. There is a natural continuous surjective map such that the preimage of a (scheme) point is identified with the set of real-valued valuations66 6 Here we use additive terminology; the multiplicative norm associated to is . on the residue field of satisfying and . In particular, the preimage of the generic point of consists of real-valued valuations of the function field .
5.1. Models
Set . Following the convention of [MN15], we define a model of to be a normal scheme , flat and of finite type (but possibly non-proper) over , together with an identification of the generic fiber of the structure morphism with .
For any two models , , the identifications of the generic fibers with induces a unique birational map . We say that dominates if this map is a morphism. Any two models can be dominated by a third.
For any model and every irreducible component of , we set , and view the divisorial valuation
as an element of . The set of such points is a dense subset .
We usually denote by the irreducible decomposition of the central fiber, and write for . We say that is snc if ( is regular and) has simple normal crossing support. Since has characteristic , this means that each non-empty is smooth over , of codimension in .
More generally, a model is toroidal if is a strict toroidal embedding in the sense of [KKMS], i.e. is formally isomorphic, at each closed point of , to the inclusion of in a toric -variety, and such that each is normal (which then implies that each non-empty is normal).
Every model contains a largest snc Zariski open subset . By Temkin’s version of Hironaka’s theorem [Tem12], is dominated by an snc model such that the induced birational morphism is projective, and an isomorphism over .
If is a model of , the set of semivaluations that admit a center (or reduction) on is a closed subset; it can be viewed as the generic fiber of a suitable formal scheme [MN15, 2.2.2]. By the valuative criterion of properness, we have for each proper morphism of models , and if is proper (over , that is). The reduction map , taking a semivaluation to its center, is anticontinuous.77 7 Anticontinuity means that the inverse image of an open set is closed.
The set consists of all divisorial valuations on that are centered on , trivial on and such that .
5.2. Model metrics
If is a line bundle on , a model of is a -line bundle on a proper model , together with an identification . It defines a model metric on the Berkovich analytification of . If is another model of , determined on a proper model of , then if and only if the pull-backs of and to some higher model coincide.
A model of is given by a -Cartier divisor supported on the central fiber of a proper model ; the corresponding model metric will then be identified with the model function defined by . It satisfies
| (5.1) |
where runs over the irreducible components of .
5.3. Log canonical divisors
If is a regular model, is a locally complete intersection morphism, so the dualizing sheaf is a well-defined line bundle (see [MN15, §4.1] for a more detailed discussion). For an arbitrary (normal) model, we may thus introduce the relative canonical divisor (class) as the Weil divisor class on such that . We then define:
- (i)
the canonical divisor ;
- (ii)
the log canonical divisor ;
- (iii)
the relative log canonical divisor
Note that is -Cartier if and only if is -Cartier.
Example 5.1.
Assume that is snc, and write as above . Pick a closed point , and denote by the set of components of passing through . We may choose a regular system of parameters such that is a local equation of for , i.e. for some unit . The logarithmic form
is then a local generator of , and induces a local generator
of .
5.4. Log discrepancies
Let be a model with -Cartier, and recall that denotes the set of divisorial valuations on such that . We define the log discrepancy as the log discrepancy of with respect to the pair , in the usual sense of the Minimal Model Program.
The log discrepancy function is characterized by the following property: if is a model over with proper birational morphism , then
| (5.2) |
with running over the irreducible components of .
We say that a model is log canonical (lc for short), Kawamata log terminal (klt) or divisorially log terminal (dlt) if the pair has this property, in the sense of the Minimal Model Program.
Since the generic fiber is smooth, a model is thus lc (resp. klt) if and only if is -Cartier, with log discrepancy function taking non-negative (resp. positive) values. If is lc, then the center of a valuation with is called an lc center of , and an lc model is dlt if and only if contains all lc centers. The irreducible components of each non-empty are then normal, with generic point contained in [Kol13, 4.16].
Example 5.3.
Assume that , and let be a dlt model. Each irreducible component is then a smooth curve. At a point , , is snc. At a closed point , is either regular, or has a cyclic quotient singularity.
Example 5.4.
Example 5.5.
If is any model such that has klt singularities (and hence is reduced), then is dlt, by inversion of adjunction.
5.5. The skeleton of a dlt model
The dual complex of an snc model is defined as the dual complex of the snc divisor , as in §2.1. It is equipped with a natural integral affine structure, in which the face corresponding to a component of a non-empty is identified with the simplex
in such a way that .
As explained in [BFJ16, §3] and [MN15, §3], there is a natural embedding
that takes a point to the corresponding monomial valuation. In particular, the vertex corresponding to is sent to the divisorial valuation . The value group of a valuation , , is given by
Further, if , then is the closure of the center of .
The resulting subspace is called the skeleton of . It is naturally a -PA space, the -PA functions on being precisely the restrictions of model functions determined by a Cartier divisor on some proper modification .
We further have a natural retraction , mapping a valuation centered on to the monomial valuation taking the same values on the ’s. These retractions induce a homeomorphism
where runs over all proper (or projective) snc models, compare (4.3).
If is a proper morphism of snc models, then, by [MN15, 3.1.7],
the first inclusion being -PA. Further,
coincides with the set of (quasi)monomial, or Abhyankar, valuations.
For a dlt model , the dual complex and skeleton are simply defined as those of , cf. [NX13]. The retraction can be defined as above when is -factorial, but its existence is otherwise unclear (at least to us!).
By [KKMS], any toroidal model has a dual complex endowed with a natural integral affine structure. This dual complex is canonically realized as a subspace , for instance by setting for any toroidal modification with snc. Thus is equipped with a -PA structure.
5.6. From log discrepancies to Temkin’s metric
As noted in [FJ04, BFJ08, JM12] in increasing order of generality, log discrepancy functions extend in a natural way to Berkovich spaces. More precisely, let be any model of such that is -Cartier, with log discrepancy function . For each snc model properly dominating , a simple computation going back (at least) to [Kol97, Lemma 3.11] shows the following:
- (i)
the restriction of to is -affine on each face of ;
- (ii)
we have , the inequality being strict outside .
We may thus extend to an lsc function by setting
| (5.3) |
for any . When is dlt, the log discrepancy function determines the skeleton as follows.
Proposition 5.6.
If is dlt, then .
Lemma 5.7.
Assume that is lc, and pick with . Then is an lc center of .
Proof.
We claim that, for every sufficiently high snc model proper over , and have the same center on . Indeed, the center of on is a specialization of that of , and hence . On the other hand, we have . Since is anticontinuous, is open, and hence contains for some snc model proper over . As a result, is a specialization of , and the claim follows.
By (5.3), we have , and it is thus enough to prove the result for . If is the unique face of containing in its interior, then on , since is non-negative and affine on . For any divisorial point in the relative interior of , we thus have and , which shows that is an lc center. ∎
Proof of Proposition 5.6.
When is snc, the result is a direct consequence of (i) and (ii) above. When is dlt, we have by definition
and on . It is thus enough to show that any with belongs to , i.e. satisfies . But is an lc center by Lemma 5.7, and hence by definition of dlt singularities. ∎
Let be a proper model with -Cartier. Viewed as a -line bundle, the latter is then a model of , and hence defines a model metric on . Further, (5.2) shows that the lsc metric
| (5.4) |
on is independent of . This is a special case of Temkin’s canonical metrization of the canonical bundle [Tem14].88 8 That we obtain Temkin’s metric follows from [Tem14, Theorem 8.1.2]. Note that Temkin uses multiplicative terminology. The weight function of [MN15] associated to a pluricanonical form is the function on .
5.7. The skeleton of a metric on
The purpose of this section is to introduce and study a slight generalization of the Kontsevich–Soibelman skeleton introduced in [KS06] and further analyzed in [MN15, NX13].
Definition 5.8.
If is a continuous (or usc) metric on , set and . The skeleton of is the compact set
Note that is an lsc function , and hence achieves its infimum.
Definition 5.9.
Let be a model of determined on a proper dlt model . We denote by the subcomplex of such that a face of is in if and only if each vertex of achieves with .
Concretely, the values are computed as follows: we have
with , and . Note that each face of contains at most one maximal face of .
Proposition 5.10.
Assume that is a model metric on , determined by a model of on a proper dlt model of . Then , and is affine on each face of . In particular,
| (5.5) |
where runs over the vertices in , and is the subset of corresponding to the subcomplex of .
5.8. Residual boundaries
The following construction plays a crucial role for the understanding of the limit measure appearing in Corollary B.
Consider a model metric of defined on a proper dlt model . Following §3.1 we explain how to associate a subklt pair to each stratum of corresponding to a maximal simplex in .
Let us first recall a few facts about adjunction. When is an snc model, each stratum comes with a boundary . Here is log smooth, and
| (5.6) |
the identification being provided by Poincaré residues. When is merely dlt, each stratum is normal, and comes with a canonically defined effective -divisor such that is dlt and still satisfies (5.6) (cf. [Kol13, 4.19]). We have
where is an effective -divisor supported in the complement of .
Example 5.11.
For each , contains finitely many prime divisors of . At the generic point of , has cyclic quotient singularities, and
with the order of the corresponding cyclic groups, cf. [Kol13, 3.36.3].
Now let be a model metric on , determined by a model of on a proper dlt model of . Introduce as before the function on , and note that the -Cartier divisor
is effective.
Lemma 5.12.
If is a stratum of corresponding to a face of , then . It follows that the -Cartier divisor
is well-defined, and we have a canonical identification as -line bundles. Further, if is a maximal face of , then the pair is subklt.
We emphasize that is not effective in general.
Proof.
The first two points are clear. When is a maximal face, each meeting satisfies . As a result, contains each lc center of , which yields the last assertion. ∎
5.9. Skeleta and base change
Now we study how skeleta of snc models and of metrics behave under base change.
For consider the Galois extension of , with Galois group , and set . Then acts on and the canonical map induces a homeomorphism
If is a model of , then its normalized base change yields a model of with a finite morphism . If is a -divisor on defining a model function on , then
| (5.7) |
When is an snc model, is toroidal, by [KKMS, pp.98–102]. The following rather detailed description will be useful later on.
Lemma 5.13.
We have . Further, for each face of , there exist positive integers , and satisfying
and such that the following properties hold: is a union of faces of , and these are permuted by . For each :
- (a)
induces a -affine isomorphism ;
- (b)
induces a generically finite map , of degree ;
- (c)
, and .
Furthermore, we have:
- (i)
;
- (ii)
;
- (iii)
.
Proof.
The proof uses the toroidal theory of [KKMS] together with elementary ramification theory of valuations [ZS75].
Let be the face of corresponding to an irreducible component of . Set . With the identification
the integral affine structure is given by the lattice . Note that .
Given a closed point , we can find local coordinates in the formal completion such that . A toric computation (cf. [KKMS, pp.98–102]) shows that has preimages in , with formally isomorphic, at each , to the product of with the affine toric -variety corresponding to the cone with lattice
It follows that is the union of the corresponding faces of , each isomorphic to
with integral affine structure induced by . Now restricts to a homeomorphism given by . Thus . This implies (i), and (ii)–(iii) easily follow.
Now note that
It remains to analyze the degree of the restriction . For this we use ramification theory.
The function field is a Galois extension of of degree , with Galois group . For any valuation , we have .
Let be a valuation corresponding to a point . Assume is “general” in the sense that . The point has preimages under , one in each , and the valuations are all the extensions of to . Let us compute the residue degree and ramification index of these extensions.
The residue fields of and are exactly the function fields of and , respectively, so the residue degree of the extension of is equal to .
The value group of is given by . Similarly, the value group of is given by . It follows that the ramification index of the extension of is given by
By [ZS75, p.77] we now have , which completes the proof. ∎
Next we study skeleta of metrics. Generalizing [NX13, Lemma 4.1.9], we prove:
Lemma 5.14.
Let be a continuous metric on , the metric on corresponding to , and set . Then . As a consequence, and .
Proof.
By [Gub98, Theorem 7.12] (see also [BFJ16, Corollary 2.3]), model metrics are dense in the set of continuous metrics on . Hence we may assume is a model metric. Using (5.3), it is enough to show that for a divisorial valuation . Let be an snc model with , and such that for a model of on . Since the normalized base change of is toroidal, we can choose a toroidal modification with snc. The induced morphism is toroidal; hence it satisfies the log ramification formula
By (5.7), we infer , which gives the desired result since , imply . ∎