ScalingStacks

Appendix A Berkovich spaces over Banach rings [018B]

Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.

Complete original source context · Original author HTML

Appendix A Berkovich spaces over Banach rings

In this appendix we review the construction of the analytification of a scheme of finite type defined over a Banach ring. The main reference for this is [Berk09]; see also [Poi10, Poi13a, Jon16]. For suitable choices of Banach rings, this leads to spaces that contain both Archimedean and non-Archimedean data.

A.1. Berkovich spectra

Let AA be a Banach ring, that is, a commutative ring that is complete with respect to a submultiplicative norm ∥⋅∥\|\cdot\|. The Berkovich spectrum ℳ⁡(A){\mathcal{M}}(A) is the set of all bounded multiplicative seminorms on AA. In other words, a point x∈ℳ⁡(A)x\in{\mathcal{M}}(A) corresponds to a function |⋅|x:A→ℝ≥0|\cdot|_{x}\colon A\to{\mathbb{R}}_{\geq 0} such that |⋅|x≤∥⋅∥|\cdot|_{x}\leq\|\cdot\|, |1|x=1|1|_{x}=1, |f+g|x≤|f|x+|​g|x|f+g|_{x}\leq|f|_{x}+|g|_{x} and |f​g|x=|f|x|​g|x|fg|_{x}=|f|_{x}|g|_{x} for f,g∈Af,g\in A. The spectrum is a nonempty, compact Hausdorff space with respect to the topology of pointwise convergence.

For x∈ℳ⁡(A)x\in{\mathcal{M}}(A), denote by 𝔭x{\mathfrak{p}}_{x} the kernel of |⋅|x|\cdot|_{x}. This is a prime ideal of AA, and |⋅|x|\cdot|_{x} defines a multiplicative norm on A/𝔭xA/{\mathfrak{p}}_{x}. The completion of the fraction field of A/𝔭xA/{\mathfrak{p}}_{x} with respect to this norm is a valued field ℋ⁡(x){\mathcal{H}}(x). We write f⁡(x)f(x) for the image of f∈Af\in A in ℋ⁡(x){\mathcal{H}}(x); then |f⁡(x)|=|f|x|f(x)|=|f|_{x}. The assignment x↦𝔭xx\mapsto{\mathfrak{p}}_{x} yields a map ℳ⁡(A)→Spec⁡(A){\mathcal{M}}(A)\to\operatorname{Spec}(A) that is continuous for the Zariski topology Spec⁡(A)\operatorname{Spec}(A).

Example A.1.

If kk is a valued field (i.e. a field with a multiplicative norm), then ℳ⁡(k){\mathcal{M}}(k) is a singleton.

Example A.2.

When AA is a complex Banach algebra, the Gelfand-Mazur Theorem implies that the Berkovich spectrum agrees with the maximal ideal spectrum.

A.2. Analytification of a scheme

To any scheme XX of finite type over a Banach ring AA, Berkovich associates an analytification99 9 We use the term analytification even though we shall only consider XAnX^{\mathrm{An}} as a topological space. In particular, XAnX^{\mathrm{An}} only depends on the reduced scheme structure of XX. XAnX^{\mathrm{An}}, a locally compact topological space with a continuous morphism XAn→ℳ⁡(A)X^{\mathrm{An}}\to{\mathcal{M}}(A), defined as follows.

When X=Spec⁡BX=\operatorname{Spec}B is affine, with BB a finitely generated AA-algebra, XAnX^{\mathrm{An}} is defined as the set of multiplicative seminorms |⋅|x|\cdot|_{x} on BB whose restriction to AA is bounded by the given norm on AA, i.e. belongs to ℳ⁡(A){\mathcal{M}}(A). The topology on XAnX^{\mathrm{An}} is the weakest one for which x↦|f|x=|f⁡(x)|x\mapsto|f|_{x}=|f(x)| is continuous for every f∈Bf\in B.

In the general case, the analytification XAnX^{\mathrm{An}} is defined by gluing together the analytifications of an affine open cover, and yields a covariant functor X↦XAnX\mapsto X^{\mathrm{An}}. If X↪YX\hookrightarrow Y is an open (resp. closed) embedding, then so is XAn↪YAnX^{\mathrm{An}}\hookrightarrow Y^{\mathrm{An}}. If X→YX\to Y is surjective, then so is XAn→YAnX^{\mathrm{An}}\to Y^{\mathrm{An}}.

The topological space XAnX^{\mathrm{An}} is Hausdorff (resp. compact) if XX is separated (resp. projective). The assignment x↦𝔭xx\mapsto{\mathfrak{p}}_{x} above globalizes to a continuous map

π:XAn→X,\pi\colon X^{\mathrm{An}}\to X,

where XX is equipped with the Zariski topology.

When AA is a valued field, it is more common to write XanX^{\mathrm{an}} instead of XAnX^{\mathrm{An}} [Berk90].

Example A.3.

For A=ℂA={\mathbb{C}}, the Gelfand-Mazur theorem shows that XAnX^{\mathrm{An}} coincides with the usual analytification of XX, i.e. the set X⁡(ℂ)X({\mathbb{C}}) of complex points of XX endowed with the euclidean topology.

A.3. The hybrid norm on ℂ{\mathbb{C}}

Denote by ℂhyb{\mathbb{C}}_{\mathrm{hyb}} the Banach field (ℂ,∥⋅∥hyb)({\mathbb{C}},\|\cdot\|_{\mathrm{hyb}}), where the hybrid norm is defined as

∥⋅∥hyb:=max{|⋅|0,|⋅|∞},\|\cdot\|_{\mathrm{hyb}}:=\max\{|\cdot|_{0},|\cdot|_{\infty}\},

with |⋅|0|\cdot|_{0} the trivial absolute value and |⋅|∞|\cdot|_{\infty} the usual absolute value.

The elements of the Berkovich spectrum ℳ⁡(ℂhyb){\mathcal{M}}({\mathbb{C}}_{\mathrm{hyb}}) are of the form |⋅|∞ρ|\cdot|_{\infty}^{\rho} for ρ∈[0,1]\rho\in[0,1], interpreted as the trivial absolute value |⋅|0|\cdot|_{0} for ρ=0\rho=0. This yields a homeomorphism ℳ⁡(ℂhyb)≃[0,1]{\mathcal{M}}({\mathbb{C}}_{\mathrm{hyb}})\simeq[0,1].

A.4. Hybrid geometry over ℂ{\mathbb{C}}

If XX is a scheme of finite type over ℂ{\mathbb{C}}, we denote by Xhol=X⁡(ℂ)X^{\operatorname{hol}}=X({\mathbb{C}}) its analytification with respect to the usual absolute value |⋅|∞|\cdot|_{\infty}, by X0anX^{\mathrm{an}}_{0} its analytification with respect to the trivial absolute value, and by XhybX^{\mathrm{hyb}} its analytification with respect to the hybrid norm ∥⋅∥hyb\|\cdot\|_{\mathrm{hyb}}.

From the structure morphism X→Spec⁡ℂX\to\operatorname{Spec}{\mathbb{C}} we obtain a continuous map λ:Xhyb→ℳ⁡(ℂhyb)≃[0,1]\lambda\colon X^{\mathrm{hyb}}\to{\mathcal{M}}({\mathbb{C}}_{\mathrm{hyb}})\simeq[0,1]. The fiber λ−1​(ρ)\lambda^{-1}(\rho) is equal to the analytification of XX with respect to the multiplicative norm |⋅|∞ρ|\cdot|_{\infty}^{\rho} on ℂ{\mathbb{C}}. In particular, we have canonical identifications λ−1​(1)≃Xhol\lambda^{-1}(1)\simeq X^{\operatorname{hol}} and λ−1​(0)≃X0An\lambda^{-1}(0)\simeq X^{\mathrm{An}}_{0}. For 0<ρ≤10<\rho\leq 1, the fiber λ−1​(ρ)\lambda^{-1}(\rho) is also homeomorphic to XholX^{\operatorname{hol}}. In fact, we have a a homeomorphism

λ−1​((0,1])≃(0,1]×Xhol,\lambda^{-1}\left((0,1]\right)\simeq(0,1]\times X^{\operatorname{hol}},

see [Berk09, Lemma 2.1].

A.5. The hybrid circle

Now consider the hybrid circle of radius r∈(0,1)r\in(0,1), that is, Chyb(r):={|t|=r}⊂𝔸1,hyb=(Specℂ[t])hybC_{\mathrm{hyb}}(r):=\{|{t}|=r\}\subset{\mathbb{A}}^{1,\mathrm{hyb}}=(\operatorname{Spec}{\mathbb{C}}[{t}])^{\mathrm{hyb}}. By [Poi10, Prop 2.1.1], this is compact and realized as the Berkovich spectrum of the Banach ring

Ar:={f=∑α∈ℤcα​tα∈ℂ⁡((t))|‖f‖hyb:=∑α∈ℤ‖cα‖hyb​rα<+∞}.A_{r}:=\left\{f=\sum_{\alpha\in{\mathbb{Z}}}c_{\alpha}{t}^{\alpha}\in{\mathbb{C}}(\!({t})\!)\ \bigg|\ \|f\|_{\mathrm{hyb}}:=\sum_{\alpha\in{\mathbb{Z}}}\|c_{\alpha}\|_{\mathrm{hyb}}r^{\alpha}<+\infty\right\}.

Since ‖cα‖hyb≥|cα|∞\|c_{\alpha}\|_{\mathrm{hyb}}\geq|c_{\alpha}|_{\infty}, every f∈Arf\in A_{r} defines a continuous function fholf^{\operatorname{hol}} on the punctured closed disc 𝔻¯r∗\overline{{\mathbb{D}}}^{*}_{r} that is holomorphic on 𝔻r∗{\mathbb{D}}^{*}_{r} and meromorphic at 0.

Proposition A.4.

There is a homeomorphism 𝔻¯r​→∼​ℳ​(Ar)≃Chyb​(r)\overline{{\mathbb{D}}}_{r}\overset{\sim}{\to}{\mathcal{M}}(A_{r})\simeq C_{\mathrm{hyb}}(r), that maps z∈𝔻¯r⊂ℂz\in\overline{{\mathbb{D}}}_{r}\subset{\mathbb{C}} to the seminorm on ArA_{r} defined by

|f|={rord0⁡(f)if z=0rlog⁡|fhol​(z)|∞log⁡|z|∞otherwise,|f|=\begin{cases}r^{\operatorname{ord}_{0}(f)}&\ \text{if $z=0$}\\ r^{\frac{\log|f^{\operatorname{hol}}(z)|_{\infty}}{\log|z|_{\infty}}}\ &\text{otherwise},\end{cases} (A.1)

and via which the map λ:Chyb​(r)→[0,1]\lambda\colon C_{\mathrm{hyb}}(r)\to[0,1] is given by λ⁡(z)=log⁡rlog⁡|z|∞\lambda(z)=\frac{\log r}{\log|z|_{\infty}}.

Proof.

The map τ:𝔻¯r→ℳ⁡(Ar)\tau\colon\overline{{\mathbb{D}}}_{r}\to{\mathcal{M}}(A_{r}) given by (A.1) is clearly well defined. It is also continuous on 𝔻¯r∗\overline{{\mathbb{D}}}^{*}_{r}. To prove continuity at 00, we note that for each f∈Arf\in A_{r}, we can write fhol=zord0⁡(f)​uf^{\operatorname{hol}}=z^{\operatorname{ord}_{0}(f)}u, where uu is a continuous function on 𝔻¯r\overline{{\mathbb{D}}}_{r} that is holomorphic on 𝔻r{\mathbb{D}}_{r} with u⁡(0)≠0u(0)\neq 0. As a consequence, we get limz→0log⁡|fhol​(z)|∞log⁡|z|∞=ord0⁡(f)\lim_{z\to 0}\frac{\log|f^{\operatorname{hol}}(z)|_{\infty}}{\log|z|_{\infty}}=\operatorname{ord}_{0}(f).

Now, for each ρ∈(0,1]\rho\in(0,1], λ−1​(ρ)⊂Chyb​(r)\lambda^{-1}(\rho)\subset C_{\mathrm{hyb}}(r) can be identified with the circle of radius rr with respect to the absolute value |⋅|∞ρ|\cdot|_{\infty}^{\rho}, while λ−1​(0)\lambda^{-1}(0) is the non-Archimedean absolute value r−ord0r^{-\operatorname{ord}_{0}} on ℂ⁡((t)){\mathbb{C}}(\!({t})\!). This proves that the map τ\tau above is bijective, and hence a homeomorphism by compactness. ∎

Remark A.5.

When r<sr<s, the identity gives a bounded map from AsA_{s} to ArA_{r}, and lim→r→0⁡Ar\varinjlim_{r\to 0}A_{r} is the fraction field of 𝒪ℂ,0{\mathcal{O}}_{{\mathbb{C}},0}, i.e. the ring of meromorphic germs at the origin of ℂ{\mathbb{C}}.

A.6. Geometry over the hybrid circle

Let now XX be a scheme of finite type over ArA_{r}. We will associate to XX three kinds of analytic spaces.

First, since XX is obtained by gluing together finitely many affine schemes cut out by polynomials with coefficients holomorphic on 𝔻r∗⊂ℂ{\mathbb{D}}^{*}_{r}\subset{\mathbb{C}} and meromorphic at 00, we can associate to XX in a functorial way a complex analytic space XholX^{\operatorname{hol}} over 𝔻r∗{\mathbb{D}}^{*}_{r}, which we call its holomorphic analytification.

Second, since ArA_{r} is contained in ℂ⁡((t)){\mathbb{C}}(\!({t})\!), we may also consider the base change Xℂ⁡((t))X_{{\mathbb{C}}(\!({t})\!)} and its non-Archimedean analytification Xℂ⁡((t))anX^{\mathrm{an}}_{{\mathbb{C}}(\!({t})\!)} with respect to the non-Archimedean absolute value rord0r^{\operatorname{ord}_{0}} on ℂ⁡((t)){\mathbb{C}}(\!({t})\!).

Third, we denote by XhybX^{\mathrm{hyb}} the analytification of XX as a scheme of finite type over the Banach ring ArA_{r}, and call it the hybrid analytification of XX. In view of Proposition A.4, it comes with a continuous structure map

π:Xhyb→𝔻¯r≃ℳ⁡(Ar),\pi\colon X^{\mathrm{hyb}}\to\overline{{\mathbb{D}}}_{r}\simeq{\mathcal{M}}(A_{r}),

Recall further that XhybX^{\mathrm{hyb}} is locally compact, Hausdorff if XX is separated, and compact if XX is proper over ArA_{r}. The discussion above implies:

Lemma A.6.

We have canonical homeomorphisms

π−1​(0)≃Xℂ⁡((t))anandπ−1​(𝔻r∗)≃Xhol\pi^{-1}(0)\simeq X_{{\mathbb{C}}(\!({t})\!)}^{\mathrm{an}}{\quad\text{and}\quad}\pi^{-1}({\mathbb{D}}^{*}_{r})\simeq X^{\operatorname{hol}} (A.2)

compatible with the projection to 𝔻r{\mathbb{D}}_{r}.

In §4 we give a topological description of XhybX^{\mathrm{hyb}}.

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source-backed reader collection; mathematical self-containment is not assessed.