ScalingStacks

Proof of Theorem 8.4 . [0187]

Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.

Complete original source context · Original author HTML

Proof of Theorem 8.4.

Let us first treat the case when (X,B)(X,B) is log smooth. In this case we need not assume that X→𝔻∗X\to{\mathbb{D}}^{*} is projective. It follows from the normal crossings condition that (Xt,Bt)(X_{t},B_{t}) is subklt for 0<|t|≪10<|t|\ll 1. After reparametrizing we may assume this is true for all t∈𝔻∗t\in{\mathbb{D}}^{*}, that is, Z=∅Z=\emptyset. Set

νt=e2​(ψt−ϕBt).\nu_{t}=e^{2(\psi_{t}-\phi_{B_{t}})}.

This is a positive measure on XtX_{t}, smooth outside the support of BtB_{t}. Pick an snc model (𝒳,ℬ)({\mathcal{X}},{\mathcal{B}}) of (X,B)(X,B), where ℬ{\mathcal{B}} is the closure of BB in 𝒳{\mathcal{X}}, such that ψ\psi extends to a continuous metric on a ℚ{\mathbb{Q}}-line bundle ℒ{\mathcal{L}} on 𝒳{\mathcal{X}} extending K(X,B)/𝔻∗K_{(X,B)/{\mathbb{D}}^{*}}.

We can then prove a version of Theorem A inside the hybrid space 𝒳hyb{\mathcal{X}}^{\mathrm{hyb}}. By letting 𝒳{\mathcal{X}} vary, we obtain Theorem 8.4 as a consequence, just as Corollary B follows from Theorem A.

The proof is very similar to the proof of Theorem A, so we will only indicate the modifications needed. Let us write

K(𝒳,ℬ)/𝔻log=ℒ+∑i∈Iai​EiK^{\mathrm{log}}_{({\mathcal{X}},{\mathcal{B}})/{\mathbb{D}}}={\mathcal{L}}+\sum_{i\in I}a_{i}E_{i}

with ai∈ℚa_{i}\in{\mathbb{Q}}. Set κi:=ai/bi\kappa_{i}:=a_{i}/b_{i} and κmin:=mini⁡κi\kappa_{\min}:=\min_{i}\kappa_{i}. Here 𝒳0=∑ibi​Ei{\mathcal{X}}_{0}=\sum_{i}b_{i}E_{i} as before.

Define Δ⁡(ℒ)\Delta({\mathcal{L}}) as the subcomplex of Δ⁡(𝒳)\Delta({\mathcal{X}}) spanned by the vertices such that κi=κmin\kappa_{i}=\kappa_{\min}. This will be the support of the measure μ0\mu_{0}. For every stratum YY corresponding to a maximal face of Δ⁡(ℒ)\Delta({\mathcal{L}}), define a subklt pair (Y,BYℒ)(Y,B_{Y}^{\mathcal{L}}) using

BYℒ:=ℬ|Y+∑i∉J(1−(ai−κmin​bi))​Ei|YB^{\mathcal{L}}_{Y}:={\mathcal{B}}|_{Y}+\sum_{i\notin J}(1-(a_{i}-\kappa_{\min}b_{i}))E_{i}|_{Y}

The residual measure ResY⁡(ψ)\operatorname{Res}_{Y}(\psi) is given by

ResY⁡(ψ):=exp⁡(2​(ψ|Y−ϕBYℒ)).\operatorname{Res}_{Y}(\psi):=\exp\left(2(\psi|_{Y}-\phi_{B^{\mathcal{L}}_{Y}})\right).

Finally set

μ0:=∑σ(∫YσResYσ⁡(ψ))​bσ−1​λσ,\mu_{0}:=\sum_{\sigma}\left(\int_{Y_{\sigma}}\operatorname{Res}_{Y_{\sigma}}(\psi)\right)b_{\sigma}^{-1}\lambda_{\sigma},

where σ\sigma ranges over the dd-dimensional faces of Δ⁡(ℒ)\Delta({\mathcal{L}}), with d=dimΔ⁡(ℒ)d=\dim\Delta({\mathcal{L}}).

We then prove a version of Theorem 3.4. Namely, if

μt:=λ​(t)d(2​π)d​|t|2​κmin​e2​(ψt−ϕBt).\mu_{t}:=\frac{\lambda(t)^{d}}{(2\pi)^{d}|t|^{2\kappa_{\min}}}e^{2(\psi_{t}-\phi_{B_{t}})}.

then we show that μt\mu_{t} converges to μ0\mu_{0} in 𝒳hyb{\mathcal{X}}^{\mathrm{hyb}} as t→0t\to 0. This is done via a local convergence result as in Lemma 3.5. Namely, given a point ξ∈𝒳0\xi\in{\mathcal{X}}_{0}, we choose local coordinates (z0,…,zn)(z_{0},\dots,z_{n}) at ξ\xi as in §3.2, but further require that these coordinates also cut out the irreducible components of ℬ{\mathcal{B}} containing ξ\xi. More precisely, there exist mm with p≤m≤np\leq m\leq n such that these irreducible components are given by Bi={zi=0}B_{i}=\{z_{i}=0\} for p<i≤mp<i\leq m. Also set ci:=ordBi⁡(ℬ)<1c_{i}:=\operatorname{ord}_{B_{i}}({\mathcal{B}})<1.

A local ℚ{\mathbb{Q}}-generator for ℒ{\mathcal{L}} at ξ\xi is then given by

τ=∏i=0pziai​∏i=p+1mzi−ci​Ωrel,\tau=\prod_{i=0}^{p}z_{i}^{a_{i}}\prod_{i=p+1}^{m}z_{i}^{-c_{i}}\ \Omega^{\mathrm{rel}},

with Ωrel\Omega^{\mathrm{rel}} as before. For a stratum YY corresponding to a dd-dimensional simplex in Δ⁡(ℒ)\Delta({\mathcal{L}}), the residual measure is given by

ResY⁡(ψ)=|τ|∏i=d+1pψ−2⁡|zi|2​(ai−κmin​bi−1)​∏i=p+1m|zi|−2​ci​|⋀i=d+1nd​zi|2.\operatorname{Res}_{Y}(\psi)=|\tau|^{-2}_{\psi}\prod_{i=d+1}^{p}|z_{i}|^{2(a_{i}-\kappa_{\min}b_{i}-1)}\prod_{i=p+1}^{m}|z_{i}|^{-2c_{i}}\bigg|\bigwedge_{i=d+1}^{n}dz_{i}\bigg|^{2}. (8.1)

The measure μt\mu_{t} can be written near ξ\xi as

μt=λ​(t)d(2​π)d​∏i=p+1m|zi|−2​ci​|Ωt|2|∏i=p+1mzi−ci​Ωt|ψt2.\mu_{t}=\frac{\lambda(t)^{d}}{(2\pi)^{d}}\frac{\prod_{i=p+1}^{m}|z_{i}|^{-2c_{i}}|\Omega_{t}|^{2}}{\big|\prod_{i=p+1}^{m}z_{i}^{-c_{i}}\Omega_{t}\big|^{2}_{\psi_{t}}}.

The proof now proceeds exactly as in §3.3 except that we need to insert a factor ∏i=p+1m|zi|−2​ci\prod_{i=p+1}^{m}|z_{i}|^{-2c_{i}} in the last two lines of (3.3) and (3.6), the second line and the second factor of the last line of (3.7), and the right-hand sides of (3.8) and (3.9). This completes the proof in the log smooth case.

Now we consider the general case, assuming X→𝔻∗X\to{\mathbb{D}}^{*} is projective. Pick a log resolution q:(X′,B′)→(X,B)q\colon(X^{\prime},B^{\prime})\to(X,B). Since (Xt′,Bt′)(X^{\prime}_{t},B^{\prime}_{t}) is subklt for 0<|t|≪10<|t|\ll 1, the same is true for (Xt,Bt)(X_{t},B_{t}). We have an induced continuous map qhyb:(X′)hyb→Xhybq^{\mathrm{hyb}}\colon(X^{\prime})^{\mathrm{hyb}}\to X^{\mathrm{hyb}}. By what precedes, there exist κ∈ℚ\kappa\in{\mathbb{Q}} and d∈ℕd\in{\mathbb{N}} such that the measure μt′:=e2​(ψt′−ϕBt′)|t|2​κmin​(2​π​log⁡|t|−1)d\mu^{\prime}_{t}:=\frac{e^{2(\psi^{\prime}_{t}-\phi_{B^{\prime}_{t}})}}{|t|^{2\kappa_{\min}}(2\pi\log|t|^{-1})^{d}} on Xt′=XhybX^{\prime}_{t}=X^{\mathrm{hyb}} converges to a nonzero positive measure μ0′\mu^{\prime}_{0} on (X′)hyb(X^{\prime})^{\mathrm{hyb}}. By continuity, it follows that μt=q∗hyb​μt′\mu_{t}=q^{\mathrm{hyb}}_{*}\mu^{\prime}_{t} converges to the nonzero positive measure μ0=q∗hyb​μ0′\mu_{0}=q^{\mathrm{hyb}}_{*}\mu^{\prime}_{0} on XhybX^{\mathrm{hyb}}. This completes the proof. ∎

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source-backed reader collection; mathematical self-containment is not assessed.