ScalingStacks

5. Berkovich spaces and skeleta [016H]

Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.

Complete original source context · Original author HTML

5. Berkovich spaces and skeleta

Our goal in this section and the next is to study the limit measure μ0\mu_{0} appearing in Corollary B in more detail. This measure lives on a Berkovich space and its support has an integral piecewise affine structure.

In this section we undertake a fairly general study of metrics on the canonical bundle of a projective variety defined over a discretely valued field of residue characteristic zero. To such a metric is associated a skeleton, a subset of the underlying Berkovich space. In the setting of Corollary B, the skeleton will be the support of the measure μ0\mu_{0}.

The material here has overlap with [MN15, NX13] and also draws on [Tem14], but we present some details for the convenience of the reader.

Until further notice, XX denotes a smooth proper variety over the field K:=k⁡((t))K:=k(\!({t})\!) of formal Laurent series with coefficients in an algebraically closed field kk of characteristic 00. We set n:=dimXn:=\dim X and denote by XanX^{\mathrm{an}} the Berkovich analytification of XX with respect the non-Archimedean absolute value |⋅|=rord0|\cdot|=r^{\operatorname{ord}_{0}} on KK, for some fixed r∈(0,1)r\in(0,1).

While XanX^{\mathrm{an}} comes equipped with a structure sheaf, we shall merely consider it as a topological space. Since XX is proper, XanX^{\mathrm{an}} is compact. There is a natural continuous surjective map Xan→XX^{\mathrm{an}}\to X such that the preimage of a (scheme) point ξ∈X\xi\in X is identified with the set of real-valued valuations66 6 Here we use additive terminology; the multiplicative norm associated to vv is rvr^{v}. vv on the residue field of ξ\xi satisfying v|k∗≡0v|_{k^{*}}\equiv 0 and v⁡(t)=1v({t})=1. In particular, the preimage XvalX^{\operatorname{val}} of the generic point of XX consists of real-valued valuations of the function field F⁡(X)F(X).

5.1. Models

Set S:=Spec⁡k⁡[[t]]S:=\operatorname{Spec}k[\![{t}]\!]. Following the convention of [MN15], we define a model of XX to be a normal scheme 𝒳{\mathcal{X}}, flat and of finite type (but possibly non-proper) over SS, together with an identification of the generic fiber of the structure morphism π:𝒳→S\pi\colon{\mathcal{X}}\to S with XX.

For any two models 𝒳{\mathcal{X}}, 𝒳′{\mathcal{X}}^{\prime}, the identifications of the generic fibers with XX induces a unique birational map 𝒳′⇢𝒳{\mathcal{X}}^{\prime}\dashrightarrow{\mathcal{X}}. We say that 𝒳′{\mathcal{X}}^{\prime} dominates 𝒳{\mathcal{X}} if this map is a morphism. Any two models can be dominated by a third.

For any model 𝒳{\mathcal{X}} and every irreducible component EE of 𝒳0{\mathcal{X}}_{0}, we set bE:=ordE⁡(t)b_{E}:=\operatorname{ord}_{E}({t}), and view the divisorial valuation

vE:=bE−1​ordEv_{E}:=b_{E}^{-1}\operatorname{ord}_{E}

as an element of Xval⊂XanX^{\operatorname{val}}\subset X^{\mathrm{an}}. The set of such points is a dense subset Xdiv⊂XanX^{\mathrm{div}}\subset X^{\mathrm{an}}.

We usually denote by 𝒳0=∑i∈Ibi​Ei{\mathcal{X}}_{0}=\sum_{i\in I}b_{i}E_{i} the irreducible decomposition of the central fiber, and write EJ:=⋂i∈JEiE_{J}:=\bigcap_{i\in J}E_{i} for J⊂IJ\subset I. We say that 𝒳{\mathcal{X}} is snc if (𝒳{\mathcal{X}} is regular and) 𝒳0,red{\mathcal{X}}_{0,\mathrm{red}} has simple normal crossing support. Since kk has characteristic 00, this means that each non-empty EJE_{J} is smooth over kk, of codimension |J||J| in 𝒳{\mathcal{X}}.

More generally, a model 𝒳{\mathcal{X}} is toroidal if 𝒳∖𝒳0⊂𝒳{\mathcal{X}}\setminus{\mathcal{X}}_{0}\subset{\mathcal{X}} is a strict toroidal embedding in the sense of [KKMS], i.e. is formally isomorphic, at each closed point of 𝒳0{\mathcal{X}}_{0}, to the inclusion of 𝔾m,kn+1{\mathbb{G}}_{m,k}^{n+1} in a toric kk-variety, and such that each EiE_{i} is normal (which then implies that each non-empty EJE_{J} is normal).

Every model 𝒳{\mathcal{X}} contains a largest snc Zariski open subset 𝒳snc⊂𝒳{\mathcal{X}}_{\mathrm{snc}}\subset{\mathcal{X}}. By Temkin’s version of Hironaka’s theorem [Tem12], 𝒳{\mathcal{X}} is dominated by an snc model 𝒳′{\mathcal{X}}^{\prime} such that the induced birational morphism μ:𝒳′→𝒳\mu\colon{\mathcal{X}}^{\prime}\to{\mathcal{X}} is projective, and an isomorphism over 𝒳snc{\mathcal{X}}_{\mathrm{snc}}.

If 𝒳{\mathcal{X}} is a model of XX, the set 𝒳an⊂Xan{\mathcal{X}}^{\mathrm{an}}\subset X^{\mathrm{an}} of semivaluations that admit a center (or reduction) on 𝒳0{\mathcal{X}}_{0} is a closed subset; it can be viewed as the generic fiber of a suitable formal scheme [MN15, 2.2.2]. By the valuative criterion of properness, we have 𝒳an=𝒳′an{\mathcal{X}}^{\mathrm{an}}={\mathcal{X}}^{\prime\mathrm{an}} for each proper morphism of models 𝒳′→𝒳{\mathcal{X}}^{\prime}\to{\mathcal{X}}, and 𝒳an=Xan{\mathcal{X}}^{\mathrm{an}}=X^{\mathrm{an}} if 𝒳{\mathcal{X}} is proper (over SS, that is). The reduction map c𝒳:𝒳an→𝒳0c_{\mathcal{X}}\colon{\mathcal{X}}^{\mathrm{an}}\to{\mathcal{X}}_{0}, taking a semivaluation to its center, is anticontinuous.77 7 Anticontinuity means that the inverse image of an open set is closed.

The set 𝒳div:=𝒳an∩Xdiv{\mathcal{X}}^{\mathrm{div}}:={\mathcal{X}}^{\mathrm{an}}\cap X^{\mathrm{div}} consists of all divisorial valuations vv on F⁡(𝒳)=F⁡(X)F({\mathcal{X}})=F(X) that are centered on 𝒳0{\mathcal{X}}_{0}, trivial on kk and such that v⁡(t)=1v({t})=1.

5.2. Model metrics

If LL is a line bundle on XX, a model ℒ{\mathcal{L}} of LL is a ℚ{\mathbb{Q}}-line bundle ℒ{\mathcal{L}} on a proper model 𝒳{\mathcal{X}}, together with an identification ℒ|X=L{\mathcal{L}}|_{X}=L. It defines a model metric ϕℒ\phi_{\mathcal{L}} on the Berkovich analytification LanL^{\mathrm{an}} of LL. If ℒ′{\mathcal{L}}^{\prime} is another model of LL, determined on a proper model 𝒳′{\mathcal{X}}^{\prime} of XX, then ϕℒ=ϕℒ′\phi_{\mathcal{L}}=\phi_{{\mathcal{L}}^{\prime}} if and only if the pull-backs of ℒ{\mathcal{L}} and ℒ′{\mathcal{L}}^{\prime} to some higher model 𝒳′′{\mathcal{X}}^{\prime\prime} coincide.

A model of 𝒪X{\mathcal{O}}_{X} is given by a ℚ{\mathbb{Q}}-Cartier divisor DD supported on the central fiber of a proper model 𝒳{\mathcal{X}}; the corresponding model metric will then be identified with the model function ϕD:Xan→ℝ\phi_{D}\colon X^{\mathrm{an}}\to{\mathbb{R}} defined by ϕD​(v)=v​(D)\phi_{D}(v)=v(D). It satisfies

infXanϕD=minE⁡ϕD​(vE)\inf_{X^{\mathrm{an}}}\phi_{D}=\min_{E}\phi_{D}(v_{E}) (5.1)

where EE runs over the irreducible components of 𝒳0{\mathcal{X}}_{0}.

5.3. Log canonical divisors

If 𝒳{\mathcal{X}} is a regular model, π:𝒳→S\pi\colon{\mathcal{X}}\to S is a locally complete intersection morphism, so the dualizing sheaf ω𝒳/S\omega_{{\mathcal{X}}/S} is a well-defined line bundle (see [MN15, §4.1] for a more detailed discussion). For an arbitrary (normal) model, we may thus introduce the relative canonical divisor (class) K𝒳/SK_{{\mathcal{X}}/S} as the Weil divisor class on 𝒳{\mathcal{X}} such that 𝒪𝒳reg​(K𝒳/S)=ω𝒳reg/S{\mathcal{O}}_{{\mathcal{X}}_{\mathrm{reg}}}(K_{{\mathcal{X}}/S})=\omega_{{\mathcal{X}}_{\mathrm{reg}}/S}. We then define:

  • (i)

    the canonical divisor K𝒳:=K𝒳/S+π∗​KSK_{\mathcal{X}}:=K_{{\mathcal{X}}/S}+\pi^{*}K_{S};

  • (ii)

    the log canonical divisor K𝒳log:=K𝒳+𝒳0,redK_{\mathcal{X}}^{\mathrm{log}}:=K_{\mathcal{X}}+{\mathcal{X}}_{0,\mathrm{red}};

  • (iii)

    the relative log canonical divisor

    K𝒳/Slog:=K𝒳log−π∗​KSlog=K𝒳/S+𝒳0,red−𝒳0.K^{\mathrm{log}}_{{\mathcal{X}}/S}:=K^{\mathrm{log}}_{\mathcal{X}}-\pi^{*}K^{\mathrm{log}}_{S}=K_{{\mathcal{X}}/S}+{\mathcal{X}}_{0,\mathrm{red}}-{\mathcal{X}}_{0}.

Note that K𝒳logK_{\mathcal{X}}^{\mathrm{log}} is ℚ{\mathbb{Q}}-Cartier if and only if K𝒳/SlogK_{{\mathcal{X}}/S}^{\mathrm{log}} is ℚ{\mathbb{Q}}-Cartier.

Example 5.1.

Assume that 𝒳{\mathcal{X}} is snc, and write as above 𝒳0=∑i∈Ibi​Ei{\mathcal{X}}_{0}=\sum_{i\in I}b_{i}E_{i}. Pick a closed point ξ∈𝒳0\xi\in{\mathcal{X}}_{0}, and denote by J={0,…,p}⊂IJ=\{0,\dots,p\}\subset I the set of components of 𝒳0{\mathcal{X}}_{0} passing through ξ\xi. We may choose a regular system of parameters z0,…,zn∈𝒪𝒳,ξz_{0},\dots,z_{n}\in{\mathcal{O}}_{{\mathcal{X}},\xi} such that ziz_{i} is a local equation of EiE_{i} for 0≤i≤p0\leq i\leq p, i.e. t=u​z0b0​…​zpbp{t}=uz_{0}^{b_{0}}\dots z_{p}^{b_{p}} for some unit u∈𝒪𝒳,ξ∗u\in{\mathcal{O}}^{*}_{{\mathcal{X}},\xi}. The logarithmic form

Ω:=d​z0z0∧⋯∧d​zpzp∧d​zp+1∧⋯∧d​zn\Omega:=\frac{dz_{0}}{z_{0}}\wedge\dots\wedge\frac{dz_{p}}{z_{p}}\wedge dz_{p+1}\wedge\dots\wedge dz_{n}

is then a local generator of K𝒳logK^{\mathrm{log}}_{{\mathcal{X}}}, and induces a local generator

Ωrel:=Ω⊗(d​tt)−1\Omega^{\mathrm{rel}}:=\Omega\otimes(\frac{d{t}}{{t}})^{-1}

of K𝒳/SlogK^{\mathrm{log}}_{{\mathcal{X}}/S}.

Remark 5.2.

When 𝒳{\mathcal{X}} is snc, 𝒪𝒳​(K𝒳/Slog){\mathcal{O}}_{\mathcal{X}}(K^{\mathrm{log}}_{{\mathcal{X}}/S}) coincides with the relative logarithmic dualizing sheaf ω𝒳+/S+\omega_{{\mathcal{X}}^{+}/S^{+}} of [NX13, (3.2.2)]. When 𝒳{\mathcal{X}} is regular, 𝒪𝒳​(K𝒳){\mathcal{O}}_{\mathcal{X}}(K_{\mathcal{X}}) is described in [dFEM11, Appendix A] as the determinant of the locally free sheaf Ω𝒳/k′⊂Ω𝒳/k1\Omega^{\prime}_{{\mathcal{X}}/k}\subset\Omega^{1}_{{\mathcal{X}}/k} of special differentials, corresponding to derivations DD of 𝒪𝒳{\mathcal{O}}_{\mathcal{X}} such that D⁡(f)=f′​(t)​d​tD(f)=f^{\prime}({t})d{t} for f∈k⁡[[t]]f\in k[\![{t}]\!].

5.4. Log discrepancies

We refer to [dFKX12], [NX13, §2.2] and [KNX15] for more details and references on what follows.

Let 𝒳{\mathcal{X}} be a model with K𝒳logK^{\mathrm{log}}_{\mathcal{X}} ℚ{\mathbb{Q}}-Cartier, and recall that 𝒳div{\mathcal{X}}^{\mathrm{div}} denotes the set of divisorial valuations vv on 𝒳{\mathcal{X}} such that v⁡(t)=1v({t})=1. We define the log discrepancy A𝒳​(v)A_{\mathcal{X}}(v) as the log discrepancy of vv with respect to the pair (𝒳,𝒳0,red)({\mathcal{X}},{\mathcal{X}}_{0,\mathrm{red}}), in the usual sense of the Minimal Model Program.

The log discrepancy function A𝒳:𝒳div→ℚA_{\mathcal{X}}\colon{\mathcal{X}}^{\mathrm{div}}\to{\mathbb{Q}} is characterized by the following property: if 𝒳′{\mathcal{X}}^{\prime} is a model over 𝒳{\mathcal{X}} with proper birational morphism ρ:𝒳′→𝒳\rho\colon{\mathcal{X}}^{\prime}\to{\mathcal{X}}, then

K𝒳′log=ρ∗​K𝒳log+∑EbE​A𝒳​(vE)​E,K^{\mathrm{log}}_{{\mathcal{X}}^{\prime}}=\rho^{*}K^{\mathrm{log}}_{\mathcal{X}}+\sum_{E}b_{E}A_{\mathcal{X}}(v_{E})E, (5.2)

with EE running over the irreducible components of 𝒳0′{\mathcal{X}}^{\prime}_{0}.

We say that a model 𝒳{\mathcal{X}} is log canonical (lc for short), Kawamata log terminal (klt) or divisorially log terminal (dlt) if the pair (𝒳,𝒳0,red)({\mathcal{X}},{\mathcal{X}}_{0,\mathrm{red}}) has this property, in the sense of the Minimal Model Program.

Since the generic fiber XX is smooth, a model 𝒳{\mathcal{X}} is thus lc (resp. klt) if and only if K𝒳logK^{\mathrm{log}}_{\mathcal{X}} is ℚ{\mathbb{Q}}-Cartier, with log discrepancy function A𝒳:𝒳div→ℚA_{\mathcal{X}}\colon{\mathcal{X}}^{\mathrm{div}}\to{\mathbb{Q}} taking non-negative (resp. positive) values. If 𝒳{\mathcal{X}} is lc, then the center c𝒳​(v)∈𝒳0c_{\mathcal{X}}(v)\in{\mathcal{X}}_{0} of a valuation v∈𝒳divv\in{\mathcal{X}}^{\mathrm{div}} with A𝒳​(v)=0A_{\mathcal{X}}(v)=0 is called an lc center of 𝒳{\mathcal{X}}, and an lc model 𝒳{\mathcal{X}} is dlt if and only if 𝒳snc{\mathcal{X}}_{\mathrm{snc}} contains all lc centers. The irreducible components of each non-empty EJE_{J} are then normal, with generic point contained in 𝒳snc{\mathcal{X}}_{\mathrm{snc}} [Kol13, 4.16].

Example 5.3.

Assume that dimX=1\dim X=1, and let 𝒳{\mathcal{X}} be a dlt model. Each irreducible component EiE_{i} is then a smooth curve. At a point ξ∈Ei∩Ej\xi\in E_{i}\cap E_{j}, i≠ji\neq j, 𝒳{\mathcal{X}} is snc. At a closed point ξ∈E̊i\xi\in\mathring{E}_{i}, 𝒳{\mathcal{X}} is either regular, or has a cyclic quotient singularity.

Example 5.4.

If 𝒳{\mathcal{X}} is toroidal, then 𝒳{\mathcal{X}} is lc, and 𝒳{\mathcal{X}} is dlt if and only if it is snc. Following [dFKX12, KNX15], we could say that an lc model 𝒳{\mathcal{X}} is qdlt (for quotient of dlt) if its lc centers are contained in a toroidal open subset 𝒰⊂𝒳{\mathcal{U}}\subset{\mathcal{X}}.

Example 5.5.

If 𝒳{\mathcal{X}} is any model such that 𝒳0{\mathcal{X}}_{0} has klt singularities (and hence is reduced), then 𝒳{\mathcal{X}} is dlt, by inversion of adjunction.

5.5. The skeleton of a dlt model

The dual complex Δ⁡(𝒳)\Delta({\mathcal{X}}) of an snc model 𝒳{\mathcal{X}} is defined as the dual complex of the snc divisor 𝒳0=∑i∈Ibi​Ei{\mathcal{X}}_{0}=\sum_{i\in I}b_{i}E_{i}, as in §2.1. It is equipped with a natural integral affine structure, in which the face σ\sigma corresponding to a component YY of a non-empty EJE_{J} is identified with the simplex

σ={w∈ℝ+J∣∑i∈Jbi​wi=1},\sigma=\left\{w\in{\mathbb{R}}_{+}^{J}\mid\sum_{i\in J}b_{i}w_{i}=1\right\},

in such a way that Mσ=ℤJM_{\sigma}={\mathbb{Z}}^{J}.

As explained in [BFJ16, §3] and [MN15, §3], there is a natural embedding

emb𝒳:Δ⁡(𝒳)→𝒳an\operatorname{emb}_{\mathcal{X}}\colon\Delta({\mathcal{X}})\to{\mathcal{X}}^{\mathrm{an}}

that takes a point w∈σw\in\sigma to the corresponding monomial valuation. In particular, the vertex corresponding to EiE_{i} is sent to the divisorial valuation vEi=bi−1​ordEiv_{E_{i}}=b_{i}^{-1}\operatorname{ord}_{E_{i}}. The value group of a valuation v=emb𝒳⁡(w)v=\operatorname{emb}_{\mathcal{X}}(w), w∈σw\in\sigma, is given by

v⁡(F​(X)∗)=Mσ​(w):={f⁡(w)∣f∈Mσ}.v(F(X)^{*})=M_{\sigma}(w):=\{f(w)\mid f\in M_{\sigma}\}.

Further, if w∈σ̊w\in\mathring{\sigma}, then YσY_{\sigma} is the closure of the center of emb𝒳⁡(w)\operatorname{emb}_{\mathcal{X}}(w).

The resulting subspace Sk⁡(𝒳):=emb𝒳⁡(ΔX)⊂𝒳an⊂Xan\operatorname{Sk}({\mathcal{X}}):=\operatorname{emb}_{\mathcal{X}}(\Delta_{X})\subset{\mathcal{X}}^{\mathrm{an}}\subset X^{\mathrm{an}} is called the skeleton of 𝒳{\mathcal{X}}. It is naturally a ℤ{\mathbb{Z}}-PA space, the ℤ{\mathbb{Z}}-PA functions on Sk⁡(𝒳)\operatorname{Sk}({\mathcal{X}}) being precisely the restrictions of model functions ϕD\phi_{D} determined by a Cartier divisor DD on some proper modification 𝒳′→𝒳{\mathcal{X}}^{\prime}\to{\mathcal{X}}.

We further have a natural retraction r𝒳:𝒳an→Sk⁡(𝒳)r_{\mathcal{X}}\colon{\mathcal{X}}^{\mathrm{an}}\to\operatorname{Sk}({\mathcal{X}}), mapping a valuation vv centered on 𝒳0{\mathcal{X}}_{0} to the monomial valuation r𝒳​(v)r_{\mathcal{X}}(v) taking the same values on the EiE_{i}’s. These retractions induce a homeomorphism

Xan​→∼​lim←𝒳⁡Sk⁡(𝒳),X^{\mathrm{an}}\overset{\sim}{\to}\varprojlim_{\mathcal{X}}\operatorname{Sk}({\mathcal{X}}),

where 𝒳{\mathcal{X}} runs over all proper (or projective) snc models, compare (4.3).

If 𝒳′→𝒳{\mathcal{X}}^{\prime}\to{\mathcal{X}} is a proper morphism of snc models, then, by [MN15, 3.1.7],

Sk⁡(𝒳)⊂Sk⁡(𝒳′)⊂𝒳′an=𝒳an,\operatorname{Sk}({\mathcal{X}})\subset\operatorname{Sk}({\mathcal{X}}^{\prime})\subset{\mathcal{X}}^{\prime\mathrm{an}}={\mathcal{X}}^{\mathrm{an}},

the first inclusion being ℤ{\mathbb{Z}}-PA. Further,

⋃𝒳​sncSk⁡(𝒳)⊂Xan\bigcup_{{\mathcal{X}}\ \text{snc}}\operatorname{Sk}({\mathcal{X}})\subset X^{\mathrm{an}}

coincides with the set of (quasi)monomial, or Abhyankar, valuations.

For a dlt model 𝒳{\mathcal{X}}, the dual complex Δ⁡(𝒳)\Delta({\mathcal{X}}) and skeleton Sk⁡(𝒳)⊂Xan\operatorname{Sk}({\mathcal{X}})\subset X^{\mathrm{an}} are simply defined as those of 𝒳snc{\mathcal{X}}_{\mathrm{snc}}, cf. [NX13]. The retraction r𝒳:𝒳an→Sk⁡(𝒳)r_{\mathcal{X}}\colon{\mathcal{X}}^{\mathrm{an}}\to\operatorname{Sk}({\mathcal{X}}) can be defined as above when 𝒳{\mathcal{X}} is ℚ{\mathbb{Q}}-factorial, but its existence is otherwise unclear (at least to us!).

By [KKMS], any toroidal model 𝒳{\mathcal{X}} has a dual complex Δ⁡(𝒳)\Delta({\mathcal{X}}) endowed with a natural integral affine structure. This dual complex is canonically realized as a subspace Sk⁡(𝒳)⊂Xan\operatorname{Sk}({\mathcal{X}})\subset X^{\mathrm{an}}, for instance by setting Sk⁡(𝒳):=Sk⁡(𝒳′)\operatorname{Sk}({\mathcal{X}}):=\operatorname{Sk}({\mathcal{X}}^{\prime}) for any toroidal modification 𝒳′→𝒳{\mathcal{X}}^{\prime}\to{\mathcal{X}} with 𝒳′{\mathcal{X}}^{\prime} snc. Thus Sk⁡(𝒳)\operatorname{Sk}({\mathcal{X}}) is equipped with a ℤ{\mathbb{Z}}-PA structure.

5.6. From log discrepancies to Temkin’s metric

As noted in [FJ04, BFJ08, JM12] in increasing order of generality, log discrepancy functions extend in a natural way to Berkovich spaces. More precisely, let 𝒳{\mathcal{X}} be any model of XX such that K𝒳logK^{\mathrm{log}}_{\mathcal{X}} is ℚ{\mathbb{Q}}-Cartier, with log discrepancy function A𝒳:𝒳div→ℚA_{\mathcal{X}}\colon{\mathcal{X}}^{\mathrm{div}}\to{\mathbb{Q}}. For each snc model 𝒳′{\mathcal{X}}^{\prime} properly dominating 𝒳{\mathcal{X}}, a simple computation going back (at least) to [Kol97, Lemma 3.11] shows the following:

  • (i)

    the restriction of A𝒳A_{\mathcal{X}} to Sk⁡(𝒳′)\operatorname{Sk}({\mathcal{X}}^{\prime}) is ℤ{\mathbb{Z}}-affine on each face of Δ⁡(𝒳′)\Delta({\mathcal{X}}^{\prime});

  • (ii)

    we have A𝒳≥A𝒳∘r𝒳′A_{\mathcal{X}}\geq A_{\mathcal{X}}\circ r_{{\mathcal{X}}^{\prime}}, the inequality being strict outside Sk⁡(𝒳′)\operatorname{Sk}({\mathcal{X}}^{\prime}).

We may thus extend A𝒳A_{\mathcal{X}} to an lsc function A𝒳:𝒳an→[0,+∞]A_{\mathcal{X}}\colon{\mathcal{X}}^{\mathrm{an}}\to[0,+\infty] by setting

A𝒳​(v):=sup𝒳′A𝒳​(r𝒳′​(v))A_{\mathcal{X}}(v):=\sup_{{\mathcal{X}}^{\prime}}A_{\mathcal{X}}(r_{{\mathcal{X}}^{\prime}}(v)) (5.3)

for any v∈𝒳anv\in{\mathcal{X}}^{\mathrm{an}}. When 𝒳{\mathcal{X}} is dlt, the log discrepancy function A𝒳A_{\mathcal{X}} determines the skeleton as follows.

Proposition 5.6.

If 𝒳{\mathcal{X}} is dlt, then Sk⁡(𝒳)={v∈𝒳an∣A𝒳​(v)=0}\operatorname{Sk}({\mathcal{X}})=\left\{v\in{\mathcal{X}}^{\mathrm{an}}\mid A_{\mathcal{X}}(v)=0\right\}.

Lemma 5.7.

Assume that 𝒳{\mathcal{X}} is lc, and pick v∈𝒳anv\in{\mathcal{X}}^{\mathrm{an}} with A𝒳​(v)=0A_{\mathcal{X}}(v)=0. Then c𝒳​(v)c_{\mathcal{X}}(v) is an lc center of 𝒳{\mathcal{X}}.

Proof.

We claim that, for every sufficiently high snc model 𝒳′{\mathcal{X}}^{\prime} proper over 𝒳{\mathcal{X}}, v′:=r𝒳′​(v)v^{\prime}:=r_{{\mathcal{X}}^{\prime}}(v) and vv have the same center on 𝒳{\mathcal{X}}. Indeed, the center of vv on 𝒳′{\mathcal{X}}^{\prime} is a specialization of that of r𝒳′​(v)r_{{\mathcal{X}}^{\prime}}(v), and hence c𝒳​(v)∈c𝒳​(r𝒳′​(v))¯c_{\mathcal{X}}(v)\in\overline{c_{\mathcal{X}}(r_{{\mathcal{X}}^{\prime}}(v))}. On the other hand, we have lim𝒳′r𝒳′​(v)=v\lim_{{\mathcal{X}}^{\prime}}r_{{\mathcal{X}}^{\prime}}(v)=v. Since c𝒳:𝒳an→𝒳0c_{\mathcal{X}}\colon{\mathcal{X}}^{\mathrm{an}}\to{\mathcal{X}}_{0} is anticontinuous, c𝒳−1​({c𝒳​(v)}¯)c_{\mathcal{X}}^{-1}(\overline{\{c_{\mathcal{X}}(v)\}}) is open, and hence contains v′:=r𝒳′​(v)v^{\prime}:=r_{{\mathcal{X}}^{\prime}}(v) for some snc model 𝒳′{\mathcal{X}}^{\prime} proper over 𝒳{\mathcal{X}}. As a result, c𝒳​(v′)c_{\mathcal{X}}(v^{\prime}) is a specialization of c𝒳​(v)c_{\mathcal{X}}(v), and the claim follows.

By (5.3), we have A𝒳​(v′)=0A_{\mathcal{X}}(v^{\prime})=0, and it is thus enough to prove the result for v′∈Sk⁡(𝒳′)v^{\prime}\in\operatorname{Sk}({\mathcal{X}}^{\prime}). If σ\sigma is the unique face of Δ⁡(𝒳′)\Delta({\mathcal{X}}^{\prime}) containing v′v^{\prime} in its interior, then A𝒳≡0A_{\mathcal{X}}\equiv 0 on σ\sigma, since A𝒳A_{\mathcal{X}} is non-negative and affine on σ\sigma. For any divisorial point ww in the relative interior of σ\sigma, we thus have A𝒳​(w)=0A_{\mathcal{X}}(w)=0 and c𝒳′​(v′)=c𝒳′​(w)c_{{\mathcal{X}}^{\prime}}(v^{\prime})=c_{{\mathcal{X}}^{\prime}}(w), which shows that c𝒳​(v′)=c𝒳​(w)c_{\mathcal{X}}(v^{\prime})=c_{\mathcal{X}}(w) is an lc center. ∎

Proof of Proposition 5.6.

When 𝒳{\mathcal{X}} is snc, the result is a direct consequence of (i) and (ii) above. When 𝒳{\mathcal{X}} is dlt, we have by definition

Sk⁡(𝒳)=Sk⁡(𝒳snc)⊂𝒳sncan⊂𝒳an,\operatorname{Sk}({\mathcal{X}})=\operatorname{Sk}({\mathcal{X}}_{\mathrm{snc}})\subset{\mathcal{X}}_{\mathrm{snc}}^{\mathrm{an}}\subset{\mathcal{X}}^{\mathrm{an}},

and A𝒳=A𝒳sncA_{\mathcal{X}}=A_{{\mathcal{X}}_{\mathrm{snc}}} on 𝒳sncan{\mathcal{X}}_{\mathrm{snc}}^{\mathrm{an}}. It is thus enough to show that any v∈𝒳anv\in{\mathcal{X}}^{\mathrm{an}} with A𝒳​(v)=0A_{\mathcal{X}}(v)=0 belongs to 𝒳sncan{\mathcal{X}}_{\mathrm{snc}}^{\mathrm{an}}, i.e. satisfies c𝒳​(v)∈𝒳sncc_{\mathcal{X}}(v)\in{\mathcal{X}}_{\mathrm{snc}}. But c𝒳​(v)c_{\mathcal{X}}(v) is an lc center by Lemma 5.7, and hence c𝒳​(v)∈𝒳sncc_{\mathcal{X}}(v)\in{\mathcal{X}}_{\mathrm{snc}} by definition of dlt singularities. ∎

Let 𝒳{\mathcal{X}} be a proper model with K𝒳/SlogK^{\mathrm{log}}_{{\mathcal{X}}/S} ℚ{\mathbb{Q}}-Cartier. Viewed as a ℚ{\mathbb{Q}}-line bundle, the latter is then a model of KXK_{X}, and hence defines a model metric ϕK𝒳/Slog\phi_{K^{\mathrm{log}}_{{\mathcal{X}}/S}} on KXanK_{X}^{\mathrm{an}}. Further, (5.2) shows that the lsc metric

AX:=ϕK𝒳/Slog+A𝒳A_{X}:=\phi_{K^{\mathrm{log}}_{{\mathcal{X}}/S}}+A_{\mathcal{X}} (5.4)

on KXanK_{X}^{\mathrm{an}} is independent of 𝒳{\mathcal{X}}. This is a special case of Temkin’s canonical metrization of the canonical bundle [Tem14].88 8 That we obtain Temkin’s metric follows from [Tem14, Theorem 8.1.2]. Note that Temkin uses multiplicative terminology. The weight function of [MN15] associated to a pluricanonical form ω∈H0​(X,m​KX)\omega\in H^{0}(X,mK_{X}) is the function AX−1m​log⁡|ω|A_{X}-\frac{1}{m}\log|\omega| on XanX^{\mathrm{an}}.

5.7. The skeleton of a metric on KXK_{X}

The purpose of this section is to introduce and study a slight generalization of the Kontsevich–Soibelman skeleton introduced in [KS06] and further analyzed in [MN15, NX13].

Definition 5.8.

If ψ\psi is a continuous (or usc) metric on KXanK_{X}^{\mathrm{an}}, set κ:=AX−ψ\kappa:=A_{X}-\psi and κmin:=infXanκ\kappa_{\min}:=\inf_{X^{\mathrm{an}}}\kappa. The skeleton of ψ\psi is the compact set

Sk⁡(ψ)={x∈Xan∣κ⁡(x)=κmin}.\operatorname{Sk}(\psi)=\left\{x\in{X^{\mathrm{an}}}\mid\kappa(x)=\kappa_{\min}\right\}.

Note that κ\kappa is an lsc function Xan→(−∞,+∞]X^{\mathrm{an}}\to(-\infty,+\infty], and hence achieves its infimum.

Definition 5.9.

Let ℒ{\mathcal{L}} be a model of KXK_{X} determined on a proper dlt model 𝒳{\mathcal{X}}. We denote by Δ⁡(ℒ)\Delta({\mathcal{L}}) the subcomplex of Δ⁡(𝒳)\Delta({\mathcal{X}}) such that a face σ\sigma of Δ⁡(𝒳)\Delta({\mathcal{X}}) is in Δ⁡(ℒ)\Delta({\mathcal{L}}) if and only if each vertex of σ\sigma achieves mini⁡κ⁡(vi)\min_{i}\kappa(v_{i}) with κ=AX−ϕℒ\kappa=A_{X}-\phi_{\mathcal{L}}.

Concretely, the values κ⁡(vi)\kappa(v_{i}) are computed as follows: we have

K𝒳/Slog=ℒ+∑i∈Iai​EiK^{\mathrm{log}}_{{\mathcal{X}}/S}={\mathcal{L}}+\sum_{i\in I}a_{i}E_{i}

with ai∈ℚa_{i}\in{\mathbb{Q}}, and κ⁡(vEi)=ai/bi\kappa(v_{E_{i}})=a_{i}/b_{i}. Note that each face of Δ⁡(𝒳)\Delta({\mathcal{X}}) contains at most one maximal face of Δ⁡(ℒ)\Delta({\mathcal{L}}).

Proposition 5.10.

Assume that ψ\psi is a model metric on KXanK_{X}^{\mathrm{an}}, determined by a model ℒ{\mathcal{L}} of KXK_{X} on a proper dlt model 𝒳{\mathcal{X}} of XX. Then Sk⁡(ψ)⊂Sk⁡(𝒳)\operatorname{Sk}(\psi)\subset\operatorname{Sk}({\mathcal{X}}), and κ=AX−ψ\kappa=A_{X}-\psi is affine on each face of Δ⁡(𝒳)\Delta({\mathcal{X}}). In particular,

κmin=mini⁡κ⁡(vi),\kappa_{\min}=\min_{i}\kappa(v_{i}), (5.5)

where viv_{i} runs over the vertices in Δ⁡(𝒳)\Delta({\mathcal{X}}), and Sk⁡(ψ)\operatorname{Sk}(\psi) is the subset of Sk⁡(𝒳)⊂Xan\operatorname{Sk}({\mathcal{X}})\subset X^{\mathrm{an}} corresponding to the subcomplex Δ⁡(ℒ)\Delta({\mathcal{L}}) of Δ⁡(𝒳)\Delta({\mathcal{X}}).

Proof.

Since the relative log canonical divisor K𝒳/SlogK^{\mathrm{log}}_{{\mathcal{X}}/S} and ℒ{\mathcal{L}} are both models of KXK_{X}, D:=K𝒳/Slog−ℒD:=K^{\mathrm{log}}_{{\mathcal{X}}/S}-{\mathcal{L}} is a ℚ{\mathbb{Q}}-Cartier divisor supported on 𝒳0{\mathcal{X}}_{0}. The corresponding model function ϕD\phi_{D} satisfies κ=A𝒳+ϕD\kappa=A_{\mathcal{X}}+\phi_{D}, which shows that κ|Sk⁡(𝒳)=ϕD|Sk⁡(𝒳)\kappa|_{\operatorname{Sk}({\mathcal{X}})}=\phi_{D}|_{\operatorname{Sk}({\mathcal{X}})} is affine on each face of Δ⁡(𝒳)\Delta({\mathcal{X}}). Now pick v∈Sk⁡(ψ)v\in\operatorname{Sk}(\psi). By (5.1), we get

κ⁡(v)=A𝒳​(v)+ϕD​(v)≥infϕD=mini⁡ϕD​(vi)=mini⁡(A𝒳+ϕD)​(vi)≥infXanκ.\kappa(v)=A_{\mathcal{X}}(v)+\phi_{D}(v)\geq\inf\phi_{D}=\min_{i}\phi_{D}(v_{i})=\min_{i}(A_{\mathcal{X}}+\phi_{D})(v_{i})\geq\inf_{X^{\mathrm{an}}}\kappa.

It follows that A𝒳​(v)=0A_{\mathcal{X}}(v)=0, and hence v∈Sk⁡(𝒳)v\in\operatorname{Sk}({\mathcal{X}}), by Proposition 5.6. ∎

5.8. Residual boundaries

The following construction plays a crucial role for the understanding of the limit measure appearing in Corollary B.

Consider a model metric ℒ{\mathcal{L}} of KXK_{X} defined on a proper dlt model 𝒳{\mathcal{X}}. Following §3.1 we explain how to associate a subklt pair (Y,BYℒ)(Y,B^{\mathcal{L}}_{Y}) to each stratum YY of 𝒳0{\mathcal{X}}_{0} corresponding to a maximal simplex in Δ⁡(ℒ)\Delta({\mathcal{L}}).

Let us first recall a few facts about adjunction. When 𝒳{\mathcal{X}} is an snc model, each stratum YY comes with a boundary BY:=∑i∉JYEi∩YB_{Y}:=\sum_{i\notin J_{Y}}E_{i}\cap Y. Here (Y,BY)(Y,B_{Y}) is log smooth, and

K𝒳/Slog|Y=K(Y,BY):=KY+BY,K^{\mathrm{log}}_{{\mathcal{X}}/S}\big|_{Y}=K_{(Y,B_{Y})}:=K_{Y}+B_{Y}, (5.6)

the identification being provided by Poincaré residues. When 𝒳{\mathcal{X}} is merely dlt, each stratum YY is normal, and comes with a canonically defined effective ℚ{\mathbb{Q}}-divisor BYB_{Y} such that (Y,BY)(Y,B_{Y}) is dlt and still satisfies (5.6) (cf. [Kol13, 4.19]). We have

BY=∑i∉JYEi∩Y+BY′B_{Y}=\sum_{i\notin J_{Y}}E_{i}\cap Y+B^{\prime}_{Y}

where BY′B^{\prime}_{Y} is an effective ℚ{\mathbb{Q}}-divisor supported in the complement of 𝒳snc{\mathcal{X}}_{\mathrm{snc}}.

Example 5.11.

For each ii, Ei∩(𝒳∖𝒳snc)E_{i}\cap({\mathcal{X}}\setminus{\mathcal{X}}_{\mathrm{snc}}) contains finitely many prime divisors Fi​kF_{ik} of EiE_{i}. At the generic point of Fi​kF_{ik}, 𝒳{\mathcal{X}} has cyclic quotient singularities, and

BEi=∑j≠iEj∩Ei+∑k(1−1mi​k)​Fi​kB_{E_{i}}=\sum_{j\neq i}E_{j}\cap E_{i}+\sum_{k}\left(1-\frac{1}{m_{ik}}\right)F_{ik}

with mi​km_{ik} the order of the corresponding cyclic groups, cf. [Kol13, 3.36.3].

Now let ψ\psi be a model metric on KXanK_{X}^{\mathrm{an}}, determined by a model ℒ{\mathcal{L}} of KXK_{X} on a proper dlt model 𝒳{\mathcal{X}} of XX. Introduce as before the function κ:=AX−ψ\kappa:=A_{X}-\psi on XanX^{\mathrm{an}}, and note that the ℚ{\mathbb{Q}}-Cartier divisor

D:=K𝒳/Slog−ℒ−κmin​𝒳0=∑i(κ⁡(vEi)−κmin)​bi​EiD:=K^{\mathrm{log}}_{{\mathcal{X}}/S}-{\mathcal{L}}-\kappa_{\min}{\mathcal{X}}_{0}=\sum_{i}(\kappa(v_{E_{i}})-\kappa_{\min})b_{i}E_{i}

is effective.

Lemma 5.12.

If YY is a stratum of 𝒳0{\mathcal{X}}_{0} corresponding to a face σ\sigma of Δ⁡(ℒ)\Delta({\mathcal{L}}), then Y⊄supp⁡DY\not\subset\operatorname{supp}D. It follows that the ℚ{\mathbb{Q}}-Cartier divisor

BYℒ:=BY−D|YB^{\mathcal{L}}_{Y}:=B_{Y}-D|_{Y}

is well-defined, and we have a canonical identification ℒ|Y=K(Y,BYℒ){\mathcal{L}}|_{Y}=K_{(Y,B^{\mathcal{L}}_{Y})} as ℚ{\mathbb{Q}}-line bundles. Further, if σ\sigma is a maximal face of Δ⁡(ℒ)\Delta({\mathcal{L}}), then the pair (Y,BYℒ)(Y,B^{\mathcal{L}}_{Y}) is subklt.

We emphasize that BYℒB^{\mathcal{L}}_{Y} is not effective in general.

Proof.

The first two points are clear. When σ\sigma is a maximal face, each EiE_{i} meeting YY satisfies κ⁡(vEi)>κmin\kappa(v_{E_{i}})>\kappa_{\min}. As a result, D|YD|_{Y} contains each lc center Ei∩YE_{i}\cap Y of (Y,BY)(Y,B_{Y}), which yields the last assertion. ∎

5.9. Skeleta and base change

Now we study how skeleta of snc models and of metrics behave under base change.

For m∈ℤ>0m\in{\mathbb{Z}}_{>0} consider the Galois extension K′:=k⁡((t1/m))K^{\prime}:=k(\!({t}^{1/m})\!) of K=k⁡((t))K=k(\!({t})\!), with Galois group G=ℤ/m​ℤG={\mathbb{Z}}/m{\mathbb{Z}}, and set X′=XK′X^{\prime}=X_{K^{\prime}}. Then GG acts on X′anX^{\prime\mathrm{an}} and the canonical map p:X′an→Xanp\colon X^{\prime\mathrm{an}}\to X^{\mathrm{an}} induces a homeomorphism

X′an/G​→∼​Xan.X^{\prime\mathrm{an}}/G\overset{\sim}{\to}X^{\mathrm{an}}.

If 𝒳{\mathcal{X}} is a model of XX, then its normalized base change yields a model 𝒳′{\mathcal{X}}^{\prime} of X′X^{\prime} with a finite morphism ρ:𝒳′→𝒳\rho\colon{\mathcal{X}}^{\prime}\to{\mathcal{X}}. If DD is a ℚ{\mathbb{Q}}-divisor on 𝒳{\mathcal{X}} defining a model function ϕD\phi_{D} on XanX^{\mathrm{an}}, then

ϕρ∗​D=m​p∗​ϕD.\phi_{\rho^{*}D}=mp^{*}\phi_{D}. (5.7)

When 𝒳{\mathcal{X}} is an snc model, 𝒳′{\mathcal{X}}^{\prime} is toroidal, by [KKMS, pp.98–102]. The following rather detailed description will be useful later on.

Lemma 5.13.

We have p−1​(Sk⁡(𝒳))=Sk⁡(𝒳′)p^{-1}(\operatorname{Sk}({\mathcal{X}}))=\operatorname{Sk}({\mathcal{X}}^{\prime}). Further, for each face σ\sigma of Δ⁡(𝒳)\Delta({\mathcal{X}}), there exist positive integers eσe_{\sigma}, fσf_{\sigma} and gσg_{\sigma} satisfying

eσ=mgcd⁡(m,bσ)andfσ​gσ=gcd⁡(m,bσ)e_{\sigma}=\frac{m}{\gcd(m,b_{\sigma})}{\quad\text{and}\quad}f_{\sigma}g_{\sigma}=\gcd(m,b_{\sigma})

and such that the following properties hold: p−1​(σ)p^{-1}(\sigma) is a union of gσg_{\sigma} faces σα′\sigma^{\prime}_{\alpha} of Δ⁡(𝒳′)\Delta({\mathcal{X}}^{\prime}), and these are permuted by GG. For each α\alpha:

  • (a)

    pp induces a ℚ{\mathbb{Q}}-affine isomorphism σα′​→∼​σ\sigma^{\prime}_{\alpha}\overset{\sim}{\to}\sigma;

  • (b)

    pp induces a generically finite map Yσα′→YσY_{\sigma^{\prime}_{\alpha}}\to Y_{\sigma}, of degree fσf_{\sigma};

  • (c)

    m​p∗​Mσ⊂Mσα′mp^{*}M_{\sigma}\subset M_{\sigma^{\prime}_{\alpha}}, and [Mσα′:mp∗Mσ]=eσ[M_{\sigma^{\prime}_{\alpha}}:mp^{*}M_{\sigma}]=e_{\sigma}.

Furthermore, we have:

  • (i)

    Mσα′=p∗​(m​Mσ+ℤ​1σ)M_{\sigma^{\prime}_{\alpha}}=p^{*}\left(mM_{\sigma}+{\mathbb{Z}}1_{\sigma}\right);

  • (ii)

    Vol⁡(σα′)=mdimσ​Vol⁡(σ)\operatorname{Vol}(\sigma^{\prime}_{\alpha})=m^{\dim\sigma}\operatorname{Vol}(\sigma);

  • (iii)

    bσα′=bσ/gcd⁡(m,bσ)b_{\sigma^{\prime}_{\alpha}}=b_{\sigma}/\gcd(m,b_{\sigma}).

Proof.

The proof uses the toroidal theory of [KKMS] together with elementary ramification theory of valuations [ZS75].

Let σ\sigma be the face of Δ⁡(𝒳)\Delta({\mathcal{X}}) corresponding to an irreducible component YY of E0∩⋯∩EpE_{0}\cap\dots\cap E_{p}. Set bi=ordEi⁡(t)b_{i}=\operatorname{ord}_{E_{i}}({t}). With the identification

σ={w∈ℝ+p+1∣∑ibi​wi=1},\sigma=\{w\in{\mathbb{R}}_{+}^{p+1}\mid\sum_{i}b_{i}w_{i}=1\},

the integral affine structure MσM_{\sigma} is given by the lattice ℤp+1{\mathbb{Z}}^{p+1}. Note that bσ=gcdi⁡bib_{\sigma}=\gcd_{i}b_{i}.

Given a closed point ξ∈Y̊\xi\in\mathring{Y}, we can find local coordinates z0,…,znz_{0},\dots,z_{n} in the formal completion 𝒪^𝒳,ξ≃k⁡[[z0,…,zn]]\widehat{\mathcal{O}}_{{\mathcal{X}},\xi}\simeq k[\![z_{0},\dots,z_{n}]\!] such that t=∏i=0pzibi{t}=\prod_{i=0}^{p}z_{i}^{b_{i}}. A toric computation (cf. [KKMS, pp.98–102]) shows that ξ\xi has gcd⁡(m,bσ)\gcd(m,b_{\sigma}) preimages ξα′\xi^{\prime}_{\alpha} in 𝒳0′{\mathcal{X}}^{\prime}_{0}, with 𝒳′{\mathcal{X}}^{\prime} formally isomorphic, at each ξα′\xi^{\prime}_{\alpha}, to the product of 𝔸kn−p{\mathbb{A}}_{k}^{n-p} with the affine toric kk-variety corresponding to the cone ℝ+p+1⊂ℝp+1{\mathbb{R}}_{+}^{p+1}\subset{\mathbb{R}}^{p+1} with lattice

M′:=ℤp+1+ℤ⁡(b0m,…,bpm).M^{\prime}:={\mathbb{Z}}^{p+1}+{\mathbb{Z}}\left(\frac{b_{0}}{m},\dots,\frac{b_{p}}{m}\right).

It follows that p−1​(σ)p^{-1}(\sigma) is the union of the corresponding faces σα′\sigma^{\prime}_{\alpha} of Δ⁡(𝒳′)\Delta({\mathcal{X}}^{\prime}), each isomorphic to

σ′={w′∈ℝ+p+1∣∑ibi​wi′=m},\sigma^{\prime}=\left\{w^{\prime}\in{\mathbb{R}}_{+}^{p+1}\mid\sum_{i}b_{i}w^{\prime}_{i}=m\right\},

with integral affine structure induced by M′M^{\prime}. Now pp restricts to a homeomorphism σα′​→∼​σ\sigma^{\prime}_{\alpha}\overset{\sim}{\to}\sigma given by w=w′/mw=w^{\prime}/m. Thus Mσα′=m​p∗​Mσ+ℤ​1σα′M_{\sigma^{\prime}_{\alpha}}=mp^{*}M_{\sigma}+{\mathbb{Z}}1_{\sigma^{\prime}_{\alpha}}. This implies (i), and (ii)–(iii) easily follow.

Now note that

[Mσα′′:mp∗Mσ]=[mp∗Mσ+ℤ1σα′:mp∗Mσ]=[ℤp+1+ℤ(b0m,…,bpm):ℤp+1]=mgcd⁡(m,bσ)=:eσ.[M_{\sigma^{\prime}_{\alpha}}^{\prime}:mp^{*}M_{\sigma}]=[mp^{*}M_{\sigma}+{\mathbb{Z}}1_{\sigma^{\prime}_{\alpha}}:mp^{*}M_{\sigma}]\\ =[{\mathbb{Z}}^{p+1}+{\mathbb{Z}}(\frac{b_{0}}{m},\dots,\frac{b_{p}}{m}):{\mathbb{Z}}^{p+1}]=\frac{m}{\gcd(m,b_{\sigma})}=:e_{\sigma}.

It remains to analyze the degree fσf_{\sigma} of the restriction Yσα′→YσY_{\sigma^{\prime}_{\alpha}}\to Y_{\sigma}. For this we use ramification theory.

The function field F⁡(X′)=F⁡(X)​(t1/m)F(X^{\prime})=F(X)({t}^{1/m}) is a Galois extension of F⁡(X)F(X) of degree mm, with Galois group GG. For any valuation v′∈X′valv^{\prime}\in X^{\prime\operatorname{val}}, we have v′|F⁡(X)=m​p​(v′)v^{\prime}|_{F(X)}=mp(v^{\prime}).

Let v∈Xanv\in X^{\mathrm{an}} be a valuation corresponding to a point w∈σw\in\sigma. Assume ww is “general” in the sense that dimℚ∑i=0pℚ​wi=p\dim_{\mathbb{Q}}\sum_{i=0}^{p}{\mathbb{Q}}w_{i}=p. The point ww has gσg_{\sigma} preimages wα′w^{\prime}_{\alpha} under pp, one in each σα′\sigma^{\prime}_{\alpha}, and the valuations vα′:=m−1​wα′v^{\prime}_{\alpha}:=m^{-1}w^{\prime}_{\alpha} are all the extensions of vv to F⁡(X′)F(X^{\prime}). Let us compute the residue degree and ramification index of these extensions.

The residue fields of vv and vα′v^{\prime}_{\alpha} are exactly the function fields of YY and Yα′Y^{\prime}_{\alpha}, respectively, so the residue degree of the extension vα′v^{\prime}_{\alpha} of vv is equal to fσf_{\sigma}.

The value group Γv=v⁡(F⁡(X))\Gamma_{v}=v(F(X)) of vv is given by Γv=∑i=0pℤ​wi\Gamma_{v}=\sum_{i=0}^{p}{\mathbb{Z}}w_{i}. Similarly, the value group of vα′v^{\prime}_{\alpha} is given by Γvα′=1m​ℤ+1m​∑i=0pℤ​wi′=1m​ℤ+∑i=0pℤ​wi\Gamma_{v^{\prime}_{\alpha}}=\frac{1}{m}{\mathbb{Z}}+\frac{1}{m}\sum_{i=0}^{p}{\mathbb{Z}}w^{\prime}_{i}=\frac{1}{m}{\mathbb{Z}}+\sum_{i=0}^{p}{\mathbb{Z}}w_{i}. It follows that the ramification index of the extension vα′v^{\prime}_{\alpha} of vv is given by

[Γvα′:Γv]=[1mℤ+∑i=0pℤwi:∑i=0pℤwi]=gcd(ℤ∩m∑i=0pℤwi)=mgcd⁡(m,bσ)=eσ.[\Gamma_{v^{\prime}_{\alpha}}:\Gamma_{v}]=[\frac{1}{m}{\mathbb{Z}}+\sum_{i=0}^{p}{\mathbb{Z}}w_{i}:\sum_{i=0}^{p}{\mathbb{Z}}w_{i}]=\gcd({\mathbb{Z}}\cap m\sum_{i=0}^{p}{\mathbb{Z}}w_{i})=\frac{m}{\gcd(m,b_{\sigma})}=e_{\sigma}.

By [ZS75, p.77] we now have eσ​fσ​gσ=me_{\sigma}f_{\sigma}g_{\sigma}=m, which completes the proof. ∎

Next we study skeleta of metrics. Generalizing [NX13, Lemma 4.1.9], we prove:

Lemma 5.14.

Let ψ\psi be a continuous metric on KXanK_{X}^{\mathrm{an}}, ψ′\psi^{\prime} the metric on KX′an≃p∗​KXanK_{X^{\prime}}^{\mathrm{an}}\simeq p^{*}K_{X}^{\mathrm{an}} corresponding to p∗​ψp^{*}\psi, and set κ′:=AX′−ψ′\kappa^{\prime}:=A_{X^{\prime}}-\psi^{\prime}. Then κ′=m​p∗​κ\kappa^{\prime}=mp^{*}\kappa. As a consequence, Sk⁡(ψ′)=p−1​Sk⁡(ψ)\operatorname{Sk}(\psi^{\prime})=p^{-1}\operatorname{Sk}(\psi) and κmin′=m​κmin\kappa^{\prime}_{\min}=m\kappa_{\min}.

Proof.

By [Gub98, Theorem 7.12] (see also [BFJ16, Corollary 2.3]), model metrics are dense in the set of continuous metrics on KXanK_{X}^{\mathrm{an}}. Hence we may assume ψ\psi is a model metric. Using (5.3), it is enough to show that κ′​(v′)=m​κ​(p⁡(v′))\kappa^{\prime}(v^{\prime})=m\kappa(p(v^{\prime})) for a divisorial valuation v′∈X′divv^{\prime}\in X^{\prime\mathrm{div}}. Let 𝒳{\mathcal{X}} be an snc model with p⁡(v′)∈Sk⁡(𝒳)p(v^{\prime})\in\operatorname{Sk}({\mathcal{X}}), and such that ψ=ϕℒ\psi=\phi_{\mathcal{L}} for a model ℒ{\mathcal{L}} of KXK_{X} on 𝒳{\mathcal{X}}. Since the normalized base change 𝒳′{\mathcal{X}}^{\prime} of 𝒳{\mathcal{X}} is toroidal, we can choose a toroidal modification 𝒳′′→𝒳′{\mathcal{X}}^{\prime\prime}\to{\mathcal{X}}^{\prime} with 𝒳′′{\mathcal{X}}^{\prime\prime} snc. The induced morphism ρ:𝒳′′→𝒳\rho\colon{\mathcal{X}}^{\prime\prime}\to{\mathcal{X}} is toroidal; hence it satisfies the log ramification formula

m​K𝒳′′/S′log=ρ∗​K𝒳/Slog.mK^{\mathrm{log}}_{{\mathcal{X}}^{\prime\prime}/S^{\prime}}=\rho^{*}K^{\mathrm{log}}_{{\mathcal{X}}/S}.

By (5.7), we infer ϕK𝒳′′/S′log−ψ′=p∗​(ϕK𝒳/Slog−ψ)\phi_{K^{\mathrm{log}}_{{\mathcal{X}}^{\prime\prime}/S^{\prime}}}-\psi^{\prime}=p^{*}(\phi_{K^{\mathrm{log}}_{{\mathcal{X}}/S}}-\psi), which gives the desired result since v′∈Sk⁡(𝒳′′)v^{\prime}\in\operatorname{Sk}({\mathcal{X}}^{\prime\prime}), p⁡(v′)∈Sk⁡(𝒳)p(v^{\prime})\in\operatorname{Sk}({\mathcal{X}}) imply A𝒳′′​(v′)=A𝒳​(p⁡(v′))=0A_{{\mathcal{X}}^{\prime\prime}}(v^{\prime})=A_{{\mathcal{X}}}(p(v^{\prime}))=0. ∎

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source-backed reader collection; mathematical self-containment is not assessed.