Proof of Proposition 4.3 . [0165]
Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.
Complete original source context · Original author HTML
Proof of Proposition 4.3.
Since is continuous, is compact, and
is Hausdorff, it suffices to prove that
is bijective.
Using Lemma 4.6 (c)–(d) and Lemma 4.7, one proves by
induction on the
number of blowups that is bijective when
is a composition of simple blowups.
Now consider the general case.
Using Lemma 4.1 we find an snc model
dominating both and and such that the morphism
is a composition of simple blowups.
Thus is bijective.
By Lemma 4.6 (a), it follows that
is surjective.
Since and were arbitrary snc models with
dominating , it follows that
is also surjective. It now follows from Lemma 4.6 (b) that
is injective, which completes the proof.
∎