ScalingStacks

2. The hybrid space associated to an snc model [0153]

Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.

Complete original source context · Original author HTML

2. The hybrid space associated to an snc model

In this section, we show how to perform a topological surgery in a complex manifold, replacing a simple normal crossing divisor with its dual complex. Our construction is similar to the one used by Morgan-Shalen in [MS84, §I.3], and can even be traced back to the pioneering work of Bergman [Berg71].

2.1. The dual complex

Let DD be an effective divisor with simple normal crossing (snc) support in a complex manifold 𝒳{\mathcal{X}}. By definition, D=∑i∈Ibi​EiD=\sum_{i\in I}b_{i}E_{i} with bi∈ℕ∗b_{i}\in{\mathbb{N}}^{*} and (Ei)i∈I(E_{i})_{i\in I} a finite family of smooth irreducible divisors such that

EJ:=⋂i∈JEiE_{J}:=\bigcap_{i\in J}E_{i}

is either empty or smooth of codimension |J||J| (with finitely many connected components) for each ∅≠J⊂I\emptyset\neq J\subset I. A connected component YY of a non-empty EJE_{J} is called a stratum. Together with 𝒳∖D=E∅{\mathcal{X}}\setminus D=E_{\emptyset}, the locally closed submanifolds Y̊:=Y∖⋃i∈I∖JEi\mathring{Y}:=Y\setminus\bigcup_{i\in I\setminus J}E_{i} define a partition of 𝒳{\mathcal{X}}.

The dual complex Δ⁡(D)\Delta(D) is the simplicial complex44 4 This is understood in the slightly generalized sense that the intersection of two faces is a union of common faces. defined as follows: to each stratum YY corresponds a simplex

σY={w∈ℝ+J∣∑i∈Jbi​wi=1},\sigma_{Y}=\left\{w\in{\mathbb{R}}_{+}^{J}\mid\sum_{i\in J}b_{i}w_{i}=1\right\},

and σY\sigma_{Y} is a face of σY′\sigma_{Y^{\prime}} if and only if Y′⊂YY^{\prime}\subset Y. This description equips Δ⁡(D)\Delta(D) with an integral affine structure, by which we mean a compatible choice of integral affine structures on each simplex σ\sigma. This further induces a ℤ{\mathbb{Z}}-PA structure on Δ⁡(D)\Delta(D).

We write YσY_{\sigma} for the stratum of a face σ\sigma. Each point ξ∈D\xi\in D belongs to Yξ̊\mathring{Y_{\xi}} for a unique stratum YξY_{\xi}, obtained as the connected component of EJξE_{J_{\xi}} containing ξ\xi, with Jξ={i∈I∣ξ∈Ei}J_{\xi}=\{i\in I\mid\xi\in E_{i}\}. We denote by σξ:=σYξ\sigma_{\xi}:=\sigma_{Y_{\xi}} the corresponding face of Δ⁡(D)\Delta(D).

2.2. The hybrid topology

Next we define a natural topology on the disjoint union

𝒳hyb:=(𝒳∖D)​∐Δ⁡(D).{\mathcal{X}}^{\mathrm{hyb}}:=({\mathcal{X}}\setminus D)\coprod\Delta(D).

Consider a connected open set 𝒰⊂𝒳{\mathcal{U}}\subset{\mathcal{X}} meeting DD and local coordinates z=(z0,…,zn)z=(z_{0},\dots,z_{n}) on 𝒰{\mathcal{U}}. We say that the pair (𝒰,z)({\mathcal{U}},z) is adapted (to DD) if the following conditions hold:

  • (i)

    if E0,…,EpE_{0},\dots,E_{p} are the irreducible components of DD intersecting 𝒰{\mathcal{U}}, then we have 𝒰∩E0∩⋯∩Ep=𝒰∩Y̊{\mathcal{U}}\cap E_{0}\cap\dots\cap E_{p}={\mathcal{U}}\cap\mathring{Y} for a component YY of E0∩⋯∩EpE_{0}\cap\dots\cap E_{p};

  • (ii)

    ziz_{i} is an equation of Ei∩𝒰E_{i}\cap{\mathcal{U}} with |zi|<1|z_{i}|<1, 0≤i≤p0\leq i\leq p.

We call Y=Y𝒰Y=Y_{\mathcal{U}} the stratum of 𝒰{\mathcal{U}}, and denote by

σ𝒰={w∈ℝp+1∣∑i=0pbi​wi=1}\sigma_{\mathcal{U}}=\left\{w\in{\mathbb{R}}^{p+1}\mid\sum_{i=0}^{p}b_{i}w_{i}=1\right\}

the corresponding face of Δ⁡(D)\Delta(D). The function f𝒰,z:=∏i=0pzibif_{{\mathcal{U}},z}:=\prod_{i=0}^{p}z_{i}^{b_{i}} is an equation of DD in 𝒰{\mathcal{U}}, with |f𝒰,z|<1|f_{{\mathcal{U}},z}|<1, and we get a continuous map Log𝒰:𝒰∖D→σY\operatorname{Log}_{{\mathcal{U}}}\colon{\mathcal{U}}\setminus D\to\sigma_{Y} by setting

Log𝒰=(log⁡|zi|log⁡|f𝒰|)0≤i≤p.\operatorname{Log}_{{\mathcal{U}}}=\left(\frac{\log|z_{i}|}{\log|f_{\mathcal{U}}|}\right)_{0\leq i\leq p}.

For any two adapted coordinate charts (𝒰,z)({\mathcal{U}},z), (𝒰′,z′)({\mathcal{U}}^{\prime},z^{\prime}), with the same stratum YY, we have zi′=ui​ziz^{\prime}_{i}=u_{i}z_{i} with uiu_{i} nonvanishing on 𝒰∩𝒰′{\mathcal{U}}\cap{\mathcal{U}}^{\prime}, for i=0,…,pi=0,\dots,p (after a possible reindexing); it follows that

Log𝒰′=Log𝒰+O⁡(1log⁡|f𝒰,z|−1)\operatorname{Log}_{{\mathcal{U}}^{\prime}}=\operatorname{Log}_{{\mathcal{U}}}+O\left(\frac{1}{\log|f_{{\mathcal{U}},z}|^{-1}}\right) (2.1)

locally uniformly on 𝒰∩𝒰′{\mathcal{U}}\cap{\mathcal{U}}^{\prime}. We next show how to globalize this construction.

Proposition 2.1.

There exists an open neighborhood 𝒱⊂𝒳{\mathcal{V}}\subset{\mathcal{X}} of DD and a continuous map Log𝒱:𝒱∖D→Δ⁡(D)\operatorname{Log}_{\mathcal{V}}\colon{\mathcal{V}}\setminus D\to\Delta(D) such that for each adapted coordinate chart (𝒰,z)({\mathcal{U}},z) with 𝒰⊂𝒱{\mathcal{U}}\subset{\mathcal{V}} we have Log𝒱⁡(𝒰∖D)⊂σ𝒰\operatorname{Log}_{\mathcal{V}}({\mathcal{U}}\setminus D)\subset\sigma_{\mathcal{U}} and

Log𝒱=Log𝒰+O⁡(1log⁡|f𝒰,z|−1)\operatorname{Log}_{\mathcal{V}}=\operatorname{Log}_{{\mathcal{U}}}+O\left(\frac{1}{\log|f_{{\mathcal{U}},z}|^{-1}}\right) (2.2)

uniformly on compact subsets of 𝒰{\mathcal{U}}.

This will be accomplished by means of a partition of unity, using the following elementary special case of [Cle77, Theorem 5.7].

Lemma 2.2.

There exists a family ((𝒱α,zα))α∈A(({\mathcal{V}}_{\alpha},z_{\alpha}))_{\alpha\in A} of adapted coordinate charts, such that (𝒱α)α({\mathcal{V}}_{\alpha})_{\alpha} forms a locally finite covering of DD and such that the strata YαY_{\alpha} of the 𝒱α{\mathcal{V}}_{\alpha} satisfy

⋂β∈B𝒱β≠∅⟹⋂β∈BYβ≠∅\bigcap_{\beta\in B}{\mathcal{V}}_{\beta}\neq\emptyset\Longrightarrow\bigcap_{\beta\in B}Y_{\beta}\neq\emptyset (2.3)

for every finite B⊂AB\subset A.

Proof of Proposition 2.1.

Pick an open cover (𝒱α)α({\mathcal{V}}_{\alpha})_{\alpha} as in Lemma 2.2, and denote by Logα:𝒱α∖D→σα\operatorname{Log}_{\alpha}\colon{\mathcal{V}}_{\alpha}\setminus D\to\sigma_{\alpha} the corresponding maps. Set 𝒱:=⋃α𝒱α{\mathcal{V}}:=\bigcup_{\alpha}{\mathcal{V}}_{\alpha}, and pick a partition of unity (χα)(\chi_{\alpha}) subordinate to (𝒱α)({\mathcal{V}}_{\alpha}). We claim that for each ξ∈𝒱\xi\in{\mathcal{V}} there exists an open neighborhood WW of ξ\xi and a face σW\sigma_{W} of Δ⁡(D)\Delta(D) such that

W∩supp⁡χα≠∅⟹σα⊂σWW\cap\operatorname{supp}\chi_{\alpha}\neq\emptyset\Longrightarrow\sigma_{\alpha}\subset\sigma_{W}

for any α∈A\alpha\in A. Indeed, using (2.3) it is easy to see that

W:=⋂α|ξ∈𝒰α𝒱α∖⋃α|ξ∉supp⁡χβsupp⁡χβW:=\bigcap_{\alpha\mid\xi\in{\mathcal{U}}_{\alpha}}{\mathcal{V}}_{\alpha}\setminus\bigcup_{\alpha\mid\xi\notin\operatorname{supp}\chi_{\beta}}\operatorname{supp}\chi_{\beta}

satisfies this property. By convexity of σW\sigma_{W}, it follows that Log𝒱:=∑αχα​Log𝒱α\operatorname{Log}_{\mathcal{V}}:=\sum_{\alpha}\chi_{\alpha}\operatorname{Log}_{{\mathcal{V}}_{\alpha}} is well-defined on W∖DW\setminus D, and hence yields a continuous map Log𝒱:𝒱∖D→Δ⁡(D)\operatorname{Log}_{\mathcal{V}}\colon{\mathcal{V}}\setminus D\to\Delta(D). The last property is a direct consequence of (2.1). ∎

We extend the previous map as

Log𝒱:𝒱hyb:=(𝒱∖D)∪Δ⁡(D)→Δ⁡(D)\operatorname{Log}_{\mathcal{V}}\colon{\mathcal{V}}^{\mathrm{hyb}}:=({\mathcal{V}}\setminus D)\cup\Delta(D)\to\Delta(D)

by setting Log𝒱=id\operatorname{Log}_{\mathcal{V}}=\operatorname{id} on Δ⁡(D)\Delta(D).

Definition 2.3.

The hybrid topology on 𝒳hyb:=(𝒳∖D)∪Δ⁡(D){\mathcal{X}}^{\mathrm{hyb}}:=({\mathcal{X}}\setminus D)\cup\Delta(D) is defined as the coarsest topology such that:

  • (i)

    𝒳∖D↪𝒳hyb{\mathcal{X}}\setminus D\hookrightarrow{\mathcal{X}}^{\mathrm{hyb}} is an open embedding;

  • (ii)

    For every open neighborhood 𝒱{\mathcal{V}} of DD in 𝒳{\mathcal{X}}, the set (𝒱∖D)∪Δ⁡(𝒳)({\mathcal{V}}\setminus D)\cup\Delta({\mathcal{X}}) is open in 𝒳hyb{\mathcal{X}}^{\mathrm{hyb}};

  • (iii)

    Log𝒱:𝒱hyb→Δ⁡(D)\operatorname{Log}_{\mathcal{V}}\colon{\mathcal{V}}^{\mathrm{hyb}}\to\Delta(D) is continuous.

Using (2.2), this definition is easily seen to be independent of the choice of map Log𝒱\operatorname{Log}_{\mathcal{V}}. If DD is compact and K⊂𝒳K\subset{\mathcal{X}} is a compact neighborhood of DD, then one easily checks that the corresponding subset Khyb=(K∖D)∪Δ⁡(D)K^{\mathrm{hyb}}=(K\setminus D)\cup\Delta(D) is compact (Hausdorff). When D=b0​E0D=b_{0}E_{0} has only one irreducible component, KhybK^{\mathrm{hyb}} is simply the Tychonoff one-point compactification of K∖DK\setminus D.

Example 2.4.

Set 𝒳=𝔻2{\mathcal{X}}={\mathbb{D}}^{2} and D=E0+E1D=E_{0}+E_{1} the union of the coordinate axes, with coordinates (z0,z1)(z_{0},z_{1}). Then 𝒰=𝒳{\mathcal{U}}={\mathcal{X}} is itself an adapted coordinate chart. In these coordinates, Log𝒰:𝒰∖D→σ𝒰\operatorname{Log}_{{\mathcal{U}}}\colon{\mathcal{U}}\setminus D\to\sigma_{\mathcal{U}} becomes the map (𝔻∗)2→[0,1]({\mathbb{D}}^{*})^{2}\to[0,1] sending (z0,z1)(z_{0},z_{1}) to log⁡|z1|/log⁡|z0​z1|\log|z_{1}|/\log|z_{0}z_{1}|. As a consequence, given t∈ℝ+∗t\in{\mathbb{R}}_{+}^{*} and 0<ε≪10<\varepsilon\ll 1, the closure in 𝒳hyb{\mathcal{X}}^{\mathrm{hyb}} of the closed subset

Fε:={0<|z0|,|z1|≤ε,|z0|t+ε≤|z1|≤|z0|t−ε}⊂𝔻2F_{\varepsilon}:=\{0<|z_{0}|,|z_{1}|\leq\varepsilon,|z_{0}|^{t+\varepsilon}\leq|z_{1}|\leq|z_{0}|^{t-\varepsilon}\}\subset{\mathbb{D}}^{2}

is given by F¯ε=Fε∪Iε{\bar{F}}_{\varepsilon}=F_{\varepsilon}\cup I_{\varepsilon}, where Iε:={t∈[0,1]∣t−ε1+t−ε≤t≤t+ε1+t+ε}I_{\varepsilon}:=\{t\in[0,1]\mid\frac{t-\varepsilon}{1+t-\varepsilon}\leq t\leq\frac{t+\varepsilon}{1+t+\varepsilon}\}. Further, the sets F¯ε{\bar{F}}_{\varepsilon}, for 0<ε≪10<\varepsilon\ll 1 form a basis of closed neighborhoods of the point t1+t∈[0,1]\frac{t}{1+t}\in[0,1] in 𝒳hyb{\mathcal{X}}^{\mathrm{hyb}}. See Figure 1.

Original source figure
Figure 1. The figure shows the closed subset FεF_{\varepsilon} in Example 2.4.

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source-backed reader collection; mathematical self-containment is not assessed.