ScalingStacks

Verified tagged author-source HTML · 1912.02360v1 · cited publication edition alignment unverified.

5 Fermat case: Metric convergence and SYZ fibration

We focus on the Fermat family case. We will produce a solution of the real MA equation on ∂Δλ∨\partial\Delta_{\lambda}^{\vee} by a subsequential limit, which induces a real MA metric on the regular locus (cf. section 5.1). Then we show the Calabi-Yau metrics on the degenerating hypersurfaces converge to the real MA metric, both in a Cl​o​c∞C^{\infty}_{loc}-sense (cf. section 5.2) and in the global Gromov-Hausdorff sense (cf. section 5.3). The strong regularity estimates will in particular imply that in the generic region of XsX_{s} the CY metrics are collapsing with bounded curvature, which by a result of Zhang [41] allows one to produce a special Lagrangian fibration in the generic region of XsX_{s} (cf. section 5.4).

5.1 Limiting real MA metric

We work in the context of section 4.7, and use the notations therein. We shall extract some subsequential limit of local potentials for the CY metric ωC​Y,s\omega_{CY,s}, and check that up to a constant it solves the real MA equation on ∂Δλ∨∖S​i​n​g\partial\Delta_{\lambda}^{\vee}\setminus Sing according to Def. 3.29 (cf. also section 2.6).

Since the convex functions uC​Y,su_{CY,s} on NℝN_{\mathbb{R}} produced by double Legendre transform have uniform Lipschitz bounds (25), by the Arzela-Ascoli theorem we can take a subsequential limit as s→∞s\to\infty, such that uC​Y,s→u∞u_{CY,s}\to u_{\infty} in Cl​o​c0C^{0}_{loc}-topology. Later we will sometimes suppress mentioning the subsequence for brevity. In particular u∞u_{\infty} is convex and admissible. We can also pass Cor. 4.15 to the limit, to see that in the region Star​(w)+ℝ≥0​w⊂Nℝ\text{Star}(w)+\mathbb{R}_{\geq 0}w\subset N_{\mathbb{R}}, for any mm with ⟨m,w⟩=1\langle m,w\rangle=1, the function u∞,m=u∞−mu_{\infty,m}=u_{\infty}-m is constant upon translation in the ww-direction. In particular in such regions the Cl​o​c0C^{0}_{loc} convergence improves to ‖uC​Y,s,m−u∞,m‖C0→0\left\lVert u_{CY,s,m}-u_{\infty,m}\right\rVert_{C^{0}}\to 0.

By construction ψC​Y,s,m=uC​Y,s,m∘Logs\psi_{CY,s,m}=u_{CY,s,m}\circ\text{Log}_{s}, and uC​Y,s,0=uC​Y,s∘Logs.u_{CY,s,0}=u_{CY,s}\circ\text{Log}_{s}. Thus the stability estimate Cor. 4.26 implies that

  • •

    Inside Uws,∗⊂XsU^{s,*}_{w}\subset X_{s}, for ⟨m,w⟩=1\langle m,w\rangle=1, the local potentials satisfy

    |φC​Y,s,m−u∞,m∘Logs|→0.|\varphi_{CY,s,m}-u_{\infty,m}\circ\text{Log}_{s}|\to 0.
  • •

    Inside Uws,f​a​c​eU^{s,face}_{w}, the local potentials satisfy

    |φC​Y,s,0−u∞∘Logs|→0.|\varphi_{CY,s,0}-u_{\infty}\circ\text{Log}_{s}|\to 0.

The rest of this section is devoted to proving

00SK

Theorem 5.1. On ∂Δλ∨∖S​i​n​g\partial\Delta_{\lambda}^{\vee}\setminus Sing, the locally convex function u∞u_{\infty} solves the real MA equation in the sense of Def. 3.29 up to a scaling constant:

M​A​(u∞)=a∞πn​n!​d​μ∞,MA(u_{\infty})=\frac{a_{\infty}}{\pi^{n}n!}d\mu_{\infty}, (31)

where d​μ∞d\mu_{\infty} is the Lebesgue measure on ∂Δλ∨\partial\Delta_{\lambda}^{\vee}, and the constant a∞a_{\infty} is defined by (21).

The intuitive idea is to pass the complex MA equation to some weak limit. The main problem is that the sequence φC​Y,s\varphi_{CY,s} live on different manifolds, so we need more effective estimates to pass to the limit.

00SL

Lemma 5.2. Let uu be a bounded convex function on the square {|xi|<1}⊂ℝn\{|x_{i}|<1\}\subset\mathbb{R}^{n}. Via the rescaled log map s−1​Log:(ℂ∗)n→ℝns^{-1}\text{Log}:(\mathbb{C}^{*})^{n}\to\mathbb{R}^{n}, the function uu pulls back to a psh function on {|log|zi||<s}\{|\log|z_{i}||<s\}. Then the real MA measure of uu is related to the pushforward of the complex MA measure of u∘s−1​Logu\circ s^{-1}\text{Log} by

M​A​(u)=snπn​n!​(s−1​Log)∗​(−1​∂∂¯​(u∘s−1​Log))n.MA(u)=\frac{s^{n}}{\pi^{n}n!}(s^{-1}\text{Log})_{*}(\sqrt{-1}\partial\bar{\partial}(u\circ s^{-1}\text{Log}))^{n}.
00SM

Proof. If uu is smooth, then

M​A​(u)​(K)=∫Kdet(D2​u)​d​x1​…​d​xn=snπn​n!​∫(s−1​Log)−1​(K)(−1​∂∂¯​(u∘s−1​Log))n.MA(u)(K)=\int_{K}\det(D^{2}u)dx_{1}\ldots dx_{n}=\frac{s^{n}}{\pi^{n}n!}\int_{(s^{-1}\text{Log})^{-1}(K)}(\sqrt{-1}\partial\bar{\partial}(u\circ s^{-1}\text{Log}))^{n}.

Since u∈C0u\in C^{0}, and both the real and complex MA operators are weakly continuous with respect to C0C^{0}-limits, this equality passes to general uu. ∎

00SN

Lemma 5.3. (Chern-Levine type estimate) Let uu be a psh function on the annulus region U={|log⁡|zi||<s,∀i}⊂(ℂ∗)nU=\{|\log|z_{i}||<s,\forall i\}\subset(\mathbb{C}^{*})^{n}, with ‖u‖L∞≲1\left\lVert u\right\rVert_{L^{\infty}}\lesssim 1. Then

  • •

    On the shrinked set E={|log|zi||<s/2}E=\{|\log|z_{i}||<s/2\} the measure

    ∫E(−1​∂∂¯​u)n≤C​s−n.\int_{E}(\sqrt{-1}\partial\bar{\partial}u)^{n}\leq Cs^{-n}.
  • •

    Let u+vu+v is another psh function, with ‖v‖L∞≪1\left\lVert v\right\rVert_{L^{\infty}}\ll 1. Let ff be any compactly supported function on the square {|xi|<1}⊂ℝn\{|x_{i}|<1\}\subset\mathbb{R}^{n}. Then

    ∫f⁡{(−1​∂∂¯​(u+v))n−(−1​∂∂¯​u)n}≤C​s−n​‖f‖C2​‖v‖L∞.\int f\{(\sqrt{-1}\partial\bar{\partial}(u+v))^{n}-(\sqrt{-1}\partial\bar{\partial}u)^{n}\}\leq Cs^{-n}\left\lVert f\right\rVert_{C^{2}}\left\lVert v\right\rVert_{L^{\infty}}.
00SP

Proof. Let χ\chi be a compactly supported nonnegative smooth function on the square {|xi|<1}⊂ℝn\{|x_{i}|<1\}\subset\mathbb{R}^{n}, equal to one on {|xi|≤1/2}\{|x_{i}|\leq 1/2\}. We identify χ\chi with χ∘s−1​Log\chi\circ s^{-1}\text{Log}, and denote ωs​t​d=−1​∑d​log⁡zi∧d​log⁡zi¯\omega_{std}=\sqrt{-1}\sum d\log z_{i}\wedge d\overline{\log z_{i}}. Then

−C​s−2​ωs​t​d≤−1​∂∂¯​χ≤C​s−2​ωs​t​d.-Cs^{-2}\omega_{std}\leq\sqrt{-1}\partial\bar{\partial}\chi\leq Cs^{-2}\omega_{std}.

The basic obervation is that if TT is a positive current of bidegree (n−1,n−1)(n-1,n-1), then by integration by part,

∫E−1​∂∂¯​u∧T≤∫supp​(χ)χ​−1​∂∂¯​u∧T=∫supp​(χ)u​−1​∂∂¯​χ∧T≤C​s−2​∫supp​(χ)ωs​t​d∧T.\begin{split}&\int_{E}\sqrt{-1}\partial\bar{\partial}u\wedge T\leq\int_{\text{supp}(\chi)}\chi\sqrt{-1}\partial\bar{\partial}u\wedge T\\ &=\int_{\text{supp}(\chi)}u\sqrt{-1}\partial\bar{\partial}\chi\wedge T\leq Cs^{-2}\int_{\text{supp}(\chi)}\omega_{std}\wedge T.\end{split}

Iterating this argument to lower the power of −1​∂∂¯​u\sqrt{-1}\partial\bar{\partial}u,

∫E(−1​∂∂¯​u)n≤C​s−2​n​∫Uωs​t​dn≤C​s−n.\int_{E}(\sqrt{-1}\partial\bar{\partial}u)^{n}\leq Cs^{-2n}\int_{U}\omega_{std}^{n}\leq Cs^{-n}.

The second statement is proved similarly by removing −1​∂∂¯​v\sqrt{-1}\partial\bar{\partial}v factors iteratively. ∎

00SQ

Proof. (Thm. 5.1) There are two subcases: the interior of the top dimensional faces of ∂Δλ∨\partial\Delta_{\lambda}^{\vee}, and the star of the vertices Star​(w)\text{Star}(w). Since the arguments are almost the same we focus on the latter.

On the interior of Star​(w)\text{Star}(w), we have local affine coordinates xm1,…​xmnx^{m_{1}},\ldots x^{m_{n}}, related to the holomorphic ℂ∗\mathbb{C}^{*}-coordinates zm1,…​zmnz^{m_{1}},\ldots z^{m_{n}} by xmi=s−1​log⁡|zmi|x^{m_{i}}=s^{-1}\log|z^{m_{i}}|. The star type region Uws,∗⊂XsU^{s,*}_{w}\subset X_{s} can be viewed as a subset of (ℂ∗)n(\mathbb{C}^{*})^{n}, so we use the rescaled map s−1​Log:(ℂ∗)zmin→ℝxmins^{-1}\text{Log}:(\mathbb{C}^{*})^{n}_{z^{m_{i}}}\to\mathbb{R}^{n}_{x^{m_{i}}} to pullback the function u∞,mu_{\infty,m} on Star​(w)\text{Star}(w). On the other hand, Xs∩(ℂ∗)n+1X_{s}\cap(\mathbb{C}^{*})^{n+1} maps into NℝN_{\mathbb{R}} via Logs\text{Log}_{s}, so we can also pullback u∞,mu_{\infty,m} via Logs\text{Log}_{s}. These two pullbacks differ by at most C​s−1Cs^{-1} using Cor. 4.15. We also write ϕ=φC​Y,s,m\phi=\varphi_{CY,s,m}.

Take a local test function f∈Cc2f\in C^{2}_{c} supported in the interior of Star​(w)\text{Star}(w), then ff is identified as a local function on Uws,∗⊂XsU^{s,*}_{w}\subset X_{s} via s−1​Logs^{-1}\text{Log}. By the Chern-Levine type estimate above,

sn​∫f⁡{(−1​∂∂¯​ϕ)n−(−1​∂∂¯​(u∞,m∘s−1​Log))n}≤C​‖ϕ−u∞,m∘s−1​Log‖L∞​‖f‖C2→0,\begin{split}&s^{n}\int f\{(\sqrt{-1}\partial\bar{\partial}\phi)^{n}-(\sqrt{-1}\partial\bar{\partial}(u_{\infty,m}\circ s^{-1}\text{Log}))^{n}\}\\ &\leq C\left\lVert\phi-u_{\infty,m}\circ s^{-1}\text{Log}\right\rVert_{L^{\infty}}\left\lVert f\right\rVert_{C^{2}}\to 0,\end{split}

as s→+∞s\to+\infty. By the Calabi-Yau condition (20) and Prop. 3.14,

sn​(−1​∂∂¯​ϕ)n=as​d​μs=a∞​d​μs​(1+o⁡(1)),s→+∞.s^{n}(\sqrt{-1}\partial\bar{\partial}\phi)^{n}=a_{s}d\mu_{s}=a_{\infty}d\mu_{s}(1+o(1)),\quad s\to+\infty.

Pushing forward via s−1​Logs^{-1}\text{Log}, and applying Lemma 5.2,

πn​n!​∫f​M​A​(u∞)=lims→∞∫f​as​(s−1​Log)∗​d​μs=a∞​∫f​d​μ∞.\pi^{n}n!\int fMA(u_{\infty})=\lim_{s\to\infty}\int fa_{s}(s^{-1}\text{Log})_{*}d\mu_{s}=a_{\infty}\int fd\mu_{\infty}.

Since this holds for every f∈Cc2f\in C^{2}_{c}, on the interior of this top dimensional face we obtain the measure equality (31). ∎

5.2 Higher regularity in the generic region

Once we know the subsequential limit u∞u_{\infty} satisfies the real MA equation, then by the local regularity theory surveyed in section 2.6,

00SR

Corollary 5.4. (Regularity of real MA solution) Inside ∂Δλ∨∖S​i​n​g\partial\Delta_{\lambda}^{\vee}\setminus Sing, let ℛ\mathcal{R} be the set of strictly convex points of u∞u_{\infty}, then u∞∈Cl​o​c∞​(ℛ)u_{\infty}\in C^{\infty}_{loc}(\mathcal{R}), and the complement of ℛ\mathcal{R} is a closed subset of Hausdorff (n−1)(n-1)-measure zero. In particular ℛ\mathcal{R} is path connected, and is open and dense in ∂Δλ∨∖S​i​n​g\partial\Delta_{\lambda}^{\vee}\setminus Sing.

00SS

Remark 5.5. In dimension 2, the local regularity theory implies that ℛ=∂Δλ∨∖S​i​n​g\mathcal{R}=\partial\Delta_{\lambda}^{\vee}\setminus Sing, namely the real MA solution is smooth wherever the affine structure is defined. The same might hold in any higher dimension, although this cannot be concluded by local regularity results alone (cf. Remark 2.15).

We now proceed to a very explicit coordinate version of higher order estimates for the local CY potentials, by transferring regularity from the real MA equation to the complex MA equation.

Let x∈ℛx\in\mathcal{R}, then u∞u_{\infty} (resp. the appropriate OPENu∞,m)u_{\infty,m}) has Ck,γC^{k,\gamma}-bound on some coordinate ball B⁡(x,2​r​(x))⊂ℛB(x,2r(x))\subset\mathcal{R} contained in a shrinked face (resp. Star​(w)\text{Star}(w)). For clarity we focus on the face case. The radius r⁡(x)r(x) and the Ck,γC^{k,\gamma}-bound depend on the choice of xx, but are uniform for xx in any fixed compact subset of ℛ\mathcal{R}. We identify u∞u_{\infty} with its pullback to (s−1​Log)−1​(B⁡(x,r⁡(x)))⊂Uws,f​a​c​e⊂Xs(s^{-1}\text{Log})^{-1}(B(x,r(x)))\subset U^{s,face}_{w}\subset X_{s}.

The local CY potential φC​Y,s,0\varphi_{CY,s,0} on (s−1​Log)−1​(B⁡(x,2​r​(x)))(s^{-1}\text{Log})^{-1}(B(x,2r(x))) satisfies

‖φC​Y,s,0−u∞∘s−1​Log‖C0→0,s→∞\left\lVert\varphi_{CY,s,0}-u_{\infty}\circ s^{-1}\text{Log}\right\rVert_{C^{0}}\to 0,\quad s\to\infty

along the subsequence. We may regard (s−1​Log)−1​(B⁡(x,2​r​(x)))(s^{-1}\text{Log})^{-1}(B(x,2r(x))) as an open subset of (ℂ∗)n(\mathbb{C}^{*})^{n}. On the universal cover of (ℂ∗)n(\mathbb{C}^{*})^{n}, we use the natural coordinates s−1​log⁡zmis^{-1}\log z^{m_{i}} for i=1,…​ni=1,\ldots n.

Now φC​Y,s,0\varphi_{CY,s,0} satisfies the complex MA equation (cf. (20)(14))

(−1​∂∂¯​φC​Y,s,0)n=as​s−n​d​μs=as(4​π​s2)n​−1n2​Ωs∧Ωs¯.(\sqrt{-1}\partial\bar{\partial}\varphi_{CY,s,0})^{n}=a_{s}s^{-n}d\mu_{s}=\frac{a_{s}}{(4\pi s^{2})^{n}}\sqrt{-1}^{n^{2}}\Omega_{s}\wedge\overline{\Omega_{s}}.

By the holomorphic volume form formula (12),

(−1​∂∂¯​φC​Y,s,0)n=as(4​π)n​(1+o⁡(1))​∏i−1​s−1​d​log⁡zmi∧s−1​d​log⁡zmi¯,(\sqrt{-1}\partial\bar{\partial}\varphi_{CY,s,0})^{n}=\frac{a_{s}}{(4\pi)^{n}}(1+o(1))\prod_{i}\sqrt{-1}s^{-1}d\log z^{m_{i}}\wedge s^{-1}d\overline{\log z^{m_{i}}},

where the o⁡(1)o(1) term in fact has exponentially small C∞C^{\infty} bounds in s−1​log⁡zmis^{-1}\log z^{m_{i}} coordinates; the higher order bound uses that Ωs\Omega_{s} is holomorphic. On the other hand by the calculation in section 5.1, the pullback of u∞u_{\infty} satisfies

(−1​∂∂¯​(u∞∘s−1​Log))n=a∞(4​π)n​∏is−1​−1​d​log⁡zmi∧s−1​d​log⁡zmi¯.(\sqrt{-1}\partial\bar{\partial}(u_{\infty}\circ s^{-1}\text{Log}))^{n}=\frac{a_{\infty}}{(4\pi)^{n}}\prod_{i}s^{-1}\sqrt{-1}d\log z^{m_{i}}\wedge s^{-1}d\overline{\log z^{m_{i}}}.

To summarize, the deviation of RHS is negligible and the deviation between φC​Y,s,0\varphi_{CY,s,0} and u∞∘s−1​Logu_{\infty}\circ s^{-1}\text{Log} is small in C0C^{0}-norm. Applying Savin’s Thm. 2.14,

00ST

Theorem 5.6. (Smooth convergence in generic regions) As s→+∞s\to+\infty along the subsequence, assume the coordinate ball B⁡(x,2​r​(x))⊂ℛB(x,2r(x))\subset\mathcal{R}, then on the region (s−1​Log)−1​(B⁡(x,r⁡(x)))⊂Xs(s^{-1}\text{Log})^{-1}(B(x,r(x)))\subset X_{s}, we have the following higher regularity estimates with respect to the Ck,γC^{k,\gamma}-norm in the s−1​log⁡zmis^{-1}\log z^{m_{i}} coordinates.

  • •

    In the face type region Uws,f​a​c​eU_{w}^{s,face} case

    ‖φC​Y,s,0−u∞∘s−1​Log‖Ck,γ​((s−1​Log)−1​(B⁡(x,r⁡(x)))CLOSE→0.\left\lVert\varphi_{CY,s,0}-u_{\infty}\circ s^{-1}\text{Log}\right\rVert_{C^{k,\gamma}((s^{-1}\text{Log})^{-1}(B(x,r(x)))}\to 0.
  • •

    In the star type region Uws,∗U_{w}^{s,*} case, for ⟨m,w⟩=1\langle m,w\rangle=1,

    ‖φC​Y,s,m−u∞,m∘s−1​Log‖Ck,γ​((s−1​Log)−1​(B⁡(x,r⁡(x)))CLOSE→0.\left\lVert\varphi_{CY,s,m}-u_{\infty,m}\circ s^{-1}\text{Log}\right\rVert_{C^{k,\gamma}((s^{-1}\text{Log})^{-1}(B(x,r(x)))}\to 0.

The convergence rate is uniform for xx on any fixed compact subset of ℛ\mathcal{R}.

The intuition is that in the generic regular locus in the toric part of XsX_{s}, the local CY potentials converge in some Cl​o​c∞C^{\infty}_{loc} sense.

00SU

Notation. For every compact K⊂ℛK\subset\mathcal{R}, let Us,KU_{s,K} denote the union of the regions (s−1​Log)−1​(B⁡(x,r⁡(x)))(s^{-1}\text{Log})^{-1}(B(x,r(x))) for x∈Kx\in K; the convergence rates will be uniform on Us,KU_{s,K}. Notice that

lim sups→∞Vol​(Us,K)Vol​(Xs)≥∫Kd​μ∞∫∂Δλ∨d​μ∞,\limsup_{s\to\infty}\frac{\text{Vol}(U_{s,K})}{\text{Vol}(X_{s})}\geq\frac{\int_{K}d\mu_{\infty}}{\int_{\partial\Delta_{\lambda}^{\vee}}d\mu_{\infty}},

so by taking a compact exhaustion of ℛ\mathcal{R}, we may assume Us,KU_{s,K} occupies a percentage of the total measure arbitrarily close to 1.

00SV

Remark 5.7. If one can show that the limiting real MA metric is unique, then there will be no need to pass to a subsequence.

Next we discuss CY metrics in (s−1​Log)−1​(B⁡(x,r⁡(x)))⊂Us,K(s^{-1}\text{Log})^{-1}(B(x,r(x)))\subset U_{s,K}.

  • •

    In the face type region case, up to C∞C^{\infty}-small error in the s−1​log⁡zmis^{-1}\log z^{m_{i}} coordinates,

    ωC​Y,s=−1​∂∂¯​φC​Y,s,0≈−1​∂∂¯​u∞∘s−1​Log=14​∂2u∞∂xmi​∂xmj​−1​s−1​d​log⁡zmi∧s−1​d​log⁡zmj¯,\begin{split}&\omega_{CY,s}=\sqrt{-1}\partial\bar{\partial}\varphi_{CY,s,0}\\ \approx&\sqrt{-1}\partial\bar{\partial}u_{\infty}\circ s^{-1}\text{Log}=\frac{1}{4}\frac{\partial^{2}u_{\infty}}{\partial x^{m_{i}}\partial x^{m_{j}}}\sqrt{-1}s^{-1}d\log z^{m_{i}}\wedge s^{-1}d\overline{\log z^{m_{j}}},\end{split}

    hence the CY metrics gC​Y,sg_{CY,s} is up to C∞C^{\infty}-small error

    gC​Y,s≈Re​{12​∂2u∞∂xmi​∂xmj​s−1​d​log⁡zmi⊗s−1​d​log⁡zmj¯}.g_{CY,s}\approx\text{Re}\{\frac{1}{2}\frac{\partial^{2}u_{\infty}}{\partial x^{m_{i}}\partial x^{m_{j}}}s^{-1}d\log z^{m_{i}}\otimes s^{-1}d\overline{\log z^{m_{j}}}\}. (32)
  • •

    Likewise in the star type region case, up to C∞C^{\infty} small error in the s−1​log⁡zmis^{-1}\log z^{m_{i}} coordinates,

    {ωC​Y,s≈14​∂2u∞,m∂xmi​∂xmj​−1​s−1​d​log⁡zmi∧s−1​d​log⁡zmj¯,gC​Y,s≈Re​{12​∂2u∞,m∂xmi​∂xmj​s−1​d​log⁡zmi⊗s−1​d​log⁡zmj¯}.\begin{cases}\omega_{CY,s}\approx\frac{1}{4}\frac{\partial^{2}u_{\infty,m}}{\partial x^{m_{i}}\partial x^{m_{j}}}\sqrt{-1}s^{-1}d\log z^{m_{i}}\wedge s^{-1}d\overline{\log z^{m_{j}}},\\ g_{CY,s}\approx\text{Re}\{\frac{1}{2}\frac{\partial^{2}u_{\infty,m}}{\partial x^{m_{i}}\partial x^{m_{j}}}s^{-1}d\log z^{m_{i}}\otimes s^{-1}d\overline{\log z^{m_{j}}}\}.\end{cases} (33)

Notice in such local (ℂ∗)n(\mathbb{C}^{*})^{n} coordinates, the rescaled log map s−1​Logs^{-1}\text{Log} gives a local TnT^{n}-fibration. The metric associated to −1​∂∂¯​(u∞∘s−1​Log)\sqrt{-1}\partial\bar{\partial}(u_{\infty}\circ s^{-1}\text{Log}) is a semiflat metric, namely a TnT^{n}-invariant metric which is flat when restricted to any TnT^{n}-fibre. Thus (32)(33) assert that the Calabi-Yau metrics gC​Y,sg_{CY,s} are C∞C^{\infty}-approximated by semiflat metrics in the regular regions.

00SW

Corollary 5.8. On Us,K⊂XsU_{s,K}\subset X_{s} the sectional curvature has a uniform bound |Riem​(gC​Y,s)|≤C|\text{Riem}(g_{CY,s})|\leq C, and the injectivity radius satisfies C−1​s−1≤inj≤C​s−1C^{-1}s^{-1}\leq\text{inj}\leq Cs^{-1}, with constants depending on K⊂ℛK\subset\mathcal{R}.

5.3 Gromov-Hausdorff convergence

On the regular locus ℛ⊂∂Δλ∨\mathcal{R}\subset\partial\Delta_{\lambda}^{\vee} we have a well defined real MA metric,

g∞={12​∑i,j∂2u∞∂xi​∂xj​d​xi​d​xj, on the face regions,12​∑i,j∂2u∞,m∂xi​∂xj​d​xi​d​xj, on the star regions.g_{\infty}=\begin{cases}\frac{1}{2}\sum_{i,j}\frac{\partial^{2}u_{\infty}}{\partial x_{i}\partial x_{j}}dx_{i}dx_{j},\quad\text{ on the face regions},\\ \frac{1}{2}\sum_{i,j}\frac{\partial^{2}u_{\infty,m}}{\partial x_{i}\partial x_{j}}dx_{i}dx_{j},\quad\text{ on the star regions}.\end{cases} (34)

Notice the definitions are compatible on overlapping regions. Let (ℛ¯,g∞)(\bar{\mathcal{R}},g_{\infty}) be the metric completion. The metric asymptotes (32)(33) say that in some Cl​o​c∞C^{\infty}_{loc} sense the collapsing CY metrics gC​Y,sg_{CY,s} converge to the metric g∞g_{\infty} on ℛ\mathcal{R}, and we know ℛ\mathcal{R} is path connected because its complement has zero ℋn−1\mathcal{H}^{n-1}-measure.

00SX

Remark 5.9. We do not know if ℛ¯\bar{\mathcal{R}} is homeomorphic to ∂Δλ∨≃Sn\partial\Delta_{\lambda}^{\vee}\simeq S^{n}, as the regularity theory of the real MA equation on a singular affine manifold is not yet developed, and we know little about what can happen near singularities.

The goal of this section is to show

00SY

Theorem 5.10. The subsequence of collapsing CY metrics (Xs,gC​Y,s)(X_{s},g_{CY,s}) converges in the Gromov-Hausdorff sense to (ℛ¯,g∞)(\bar{\mathcal{R}},g_{\infty}).

00SZ

Proposition 5.11. There is a uniform diameter bound

diam​(Xs,gC​Y,s)≤C.\text{diam}(X_{s},g_{CY,s})\leq C.
00T0

Proof. This argument is essentially the same as [36, Thm 3.1]. We quote [36, Lem 3.2]:

00T1

Lemma 5.12. Let (M2​n,g)(M^{2n},g) be a closed Riemannian manifold with R​i​c​(g)≥0Ric(g)\geq 0, let p∈Mp\in Mand 1<R≤d​i​a​m​(X,g)1<R\leq diam(X,g). Then R−14​n≤Vol​(B​(p,2​(R+1)))Vol​(B​(p,1))\frac{R-1}{4n}\leq\frac{\text{Vol}(B(p,2(R+1)))}{\text{Vol}(B(p,1))}.

Using Thm. 5.6, we can find inside the regular region of XsX_{s} some geodesic ball BgC​Y,s​(p,r)B_{g_{CY,s}}(p,r) of radius r<1r<1, occupying a nontrivial portion of the total volume:

OPENVol​(BgC​Y,s​(p,r)))Vol​(Xs)≥ϵ>0,\frac{\text{Vol}(B_{g_{CY,s}}(p,r)))}{\text{Vol}(X_{s})}\geq\epsilon>0,

with ϵ\epsilon independent of ss. Now applying the Lemma to the rescaled CY metric r−2​gC​Y,sr^{-2}g_{CY,s},

diam​(Xs)−r4​n​r≤Vol​(BgC​Y,s​(p,2​(diam​(Xs)+r)))Vol​(BgC​Y,s​(p,r))≤Vol​(Xs)Vol​(BgC​Y,s​(p,r))≤ϵ−1,\frac{\text{diam}(X_{s})-r}{4nr}\leq\frac{\text{Vol}(B_{g_{CY,s}}(p,2(\text{diam}(X_{s})+r)))}{\text{Vol}(B_{g_{CY,s}}(p,r))}\leq\frac{\text{Vol}(X_{s})}{\text{Vol}(B_{g_{CY,s}}(p,r))}\leq\epsilon^{-1},

so diam​(Xs)≤C​r≤C\text{diam}(X_{s})\leq Cr\leq C as required. ∎

00T2

Proof. (Thm. 5.10) By Thm 5.6 we already know the metric convergence over any properly contained open subset of ℛ\mathcal{R}, which corresponds to a region Us⊂XsU_{s}\subset X_{s}, with nearly the full measure:

Vol​(Us)>(1−ϵ)​Vol​(Xs),\text{Vol}(U_{s})>(1-\epsilon)\text{Vol}(X_{s}),

where ϵ\epsilon can be chosen arbitrarily small. It now suffices to show any point p∈Xs∖Usp\in X_{s}\setminus U_{s} is close to UsU_{s}. For any r>0r>0 such that the geodesic ball BgC​Y,s​(p,r)⊂Xs∖UsB_{g_{CY,s}}(p,r)\subset X_{s}\setminus U_{s}, the Bishop-Gromov inequality implies

(rdiam​(Xs))2​n≤Vol​(BgC​Y,s​(p,r))Vol​(Xs)≤Vol​(Xs∖Us)Vol​(Xs)<ϵ.\left(\frac{r}{\text{diam}(X_{s})}\right)^{2n}\leq\frac{\text{Vol}(B_{g_{CY,s}}(p,r))}{\text{Vol}(X_{s})}\leq\frac{\text{Vol}(X_{s}\setminus U_{s})}{\text{Vol}(X_{s})}<\epsilon.

Taking the sup of all such rr,

distgC​Y,s​(p,Us)≤ϵ1/2​n​diam​(Xs)≤C​ϵ1/2​n,\text{dist}_{g_{CY,s}}(p,U_{s})\leq\epsilon^{1/2n}\text{diam}(X_{s})\leq C\epsilon^{1/2n},

which can be made arbitrarily small. ∎

5.4 Special Lagrangian fibration in the generic region

In the setting of section 5.2, the very strong regularity bounds in the generic region leads to the existence of special Lagrangian TnT^{n}-fibrations thereon.

00T3

Theorem 5.13. For any fixed compact K⊂ℛK\subset\mathcal{R}, for s≫1s\gg 1 depending on KK, there is a special Lagrangian (SLag) TnT^{n}-fibration on an open subset of XsX_{s} containing Us,KU_{s,K}.

00T4

Remark 5.14. By considering a compact exhaustion of ℛ\mathcal{R}, we can choose KK so that the region Us,KU_{s,K} occupies a percentage of the total measure on XsX_{s} arbitrarily close to 1.

00T5

Proof. Since KK is a compact subset in the open set ℛ\mathcal{R}, we can find an open set 𝒰⊂K\mathcal{U}\subset K properly contained in ℛ\mathcal{R}. This ensures that the smooth convergence in Thm. 5.6 happens uniformly on a slightly larger set Us,K′U_{s,K^{\prime}} than Us,KU_{s,K}. We assume s≫1s\gg 1 as ususal.

Consider a coordinate region (s−1​Log)−1​(B⁡(x,r⁡(x))CLOSE(s^{-1}\text{Log})^{-1}(B(x,r(x)) contained in this larger set, which is topologically Tn×B⁡(x,r⁡(x))T^{n}\times B(x,r(x)). Here the TnT^{n} is well defined as a homology cycle independent of the coordinates. We define the phase angles θs\theta_{s} by requiring ∫Tne−1​θs​Ω>0.\int_{T^{n}}e^{\sqrt{-1}\theta_{s}}\Omega>0. We consider the rescaled CY metrics (s2​gC​Y,s,s2​ωC​Y,s)(s^{2}g_{CY,s},s^{2}\omega_{CY,s}), so the diameter of TnT^{n} fibres are now of order O⁡(1)O(1) by (32)(33). Within any log scale, these rescaled CY structures are C∞C^{\infty}-close to the standard flat structures in section 2.7 up to constant factors. By construction the Kähler forms are exact in these coordinate charts. Thus by Zhang’s result surveyed in section 2.7, within any log scale, we can construct a SLag TnT^{n}-fibration with phase θs\theta_{s}, whose fibres are very small C∞C^{\infty}-perturbations of the fibres of the map (ℂ∗)n→ℝn(\mathbb{C}^{*})^{n}\to\mathbb{R}^{n},

Log:(zm1,…,zmn)→(log⁡|zm1|,…​log⁡|zmn|).\text{Log}:(z^{m_{1}},\ldots,z^{m_{n}})\to(\log|z^{m_{1}}|,\ldots\log|z^{m_{n}}|).

Observe that on overlapping charts, the Log-fibres with respect to one chart are very small C∞C^{\infty}-perturbations of the Log-fibres of the other chart. Then the uniqueness part of Zhang’s argument shows that on overlapping charts the SLag TnT^{n}-fibrations are in fact defined independent of charts. (It is the local universal family of SLags within the perturbative regime.) Thus the local constructions glue to a SLag fibration on a subset of XsX_{s} containing Us,KU_{s,K} as required. ∎

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source collection and HTML conversion remain in progress.