Proposition 3.12. The polyhedral complex is homeomorphic to .
Verified tagged author-source HTML · 1912.02360v1 · cited publication edition alignment unverified.
3.2 Piecewise linear structure
Proof. This is because is the boundary of a convex polyhedron with nontrivial interior. ∎
We now assign a a collection of charts to , whose transition functions are piecewise linear. (Some authors prefer the terminology ‘piecewise affine’.) These are closely related to the holomorphic charts on in section 3.1.
Let be the primitive integral outward normal vector to a facet of , and choose an integral basis for , suitably oriented to be compatible with (12). On the open subset of ,
we regard as the affine linear coordinates, also written as . Such charts cover . We denote as the subset of points on which do not lie on the interior of the top dimensional faces. It is easy to check that the transition functions on overlapping charts in lie in , so the volume form is defined independent of the choice of charts. We call the associated measure the Lebesgue measure on , with respect to which is a null set. The set has real codimension 1, and the transition functions are in general only piecewise linear.
Remark 3.13. The affine structure on can be often extended to a subset of with codimension 2 complement. This in general involves a somewhat ad hoc choice of the singular locus. In the Fermat family case, due to the discrete symmetry, the barycentric subdivision provides a canonical choice. (cf. section 3.5).
We now examine the normalised canonical measure on
| (14) |
Proposition 3.14. As , the pushforward measure converges to the Lebesgue measure supported on . In particular
| (15) |
Morever, there is a uniform exponential measure decay estimate
| (16) |
Proof. (Sketch) Using Lemma 3.5 and the holomorphic volume form formula (13), the neighbourhood of the toric boundary near only contributes to the normalised measure, where . The same lemmas imply (16) by summing over contributions from boundary type regions. In the toric region corresponding to the neighbourhood of , the convergence of the normalised volume measure follows from Prop. 3.2 and formula (12). ∎
Remark 3.15. The measure convergence holds for much more general degenerating families by the work of Boucksom et al. [3]. The fact that the measure is concentrated along justifies why we focus on rather than .