ScalingStacks

Verified tagged author-source HTML · 1912.02360v1 · cited publication edition alignment unverified.

2.2 Kolodziej’s estimate on pluripotentials

Here we outline a method to estimate Kähler potentials, pioneered by Kolodziej, and further developed by [12] and [15][22]. Our exposition largely adapts [15][22][16], with special attention to the dependence of constants. Unlike in [15], we do not impose a volume normalisation.

Given an nn-dimensional Kähler manifold (X,ω)(X,\omega), for ϕ∈P​S​H​(X,ω)∩L∞\phi\in PSH(X,\omega)\cap L^{\infty}, pluripotential theory allows one to make sense of the Monge-Ampère (MA) measure ωϕn\omega_{\phi}^{n}, generalising the notion of volume forms. The basic problem is to estimate ϕ\phi from a priori bounds on ωϕn\omega_{\phi}^{n}. A key concept is the capacity of subsets K⊂XK\subset X:

Capω(K)=sup{∫Kωun|u∈PSH(X,ω),0≤u≤1}.Cap_{\omega}(K)=\sup\{\int_{K}\omega_{u}^{n}|u\in PSH(X,\omega),0\leq u\leq 1\}.

We wish to sketch the main ideas behind a prototypical result:

00PQ

Theorem 2.7. Let (X,ω)(X,\omega) be a compact Kähler manifold, and ϕ∈P​S​H​(X,ω)∩C0\phi\in PSH(X,\omega)\cap C^{0}, such that ωϕn\omega_{\phi}^{n} is an absolutely continuous measure. Assume there are positive constants α,A\alpha,A, such that the Skoda type estimate holds with respect to ωϕn\omega_{\phi}^{n}:

∫Xe−α​u​ωϕnVol​(X)≤A,∀u∈P​S​H​(X,ω)​ with ​supXu=0.\int_{X}e^{-\alpha u}\frac{\omega_{\phi}^{n}}{\text{Vol}(X)}\leq A,\quad\forall u\in PSH(X,\omega)\text{ with }\sup_{X}u=0. (2)
  • •

    For fixed n,α,An,\alpha,A, there is number B⁡(n,α,A)B(n,\alpha,A), such that if ∫ϕ≤−t0ωϕnV​o​l​(X)<(2​B)−2​n\frac{\int_{\phi\leq-t_{0}}\omega_{\phi}^{n}}{Vol(X)}<(2B)^{-2n} for some t0t_{0}, then min⁡ϕ≥−t0−4​B​(∫ϕ≤−t0ωϕnV​o​l​(X))1/2​n\min\phi\geq-t_{0}-4B(\frac{\int_{\phi\leq-t_{0}}\omega_{\phi}^{n}}{Vol(X)})^{1/2n}.

  • •

    If supXϕ=0\sup_{X}\phi=0, then ‖ϕ‖C0≤C⁡(n,α,A)\left\lVert\phi\right\rVert_{C^{0}}\leq C(n,\alpha,A).

The first ingredient is:

00PR

Lemma 2.8. (cf. [15, Lemma 2.3]) The MA measure of sublevel sets controls the capacity of lower sublevel sets : for τ≥0\tau\geq 0 and 0≤t≤10\leq t\leq 1,

tn​C​a​pω​(ϕ<−τ−t)≤∫ϕ<−τωϕn.t^{n}Cap_{\omega}(\phi<-\tau-t)\leq\int_{\phi<-\tau}\omega_{\phi}^{n}.

The second ingredient below contains the most substance:

00PS

Lemma 2.9. (Volume-capacity estimate) In the setting of Thm. 2.7, for any compact set K⊂XK\subset X,

∫KωϕnVol​(X)≤A​eα​exp⁡(−α​(Vol​(X)Capω​(K))1/n).\frac{\int_{K}\omega_{\phi}^{n}}{\text{Vol}(X)}\leq Ae^{\alpha}\exp\left(-\alpha(\frac{\text{Vol}(X)}{\text{Cap}_{\omega}(K)})^{1/n}\right). (3)

In particular there is a constant B=B⁡(n,α,A)B=B(n,\alpha,A) verifying the power law bound

∫KωϕnVol​(X)≤B2​n​(Capω​(K)Vol​(X))2.\frac{\int_{K}\omega_{\phi}^{n}}{\text{Vol}(X)}\leq B^{2n}\left(\frac{\text{Cap}_{\omega}(K)}{\text{Vol}(X)}\right)^{2}.
00PT

Proof. (Sketch) We may assume KK is not pluripolar, for otherwise ∫Kωϕn=0\int_{K}\omega_{\phi}^{n}=0 and Capω​(K)=0\text{Cap}_{\omega}(K)=0. We introduce the Siciak extremal function

VK,ω=sup{u∈P​S​H​(X,ω)|u≤0​ on ​K},V_{K,\omega}=\sup\{u\in PSH(X,\omega)|u\leq 0\text{ on }K\},

whose upper semicontinuous regularisation VK,ω∗∈P​S​H​(X,ω)V_{K,\omega}^{*}\in PSH(X,\omega). By the Alexander-Taylor comparison principle (cf. [22, Prop. 6.1]),

exp(−supXVK,ω)≤eexp(−(Vol​(X)Capω​(K))1/n).\exp(-\sup_{X}V_{K,\omega})\leq e\exp\left(-(\frac{\text{Vol}(X)}{\text{Cap}_{\omega}(K)})^{1/n}\right).

By the Skoda integrability assumption (2), and the fact that VK,ω=Vk,ω∗V_{K,\omega}=V_{k,\omega}^{*} a.e with respect to ωn\omega^{n} (so by absolute continuity also for ωϕn\omega_{\phi}^{n}),

∫Xeα⁡(supXVK,ω−VK,ω)​ωϕn=∫Xeα⁡(supXVK,ω−VK,ω∗)​ωϕn≤A​Vol​(X),\int_{X}e^{\alpha(\sup_{X}V_{K,\omega}-V_{K,\omega})}\omega_{\phi}^{n}=\int_{X}e^{\alpha(\sup_{X}V_{K,\omega}-V_{K,\omega}^{*})}\omega_{\phi}^{n}\leq A\text{Vol}(X),

hence

∫Ke−α​VK,ω​ωϕn≤∫Xe−α​VK,ω​ωϕn≤A​eα​Vol​(X)​exp⁡(−α​(Vol​(X)Capω​(K))1/n).\int_{K}e^{-\alpha V_{K,\omega}}\omega_{\phi}^{n}\leq\int_{X}e^{-\alpha V_{K,\omega}}\omega_{\phi}^{n}\leq Ae^{\alpha}\text{Vol}(X)\exp\left(-\alpha(\frac{\text{Vol}(X)}{\text{Cap}_{\omega}(K)})^{1/n}\right).

The volume-capacity estimate (3) follows because VK,ω≤0V_{K,\omega}\leq 0 on KK. ∎

The third ingredient is an elementary decay lemma:

00PU

Lemma 2.10. (cf. [15, Lemma 2.4 and Remark 2.5]) Let f:[t0,∞)→[0,∞)f:[t_{0},\infty)\to[0,\infty) be a nonincreasing right-continuous function, such that

{f⁡(t0)<12​B,tf(τ+t)≤Bf(τ)2,∀τ≥0,0≤t≤1,limt→∞f⁡(t)=0.\begin{cases}f(t_{0})<\frac{1}{2B},\\ tf(\tau+t)\leq Bf(\tau)^{2},\quad\forall\tau\geq 0,\quad 0\leq t\leq 1,\\ \lim_{t\to\infty}f(t)=0.\end{cases}

Then f⁡(t)=0f(t)=0 for t≥t0+4​B​f​(t0)t\geq t_{0}+4Bf(t_{0}).

00PV

Proof. (Thm 2.7) Combining the first two ingredients, the function f⁡(t)=(∫ϕ≤−tωϕnVol​(X))1/2​nf(t)=(\frac{\int_{\phi\leq-t}\omega_{\phi}^{n}}{\text{Vol}(X)})^{1/2n} satisfies

t​f​(t+τ)≤B​f​(τ)2,0≤t≤1,τ≥0,tf(t+\tau)\leq Bf(\tau)^{2},\quad 0\leq t\leq 1,\quad\tau\geq 0,

We conclude that for t>t0+4​B​f​(t0)t>t_{0}+4Bf(t_{0}) the sublevel set {ϕ≤−t}\{\phi\leq-t\} has zero ωϕ\omega_{\phi}-measure, and therefore zero capacity by Lemma 2.8, so ϕ\phi has the lower estimate as claimed in the first statement.

For the second statement, by (2) we have an a priori exponential decay

f(t)≤A1/2​ne−αt/2n,t≥0,f(t)\leq A^{1/2n}e^{-\alpha t/2n},\quad t\geq 0,

which allows us to find an appropriate t0t_{0}. ∎

00PW

Remark 2.11. Thm. 2.7 implies a famous result of Kolodziej stating that if we fix (X,ω)(X,\omega) and p>1p>1, then ϕ\phi has a C0C^{0}-bound depending only on X,ω,‖ωϕnωn‖LpX,\omega,\left\lVert\frac{\omega_{\phi}^{n}}{\omega^{n}}\right\rVert_{L^{p}}. It is enough to check (2), which reduces by Hölder inequality to the standard Skoda inequality (cf. Thm 2.4), with modified constants. The strength of Thm. 2.7 is that it still applies when the complex/Kähler structures are highly degenerate, as it distills the dependence on (X,ω)(X,\omega) to only 3 constants n,α,An,\alpha,A.

Thm. 2.7 gives a criterion for two Kähler potentials to be close to each other.

00PX

Corollary 2.12. (Stability estimate) Let (X,ω)(X,\omega) be a compact Kähler manifold, and ϕ,ψ∈P​S​H​(X,ω)∩C0\phi,\psi\in PSH(X,\omega)\cap C^{0}, such that ωϕn\omega_{\phi}^{n} is absolutely continuous. Assume ‖ψ‖C0≤A′\left\lVert\psi\right\rVert_{C^{0}}\leq A^{\prime} and the Skoda type estimate (2). Then there is a number B⁡(n,A,A′,α)B(n,A,A^{\prime},\alpha), such that if ∫ϕ−ψ≤−t0ωϕnV​o​l​(X)<(2​B)−2​n\frac{\int_{\phi-\psi\leq-t_{0}}\omega_{\phi}^{n}}{Vol(X)}<(2B)^{-2n} for some t0t_{0}, then

min⁡(ϕ−ψ)≥−t0−4​B​(∫ϕ−ψ≤−t0ωϕnV​o​l​(X))1/2​n.\min(\phi-\psi)\geq-t_{0}-4B\left(\frac{\int_{\phi-\psi\leq-t_{0}}\omega_{\phi}^{n}}{Vol(X)}\right)^{1/2n}.

.

00PY

Proof. If ψ\psi is smooth, this follows from Thm. 2.7 by changing ω\omega into ωψ\omega_{\psi}, and changing ϕ\phi into ϕ−ψ\phi-\psi, and checking the Skoda type estimate holds with modified constants. In general, one can approximate ψ∈P​S​H​(X,ω)\psi\in PSH(X,\omega) by a decreasing sequence of functions in P​S​H​(X,ω)∩C∞PSH(X,\omega)\cap C^{\infty} [1], and since ψ∈C0\psi\in C^{0} the convergence is uniform by Dini’s theorem. ∎

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source collection and HTML conversion remain in progress.