Original official author HTML, exact retained edition. Historical TeX conversion verdicts remain unchanged. Cited-edition alignment and mathematical self-containment are not assessed.
Source coverage notes Source fidelity gap: the original arXiv HTML omits an author TeX footnote attached to equation e:def-omega, including its reference to Remark r:error-function. The retained HTML is preserved as published; the original author TeX remains available. TeX correspondence is not complete. Complete original source context · Original author HTML
Proof.
We work in U β 1 U_{\beta}^{1} for a fixed β \beta . We have
(7.132)
ϕ t , 𝐈 − ( 𝒙 ) = T d 2 log | f 2 ( 𝒙 ) | + π 𝒩 ∗ ϕ t ( 𝒙 ) \phi_{t,\bf{I}_{-}}(\bm{x})=\frac{T}{d_{2}}\log|f_{2}(\bm{x})|+\pi_{\mathcal{N}}^{*}\phi_{t}(\bm{x})
and
(7.133)
( π β 𝒩 ) ∗ ϕ − ( 𝒙 ) = ϕ t ( 𝒚 ) − T d 2 log r − ( 𝒚 ) (\pi_{\beta}^{\mathcal{N}})^{*}\phi_{-}(\bm{x})=\phi_{t}(\bm{y})-\frac{T}{d_{2}}\log r_{-}(\bm{y})
where 𝒚 = π β 𝒩 ( 𝒙 ) \bm{y}=\pi_{\beta}^{\mathcal{N}}(\bm{x}) . By definition it is easy to see that 𝒚 − 𝒙 \bm{y}-\bm{x} is of order ϵ ¯ T 2 \underline{\epsilon}_{T^{2}} in the coordinates in v 2 , ζ 3 , w 2 , ⋯ , w n − 1 v_{2},\zeta_{3},w_{2},\cdots,w_{n-1} .
By our choice of T T in terms of t t we have
(7.134)
− log | r − ( 𝒚 ) | = d 1 log | t | − log | f 2 ( 𝒚 ) | . -\log|r_{-}(\bm{y})|=d_{1}\log|t|-\log|f_{2}(\bm{y})|.
Then by Lemma 7.6 , and use weighed Schauder estimates as above we get the conclusion.